=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== morphis_ is now known as morphis
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
=== darkxst_ is now known as darkxst
[10:36] <monsieur_h> Hello. So I made an app with JS/GTk3 and I'd like to host a PPA, but I have no clue where to begin.
[10:36] <monsieur_h> The documentation I found always relates to building .deb files, but I don't know how to do it
[10:37] <monsieur_h> Would you guys point me in the right direction ?
[10:48] <ginggs> monsieur_h: this looks like a good place to start http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/
[10:53] <monsieur_h> thanks
[11:46] <javier4> trying to cross-compile for buntu-touch, I keep getting
[11:46] <javier4> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/dCZHqpBY/
[11:47] <javier4> I already installed dh-system inside my chroot
[11:50] <javier4> schroot -c source:vivid-amd64-armhf
[11:51] <javier4> https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/qGbOlZZe/
=== hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln
=== boiko_ is now known as boiko
=== hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko
=== _salem is now known as salem_
[16:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! I wanted to review cinder from the unapproved queue, but to handle it I'd have to approve the previous upload to -updates - and since I didn't get a formal green light from you on approval of packages for -updates, I'd like to get a double-confirmation from if it's ok
[16:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: I checked the bugs and the testing validation comments seem sane, aging period is good
[16:22] <alkisg> xnox: hi, friendly-recovery.service has 2 syntax errors, could you please have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/friendly-recovery/+bug/1675805 whenever you have some time? Patch included.
[16:22] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1675805 in friendly-recovery (Ubuntu) "Friendly recovery uses invalid font" [Undecided,New]
[16:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: can I approve the -proposed cinder?
[16:28] <bdmurray> sil2100: No, because its Friday.
[16:37] <tinoco> I think https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1317491 has passed enough time in -proposed an has been verified as good. Could someone move it to -updates, please ?
[16:37] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1317491 in libvirt (Ubuntu Trusty) "virsh blockcommit hangs at 100%" [Medium,Fix committed]
[16:37] <bdmurray> tinoco: Not today because it's Friday.
[16:39] <sil2100> bdmurray: ah! You are right!
[16:39] <bdmurray> I always know when its Friday.
[16:39] <sil2100> Time files
[16:40] <sil2100> *flies
[16:40]  * alkisg feels happy when it's summer holidays and doesn't know what day it is :D
[16:40] <tinoco> bdmurray: ok. I'll ping you back on Monday. tks.
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== _salem is now known as salem_
[17:10] <jbicha> bdmurray: why should this file be so private? LP: #1386752
[17:10] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1386752 in whoopsie (Ubuntu RTM) "whoopsie-id is world readable" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1386752
=== powersj_ is now known as powersj
[17:53] <infinity> jbicha: A curious question (that I also don't know the answer to).
[20:43] <jbicha> cyphermox: you don't happen to have a fingerprint reader on your computer, do you?
[20:47] <cyphermox> jbicha: I do, why?
[20:47] <dobey> anyone know how /var/run related stuff works in sbuild? am trying to figure out how to solve a problem with starting services during tests in sbuild in jenkins. it works fine on lp builders, but not so much in jenkins sbuild
[20:49] <Unit193> ginggs: You seem pretty interested in getting last minute universe bugfixes in, interested in sponsoring xfdashboard bugfix release?
[20:49] <jbicha> cyphermox: because gdm is still broken for you, probably? I saw this g-shell commit post 3.24.0: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/commit/?id=c0861b1
[20:51] <ginggs> Unit193: I could be
[20:52] <Unit193> https://git.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+git/xfdashboard or I could get you a dsc.
[20:53] <cyphermox> jbicha: it fails as much on my system with as the one without
[20:56] <ginggs> Unit193: please file a LP bug and include the upstream changelog (and close the bug in d/changelog)
[20:56] <jbicha> cyphermox: it's broken on 2 computers and you haven't filed a bug yet?! :)
[20:57] <ginggs> Unit193: are you interested in doing a xscreensaver merge? :)
[20:57] <cyphermox> jbicha: I'm pretty sure I *did* me-too one of the crash bugs before we figured that it's really something different, and since reverted back to lightdm
[20:58] <cyphermox> having no session-manager is pretty crippling
[20:58] <jbicha> well if you want to try again sometime; you're the only one I've heard from that still has problems loading gdm on zesty
[20:59] <cyphermox> ok, I'll have a look
[20:59] <Unit193> ginggs: Oh, I just checked permissions.  Turns out it was added to our packageset (https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/devel-permissions/2017-February/001033.html)  I might be, lets check it out.
[20:59] <jbicha> (today started out bad for me, I managed to break lightdm :( )
[21:07] <nacc> jbicha: you broke lightdm? I wondered who did
[21:12] <cyphermox> jbicha: to answer your question gdm3 still doesn't work on my laptop with the fingerprint reader, but it's not completing bootup -- I don't have ssh started or any getty, so I can't go dig right now
[21:17] <cyphermox> yuck, and recovering from that is no fun
[21:19] <Unit193> ginggs: Actually,  xscreensaver-data 5.26-1ubuntu1  is even in Xenial, looks like the breaks/replaces can be dropped.
[21:37] <Unit193> ginggs: https://launchpad.net/~unit193/+archive/ubuntu/staging/+sourcepub/7629643/+listing-archive-extra
[22:08] <bdmurray> sarnold: Could you maybe have a look at bug 1582992 again?
[22:08] <ubottu> bug 1582992 in apport (Ubuntu) "broken apport hook: TypeError: Can't convert 'bytes' object to str implicitly" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1582992
[22:13] <sarnold> bdmurray: either it's been fixed or whatever was in my logs that tripped python's OCD is no longer in my logs -- now I only get the "Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged." message. I didn't actually file the bug reports though.
[22:13] <sarnold> (I don't think I _could_ file the bug reports in may)
[22:14] <sarnold> bdmurray: is there anything else you'd suggest checking? or shoudl I add this info to the bug and mark it invalid?
[22:15] <sarnold> sigh looks like I missed arges's question in comment #4 :( .. heh, and your #5
[22:17] <bdmurray> Well I just added #5
[22:18] <bdmurray> presumably it was the Kern.log file in the bug report which was a problem right?
[22:20] <sarnold> I can't find download-crash; is this the right place to look? https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/apport/ubuntu-bugpatterns
[22:22] <bdmurray> Oh, apparently that's just on my local filesystem. :-|
=== salem_ is now known as _salem