-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: genwqe-user (zesty-proposed/primary) [4.0.18-3] | 08:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.36.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.36.1-0ubuntu2.1] (no packageset) | 09:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [1.34.0-0ubuntu8.2 => 1.34.0-0ubuntu8.3] (no packageset) | 09:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: account-plugins (xenial-proposed/main) [0.12+16.04.20160126-0ubuntu1 => 0.13+16.04.20161212-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 09:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center-signon (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.8+16.04.20160201-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.9+16.04.20161212-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 09:43 | |
acheronuk | Hi. could someone please take a look at bug #1672672 | 10:42 |
---|---|---|
ubot5 | bug 1672672 in krita (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Krita 3.1.2.1 for zesty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672672 | 10:42 |
acheronuk | thanks :) | 10:42 |
caribou | apw: we have an issue with makedumpfile 1.5.5 in Trusty : it only supports up to kernel 3.19 | 10:45 |
caribou | apw: with the xenial_lts kernel, we're up to 4.4 so I'm not convinced that cherry-picking fixes would be viable | 10:45 |
caribou | apw: do you think that it would be acceptable to SRU the 1.5.9 version from Xenial into trusty ? | 10:46 |
caribou | question opened to any of the SRU team members of course | 10:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (xenial-proposed/main) [5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.2 => 5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.3] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 10:47 | |
apw | caribou: it is fixing dumping for a supported kernel, so i think so | 10:47 |
caribou | apw: yes indeed | 10:48 |
caribou | I'll have a peek at the differences in commit,but it would be safer to bring the whole version in | 10:49 |
Mirv | hi. could you perhaps comment whether you could override the camitk i386 tests, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qtbase-opensource-src ? the release has been stuck in proposed for some time. | 11:51 |
Laney | Mirv: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/camitk/zesty/i386 doesn't look too good for the new qtbase, does it? | 11:57 |
Mirv | Laney: it seems to except no warnings etc, thus parsing a long string wrong. that's why I asked for a comment and whether Trevinho should revisit the landing or if it's deemed that the test is a bit badly written. | 11:58 |
Mirv | c/p/ | 11:58 |
Laney | Mirv: I'd imagine it's not too hard to fix the test if it's a parsing error, and then you can get some more confidence about your upload. | 12:03 |
Mirv | ok | 12:03 |
Mirv | Trevinho: ^ FYI | 12:03 |
oSoMoN | seb128, hey, webbrowser-app is blocked in -proposed because it depends on ubuntu-ui-extras which is in universe but has been approved for main inclusion: bug #1666556 | 14:32 |
ubot5 | bug 1666556 in ubuntu-ui-extras (Ubuntu) "[MIR] ubuntu-ui-extras" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1666556 | 14:32 |
oSoMoN | could you by any chance unblock it by promoting ubuntu-ui-extras to main? | 14:32 |
sil2100 | mterry: hey! Does an AA have to do the promotion or do ubuntu-mir guys have the power to do so? ^ | 14:38 |
mterry | sil2100: need an AA | 14:38 |
sil2100 | oSoMoN: so it didn't happen automatically in the end? | 14:38 |
mterry | oSoMoN: sil2100 : but it won't be promoted unless something is pulling it in | 14:38 |
mterry | Does anything depend on the extras package? | 14:38 |
sil2100 | mterry: webbrowser-app now depends on it | 14:38 |
mterry | ah I see, that's the issue above :P | 14:39 |
oSoMoN | sil2100, no it wasn’t automatically promoted, I had misremembered what ahayzen said | 14:40 |
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-mate-artwork [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [17.04.2] (ubuntu-mate) | 17:36 | |
ahayzen | Hey, I'm looking for a reviewer to do a "preNEW review" of two new packages (qtubuntu-print and ubuntu-printing-app) that I have in silo 2236 (https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2236), would anyone here be able to do this? | 18:19 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (precise-proposed/partner) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 => 1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) | 19:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1:20170214.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset) | 19:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.15+16.10ubuntu1 => 1.0+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.15+16.04ubuntu1 => 1.0+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:58 | |
chrisccoulson | Is there anyone who can approve the adobe-flashplugin uploads in partner please? | 20:22 |
chrisccoulson | (for all releases) | 20:22 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam-mysql (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.7~RC1-4ubuntu2 => 0.7~RC1-4ubuntu2.1] (no packageset) | 20:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam-mysql (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.7~RC1-4.1ubuntu1 => 0.7~RC1-4.1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) | 20:45 | |
bluesabre | RAOF1, if you are around, would you be interested in releasing thunar into xenial- and yakkety-updates? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunar/+bug/1512120 | 21:54 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1512120 in thunar (Ubuntu Yakkety) "[SRU] thunar crashes on file renaming" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 21:54 |
jbicha | RAOF: please reject gnome-shell/xenial and /yakkety | 22:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.5-0ubuntu0.3] | 22:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-shell [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.4-0ubuntu3] | 22:58 | |
RAOF | jbicha: Done. | 22:59 |
RAOF | bluesabre: And done. | 22:59 |
RAOF | Thanks for the ping. | 22:59 |
bluesabre | RAOF, thank you very much! | 23:06 |
Beret | j #i3 | 23:48 |
acheronuk | Hi. Could someone please the FFe in bug #1672672 thanks | 23:53 |
ubot5 | bug 1672672 in krita (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Krita 3.1.2.1 for zesty" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672672 | 23:53 |
acheronuk | *please look at | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!