[01:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (zesty-proposed/main) [2.15.92-1 => 2.16.0-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[01:14] <jbicha> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/312058096/webkit2gtk_2.15.92-1_2.16.0-1~ubuntu17.04.1.diff.gz
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk+3.0 (zesty-proposed/main) [3.22.11-0ubuntu1 => 3.22.11-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted activity-log-manager [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.7-0ubuntu25]
[03:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.16.0-1]
[03:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.11-0ubuntu2]
[03:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (zesty-proposed/main) [1.7-0ubuntu1 => 1.9-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-settings-daemon (zesty-proposed/main) [15.04.1+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu1 => 15.04.1+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:52] <robert_ancell> unity-settings-daemon 15.04.1+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu1.1 fixes bug 1675612 which appeared in the previous release
[03:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.27.1+17.04 => 2.28+17.04] (no packageset)
[03:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.28+17.04]
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gwc (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.21.19~dfsg0-7 => 0.21.19~dfsg0-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gwc [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.21.19~dfsg0-7ubuntu1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (zesty-proposed/main) [2.11.0-2ubuntu2 => 2.11.0-2ubuntu3] (core)
[06:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected system-config-printer [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu7]
[06:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted system-config-printer [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu8]
[06:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9]
[06:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.9]
[06:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.11.0-2ubuntu3]
[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedev (trusty-proposed/main) [2.3.1-93ubuntu1 => 2.3.1-93ubuntu2~ubuntu14.04.1] (core)
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedev (xenial-proposed/main) [2.3.1-93ubuntu1 => 2.3.1-93ubuntu2~ubuntu16.04.1] (core)
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedev (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-93ubuntu1 => 2.3.1-93ubuntu2~ubuntu16.10.1] (core, lubuntu)
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-44.47~16.04.1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-70.91]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim [sync] (xenial-proposed) [0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedev (precise-proposed/main) [2.3.1-89ubuntu2 => 2.3.1-89ubuntu3] (core)
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-44.47]
[06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd-glib [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.8-0ubuntu1]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.8 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9] (core)
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.27~16.04.1]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.19~16.04.1 => 1.27~16.04.1] (core)
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.27~16.04.1]
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.19~16.04.1 => 1.27~16.04.1] (core)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.27~16.04.1]
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.19~16.04.1 => 1.27~16.04.1] (core)
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9] (core)
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.27~16.04.1]
[06:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.2]
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9]
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9]
[06:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.74.2]
[06:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1]
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-settings-daemon [source] (zesty-proposed) [15.04.1+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu1.1]
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.27~16.10.1]
[06:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.21.3 => 1.27~16.10.1] (core)
[06:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.2] (core)
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.2]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.27~16.10.1]
[07:01] <ginggs> any ~ubuntu-archive members around to remove some universe packages please?
[07:18] <apw> ginggs, you should just ask for what you want done, not if people are here
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.2 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.2] (core)
[07:20] <ginggs> apw: i have a list of several bugs, i didn't want to spam the channel :)
[07:21] <ginggs> LP: #167419 LP: #1671423 LP: #1671429
[07:22] <ginggs> sorry first one was a typo, should be LP: #1671419
[07:23] <ginggs> LP: #1671431 LP: #1671451 LP: #1671452
[07:27] <ginggs> and i'd appreciate if someone would look at an FFe LP: #1672412 - should be straightforward
[07:39] <apw> ginggs, on that FFe i think the question about where does the current stable go if this is done is valid
[07:43] <ginggs> apw, jbicha: the only reason debian are stuck with wine 1.8.7 instead of 2.0 is because of their freeze, i see no reason why we couldn't have wine-development 2.4+ and wine 2.0 in ubuntu
[07:44] <apw> ginggs, and perhaps indeed that is also reasonable, but right now we have two stable releases (with daft names) and your ffe would mean we lose the newer of those
[07:46] <ginggs> apw: i don't think we should be encouraging users who want the stable version to switch to wine-development
[07:46] <apw> ginggs, no this is all a bit of a mess
[07:47] <apw> because they almost cirtianly will, i am sure the first hit on google for "wine not working" will be to update to that, bound to be
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: socklog (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-8 => 2.1.0-8.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twoftpd (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.42-1 => 1.42-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted socklog [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.1.0-8.1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twoftpd [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.42-1.1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uucpsend (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1-4 => 1.1-4.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted uucpsend [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.1-4.1]
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gitlab (zesty-proposed/universe) [8.13.11+dfsg-7 => 8.13.11+dfsg-8] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gitlab [sync] (zesty-proposed) [8.13.11+dfsg-8]
[08:42] <tjaalton> Laney: re https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/1671799 please have a look, it'll take a while to get these sorted through -proposed
[08:52] <acheronuk> apw or anyone else: could you badtest/skiptest etc the test on liqapt against polkit-kde-agent-1? https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#polkit-kde-agent-1
[08:52] <acheronuk> that acc fail there is just it needing -fno-keep-inline-functions passed to GCC (change in gcc since last upload) rather than any actual fail to be concerned on
[08:54] <acheronuk> something to tweak to fix next time a upload is needed for another reason, but probably not now with all re-tests against it's r-deps that brings
[08:54] <flexiondotorg> Please unblock ubuntu-mate-artwork/17.04.8
[09:05] <apw> flexiondotorg, ? that is in zesty-release ?
