[00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: steam [i386] (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [1:1.0.0.54+repack-2ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[07:05] <handsome_feng> Good morning! everyone! I'm a member of Ubuntu Kylin, Could someone help to approve the UKUI packages? or one of them first?  Thank you in advance! bug: #1663477, bug: #1664229, bug: #1664232, bug: #1664235, bug: #1664244, bug: #1664247, bug: #1664256
[07:05] <ubot5> bug 1663477 in Ubuntu "[FFe] UKUI desktop environment" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1663477
[07:05] <ubot5> bug 1664229 in Ubuntu "[FFe] ukui-menu" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664229
[07:05] <ubot5> bug 1664232 in Ubuntu Kylin "[FFe] ukui-indicators" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664232
[07:05] <ubot5> bug 1664235 in Ubuntu "[FFe] peony" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664235
[07:05] <ubot5> bug 1664244 in Ubuntu "[FFe] ukui-control-center" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1664244
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, just to understand, is it ok to sync tzdata?
[10:58]  * LocutusOfBorg sync'd it
[10:59] <LocutusOfBorg> debdiff was translation-only updates and two timezones that are changing in may
[11:09] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: you want to handle SRUing it too, right? :-)
[11:17] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, maybe not :p
[11:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm still not confident enough about such tzdata updates
[11:18] <LocutusOfBorg> they don't even have an SRU bug in previous updates, I always thought they were using some special SRU handling
[11:20] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Data_Packages_Kept_in_Sync_with_Security
[11:21] <LocutusOfBorg> as said, I would appreciate somebody else doing it :) thanks for the link, it is scary enough to keep me away
[11:21] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[11:31] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, normally infinity does those
[11:32] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, I hope he will take care, it is too difficult for my brain :)
[11:33] <LocutusOfBorg> BTW, a quick MIR for libfolks-dummy25? it should already be in main, not sure what went wrong with it
[11:33] <LocutusOfBorg> libfolks-dummy-dev/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: libfolks-dummy25 (= 0.11.3-2)
[11:34] <LocutusOfBorg> folks is in main, and rmadison for the libraries is... don't know how to understand the answer
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure how the dev package can be useful with a library in universe (BTW the library has been in universe since the begin, but now somebody corrected the dependency in control file, so now it is picked up by britney)
[11:41] <jbicha> I don't understand android-sdk-meta/zesty's upload errors
[11:41] <jbicha> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-sdk-meta/25.0.0+3
[11:44] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, i assume that is a new binary packag e?
[11:45] <jbicha> apw: no, folks-dummy isn't new, it's just now being correctly depended on by its -dev package (and the -dev package was in main)
[11:46] <jbicha> like Locutus said, I'm not sure why folks wasn't fully in main anyway
[11:48] <Laney> jbicha: It's producing binary packages with the wrong version, or at least with version numbers that are already in use.
[11:50] <jbicha> Laney: ok I see now (for the android pkg)
[11:52] <jbicha> darktable/i386 is intentionally being dropped so please let it through zesty-proposed
[11:58] <apw> jbicha, yeah that is producing binary packages for the previous version not its own version, that is pretty odd
[12:02] <jbicha> yes it looks like it's fixed in 25.0.0+5 so I'll sync that later
[12:05] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, libfolks-dummy25 sorted
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> no apw :) (ETOOLATE)
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> ta!
[12:09] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, ?
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> your question about the new package
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> I was AFK
[12:10] <apw> oh ... heh, derp, forgot i even asked
[12:36] <ginggs> jbicha, apw: here' a bug for darktable LP: #1672020
[12:36] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1672020 in darktable (Ubuntu) "Please remove i386 binaries" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672020
[12:39] <apw> ginggs, that is seeded on the ubuntustudio dvd
[12:47] <ginggs> apw: so should that be removed from ubuntustudio, or is it too late for that now?
[12:47] <apw> ginggs, i think they need to do something if the package is no longer supported on that arch
[13:01] <caribou> Repeating a question that went unnoticed : The clamav sync is stucked in -proposed on the MIR for tomsfastmath. MIR is apparently completed so is there anything else to be done to get this sync finalized ?
[13:03] <apw> caribou, do you have the MIR bug # ?
[13:03] <caribou> apw: LP: #1619239
[13:03] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1619239 in tomsfastmath (Ubuntu) "[MIR] tomsfastmath (runtime dependency of clamav)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1619239
[13:42] <handsome_feng> Hi, Could someone in release team help to approve the UKUI packages ? bug: #1663477, Thank you!
[13:42] <ubot5> bug 1663477 in Ubuntu "[FFe] UKUI desktop environment" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1663477
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keepalived (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.2.19-1ubuntu0.1 => 1:1.2.19-1ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[15:55] <jbicha> 2 metapackages recommend darktable; do we need to fix them before we remove darktable:i386?
[15:58] <apw> jbicha, i think we do
[15:58] <ginggs> jbicha: in my experience, recommends haven't been a problem
[15:58] <jbicha> I'm asking because I think ubuntu-studio-meta's ./update script will automatically detect that darktable isn't available if it's not available
[15:58] <jbicha> like how Firefox was removed from some ppc architecture just before yakkety was released
[15:58] <apw> jbicha, yeah as they are mostly meta related, probabally if we have commitment from them to update them
[15:59] <apw> then we might well be ok
[15:59] <jbicha> I will follow up to update both metapackages
[16:01] <apw> jbicha, ok thanks if you say that in the bug i'll get'er'done
[16:02] <apw> jbicha, which is bug: #1672020
[16:02] <ubot5> bug 1672020 in darktable (Ubuntu) "Please remove i386 binaries" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672020
[16:06] <jbicha> commented on the bug
[16:07] <apw> ginggs, and gone
[16:08] <ginggs> apw, jbicha: thanks!
[18:34] <tash> Hi, is there an exact date for 12.04 EOL?  April 2017 is a little vague.  Is that 4/1/2017?
[18:38] <apw> tash, it is more normally nearer the say in april it origianally released
[18:39] <apw> tash, but yes, there should be a formal date announced and soon
[18:39] <tash> ok thanks
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [i386] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-dicomweb [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [powerpc] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted orthanc-webviewer [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [2.2-1ubuntu1]
[20:16] <jbicha> apw: uh, Debian's multimedia-photography is arch: all, so I could either 1) make it arch: any (and add [any-amd64 any-arm64] to Recommends: darktable), 2) drop darktable there
[20:16] <jbicha> or 3) don't worry about it since it's not a very popular package on Ubuntu
[20:17] <jbicha> (since multimedia-photography:i386 isn't popular)
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: supervisor (xenial-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-2 => 3.2.0-2ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)