| === JanC is now known as Guest79577 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| jbicha | robert_ancell: hi | 03:44 |
|---|---|---|
| robert_ancell | jbicha, hi | 03:44 |
| jbicha | with LP: #1639507, I don't think that's reproducible on 17.04 so I think something was fixed in gnome-software 3.22.* but I haven't gone through to check | 03:44 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1639507 in unity-control-center (Ubuntu Yakkety) "unity-control-center in installed software is listed with wrong icon and title" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1639507 | 03:44 |
| robert_ancell | jbicha, the fix I made was just to backport the appstream file. I think it wont actually fix the problem until it's been released and the appstream data for the archive is updated | 03:45 |
| robert_ancell | But I'm not sure, that's something that Laney knows better than me | 03:46 |
| jbicha | new appstream data is generated in xenial-proposed | 03:46 |
| jbicha | and hopefully the xenial-proposed appdata is preferred over xenial? | 03:47 |
| robert_ancell | oh, then I don't know :( | 03:48 |
| jbicha | robert_ancell: you saw LP: #1672424 right? | 03:49 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1672424 in gnome-software (Ubuntu Yakkety) "Cannot install Debian files outside of the repositories" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672424 | 03:49 |
| robert_ancell | no | 03:50 |
| jbicha | yeah, the bug title sounds like all those duplicates of that one bug so it's easy to miss | 03:51 |
| robert_ancell | jbicha, is this a regression? | 03:51 |
| jbicha | yes, see comment #5 | 03:51 |
| jbicha | I didn't block this week's gnome-software SRU since this is an older regression | 03:52 |
| robert_ancell | jbicha, when did that version hit the archive? In Nov 2016? | 03:53 |
| robert_ancell | I'll have to look at it next week, looks like it's been in the wild like that for a while then | 03:55 |
| jbicha | yes, it looks like December 1 2016 | 03:55 |
| jbicha | ok | 03:55 |
| jbicha | have a good weekend! | 03:56 |
| robert_ancell | bye! | 03:57 |
| willcooke | morning all | 09:03 |
| willcooke | Trevinho, hikiko - low gfx done today do we think? | 09:03 |
| * willcooke is going to keep nagging | 09:03 | |
| hikiko | good morning willcooke | 09:03 |
| hikiko | Trevinho, did a review yesterday and proposed a branch, I am doing the 1st fixes I haven't check his branch yet | 09:04 |
| willcooke | thanks | 09:04 |
| hikiko | willcooke, I'll ping you later when I have news :) | 09:05 |
| davmor2 | Morning all | 09:05 |
| Sweetshark | moin all | 09:57 |
| willcooke | hey Sweetshark | 10:00 |
| Trevinho | hikiko: just merge my branch as it has fixes... | 11:20 |
| Trevinho | hikiko: there's something also coming for ucc | 11:20 |
| Sweetshark | jbicha: did I hear that right, you'd sponsor a libreoffice package if I do the moves via ubuntu-sponsors? Would that apply to a LibreOffice 5.3.1 update for zesty? | 11:53 |
| jbicha | subscribing ubuntu-sponsors is nice because it gets your bug on http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ and there are people that do look at that for things to upload | 12:05 |
| jbicha | oh, seb128 isn't around? yeah I'll probably upload that for you | 12:06 |
| Sweetshark | jbicha: right. Im just sking because there isnt a bug for the update yet, so I would write one. Would skip that though, if we ignore it anyway though ... | 12:08 |
| Sweetshark | jbicha: /me goes writing that bug. | 12:08 |
| jbicha | I prefer the ubuntu-sponsors bug because more potential uploaders could see the request so you might get faster results | 12:10 |
| alexarnaud | Hello all ! | 12:30 |
| alexarnaud | Trevinho, andyrock, didrocks: do you know the state of the color filter module into Compiz ? It could be really helpful for low-vision people. | 12:31 |
| alexarnaud | I've seen a work on it on LP : https://launchpad.net/compiz-colorfilter-plugin/0.9.5 | 12:31 |
| Trevinho | alexarnaud: not really... It was outside our scope | 12:32 |
| alexarnaud | Trevinho: OK, no problem. I would be sure to note duplicate the work on ti. | 12:32 |
| alexarnaud | *it | 12:32 |
| alexarnaud | thanks | 12:32 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| Sweetshark | jbicha: bug 1673790 should have everything needed and has ubuntu-sponsors subscribed. please let me know if anything is missing. | 14:25 |
| ubot5 | bug 1673790 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "bump LibreOffice to 5.3.1 on zesty and fix autpkgtest dependencies" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1673790 | 14:25 |