[09:16] <Laney> right, there's no freeze @ proposed-migration
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.27.1 => 2.28] (no packageset)
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.27.1+16.10 => 2.28+16.10] (no packageset)
[09:39] <Laney> wtf
[09:39] <Laney> why are there now *three* kwin/ppc64el tests running?
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rickshaw (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.5.1.dfsg-1 => 1.5.1.dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rickshaw [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.5.1.dfsg-2]
[09:39] <Laney> acheronuk: I'm killing yours
[09:40] <flexiondotorg> apw Yes, it is. I wasn't seeing it in updates to the test machine. It has arrived now. Thanks.
[09:42] <acheronuk> Laney: whoops. sorry
[09:44] <acheronuk> Laney: could you also see my earlier request to skip the libqapt test for now? thx
[09:44] <acheronuk> if you have time to look
[09:45] <Laney> Not right now
[09:45] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, my bad sorry
[09:46] <LocutusOfBorg> I didn't mean to run against proposed, so I triggered again without
[09:46] <acheronuk> Laney: np. not urgent
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> (I can't see the third one BTW)
[09:47] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: I guess already killed
[09:48] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe, not sure how I could have triggered it
[09:49] <acheronuk> LocutusOfBorg: you didn't. that was me :P
[09:49] <acheronuk> should have check what was running 1st :/
[09:49] <LocutusOfBorg> oh wondeerful! sometimes with my little android screen I misclick them :)
[09:50]  * acheronuk shudders at the thought of the excuses page on android!
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty/zesty/armhf/w/wheel/20170323_235044_a755f@/log.gz
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, ^^ wheel/armhf stuck again
[09:52] <Laney> retry it
[09:52] <Laney> that bug isn't going to get magically fixed
[09:52]  * LocutusOfBorg finds difficult to generate a retry link when it is "running" :p
[09:53] <Laney> retry-autopkgtest-regressions --state RUNNING
[09:53] <LocutusOfBorg> lovely
[09:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I waste a lot of time manually creating such links :)
[09:54] <Laney> heh
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> it is too silent, it exits without printing stuff
[09:56]  * LocutusOfBorg looks at the code
[09:58] <Laney> https://paste.ubuntu.com/24240035/
[09:59] <LocutusOfBorg> ok missing cookie and running uppercase :)
[10:00] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[10:00] <Laney> you only need the cookie for passing the URLs into wget or whatever
[10:00] <Laney> not if you just want to click them
[10:01]  * LocutusOfBorg deletes the cookie
[10:01] <LocutusOfBorg> I prefer to for i in `cat output` open them :p
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: putty (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.67-2 => 0.67-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted putty [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.67-3]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.28+16.10]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.28]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.2-1ubuntu1]
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (yakkety-proposed) [16.03-0ubuntu2.16.10.1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (xenial-proposed) [16.03-0ubuntu2.16.04.1]
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu11.2]
[12:32] <jbicha> ginggs: why don't you see if you can convert 'wine' to 2.0 *before* updating wine-development then?
[12:51] <ginggs> jbicha: for simplicity, i would prefer to stick as close as possible to debian, i.e. wine 1.8.7-2 and wine-development 2.4-1 - but I don't see any reason why you should not convert wine-development 2.0 into wine 2.0, if you wanted to do that
[12:52] <jbicha> ginggs: well you could ask jre to push wine 2.0 to wine/exp
[12:53] <jbicha> I like staying close to Debian too; that's how we ended up wine 1.7 and wine-development 2.0 because that made the most sense there I think
[12:54] <ginggs> jbicha: good idea :) i will ask jre - but i believe he is waiting on an unblock for wine 1.8.7-2
[12:55] <ginggs> jbicha: for reference, debian bug #858371
[12:56] <jbicha> since wine/exp is in use, maybe it could still be pushed to a Debian git branch?
