/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/03/23/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
* slangasek waves15:01
slangasek#startmeeting15:01
meetingologyMeeting started Thu Mar 23 15:01:31 2017 UTC.  The chair is slangasek. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.15:01
meetingologyAvailable commands: action commands idea info link nick15:01
slangasek[TOPIC] Lightning round15:01
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Lightning round
slangasek$ echo $(shuf -e barry doko bdmurray slangasek caribou infinity sil2100 robru cyphermox tdaitx xnox chiluk mwhudson rbalint)15:02
slangasektdaitx infinity doko barry robru sil2100 chiluk rbalint slangasek cyphermox bdmurray caribou xnox mwhudson15:02
slangasektdaitx: tag15:02
tdaitx= JCK15:02
tdaitx  * firewall exception to run interactive tests not working15:02
tdaitx  * executing full tests15:02
tdaitx= Other15:02
tdaitx  * Checking a few openjdk-7/openjdk-8 errors on error tracker15:02
tdaitx    - unable to find a reproducer for GMenuModelItemsChangedInvalidIndex; error is still being reported on Trusty though, might be related to LP: #1499747 but need a reproducer to check if glib update fixes that15:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1499747 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu) "gedit crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/149974715:02
tdaitx    - An awt bug happening since 8u121-b13-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 which seems like a regression; working on a reproducer15:02
tdaitx(done)15:02
infinity - Wasted some time trying unsuccessfully to smooth over the kernel/snappy issues.15:03
infinity - Helped sort out a glibc security regression.15:03
infinity - glibc uploads to zesty.15:03
infinity - SRU/AA faff.15:03
infinity - Beta, beta, beta.15:03
infinity(done)15:03
slangasekdoko is off15:04
slangasekbarry is off15:04
slangasekrobru:15:04
robrubritney15:04
robru* reviewed a couple branches by laney15:04
robru* made Email Policy resend mails periodically, with a decreasing frequency15:04
robruarchive maintenance15:04
robru* troubleshoot a number of packages stuck in proposed (mentored by cyphermox)15:04
robru* poked at curl, which is blocked by MIR of two new dependencies15:04
robru(done)15:04
cyphermoxrobru: did you file the MIR bugs or update them? I could review those15:05
bdmurrayrobru: was there any discussion about stable releases?15:05
robrubdmurray: stable releases still not being emailed as far as I know. do you want that?15:05
robrucyphermox: yeah I think mterry is on top of those two MIRs, was just blocked trying to find a team bug subscriber, which is settled now15:06
slangasekno sil2100?15:06
cyphermoxalrighty15:06
slangasekchiluk:15:06
chiluk* Been mostly working on quite a few ceph and ceph performance issues lately, so not much foundation-y stuff.15:06
chiluk* 2 half days PTO15:06
chiluk- done -15:06
robrucyphermox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpsl/+bug/1668568 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libidn2-0/+bug/1668566 both "fix committed" not sure what else needs to happen to finish those off15:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1668568 in libpsl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libpsl" [Undecided,Fix committed]15:06
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1668566 in libidn2-0 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libidn2-0" [Undecided,Fix committed]15:06
cyphermoxaye aye15:07
cyphermoxfix committed means it's approved, just needs magic AA powers to complete15:07
slangasekrbalint: welcome :)15:08
slangasekrbalint: your turn, if you have anything15:08
rbalint* entered the foundation team just earlier this week (Hello, Everyone! :-))15:08
rbalint* triaged nama's ftbfs looks like to be caused by perl bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=83921815:08
rbalint* pushed forward boost1.62 transition providing patches for the last 3 packages to transition http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.62.html15:08
ubottuDebian bug 839218 in perl "Perl 5.24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault" [Serious,Open]15:08
rbalintseems I should copy one by one :-)15:08
slangasekrobru, bdmurray: I guess the mail policy for stable releases needs to be different, since a one-day delay in migrating isn't "stuck"15:08
tdaitxrbalint, hi there! welcome =)15:09
bdmurrayI think Laney might have said everything in -proposed for stable would appear stuck.15:09
