| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: steam [i386] (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [1:1.0.0.54+repack-2ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 00:41 | |
| handsome_feng | Good morning! everyone! I'm a member of Ubuntu Kylin, Could someone help to approve the UKUI packages? or one of them first? Thank you in advance! bug: #1663477, bug: #1664229, bug: #1664232, bug: #1664235, bug: #1664244, bug: #1664247, bug: #1664256 | 07:05 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | bug 1663477 in Ubuntu "[FFe] UKUI desktop environment" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1663477 | 07:05 |
| ubot5 | bug 1664229 in Ubuntu "[FFe] ukui-menu" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664229 | 07:05 |
| ubot5 | bug 1664232 in Ubuntu Kylin "[FFe] ukui-indicators" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664232 | 07:05 |
| ubot5 | bug 1664235 in Ubuntu "[FFe] peony" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664235 | 07:05 |
| ubot5 | bug 1664244 in Ubuntu "[FFe] ukui-control-center" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664244 | 07:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello, just to understand, is it ok to sync tzdata? | 10:41 |
| * LocutusOfBorg sync'd it | 10:58 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | debdiff was translation-only updates and two timezones that are changing in may | 10:59 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: you want to handle SRUing it too, right? :-) | 11:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, maybe not :p | 11:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm still not confident enough about such tzdata updates | 11:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | they don't even have an SRU bug in previous updates, I always thought they were using some special SRU handling | 11:18 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Data_Packages_Kept_in_Sync_with_Security | 11:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | as said, I would appreciate somebody else doing it :) thanks for the link, it is scary enough to keep me away | 11:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 11:21 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, normally infinity does those | 11:31 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, I hope he will take care, it is too difficult for my brain :) | 11:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | BTW, a quick MIR for libfolks-dummy25? it should already be in main, not sure what went wrong with it | 11:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | libfolks-dummy-dev/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: libfolks-dummy25 (= 0.11.3-2) | 11:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | folks is in main, and rmadison for the libraries is... don't know how to understand the answer | 11:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not sure how the dev package can be useful with a library in universe (BTW the library has been in universe since the begin, but now somebody corrected the dependency in control file, so now it is picked up by britney) | 11:35 |
| jbicha | I don't understand android-sdk-meta/zesty's upload errors | 11:41 |
| jbicha | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-sdk-meta/25.0.0+3 | 11:41 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, i assume that is a new binary packag e? | 11:44 |
| jbicha | apw: no, folks-dummy isn't new, it's just now being correctly depended on by its -dev package (and the -dev package was in main) | 11:45 |
| jbicha | like Locutus said, I'm not sure why folks wasn't fully in main anyway | 11:46 |
| Laney | jbicha: It's producing binary packages with the wrong version, or at least with version numbers that are already in use. | 11:48 |
| jbicha | Laney: ok I see now (for the android pkg) | 11:50 |
| jbicha | darktable/i386 is intentionally being dropped so please let it through zesty-proposed | 11:52 |
| apw | jbicha, yeah that is producing binary packages for the previous version not its own version, that is pretty odd | 11:58 |
| jbicha | yes it looks like it's fixed in 25.0.0+5 so I'll sync that later | 12:02 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, libfolks-dummy25 sorted | 12:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | no apw :) (ETOOLATE) | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ta! | 12:08 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, ? | 12:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | your question about the new package | 12:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was AFK | 12:10 |
| apw | oh ... heh, derp, forgot i even asked | 12:10 |
| ginggs | jbicha, apw: here' a bug for darktable LP: #1672020 | 12:36 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1672020 in darktable (Ubuntu) "Please remove i386 binaries" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672020 | 12:36 |
| apw | ginggs, that is seeded on the ubuntustudio dvd | 12:39 |
| ginggs | apw: so should that be removed from ubuntustudio, or is it too late for that now? | 12:47 |
| apw | ginggs, i think they need to do something if the package is no longer supported on that arch | 12:47 |
| caribou | Repeating a question that went unnoticed : The clamav sync is stucked in -proposed on the MIR for tomsfastmath. MIR is apparently completed so is there anything else to be done to get this sync finalized ? | 13:01 |
| apw | caribou, do you have the MIR bug # ? | 13:03 |
| caribou | apw: LP: #1619239 | 13:03 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1619239 in tomsfastmath (Ubuntu) "[MIR] tomsfastmath (runtime dependency of clamav)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1619239 | 13:03 |
| handsome_feng | Hi, Could someone in release team help to approve the UKUI packages ? bug: #1663477, Thank you! | 13:42 |
| ubot5 | bug 1663477 in Ubuntu "[FFe] UKUI desktop environment" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1663477 | 13:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keepalived (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.2.19-1ubuntu0.1 => 1:1.2.19-1ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-server) (sync) | 14:05 | |
| jbicha | 2 metapackages recommend darktable; do we need to fix them before we remove darktable:i386? | 15:55 |
| apw | jbicha, i think we do | 15:58 |
| ginggs | jbicha: in my experience, recommends haven't been a problem | 15:58 |
| jbicha | I'm asking because I think ubuntu-studio-meta's ./update script will automatically detect that darktable isn't available if it's not available | 15:58 |
| jbicha | like how Firefox was removed from some ppc architecture just before yakkety was released | 15:58 |
| apw | jbicha, yeah as they are mostly meta related, probabally if we have commitment from them to update them | 15:58 |
| apw | then we might well be ok | 15:59 |
| jbicha | I will follow up to update both metapackages | 15:59 |
| apw | jbicha, ok thanks if you say that in the bug i'll get'er'done | 16:01 |
| apw | jbicha, which is bug: #1672020 | 16:02 |
| ubot5 | bug 1672020 in darktable (Ubuntu) "Please remove i386 binaries" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672020 | 16:02 |
| jbicha | commented on the bug | 16:06 |
| apw | ginggs, and gone | 16:07 |
| ginggs | apw, jbicha: thanks! | 16:08 |
| tash | Hi, is there an exact date for 12.04 EOL? April 2017 is a little vague. Is that 4/1/2017? | 18:34 |
| apw | tash, it is more normally nearer the say in april it origianally released | 18:38 |
| apw | tash, but yes, there should be a formal date announced and soon | 18:39 |
| tash | ok thanks | 18:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [i386] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1] | 20:03 | |
| jbicha | apw: uh, Debian's multimedia-photography is arch: all, so I could either 1) make it arch: any (and add [any-amd64 any-arm64] to Recommends: darktable), 2) drop darktable there | 20:16 |
| jbicha | or 3) don't worry about it since it's not a very popular package on Ubuntu | 20:16 |
| jbicha | (since multimedia-photography:i386 isn't popular) | 20:17 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: supervisor (xenial-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-2 => 3.2.0-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) | 21:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!