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-libav1.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1 => 1.10.4-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-1 => 1.10.4-1] (desktop-core) (sync)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1ubuntu4 => 1.10.4-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-base1.0 (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-1ubuntu1 => 1.10.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-ugly1.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1ubuntu1 => 1.10.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (zesty-proposed/main) [1.10.3-1ubuntu1 => 1.10.4-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-python1.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1 => 1.10.4-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-rtsp-server1.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1 => 1.10.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-rtsp-server1.0 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-vaapi (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.2-1build1 => 1.10.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-editing-services1.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1 => 1.10.4-1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-vaapi [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[13:35] <Laney> who synced vaapi?
[13:36] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer-vaapi/+publishinghistory
[13:36] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqapt (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.2-0ubuntu4 => 3.0.2-0ubuntu5] (kubuntu)
[13:37] <Laney> Waste of a build, and I had deliberately not synced it.
[13:37] <Laney> It needs to be built after -bad.
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, ^^
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mir (zesty-proposed/main) [0.26.1+17.04.20170209.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.26.2+17.04.20170322.1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: signon-ui (zesty-proposed/main) [0.17+17.04.20161109-0ubuntu1 => 0.17+17.04.20170320-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[14:36] <apw> Laney, it would be so nice if there was a block for those at the queue level, but expressed like the britney ones
[14:38] <Laney> for what?
[14:38] <apw> "i know this won't build don't let anyone sync it till that is fixed"
[14:39] <Laney> meh, maybe, I could have put something into queuebot
[14:40] <Laney> or people could not get involved in something that somebody else is clearly actively working on without consulting with that person
[14:40] <apw> or that
[14:46] <jbicha> yes, I'll try to ask first next time
[14:48] <Laney> thx
[14:57] <salem_> Hello. We are about to land a silo that will include a new package to the archive. Can anybody tell me what's the correct procedure to get someone to review the package for us? This is the branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/mfw-plugin-irc/dummy-branch/files/head:/debian/
[14:59] <apw> salem_, normally you tell us the silo i think
[14:59] <salem_> apw, thanks! it's https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2629
[15:01] <apw> salem_, any idea which of the packages are new ?
[15:04] <salem_> apw, mfw-plugin-irc is the new one. But messaging-framework is now generating a new binary as well: mfw-plugin-dummy. Not sure if new binaries also require review.
[15:07] <apw> salem_, they do
[15:38] <Laney> hmm
[15:38] <Laney> if a silo can clear a depwait of a package in the main archive on one arch, can I copy that source + binaries into the silo?
[15:39] <Laney> that is, will it work to copy that package same back into zesty-proposed?
[15:43] <Laney> s/package same/same package/ ...
[15:48] <Laney> I guess I can just try it
[15:57] <apw> Laney, as in will you be able to retry the broken one and copy it back ... i think i have done htat kind of thing in error and it tends to work, but i am no lp-db expert
[15:57] <Laney> apw: Yeah, can you just copy some binaries back?
[15:57] <Laney> but I figure that even if that doesn't work, the thing which clears the depwait will be copied and the build will happen again anyway
[15:57] <apw> i think i removed it and copied it in again, but hmmmm
[15:58] <apw> right, that would be more normal i guess, copy the bits to teh PPA, prove it fixes things, copy the fixed other package out, depwait clears in -proposed and that build builds
[15:59] <Laney> well it'll be educational anyway :P
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted variety [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.6.0-1ubuntu1]
[15:59] <apw> :)
[15:59] <apw> my most educational experiences have been through accidents :)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webbrowser-app (zesty-proposed/main) [0.23+17.04.20170310-0ubuntu1 => 0.23+17.04.20170321-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync)
[16:22] <infinity> Laney: It can be done, yes.  Or you could just wait until the silo thing is copied to the archive and the arch builds there.  Unless it's blocking silo promotion, and you're trying to hack around that.