slangasekrbalint: oh oops, I removed nama from zesty-proposed because I had assumed that was a bug in nama rather than perl; should I un-delete it?15:09
Laneyhi15:10
rbalintslangasek: i think it can be readed15:10
cyphermoxslangasek: needs fixing in Debian first, no need to undelete it, I'd say15:10
cyphermoxoh?15:10
slangasekcyphermox: according to rbalint the bug is perl rather than nama15:10
cyphermoxwell, yeah, but in the meantime it's still broken15:10
rbalintit can be fixed in perl or nama by a workaround15:10
cyphermoxoh, I didn't remember that15:10
rbalintcyphermox: it just came up today15:11
cyphermoxrbalint: do you have the workaround ready? we could land that and unblock it once re-added?15:11
slangasekcyphermox: yes, but once perl is fixed we still won't have a nama package in the archive unless the Debian maintainer happens to upload a new one15:11
slangasek * systemd SRU (LP: #1673860, LP: #1647031, LP: #1651518).15:11
slangasek * ordered more memory for laptop, so I can run a web browser15:11
slangasek * discussions around signed custom kernels for ubuntu-core15:11
slangasek * debugging of k8s testsuite failures in GCE15:11
slangasek * worked on shim-signed, which we've just gotten our first signed binary through the new community process (https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/47438.html)15:11
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1673860 in systemd (Ubuntu Yakkety) "systemd-resolved unit should run Before=network-online.target" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/167386015:11
slangasek * proposed-migration un-sticking work15:11
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1647031 in systemd (Ubuntu Yakkety) "systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164703115:11
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1651518 in systemd (Ubuntu Yakkety) "systemd/logind parsing problem: HTX exercisers stopped on error: rc 11, errno 11 from main(): pthread_create" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165151815:11
slangasek  * have requested more email reminders about stuck packages15:11
slangasek * miscellaneous ppc64el triage and uploads15:11
slangasek(done)15:11
cyphermox- multipath-tools fix for missing dm-queue-length + SRUs15:11
cyphermox- multipath-tools path-selector change15:11
cyphermox- merge slideshow update for mascot15:11
cyphermox- more slideshow merges to complete for 17.04 updates15:11
cyphermox- shim testing and grub2 changes for shim SRUs.15:12
cyphermox- subiquity livefs fixes15:12
cyphermox- netplan cloned mac support / convincing systemd-networkd to properly apply .li15:12
cyphermoxnk file changes15:12
cyphermox- "mentoring" rbalint on +1 maintenance15:12
cyphermox(done)15:12
bdmurraycyphermox: why the quotes?15:12
cyphermoxwtf, vi15:12
bdmurrayhad apport updated in staging / production Error Tracker15:12
bdmurraylooked for and found other crashes which make gdb sad15:12
bdmurrayreported snappy bug (LP: #1674847) regarding manifest files15:12
bdmurrayfixed snap of apport so that hooks get run, logging works15:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1674847 in Snappy "produce package lists for Ubuntu Core versions on the web" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/167484715:12
cyphermoxbdmurray: because the force is strong with rbalint.15:12
bdmurrayconfirmed apport snap catches cores of other snaps15:13
bdmurraycreated an ubuntu-core general hook for apport snap15:13
bdmurraymodified ubuntu-core hook to capture dpkg.list file, "snap --version"15:13
bdmurraymodified ubuntu-core hook to not complain about free space15:13
rbalintcyphermox: :-)15:13
bdmurrayuploaded SRUs of update-notifier / update-manager for LP: #165400815:13
bdmurrayimproved test case for LP: #1623856, uploaded aptdaemon Y SRU15:13
bdmurraytroubleshoot of my upgrade to Yakkety15:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1654008 in update-notifier (Ubuntu Xenial) "/usr/bin/update-manager:OverflowError:/usr/bin/update-manager@117" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165400815:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1623856 in aptdaemon (Ubuntu) "Scrolled Windows in update-manager are too small to read" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162385615:13
bdmurray✔ done15:13
cyphermox(it's weird to say that when I've never watched any star wars)15:13
caribouBugfix:15:13
caribou  LP #1654600 : unattended-upgrades breaks shutdown when /var is FS15:13
caribou  - Created DEP8 tests for new systemd fix15:13
