[19:49] <jbicha> ricotz: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779915
[19:51] <ricotz> jbicha, hmm ?
[19:53] <jbicha> there's no reason for that vala bump, right?
[19:54] <ricotz> jbicha, no, there isn't, only avoiding the condition
[19:54] <jbicha> I mean it might not technically be a Freeze Break according to GNOME's definition
[19:55] <jbicha> but it's the kind of unnecessary optimization after the Freeze that makes it more difficult for Ubuntu to ship the latest GNOME
[19:55] <ricotz> it makes no difference since the maybe assigned new-value to "iter" isn't used afterwards
[19:55] <jbicha> gnome-chess didn't change that much this cycle
[19:55] <jbicha> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-chess/log/
[19:57] <ricotz> jbicha, I agree, still if the project ships the generated c-code it is better to avoid conditionals as done
[20:23] <ricotz> jbicha, I guess just add this revert-patch to the package
[20:29] <jbicha> sure, I can do that, but I don't like the precedent sent by this kind of change from a GNOME Release Team member
[20:52] <ricotz> jbicha, with vala 0.34.6 in ubuntu it would make sense to push some rebuilds if there is no more upstream release is expected
[20:53] <ricotz> e.g. rygel and zeitgeist
[22:56] <jbicha> ricotz: ok, I rebuilt rygel and zg
[22:56] <jbicha> anything else need a rebuild?
[22:57] <jbicha> and shouldn't you ping Debian about rebuilds since stretch will have 0.34.6 too?