[16:27] <Laney> infinity: Yeah, the silo's britney is crying
[16:28] <slangasek> I feel like I should have an animated gif at the ready to go with that comment
[16:29] <apw> i am sure there is an appropriate utube vidio
[16:29] <infinity> Laney: It's going to be less about what the archive allows and more about what the silo machinery lets you do, but I guess you'll find out. :P
[16:30] <infinity> (As in, I suspect silos won't allow you to "release" a package to the archive that has the same version as the archive)
[16:31] <Laney> It thinks that the package is in the release pocket
[16:31] <infinity> So it'll probably need an override on the silo side regardless of how you choose to solve it.
[16:31] <Laney> so I guess that it won't copy it
[16:32] <infinity> Laney: But the answer to the larger LP question is that, yes, you can copy things around willy-nilly and back again, as long as you make sure the binaries always follow you.  Once you end up with two binary builds for the same arch, it'll tell you to get stuffed.
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (xenial-proposed/main) [5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.2 => 5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.4] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:47] <camako> Hi Mir 0.26.2 (bug-fix release, ticket #2600) is in the 'UNAPPROVED' queue. What do I do to get it approved?
[16:47] <Laney> camako: The queue is regularly reviewed, so it'll be considered soon
[16:48] <camako> Laney, thanks
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-libav1.0 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-ugly1.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-editing-services1.0 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-python1.0 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer1.0 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libqapt [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.2-0ubuntu5]
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted signon-ui [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.17+17.04.20170320-0ubuntu1]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mir [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.26.2+17.04.20170322.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webbrowser-app [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.23+17.04.20170321-0ubuntu1]
[17:00] <infinity> robru: Yo, you around?
[17:00] <robru> infinity: hey
[17:00] <infinity> robru: WTF is "Blocking because linux from the same PPA ~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa is invalid" and how do I read that?
[17:01] <apw> that is "not-english"
[17:02] <robru> infinity: that means it's being grouped with other packages copied from that PPA.
[17:02] <apw> robru, which ones
[17:03] <infinity> robru: So, that has two problems: (1) assuming anything outside silo land is a one-ppa-per-landing scenario is wrong.
[17:03] <infinity> robru: (2) the message tells me it's blocking on something that is a valid candidate (so, the message is probably wrong).
[17:03] <robru> apw: you have to ctrl+f for that ppa to find them all
[17:03] <infinity> robru: Yeah.  VERY VERY WRONG assumption.
[17:03] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linux
[17:03] <Laney> linux is blocking itself...
[17:04] <infinity> robru: They stage all their kernels in a PPA.  Requiring linux-raspi2 to be ready before linux promotes is not sane.
[17:04] <infinity> (Which is probably what's happening here, despite the error message being a lie)
[17:04] <infinity> Who thought this was a good idea?
[17:05] <infinity> Not all PPAs are disposable silos.
[17:05] <infinity> And the kernel and security team were using theirs for landing long before silos came along. :P
[17:05] <robru> infinity: well we worked this out with Steve as it was a big problem with bileto having tickets half migrate and half get stuck
[17:06] <apw> robru, does that not all say they are only unhappy because 'self'
[17:06] <infinity> robru: Sure, so only check bileto PPAs.
[17:06] <infinity> (And also fix the error message, but that's less of a concern)
[17:06] <robru> apw: yes, there's a bug in how it records the message so all the packages look to be blocked by themselves
[17:07] <apw> robru, regardless of that and it not being appropriate for out PPA, all of those looks to be ok
[17:07] <apw> oh no, i recind that, there is a block bug for raspi2
[17:07] <infinity> All of what looks to be okay? :P
[17:08] <infinity> apw: Exactly.  raspi2 is blocking master, which is why I'm currently yelling on IRC.
[17:08] <apw> yeah for a moment i didn't notice that (cough) i have blocked it raspi2 too :)
[17:09] <robru> infinity: of you're in a hurry, push a commit that stops Britney from loading sourceppapolicy, otherwise I'll push a real fix later
[17:10] <infinity> robru: What will the fix look like?  A whitelist of LP users whose PPAs will be considered by the code (I think that would probably be sanest), or...?
[17:10] <robru> infinity: yeah
[17:10] <infinity> Kay.  If "later" can be today, I'm happy to wait on it, so the kernel PPA is an obvious production test case.
[17:11] <infinity> It's not urgent that it release this hour, but releasing it before the weekend would be a Good Thing.
[17:11] <robru> infinity: ok I'm just having breakfast, will start on that soon
[17:11] <infinity> \o/
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cargo (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.16.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.17.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcre3 (zesty-proposed/main) [2:8.39-2 => 2:8.39-3] (core) (sync)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cargo [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.17.0-0ubuntu1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (zesty-proposed/main) [1:45.7.0+build1-0ubuntu1 => 1:45.8.0+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:24] <apw> robru, is there hint language to override that block, does an explict unblock fix it ?
