[01:52] <jbicha> Laney: I uploaded gtk3 with mir enabled for s390x to zesty's unapproved queue
[02:11] <Trevinho> Laney: sorry, just noticed you mentioned me this morning... Please ping me again tomrorrow
[02:39] <duflu> robert_ancell, help :S  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/1675612
[02:39] <robert_ancell> duflu, any log information?
[02:40] <duflu> robert_ancell: Which log do you desire?
[02:40] <robert_ancell> duflu, you can start with /var/log/lightdm.log
[02:40] <duflu> Weird ubuntu-bug didn't attach that
[02:41] <robert_ancell> duflu, did you file against u-g or lightdm?
[02:41] <duflu> lightdm
[02:41] <duflu> Although it prompted for a password and then complained about a failure. So probably that's why it could not get root-owned logs
[02:48] <duflu> robert_ancell, attached. But do you want more info?
[02:49] <robert_ancell> duflu, /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log
[02:49] <robert_ancell> lightdm.log looks normal
[02:52] <duflu> robert_ancell: Done
[02:53] <robert_ancell> duflu, signal 10 is X signalling it is ready btw. Yes, it's stupid.
[03:03] <duflu> And now launchpad's timing out. I can't change anything
[03:03] <duflu> Usually this only happens when Europe wakes up
[03:05] <robert_ancell> /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon: undefined symbol: gnome_settings_plugin_info_set_settings_prefix
[03:05] <robert_ancell> That looks suspicious
[03:05] <robert_ancell> Might be u-s-d that is broken
[03:05] <robert_ancell> duflu, can you see if you can run it manually?
[03:07] <duflu> robert_ancell, yes that's the problem
[03:07] <duflu> $ /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
[03:07] <duflu> /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon: undefined symbol: gnome_settings_plugin_info_set_settings_prefix
[03:09]  * duflu hunts for the previous version
[03:10] <robert_ancell> duflu, I suspect it's one of the GNOME deps dropping the symbol
[03:10] <duflu> robert_ancell: Perhaps, but USC only changed 2 hours ago
[03:11] <duflu> So that could be the trigger
[03:11] <duflu> USD I mean
[03:11] <robert_ancell> duflu, ah, you are right
[03:13] <robert_ancell> https://code.launchpad.net/~jbicha/unity-settings-daemon/drop-updates-plugin/+merge/319275
[03:14] <robert_ancell> jbicha, ^
[03:16] <duflu> robert_ancell: Yeah the previous version fixes it
[03:44] <jbicha> sorry, I had tested with kylin-greeter because it was pulled in when I was helping Kylin get UKUI in and I only now figured out what pkg I needed to remove to get unity-greeter back
[03:44] <jbicha> robert_ancell: what's the fastest way to revert that?
[03:45] <jbicha> do we have to use bileto here?
[03:45] <robert_ancell> jbicha, I figure just committing directly and pushing to LP
[03:45] <robert_ancell> jbicha, I'm building a package now
[03:45] <robert_ancell> I dropped the line for the missing symbol, but that didn't work. So I'm reverting the whole merge
[03:45] <jbicha> that's fine, maybe I'll try again next cycle
[03:49] <robert_ancell> that fixed it
[03:50] <jbicha> great!
[03:50] <robert_ancell> 15.04.1+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu1.1
[03:50] <robert_ancell> Let's hope it gets through before too many people download the other one...
[03:51] <jbicha> you just need to find someone on the release team to let it though now :|
[03:51] <jbicha> I'm off to bed now, thanks for fixing that
[03:51] <TheMuso> Glad I haven't updated yet. :)
[03:51] <TheMuso> s/upgraded/updated/
[03:53] <robert_ancell> jbicha, np!
[03:53] <robert_ancell> duflu, good catch
[03:53] <duflu> robert_ancell: This is often an unlucky timezone for broken updates
[07:34] <hikiko> ηι
[07:34] <hikiko> hi
[07:34] <hikiko> :p
[07:42] <duflu> hikiko,   o/
[07:43] <duflu> Saviq, Could you perhaps add descriptions to those major milestones? It's not clear to me what the difference between them is
[07:43] <Saviq> duflu, dates, really
[07:43] <duflu> Well, yeah. Different milestones on the one project tend to have different dates
[07:44] <duflu> Oh they have "Expected"
[07:44] <Saviq> yup, that's it
[07:44] <Saviq> that's when we "close" the milestone
[07:44] <duflu> 'u8c-1' expected '7 hours ago'
[07:44] <Saviq> which is why I'm moving bugs that we didn't manage to close out to the next milestone(s)
[07:45] <duflu> It's slightly confusing that the order is "1, z, 2"
[07:46] <duflu> Is 2 what we would historically call "SRU0" ?
