[13:23] <smoser> jgrimm, yeah. there are some others. we didn't know that tiny url expired.
[13:24] <smoser> i dont really know what to do. i guess we could make our own ... just add a 'urls' file or something.
[13:24] <smoser> and then references into it.
[13:37] <jgrimm> smoser, yeah.. or just use the long URLs ugly as they may be
[13:37] <smoser> well, pep8 cries
[13:37] <smoser> or flake8
[13:37] <jgrimm> oh, ewh
[13:37] <smoser> thats why.
[13:38] <jgrimm> tho that should be able to be worked around, no?
[13:38] <smoser> maybe.
[13:38] <smoser> i'd be open to that if you figured out how to do so. make it be ok with long lines that consisted only of a url or something.
[13:39] <smoser> the other problem with shorteners is that mnost do not let you update the target.
[13:39] <jgrimm> smoser, yeah, though that's a smallish issue as you'd just update the docs with the new short url
[13:40] <jgrimm> but i'll look at see if i can escape it enough to make flake8/pep8 happy and be done with it
[14:26] <smoser> rharper, or larsks if you would review https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init/+merge/321709 i'd appreciate it.
[14:26] <smoser> if not, i'm probably just going to pull l)
[15:11] <rharper> smoser: boo =(  we're never going to win the battle if we keep merging these;  you're too nice to downstream =)
[15:12] <smoser> well, larsks +1'd upstream, and some others too. maybe some traction
[15:12] <smoser> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400883
[15:13] <smoser> unfortunately, my latest chnage seems to FAIL more.
[15:13] <smoser> oh duh
[15:15] <smoser> there. https://review.openstack.org/400883/5 shoudl be better now.
[15:15] <rharper> I wish review.openstack had a .diff or .patch link like github
[15:16] <smoser> got to be one in those 674 buttons
[15:16] <rharper> lol
[15:17] <smoser> really weird
[15:17] <smoser> i can get a .base64 file. or a .zip file of the diff!
[15:17] <smoser> but not just the diff
[15:18] <rharper> haha
[15:55] <smoser> rharper, so... if you click 'gitweb' link on the commit at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400883
[15:55] <smoser> takes you https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/nova.git;a=commitdiff;h=0892c10388b35bb3eb2e2ce5b93b31dae5c9e0a3
[15:56] <smoser> which has links you were after. ('raw', 'patch' and such)
[15:57] <rharper> hah, so escape gerrit
[15:57] <rharper> then sanity
[15:58] <rharper> smoser: thanks for finding the sanity button
[15:58] <rharper> even the gitweb view itself is already enough
[15:59] <smoser> yeah, but the gitweb view can't get you a zip file of the .patch file ;)
[15:59] <rharper> only a raw patch which HTTP likely will compress for you for free
[15:59] <rharper> smoser: would it make sense to put 'phy' in VIF_TYPE_PHY ?
[15:59] <rharper> since the rest are enumerated
[16:00] <rharper> maybe there is already a VIF_TYPE_PHY instead of 'phy'
[16:00] <smoser> there is not
[16:00] <smoser> but yeh, i considered that. but its not really a 'vif type'.
[16:00] <smoser> so, ii'll let it be. i pinged a nova core, hopefuly get a +1 out of that.
[16:09] <rharper> y
[19:31] <smoser> larsks, what do you know about ovh ?
[19:31] <smoser> vbah
[19:31] <smoser> not ovh.
[19:31] <smoser> ovirt.
[19:32] <larsks> Not much beyond "manage-y thing for libvirt".
[19:32] <larsks> But I can probably find someone who knows more about ovirt.
[19:32] <smoser> ok. so someon told me that they were having trouvble with ubuntu images in ovir
[19:33] <smoser> and they gave me access to a vm
[19:33] <smoser> and it seems it using a config drive like (openstak config drive)
[19:33] <smoser> but the config drive only has 'latest/
[19:33] <smoser> '
[19:34] <larsks> Would that ever have worked?
[19:35] <smoser> well, it will.
[19:35] <smoser>  http://paste.ubuntu.com/24308380/
[19:35] <smoser> thats the contents.
[19:36] <larsks> Okay.  And briefly looking at sources/helpers/openstack.py we should find the metadata with just a latest/ directory, right?
[19:36] <smoser> yeah, it will. but i'd like to file a bug against ovirt/rhev/whatever-is-doing-that that they should not do that.
[19:37] <smoser> as reading something called 'latest' is kind of never going to really work, and i wish it didnt work :)
[19:37] <larsks> I can do that.  Is there a specific problem it's causing, or is this just proactive?
[19:38] <larsks> Also, what version of ovirt is this?
[19:42] <smoser> larsks, no. its not a specific problem. i should probably put a WARN in or something that says deprecated on reading that.
[19:43] <smoser> it just seems so not really supported, and they very easily could have made the directory named 2014-11-04 or whatever it was.
[19:57] <rharper> smoser: in the past, you mentioned to me that latest was just a pointer, that parsers of the metadata support specific versions/releases of openstack metadata;  latest is a moving target versus the various dated releases
[19:58] <smoser> well, on config drive its a copy. but yeah. its a moving thing.
[22:43] <chatter29> hey guys
[22:43] <chatter29> allah is doing
[22:43] <chatter29> sun is not doing allah is doing
[22:43] <chatter29> to accept Islam say that i bear witness that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and Muhammad peace be upon him is his slave and messenger