[17:25] <robru> apw: no, it's processed after hint policy
[17:25] <apw> that is rather unfortunate
[17:26] <apw> thoough an explicit unblock of which ever one of those is broke, would that make the set copestetic ?
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected landscape-client [source] (trusty-proposed) [14.12-0ubuntu4.14.04]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (trusty-proposed) [14.12-0ubuntu5.14.04]
[18:23] <robru> infinity: https://code.launchpad.net/~robru/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+merge/320976 here's a fix confirmed with tests, please merge
[18:28] <jbicha> infinity: could you re-enable zesty daily iso builds?
[18:28] <infinity> jbicha: Yep, getting there shortly.
[18:30] <infinity> robru: An inverse test that tests, say, ~canonical-kernel-team/ or ~ubuntu-security-proposed/ to make sure no one derps up and blocks all PPAs again would be nice (at least, it looks like the tests only test the ci-train case, and maybe the empty/primary case?)
[18:30] <infinity> robru: Otherwise, lgtm.
[18:47] <robru> infinity: ok, added a test for ignoring other PPAs. please merge
[18:48] <salem_> apw, if you need any other information regarding reviewing the new packages on silo 2629 please let me know.
[18:49] <apw> salem_, sorry got called away, won't be able to sort that today
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: screen (zesty-proposed/main) [4.5.0-3 => 4.5.0-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-welcome (zesty-proposed/universe) [17.04.8 => 17.04.9] (ubuntu-mate)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-dock-applet (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.76-0ubuntu1 => 0.77-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[18:56] <salem_> apw, ok, do you know if there is any other admin who could do it for us? it's a very simple package.
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tftp-hpa [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.2+20150808-1ubuntu1.16.10.1]
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-dock-applet [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.77-0ubuntu1]
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-welcome [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.9]
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted screen [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.5.0-3ubuntu1]
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcre3 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2:8.39-3]
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tftp-hpa [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.2+20150808-1ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tftp-hpa [source] (trusty-proposed) [5.2-7ubuntu3.1]
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-dictionary (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.20.0-3 => 3.24.0-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
[20:37] <slangasek> cyphermox, jbicha: seems that shim-signed is now correctly erroring out if it needs to set up mok and has no input, but at least one ubuntu-gnome user is getting no debconf prompting when installing a driver? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1675870
[20:38] <cyphermox> fun
[20:42] <jbicha> the iso he installed was dated March 21 but the shim-signed fix is from March 22, could he still have been running the old code?
[20:43] <cyphermox> no, it shows it's 1.27
[20:44] <cyphermox> here for some reason this is running in a non-interactive frontend
[20:46] <cyphermox> my guess is it's additional drivers, and the way that's done doesn't get you a frontend because libgtk2-perl isn't installed and it's not falling back to Dialog because the terminal "window" isn't open when this installs.
[20:48] <jbicha> that's during the Install itself isn't it? in the apt history log: Requested by ubuntu-gnome (999)
[20:51] <cyphermox> it looks like it's in live but not done through the installer
[20:51] <cyphermox> Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.452'
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-68-gef18b8ac-0ubuntu1 => 0.7.9-77-g4a2b2f87-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[20:55] <jbicha> oh ok, so shim-signed was updated from the live iso but then he installed nvidia afterwards
[21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfdashboard (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu2 => 0.6.1-0ubuntu1] (xubuntu)
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-transfer-buteo (zesty-release/universe) [0.1+15.10.20151006-0ubuntu1 => 0.1+15.10.20151006-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-transfer-buteo [sync] (zesty-release) [0.1+15.10.20151006-0ubuntu1]
[21:49] <Ukikie> xfdashboard is an unseeded bugfix: https://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce/2016-December/035391.html "Fixed a typo in default application array which prevented the correct default applications to be set up when xfdashboard was started the very first time." (Xfce 12842)
[22:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mir (zesty-proposed/main) [0.26.2+17.04.20170322.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.26.2+17.04.20170322.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer-vaapi (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.4-1 => 1.10.4-1build1] (no packageset)
[22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gstreamer-vaapi [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.4-1build1]
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-panel (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-sound-recorder (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.21.92-2 => 3.24.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-sound-recorder [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-settings-daemon (zesty-proposed/main) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.0-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)