[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdm3 (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.0-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome)
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mlucas (zesty-proposed/universe) [14.1-1 => 14.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mlucas [source] (zesty-proposed) [14.1-1ubuntu1]
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-89-gbf7723e8-0ubuntu1]
[07:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios3 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu5]
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.10]
[07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-tweak-tool [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0-0ubuntu2]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-autoar [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-default-settings [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.2]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0-0ubuntu2]
[07:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1:7.4p1-10]
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cvs [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2:1.12.13+real-22]
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ebtables (trusty-proposed/main) [2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1 => 2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1.14.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (zesty-proposed/main) [0.2.34 => 0.2.35] (core) (sync)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pastewebkit (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0-7build1 => 1.0-8] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pastewebkit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0-8]
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: teem (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.11.0~svn6057-1.1ubuntu2 => 1.12.0~20160122-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted teem [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.12.0~20160122-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-46.49] (core, kernel)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-72.93~14.04.1] (kernel)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted arc-theme [source] (zesty-proposed) [20170302-0ubuntu1]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.20]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted friendly-recovery [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.35]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-control-center [sync] (zesty-proposed) [15.04.0+17.04.20170402.6-0ubuntu1]
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-ui-toolkit-gles (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.3.2184+17.04.20170306 => 1.3.2190+17.04.20170327] (ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (zesty-proposed/main) [1.3.2184+17.04.20170306 => 1.3.2190+17.04.20170327] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-46.49]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-72.93~14.04.1]
[11:56] <Mirv> ^ ubuntu-ui-toolkit and ubuntu-ui-toolkit-gles above have a fix from Saviq's team targeted to zesty bug #1671449
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-ui-toolkit-gles [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.2190+17.04.20170327]
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-ui-toolkit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.2190+17.04.20170327]
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4~rc2 => 1.4] (core) (sync)
[12:47] <tjaalton> Laney, infinity: the onscripter test fail is some sort of a race in libavifile/onscripter, much easier to hit with qemu where it
[12:47] <tjaalton> hrm, where it's not 100% reproducible either
[12:48] <tjaalton> with xvfb-run it basically happens each time, but around 50% with Xvfb already running
[12:51] <infinity> tjaalton: Fixable with a large sleep(1) hammer or something? :P
[12:52] <tjaalton> no, since it doesn't help if the server is already running..
[12:52] <Laney> why does the new xorg-server make this happen if it's a race in the thing being tested?
[12:52] <tjaalton> i've no idea
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-autoar [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] <tjaalton> actually it's SDL init and not avifile that's racy
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.4]
[13:37] <tjaalton> ok I know how to work around this in the onscripter test..
[13:37] <tjaalton> by specifying SLD_VIDEODRIVER=dummy
[13:37] <tjaalton> eh
[13:37] <tjaalton> SDL_
[13:38] <tjaalton> doesn't need xvfb then either
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: anet (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1ubuntu1 => 0.3.3-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted anet [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.3-1ubuntu2]
[13:40] <ChrisTownsend> Hello, could I get someone to reject libertine in zesty-proposed?
[13:42] <infinity> ChrisTownsend: By "reject", do you mean "delete"?
[13:42] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: Yes:)
[13:42] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: I guess "reject" is used for when it's in unapproved, right?
[13:42] <infinity> ChrisTownsend: Indeed.
[13:43] <infinity> ChrisTownsend: Why are we deleting it?
[13:43] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: We have a new build the needs to land that fixes the issue of why it won't migrate, but bileto is complaining that a version is in -proposed and won't let us continue.
[13:44] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: fyi, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2576
[13:44] <infinity> Uhh, then bileto has a masive bug.
[13:44] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: robru explained why it's this way, but it is what it is right now.
[13:45] <infinity> How "fun".
[13:45] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bileto/+bug/1678332
[13:46] <infinity> ChrisTownsend: So, you confirm that the libertine and ubuntu-app-launch in this new landing include all the changes currently in proposed (plus whatever new fixes)?
[13:46] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: Yes, absolutely.  It's the same exact silo.
[13:46] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: u-a-l could probably stay, but whatever you think is best.
[13:47] <infinity> ChrisTownsend: Kay.  Deleting libertine.
[13:47] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: Thank you
[13:47] <infinity> ChrisTownsend: GThwacked.
[13:47] <infinity> s/G//
[13:47] <ChrisTownsend> infinity: thanks again!
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ahven (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.6-1.1build1 => 2.6-1.1build2] (no packageset)
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ahven [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.6-1.1build2]
[14:04] <handsome_feng> Hi, could someone help approve the ubuntukylin-theme in upload queue?
[14:47] <mitya57> Can somebody please look at gtk+3.0 and/or qtbase-opensource-src packages in Xenial unapproved queue? I.e. the latter is waiting since March 14th, which looks quite a long to me.
[14:49] <mitya57> (I understand that these are core packages, but my changes are small and all taken from upstream / later Ubuntu releases.)