caribou  - Needs review before upload15:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1654600 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) "unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/165460015:13
caribou  LP: #1342580 : tftp does not start15:14
caribou  - Applied SRU version break suggestion & re-uploaded15:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1342580 in tftp-hpa (Ubuntu Yakkety) "tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/134258015:14
caribou  Sponsored  LP: #1566508 & rolled back15:14
caribou  Sponsored LP: #159079915:14
caribou  Reviewed LP: #1645324 for sponsoring & provided comments15:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1566508 in sssd (Ubuntu Trusty) "autofs races with sssd on startup" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/156650815:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1590799 in nfs-utils (Ubuntu Zesty) "nfs-kernel-server does not start because of dependency failure" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/159079915:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1645324 in ebtables (Ubuntu Trusty) "ebtables: Lock file should be moved from /var/lib/ebtables to /run" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164532415:14
caribou Need AA magic on releasing tomsfastmath into Main following MIR completion15:14
caribou - LP: #161923915:14
caribou - Will unblock clamav from zesty-proposed15:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1619239 in tomsfastmath (Ubuntu) "[MIR] tomsfastmath (runtime dependency of clamav)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/161923915:14
caribouMeetings15:14
caribou ☑ Done15:14
tdaitxcyphermox, didn't you meant to say "it's weird that I've never watched any star wars"?15:14
cyphermoxnot really no15:15
bdmurraycyphermox: is that some kind of choice?15:15
cyphermoxI litterally didn't have to do anythign15:15
cyphermoxdon't know, it never came up, I was never interested, I've got plenty with Trek15:16
cyphermoxcue holy war: Star Trek vs. Star Wars.15:16
bdmurrayxnox is still on holiday right?15:16
gaughenbdmurray, yes15:16
cyphermoxare we at AOB now then?15:17
bdmurrayI thought there was somebody after xnox15:18
slangasekit was mwhudson next15:18
slangasekand he gets a pass15:18
slangasekbecause he's so far off the edge of the world I don't even know how to look up his TZ15:18
slangasekany questions on status?15:18
gaughennot from me15:19
bdmurrayNo, but could we talk about emails for SRUs stuck in -proposed?15:19
slangasek[TOPIC] emails for SRUs stuck in -proposed15:19
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: emails for SRUs stuck in -proposed
slangasekok let's talk :)15:19
slangasekbut also http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/05/tourist-claims-detained-kazakhstan-officials-refused-believe/15:20
rbalintcyphermox: if you miss star wars :-) telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl15:20
cyphermoxhttps://xkcd.com/1769/15:20
bdmurrayLaney: You have an opinion on not sending emails right?15:20
cyphermoxoh, IPv6 has extra bling15:21
davmor2cyphermox: it lies15:22
davmor2cyphermox: also like there is a war, firefly all the way ;)15:22
bdmurrayWell he said things are expected to delayed in -proposed for some period of time.15:23
slangasekyes15:23
slangasekso emailing folks after a single day of a package in -proposed for an SRU would be annoying and not helpful15:23
Laneybdmurray: don't you already have tooling to mail people?15:23
bdmurrayAnd that he thought > 10 days was common.15:23
LaneyAnyway, two practical issues15:23
slangasekLaney: yes, but they only get emailed after 197 days or so15:23
Laney - Need to make the delay configurable15:23
cyphermoxthere was a bit of discussion on the exact process for emailing yesterday in #u-release... robru?15:23
cyphermoxah, Laney's there.15:24
slangasekconfigurable by whom / how?15:24
robruHmm?15:24
bdmurrayLaney: it comments on the bugs purported to be fixed by the SRU if its in -proposed for > 90 days or so15:24
Laney - Blocked packages, of which SRUs all are, won't trigger emails, so need to deal with that somehow15:24
Laneyslangasek: in the britney.conf, so by b115:24
bdmurraySo it doesn't directly email the uploader15:24
slangasekLaney: ok, so configured per-suite, not per-package or per-uploader; fair15:24
robruWe could make the threshold configurable in britney.conf, devel could be set to 3 days and stable could be set to 14 days or something15:24