[07:48] <Saviq> duflu, we're not gonna be SRUing it
[07:48] <duflu> Saviq: Oh z+1 then?
[07:49] <Saviq> well, yes, just a date
[07:49] <duflu> My confusion stems from the fact that I expect milestone 2 to follow from 1. But it doesn't
[07:50] <Saviq> duflu, -z is "for zesty still", -2 is "further out"
[07:51] <duflu> Yeah. I would suggest name "2" with a description "zesty..." and rename the old "2" to "3" with a description "17.10..."
[07:51] <duflu> Rename "z" to "2"
[09:02] <willcooke> o/
[09:03] <Laney> yo!
[09:03] <didrocks> hey willcooke, Laney!
[09:07] <Laney> hey didrocks, happy friday
[09:07] <davmor2> Morning all
[09:07] <Laney> jbicha: I was already checking a gtk with s390x/mir...
[09:07] <Laney> How did you test build / check installability?
[09:08] <Laney> hey davmor2
[09:08] <Laney> how's it going?
[09:08] <davmor2> willcooke: so final beta not too bad \o/ only 1 thing that definitely needs fixing which happyaron is aware of already
[09:09] <davmor2> Laney: it goes good, you?
[09:09] <willcooke> nice one, thanks davmor2
[09:09] <Laney> acceptable
[09:09] <Laney> only one tea drunk so far
[09:10] <davmor2> Laney: I'm on my first coffee of the day so I'm one behind you
[09:18] <Laney> happyaron: are you working on that bug?
[10:13] <allison> good morning tea drinkers!!
[10:15] <happyaron> Laney: yep on my list
[10:15] <happyaron> (the list is short
[10:50] <Laney> hey allison
[10:50]  * Laney misses desrt :(
[11:06] <allison> Laney: :(
[11:06] <allison> Laney: where'd she go?
[11:06] <Laney> maybe found an oass
[11:07] <allison> oa(ss)?
[11:07] <Laney> or a camltrn
[11:08]  * Laney ho ho ho HO HO HO
[11:10] <Sweet5hark> bonjours a tous!
[11:12] <Laney> tag Sweet5hark
[11:12] <Laney> how's it going
[11:13] <Sweet5hark> I'll be on vacation next week. Anything missing/needing handover still? 5.2 is EOL upstream 5.3 wont have a final release next week and 5.3.1 is in zesty-proposed and in snap. So -- fingers crossed -- it should be good. If there is anything else, ping me now. ;)
[11:14] <Sweet5hark> Laney: heya, last workday before a week of and the weather is sunny and beautiful. Thats ... somewhat rare ... in Hamburg. ;)
[11:14] <Laney> \o\
[11:14] <Laney> it's in the release not proposed
[11:15] <Laney> went over after the beta
[11:15] <Sweet5hark> ah, even better. didnt recheck before writing.
[11:15] <Laney> you going somewhere nice?
[11:18] <Sweet5hark> Laney: no. not really far. Its only a week and I wont fly away or something. But I plan to steal my parent mobile home for a few days and do a unplanned trip: to Denmark, north sea or baltic.
[11:18] <Sweet5hark> s/mobile home/motorhome/
[11:20] <Laney> nice
[11:20] <Laney> hope you get some sun
[11:23] <Sweet5hark> Ill try ;)
[11:26] <Laney> https://goo.gl/maps/ARmPRTFmAfr
[12:09] <jbicha> Laney: I don't have a way to test s390x
[12:11] <Laney> Silos provide builds, and let you run britney
[12:14] <jbicha> I was told I need to join Canonical before I can join ~ci-train-ppa-service
[12:15] <jbicha> or become a Core dev I guess
[12:16] <Laney> I'm sure someone would have sponsored a package for you, but as I said I was already testing the same thing
[12:16] <Laney> Less haste would have let you find that out
[12:19] <Laney> Quite glad that ual stuff got done
[12:19] <jbicha> I hadn't seen s390x discussed here in the past few days
[12:20] <jbicha> so it surprised me when I started getting LP emails 'indicator-datetime_15.10+17.04.20170309-0ubuntu1_s390x.changes (Rejected)'
[14:19] <alexarnaud> morning all :P !
[18:10] <Laney> night!
[18:22] <willcooke> Good night all, have a hoopy one