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-trusty [amd64] (precise-proposed/main) [3.13.0-116.163~precise1] (kernel)
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-116.163] (core, kernel)
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-85.93] (core, kernel)
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.8.0-46.49~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: onscripter (zesty-proposed/universe) [20161102-1 => 20161102-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted onscripter [source] (zesty-proposed) [20161102-1ubuntu1]
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-89-gbf7723e8-0ubuntu1 => 0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[15:25] <Laney> tjaalton: Aren't you worried that this is masking a real bug?
[15:26] <tjaalton> i left it open and will report upstream
[15:26] <tjaalton> i mean open for xorg-server
[15:27] <tjaalton> would that be enough?
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk-doc (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.25-7 => 1.25-7ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:34] <tjaalton> Laney: and no I'm not too worried about the severity, since other distros seem to be running fine with it
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-48-g1c795b9-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[15:38] <Laney> We probably have some of the best automated testing on distro uploads
[15:38] <Laney> Would be good to see it as helping you rather than being in your way IMO
[15:38] <tjaalton> well it's known now
[15:38] <Laney> anyway, if you're happy ...
[15:39] <Laney> I just retried yorick/s390x too and it passed
[15:40] <tjaalton> oh
[15:40] <tjaalton> good
[15:40] <Laney> after running it manually of course
[15:40] <Laney> that's weird but lucky for you :P
[15:40] <tjaalton> hehe
[15:40] <smoser> can i get someone to NACK that cloud-init upload above?
[15:40] <smoser> missed something
[15:40] <Laney> okey
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1]
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (xenial-proposed/restricted) [340.102-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 340.102-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:48] <Laney> tjaalton: you'll need to retry the test with an extra trigger on the new onscripter, once it is built everywhere and published
[15:48] <tjaalton> okay
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-48-g1c795b9-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.9-48-g1c795b9-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: erlang (zesty-proposed/main) [1:19.1.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 1:19.2.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:10] <tsimonq2> cyphermox, infinity: Please review Lubuntu's Ubiquity slideshow changes and upload, if you could. :) https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaellaguna/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/lubuntu-zesty-fixes
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgpod (zesty-proposed/main) [0.8.3-8 => 0.8.3-8.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: seahorse (zesty-proposed/main) [3.20.0-3 => 3.20.0-3.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (zesty-proposed/main) [17.0.2-1ubuntu2 => 17.0.3-1ubuntu1] (core, xorg)
[16:23] <cyphermox> tsimonq2: sure.
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-72.93] (core, kernel)
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-46.49~16.04.1]
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-72.93]
[16:59] <ginggs> slangasek: thanks for the removals on Friday!  Would you take another look at LP: #1671429 please?
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (xenial-backports/main) [2.8-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 2.12-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[17:06] <slangasek> ginggs: yep, thanks for the follow-up, done now
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (yakkety-backports/main) [2.4.1-0ubuntu1.1 => 2.12-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[17:07] <ginggs> slangasek: thanks!
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (xenial-backports) [2.12-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (yakkety-backports) [2.12-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10.1]
[17:12] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-badtest phyml/3:3.2.0+dfsg-7/armhf phyml/3:3.2.0+dfsg-7/ppc64el phyml/3:3.2.0+dfsg-7/s390x'  # since 3.2.0+dfsg-4, autopkgtests depend on pocl-opencl-icd which is not available on these architectures
[17:19] <ginggs> also 'force-badtest roary/3.8.0+dfsg-1/armhf roary/3.8.0+dfsg-1/s390x' # roary is no longer installable on these architectures since bedtools is no longer built for them
[17:24] <slangasek> ginggs: that's clearly a case where the source should be fixed in zesty-proposed to exclude those archs, then
[17:25] <slangasek> instead of using a hint to allow a regression in the autopkgtest into devel
[17:25] <slangasek> (phyml, I mean)
[17:29] <ginggs> slangasek: hmm, phyml itself doesn't depend on pocl-opencl-icd - so theoretically it could still be useful on other architectures with an opencl-icd, e.g. ppc64el with nvidia opencl
[17:52] <slangasek> ginggs: yes, but the autopkgtests should be fixed so that they are skipped on those archs or otherwise not in need of badtest'ing
[17:54] <ginggs> slangasek: ack - i'm wondering now why that depends couldn't be pocl-opencl-icd |  beignet-opencl-icd  | mesa-opencl-icd
[17:55] <ginggs> in fact, mesa-opencl-icd on its own is probably sufficient
[18:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt-xapian-index (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.47ubuntu11 => 0.47ubuntu12] (kubuntu)
[18:24] <Odd_Bloke> slangasek: infinity: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1679252
[18:25] <Odd_Bloke> That bug title sounds terrifying, let me scope it a little better.
