[08:43] <neerad> hey my boot.img is missing ramdisk.img and kernel command line pls help
[08:43] <neerad> device = Xiaomi Redmi 2
[14:14] <ulrichard> Is there any information on when the next ubuntu phone will become available?
[14:21] <matv4> ulrichard not at this time AFAIK. there first needs to be a snap-based image of ubuntu. And another precondition is that Unity8 needs to be further optimized for desktop.
[14:22] <ulrichard> matv4: So, what is the expected time horizont?
[14:24] <matv4> ulrichard first of all: I am not with Canonical so there may be knowledge that I dont have. But my estimate: not any time soon given the 2 factors I mentioned above.
[14:26] <matv4> But there is the option of getting one of the currently supported phones by eitherUbports or Canonical and flashing Ubuntu on to it
[14:26] <matv4> which may or may not be what you are looking for
[14:30] <ulrichard> No, I really want a phone that comes with an OS that I'm willing to use. My Aquaris still works, and the purism phone is far away.
[14:33] <matv4> ulrichard ok. in that case we are in the same boat :)
[14:51] <mterry> larryprice: If you have time for a review, I would like https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/ubuntu-app-launch/look-at-mir/+merge/317520 to squeeze in
[14:52] <larryprice> mterry: i could take a look
[14:53] <dobey> huh
[14:53] <larryprice> tedg shouldn't be allowed to go on holiday
[14:53] <mterry> I've tried to talk to his managers, but no dice so far
[14:53] <dobey> baaaaaah
[14:53] <dobey> libubuntu-app-launch4/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libertine-tools
[14:54] <larryprice> hmm any specifics on why it's not satisfiable?
[14:55] <dobey> no
[14:55] <mterry> universe I think
[14:55] <mterry> the source is in main
[14:55] <mterry> Needs an archive admin to promote the tools package
[14:56] <dobey> ah
[14:56] <larryprice> ChrisTownsend, didn't we discuss libertine-tools in main? ^^ for reference
[14:57] <ChrisTownsend> larryprice: No, we haven't promoted libertine-tools to main.
[14:58] <ChrisTownsend> The libertine source package as well as a few of the binary packages are in main though.
[14:58] <mterry> ChrisTownsend: was that intentional (like we don't want tools in main) or just we hadn't done it yet
[14:59] <ChrisTownsend> mterry: Well, at some time, there were other dependencies in universe that we absolutely did not want promoted.  But I'll check the dependencies of tools now and see.
[15:00] <dobey> it's promoted
[15:02] <ChrisTownsend> mterry: So we'll need to promote libertine-tools and libertine-xmir-tools, but I think that is it.  The thing we did not want promoted was matchbox, which was a dependency of libertine-xmir-tools until recently.
[15:02] <dobey> it's already done
[15:03] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Uhh, not according to rmadison.
[15:03] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Oh, lol, I see in the other channel.
[15:04] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: rmadison will still say universe becaues nothing in main depends on it yet (until ual migrates)
[15:04] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: libertine-xmir-tools will need to be promoted as well.
[15:04] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: Sure, I didn't realize you already chatted w/ Colin.
[15:05] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: i don't think it's required to be promoted, because it's a recommends
[15:05] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: I was told the recommends need to be promoted as well.
[15:05] <dobey> but if we need it for xmir stuff to work then i guess we need to maybe ask for it to be promoted too
[15:05] <dobey> ChrisTownsend: eh, dependencies are hard (tm)
[15:05] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: An AA told me that not too long ago.
[15:06] <ChrisTownsend> dobey: lol, indeed they are!
[15:06] <ChrisTownsend> Probably should all libertine binaries in main at this point any ways...
[15:06] <ChrisTownsend> *should have
[15:21] <dobey> would be nice if britney would state *why* these things happen, rather than just that they do
[15:28] <larryprice> mterry, mp looks good - should the commit message say "not the unity 8 interface" instead of "note"?
[15:29] <larryprice> could also be nice to have a test for the situation where a snap has no graphical interface - but there wasn't one before, so that's optional
[15:54] <mterry> larryprice: adding test -- good idea
[15:55] <dobey> ok, autopkgtests are running now for the ual upload
[16:10] <mterry> larryprice: pushed test if you want to confirm that I didn't blow up the branch you already approved  :P
[16:10] <mterry> Sneaking in a backdoor or whatever, in this Vault7 world
[16:11] <larryprice> heh will check
[16:26] <larryprice> mterry: looks good - given ci passes :)
[16:38] <mterry> larryprice: nice.  Once u-a-l migrates, I'll start silo 2553 down the landing path -- it has your icon branch too https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2553