| jbicha | Sweetshark: thanks! I'll look at it more a bit later | 14:36 |
| Sweetshark | jbicha: awesome, thx. | 14:48 |
| davmor2 | I blame willcooke http://www.pcworld.com/article/3181289/security/adobe-reader-edge-safari-and-ubuntu-fall-during-first-day-at-pwn2own.html ;) | 15:23 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| willcooke | I wonder what that bug is then | 15:40 |
| davmor2 | willcooke: don't know just says ubuntu desktop so I instantly blame Laney but he's not here so it must of been your fault ;) | 15:41 |
| mdeslaur | it's a kernel bug, we don'tknow the details yet | 15:41 |
| jbicha | davmor2: I note that seb128 is conveniently absent today too ;) | 15:41 |
| willcooke | mdeslaur, thanks | 15:41 |
| davmor2 | jbicha: yeah that just so willcooke definitely gets the blame :) | 15:42 |
| willcooke | I was just going through the root processes | 15:42 |
| mdeslaur | don't get me wrong, I still blame willcooke for the kernel bug :P | 15:42 |
| willcooke | :)) it's a fair cop | 15:42 |
| mdeslaur | hehehe | 15:42 |
| willcooke | man, I could be making serious coin with these kernel bugs I make :D | 15:42 |
| davmor2 | willcooke: yeah by the rules of the games they have to provide full details of the hack | 15:42 |
| davmor2 | willcooke: it is the exploit on ubuntu server through apache that peaked my interest | 15:43 |
| davmor2 | $200,000 | 15:43 |
| willcooke | yeah, although it says they haven't done it (yet) | 15:43 |
| Sweetshark | Im late to the party: But can we please just agree to blame systemd? | 15:43 |
| davmor2 | Sweetshark: no it's definite willcooke fault it says Ubuntu Desktop ;) | 15:45 |
| * Sweetshark is just grumpy that he lost a bet to the tune of one bottle of single malt because systemd wasnt forked in the last two years ... | 15:45 | |
| davmor2 | Sweetshark: but yeah I think we can all shake our fists in the air and scream Lennart | 15:45 |
| mdeslaur | Sweetshark: what do you mean it wasn't forked? every single distro forks systemd | 15:45 |
| Sweetshark | mdeslaur: well, yeah. We didnt explicitly define "fork", but I think the implied expectation was that the fork becomes its own upstream (and governance etc.). I could try the "distros fork" argument, but it would seem like me cheating out of my obligations on the bet. | 15:49 |
| mdeslaur | Sweetshark: fair enough :) | 15:49 |
| willcooke | I'm taking off early to go and nurse my cold. Ping on Telegram if anything is needed for that bug ^ | 15:55 |
| willcooke | have a good weekend all | 15:55 |
| Trevinho | hikiko: I'm reworking the ucc plugin too, as there are some problems... Also I've noticed that by default just running ucc crashes the session when in guest | 16:16 |
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| ricotz | jbicha, hi, do you have an eta for the libreoffice upload? | 19:28 |
| jbicha | ricotz: later today, why? | 19:29 |
| ricotz | jbicha, wanted to wait for the tarballs being available in the archive, this saves me some upload trouble | 19:30 |
| ricotz | ... for the backport builds | 19:31 |
| jbicha | ok, I'll ping you when they're accepted | 19:31 |
| ricotz | thanks | 19:31 |
| * ricotz hopes this would be within the next 4 hours | 19:32 | |
| jbicha | yes, it should be | 19:32 |
| jbicha | it requires an impressive amount of bandwidth though :| | 19:33 |
| ricotz | yeah nearly 1G | 19:33 |
| ricotz | jbicha, I am going to just upload it, sorry for the noise | 19:46 |
| jbicha | ricotz: I'm uploading now | 19:53 |
| ricotz | jbicha, oh, pushed the first source package now | 20:02 |
| jbicha | I uploaded but LP hasn't sent me an accepted or rejected email yet | 20:07 |
| ricotz | this can take a bit sometimes | 20:16 |
| jbicha | maybe I should have waited for the first one to get accepted before pushing the 2nd one? | 20:18 |
| ricotz | I don't think so, they are processed, pushing the whole bunch works fine for ppas | 20:20 |
| ricotz | https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages | 20:20 |
| Sweetshark | (so Im really in the weekend already, but ...) | 23:07 |
| Sweetshark | jbicha: I got this mail: "The signer of this package has no upload rights to this distribution's primary archive. Did you mean to upload to a PPA?" <- likely the cause they dont show up yet? | 23:08 |
| * Sweetshark goes back to lurking in the dark .... | 23:09 | |
| jbicha | Sweetshark: thanks, I uploaded the wrong file | 23:11 |
| jbicha | and because the file I uploaded wasn't signed by me, I didn't get the email from LP | 23:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!