[18:28] <Odd_Bloke> There we go: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1679252
[18:28] <Odd_Bloke> I mean, it's still not good. ¬.¬
[18:29] <nacc> heh
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: k3b (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0.3a+git20170320-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[19:04] <slangasek> cyphermox: any outstanding blockers for releasing the shim/grub2 SRU?  I see all the linked bugs verified except bug #1644806, which is a false positive because of the whole shim binary copy thing
[19:13] <cyphermox> slangasek: just a sec, I've been hacking at more slideshow because I broke some chinese translations
[19:16] <cyphermox> slangasek: I think we're good, no outstanding blockers that I can think of
[19:17] <cyphermox> as for 1644806; we're doing all this update in part of fix this.
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libertine (zesty-proposed/main) [1.7+17.04.20170320.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.7.1+17.04.20170331-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (zesty-proposed/main) [122 => 123] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:33] <slangasek> cyphermox: per my comment in 1644806, that particular bug was already fixed by withdrawing the previous SRU
[19:33] <slangasek> anyway, thanks for confirming; releasing them now
[19:33] <cyphermox> slangasek: or that, yes.
[19:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poedit (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8.12-1 => 2.0-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poedit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.0-1~exp1]
[19:54] <Saviq> hi team, can we please ask for libertine https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libertine to be approved? it's gone through QA as usual, targeted to zesty
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: criu (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.12-1ubuntu2 => 2.12.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted criu [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.12.1-1ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-gtk-module (zesty-proposed/main) [0.0.0+16.10.20160913-0ubuntu1 => 0.0.0+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[20:27] <Saviq> hi team, can we please ask for libertine https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/zesty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libertine to be approved? it's gone through QA as usual, targeted to zesty [sorry if duplicate, network issues]
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (trusty-proposed/main) [0.8-0ubuntu2 => 0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.19~14.04.1 => 1.27~14.04.1] (core)
[20:42] <slangasek> caribou: you tagged bug #1452580 v-done but didn't leave a comment confirming which versions you've tested; can you please add that? we're trying to be more consistent about requiring this in the process due to past incidents of people claiming to have tested things they really hadn't
[20:42] <slangasek> caribou: not that bug, this bug: bug #1342580
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (trusty-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.12 => 2.02~beta2-9ubuntu1.14] (core)
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.34.14 => 1.34.16] (core)
[20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xrdp (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-7 => 0.9.1-7build1] (no packageset)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xrdp [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.1-7build1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libertine [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.7.1+17.04.20170331-0ubuntu1]
[21:15] <tsimonq2> infinity, slangasek: Are we still having an issue with exfat-utils not being installed by default? I read the email and I just want to see if this is still an issue.
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xf86-video-armsoc (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-0ubuntu2 => 1.4.1-0ubuntu1] (xorg)
[21:20] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I skimmed that mail and saw a response and have flushed all context; I don't know anything more than you do
[21:23] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok, thanks.
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xserver-xorg-video-freedreno (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4.0-1build1 => 1.4.0-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg (zesty-proposed/main) [1:7.7+16ubuntu2 => 1:7.7+16ubuntu3] (core, xorg)
[21:49] <tjaalton> turns out that freedreno upload was unnecessary, as it can be thrown out instead
[21:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xserver-xorg-video-freedreno [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.0-1ubuntu1]
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed) [3.19.0-85.93]
[22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-trusty [amd64] (precise-proposed) [3.13.0-116.163~precise1]
[22:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-116.163]
[22:29] <slangasek> jbicha: ostree, flatpak SRUs are currently blocked because of flatpak autopkgtest regressions; have you looked into this?  does it simply require a --all-proposed run?
[23:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.12-0ubuntu1 => 2.12-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[23:20] <jbicha> slangasek: yes I've looked into it, I commented on the SRU bug, those are false alarms; the tests never did pass on yakkety before
[23:21] <jbicha> we ignored the zesty version
[23:22] <slangasek> jbicha: ah; but the flatpak tests *did* pass for both archs in the new version of flatpak in yakkety-proposed
[23:23] <slangasek> which is why I wonder if they should be retried with both packages from -proposed
[23:24] <slangasek> (trying; let's see what happens)
[23:24] <jbicha> okk
[23:25] <slangasek> fwiw I think the SRU team tends to ignore pending SRUs with outstanding autopkgtest failures... if there are failures that should be hinted away, best to ping someone here
[23:25] <slangasek> basically, from the summary page, we're not clicking on the SRU bug to look for comments telling us to ignore the autopkgtest failures
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.4-2 => 0.8.5-1] (ubuntugnome) (sync)
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencv (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.4.9.1+dfsg-2.2 => 2.4.9.1+dfsg1-2] (kubuntu) (sync)
[23:52] <jbicha> slangasek: cool, that worked, I think I was confused by ostree's autopkgtests which are almost always broken
[23:52] <jbicha> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak/yakkety/s390x
[23:52] <jbicha> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak/yakkety/armhf
[23:53] <jbicha> while you're here, do you want to demote gconf, mdbtools, etc. to universe?