slangasekrobru: where did 3 days come from?15:25
slangasekchanging the configuration for devel isn't on the table here :)15:25
Laneyrun15:25
slangasekLaney: ?15:25
robruslangasek: i decreased devel from 1 to 3 days because Laney wouldn't merge it with such a short repetition frequency15:26
bdmurraymaybe its not a change slangasek and it's already 3 days!15:26
slangasekrobru: but the first mail still comes out after 1 day?15:26
robruslangasek: no, the current email schedule for devel is day 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 78, 108...15:27
slangasekrobru: ok, that wasn't what we discussed, please change it back to sending the first mail at 1 day and *I'll* merge it15:27
robruslangasek: should i just make it configurable?15:27
slangasekrobru: that's orthogonal15:28
robruslangasek: but why would i submit one branch to change it from 3 to 1, and then submit a second branch that makes it configurable? I can just make it configurable and then that solves both problems15:29
slangasekrobru: because we haven't defined what all is configurable, and I want the devel thing fixed today :)15:30
robruslangasek: i can have a configuration branch submitted today15:30
slangasekrobru: that is not the same as having the configuration branch reviewed, agreed, and merged today15:31
robruslangasek: ok I'll submit a 1-day-mail branch after breakfast then15:32
slangasekrobru: thanks15:32
slangasekas for SRUs15:32
Laneyrobru: I think you need to restore the 1 or 5 thing15:32
robruSigh15:32
slangasekwhere have we gotten to?15:32
Laneyif you're doing that15:32
slangasek1-or-5?15:32
Laney1 if excuse.is_valid else 515:33
Laneyor the other way around, I forget15:33
robruThe other way15:33
robruI can't even remember why that existed15:33
Laneyfor things blocked at update_output.txt time, which need to be given more time15:34
slangasekah15:34
slangasekseems fair15:34
robruDo those things really take more time? Isn't that just installability checks which would be known right away? Why does that take extra time?15:34
slangasekbut I don't think we're converging on a plan for SRUs15:34
Laneyyou often have to sort out other packages15:34
slangasekso can we table this until after the meeting and take it up in #ubuntu-release?15:35
infinityIt *can* take extra time, or it *might* be an indication of a bug.15:35
Laneyit'll still be a bug in 5 days15:35
slangasek(US table, not UK table)15:35
infinityFailing in output checks doesn't necessarily mean a transition, it might be that you broke something. :P15:35
Laneyok, let's do that15:35
slangasekok15:35
slangasek[TOPIC] AOB15:35
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: AOB
slangasekanything else?15:35
rbalintslangasek: i was about to ask about the libssl 1.0.2 transition for zeisty15:36
infinityWhen is our team pony coming?15:36
slangasekrbalint: we are not transitioning to 1.0.2 for zesty15:36
rbalintok15:36
infinityWe carry a delta specifically to prevent transitioning.15:37
rbalintthere are some packages on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/zesty/update_excuses.html which depend on 1.0.215:38
slangasekrbalint: xnox had taken the lead on that, maybe send an email to the list to ask about plans for 17.1015:38
slangasekrbalint: transgui?15:38
slangasekthat one's a mess and we don't need to spend time fixing it this cycle15:38
cyphermoxyep transgui15:38
rbalintand a few others15:38
slangasekit should self-fix once we upgrade openssl15:38
rbalintbut they don't seem to be important indeed15:39
rbalinti'm looking for important packages to fix on excuses list15:39
slangasekrbalint: hopefully most of the "important" ones aren't stuck there; but we still want to clean up -proposed as much as possible.  It's just that for a package that is synced from Debian and needs no changes to be eventually correct, no clean-up is really needed (transgui)15:40
slangasekanything else?15:41
cyphermoxI suppose looking at main mainly might be good, but as you said, the cleanup in general is important15:41
slangasek#endmeeting15:43
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
meetingologyMeeting ended Thu Mar 23 15:43:09 2017 UTC.15:43
meetingologyMinutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2017/ubuntu-meeting.2017-03-23-15.01.moin.txt15:43
slangasekthanks, all!15:43
rbalinti remember a page for debian's testing migration which ordered blocked packages by the number and importance of other packages waiting for it15:43
rbalintbut I can't find it now15:43
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!