=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== gpo is now known as gpolitis | ||
alkisg | Hi, I'm trying to convert lp:sch-scripts from bzr to git. The bzr branch was lp:~ts.sch.gr/sch-scripts/trunk, but I was using `bzr pull lp:sch-scripts` to pull. For git, what's the correct origin command before pushing? `git remote add origin lp:~ts.sch.gr/sch-scripts/trunk` ? | 07:27 |
---|---|---|
alkisg | Hmm, I used this one and it worked: git remote add origin git+ssh://alkisg@git.launchpad.net/sch-scripts | 07:30 |
alkisg | ...although I don't understand how it managed to use the correct group name, ts.sch.gr... | 07:30 |
lmiccini | hello, anybody able to help with login issues? keep getting Error ID: OOPS-XXXX. thanks. | 07:33 |
ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-XXXX | 07:33 |
alkisg | I try to create a new git recipe but I get a bzr recipe instead! | 08:29 |
alkisg | https://code.launchpad.net/~ts.sch.gr/sch-scripts/+git/sch-scripts/+ref/master/+new-recipe => I see "# git-build-recipe format 0.4 deb-version {debversion}~{revtime}", I click "Create Recipe" and then I get "# bzr-builder format 0.4 deb-version {debversion}~{revtime}"!!! | 08:29 |
* alkisg tries that a third time... | 08:30 | |
alkisg | Yup, I don't think I'm doing anything wrong there | 08:33 |
alkisg | I follow the steps to create a git recipe and I'm getting a bzr recipe instead | 08:33 |
alkisg | Even the recipe contents change | 08:33 |
* alkisg tries with a new recipe name, in case there's something wrong with launchpad cache... | 08:33 | |
alkisg | Nope, I still got a bzr recipe, https://code.launchpad.net/~ts.sch.gr/+recipe/sch-scripts-proposed-git | 08:35 |
alkisg | It's a regression somewhere in launchpad, I was able to create git recipes in the past | 08:36 |
alkisg | Help, please? :) | 08:36 |
alkisg | Ah, the bug is that it thinks that lp:sch-scripts is bzr, while if I put the whole path, lp:~ts.sch.gr/sch-scripts/+git/sch-scripts, then it realizes it's git | 09:48 |
alkisg | OK, it's a viable workaround until the bug is properly fixed | 09:48 |
alkisg | It's a bit annoying that it rewrites lp:~ts.sch.gr/sch-scripts/+git/sch-scripts to lp:sch-scripts and then thinks it's bzr; so I have to remember to use the correct one every time I edit the recipe | 09:51 |
cjwatson | lmiccini: We can help but only if you give us the actual OOPS ID. | 09:51 |
cjwatson | alkisg: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1623924 | 09:52 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1623924 in Launchpad itself "Source package recipes prefer Bazaar when lp:$foo alias is VCS-ambiguous" [High,Triaged] | 09:52 |
alkisg | Thank you cjwatson :) | 09:52 |
lmiccini | Hi cjwatson here it is OOPS-4d2e29bd4815255869dea1f212d75b61 thank you very much | 10:05 |
ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-4d2e29bd4815255869dea1f212d75b61 | 10:05 |
cjwatson | lmiccini: Thanks. There'll be a delay, since I'm in meetings right now and then have a medical appointment | 10:19 |
lmiccini | cjwatson: no worries. thanks for you help. | 10:20 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
cjwatson | lmiccini: Hi, sorry for the delay. You had an old account, and I guess you must have deleted your login.ubuntu.com account at some point and then tried to recreate it. Do you want to keep your old Launchpad account name? | 14:49 |
lmiccini | cjwatson: Hi. I'd like to keep lmiccini as userid if possible | 14:52 |
cjwatson | Er | 14:54 |
cjwatson | That's neither of your IDs | 14:54 |
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
EchoFog | Hi there | 16:39 |
EchoFog | Launchpad's bug report form seems to be broken: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug/?no-redirect | 16:39 |
EchoFog | When I try to submit a bug, I get this - Timeout error: Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad | 16:40 |
EchoFog | Error ID: OOPS-de2c4f605598154d1fe1af3faf5977dc | 16:42 |
ubot5 | https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-de2c4f605598154d1fe1af3faf5977dc | 16:42 |
dobey | EchoFog: you should not file a bug against ubuntu itself, but against the package in ubuntu with which you have an issue | 16:44 |
EchoFog | the issue is not with a package but with the ubuntu 16.10 release itself | 16:45 |
EchoFog | the root of the problem is that the lvm2 & grub-pc have been removed from the live installation image starting with 16.10 causing some configurations to fail | 16:46 |
