[02:32] <jbicha> fossfreedom: could you propose bug 1670054 as a merge proposal against https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/evince/ubuntu/ ?
[09:04] <fossfreedom> jbicha: k - thanks. merge proposal made
[13:07] <xryuu> Hello
[13:08] <xryuu> Can i install gnome extensions(dash to dock, todo.txt etc) on ubuntu budgie?
[13:25] <fossfreedom> xryuu: no - those will need to be recoded using budgie-desktop applet API
[13:25] <xryuu> Damn. Any extensions tho for budgie?
[13:27] <xryuu> fossfreedom
[13:28] <fossfreedom> I'm aware of a native applet for taking screenshots and I think there is a weather applet lurking somewhere.  Which distro are you using?
[13:29] <xryuu> Im not using linux atm but im looking forward to
[13:29] <xryuu> Thinking of ubuntu budgie
[13:30] <fossfreedom> ah - in that case, ubuntu budgie has an applet that displays appindicators - so all ubuntu appindicators can be used with budgie
[13:30] <xryuu> Would love to use dash to dock and a couple of others tho
[13:32] <fossfreedom> dash to dock would be pointless under budgie-desktop - the native icon tasklist applet performs the same thing.
[13:32] <fossfreedom> you can also run docky or raven which if you want a separate app launcher
[13:33] <fossfreedom> raven ... typo sorry I meant plank
[13:33] <xryuu> Oh ok will look into it
[13:33] <xryuu> Thank you!
[13:34] <fossfreedom> yw
[21:06] <jbicha> fossfreedom: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?h=gtk-3-22&id=31832f86
[21:07] <jbicha> that commit (revert) is being pushed to sid now and will be in the next zesty upload whenever that is
[21:15] <jbicha> the individual who responded on https://bugs.debian.org/856603 is not on the release team so his opinion isn't final
[21:43] <fossfreedom> jbicha: scratching my head on this.  Its a theme - the best people to validate a theme is the theme maintainer.  Not sure why people are second guessing the reasons my theme maintainers do stuff.  Whatever.
[21:44] <fossfreedom> s/my/why
[21:51] <fossfreedom> jbicha: imho - this will just confuse theme maintainers - they would be expecting to support all distros - now debian ... and ubuntu do stuff one way and other distro do stuff in a different way.  crazy
[21:51] <jbicha> I think better Cinnamon 3.2 compatibility is a decent justification for getting the update into stretch before release
[21:52] <jbicha> Debian historically is very strict about stable updates
[21:54] <jbicha> https://release.debian.org/stretch/freeze_policy.html
[21:55] <jbicha> if you want it in stretch I think you'll need a RC bug to go along with it
[21:55] <jbicha> otherwise, it can still be uploaded to sid; but if not unblocked it just won't migrate to stretch
[21:57] <jbicha> if you want to discuss more about unblocking, you can ping pochu (who is Release Team) in say, #debian-gnome
[21:57] <jbicha> but I'd wait until it got into sid before worrying about unblocking
[21:57] <fossfreedom> jbicha: is debian going with the breaking 2.23.9 series or staying with 2.23.8 ?  I dont see any consensus.  If they stay behind there isnt any issues.
[21:59] <fossfreedom> 3.22.8 vs 3.22.9
[22:18] <jbicha> 3.22.9 but that breaking change has been reverted in both gtk upstream and Debian
[22:19] <jbicha> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2017/03/msg00274.html
[22:19] <jbicha> like I said, the guy who commented isn't a Release Team member
[22:20] <jbicha> I'm not sure I understand your comment about theme maintainers
[22:20] <jbicha> everyone knows that Debian stable is very stable (does not really change much)
[22:22] <fossfreedom> don't worry - I've got two people talking to me at the same time at the same time as you! They've gone now.  multitasking on a sunday.
[22:22] <fossfreedom> k - I'll let the arc maintainer know about the reversion. cheers