EchoFog | Everything worked fine up until 16.04 | 16:47 |
nacc | EchoFog: LP can have bugs and timeouts sometimes | 16:48 |
EchoFog | I believe this is not a timeout issue because apparently dobey was able to see what I submitted | 16:49 |
nacc | EchoFog: probably dobey was responding to the URL you used | 16:49 |
EchoFog | Yeah, I guess that's possible. Although I've tried more than a couple times within last 12 hours - each time the same error | 16:50 |
dobey | yeah, if you got a timeout, the bug wasn't reported i don't think | 16:52 |
dobey | try reporting it against grub-pc or lvm2 instead | 16:52 |
nacc | "Original error: QueryCanceledError('canceling statement due to statement timeout\n',)" | 16:53 |
nacc | was the LP OOPs | 16:53 |
EchoFog | but there really is not issue with those packages and it wouldn't be right | 16:53 |
EchoFog | the issue is with the lubuntu release package (and most likely ubuntu too - I haven't checked) | 16:54 |
nacc | EchoFog: lvm2 is specifically not seeded on lubuntu-live | 16:54 |
nacc | but it is on the other -live images, i think | 16:55 |
nacc | ubuntu: daily-live. | 16:55 |
nacc | lubuntu: daily | 16:55 |
EchoFog | any idea why it was removed? It was definitely included up until 16.04 | 16:55 |
nacc | EchoFog: you'd want to ask lubuntu | 16:56 |
cjwatson | That timeout bug is something we suffer from periodically, but it generally goes away within about 10 minutes. We haven't got to the bottom of it yet. | 16:56 |
EchoFog | and it's so horribly broken on 16.10 that I'm surprised it hasn't been reported yet | 16:56 |
nacc | EchoFog: grub-pc appears to be seeded | 16:56 |
EchoFog | nacc: are you referring to 16.10 release or daily builds? | 16:57 |
nacc | EchoFog: the daily -- i'm not sure if i can easily see what was seeded on the release ISO | 16:57 |
cjwatson | For the purposes of this particular timeout bug, it doesn't make a difference what you're trying to report it against. | 16:57 |
EchoFog | thanks, will keep trying launchpad form then | 16:59 |
EchoFog | So this does appear to be lubuntu specific bug then. If lvm is seeded on other live builds but not lubuntu-live | 17:00 |
dobey | EchoFog, nacc: both grub-pc and lvm2 are on the ISO for 16.10: http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.10/ubuntu-16.10-desktop-amd64.manifest | 17:00 |
dobey | oh lubuntu? don't know about that. but then you should file a bug against lubuntu, not ubuntu :) | 17:00 |
nacc | dobey: yeah, lubuntu :/ | 17:00 |
cjwatson | Lubuntu is a flavour of Ubuntu and its bugs are tracked in the ubuntu distribution on Launchpad. | 17:00 |
nacc | yep | 17:01 |
dobey | right https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lubuntu-meta | 17:01 |
dobey | would be where seed bugs should go | 17:02 |
cjwatson | indeed | 17:02 |
EchoFog | sure enough, both packages are missing from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/16.10/release/lubuntu-16.10-desktop-amd64.manifest | 17:02 |
dobey | EchoFog: ^^ you should file your bug against that package. hopefully the timeout has disappeared now | 17:02 |
EchoFog | successfully submitted bug against lubuntu-meta. Thanks! | 17:07 |
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
chiluk | is there a way to get e-mail notifications for all bugs that have a certain tag? | 20:34 |
nacc | chiluk: i don't think so -- but that's based upon my reading of https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Subscriptions | 20:40 |
chiluk | yeah .. that's the same conclusion I came to after reading that as well. | 20:41 |
chiluk | thanks nacc | 20:48 |
cjwatson | 21:11 <cjwatson> chiluk: You have to pick a target (project, distribution, etc.), but after that, go to the bugs page for the target (e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu) -> Edit bug mail -> Add a subscription -> are added or changed | 21:17 |
cjwatson | in any way (more options...) -> Bugs must match this filter (...) -> Tags | 21:17 |
cjwatson | in case anyone else here was wondering | 21:17 |
chiluk | ^nacc since you came to the same conclusion as I did earlier. | 21:18 |
nacc | cjwatson: ah interesting | 21:19 |
cjwatson | also API methods such as addBugSubscription and addBugSubscriptionFilter, though I've never tried doing anything that way | 21:20 |
nacc | chiluk: thanks | 21:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!