=== neith_ is now known as neith
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban
[09:21] <Martijn1234> hi guys! sorry to be asking this (for several reasons) but does anyone know if I can download as .deb or as PPA the 1.6.0+bzr2545-0ubuntu1~ppa1 maas packages?!?!?
[09:21] <Martijn1234> I've looked on various sources but can't find it
[10:22] <Martijn1234> nobody? :D
[12:33] <kiko> Martijn1234, uhh, you must be crazy looking for 1.6.0!
[12:33] <kiko> that was not a great release by any measure of the word!
[12:40] <Martijn1234> @kiko... I realize that... unfortunately I have an old box running that, which I want to clone so I can test the upgrade to 1.9 without destroying the original
[12:41] <Martijn1234> not my choice to put 1.6.0 there by the way :-P
[12:42] <Martijn1234> kiko, thanks for the answer anyway ;)
[12:48] <kiko> let me find that for you
[12:49] <Martijn1234> thanks a bunch! :)
[12:50] <kiko> oh yuck it's proper gone from even the librarian
[12:53] <kiko> Martijn1234, why not just rebuild it?
[12:53] <kiko> Martijn1234, I mean, the sources are there
=== Vito_ is now known as Guest6452
[12:54] <Guest6452> Hi! I found support fo HPE monshoot chassis in maas power management. Does it support C7000 BladeChassis.
[12:56] <Martijn1234> kiko, hmmm I guess I could. Would I need to provide it certain defaults in building the debs that were used in generating them originally or is it a fairly straightforward build?
[12:58] <kiko> Guest6452, typically we support anything that does IPMI or iLO
[13:00] <Martijn1234> kiko... I have DB and config file backups. Is there any way to import that data into a blank 1.9 maas? :) (before I try to rebuild the 1.6.0 deb packages)
[13:01] <kiko> well
[13:01] <kiko> it should be possible but it will need to be a manual upgrade run, which will mean getting your hands dirty (I've never done it!)
[13:02] <mup> Bug #1679689 opened: [2.1.5] apt http(s) proxy invalid url for custom TLD <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1679689>
[13:02] <Martijn1234> that certainly inspires confidence :D
[13:03] <Martijn1234> hmmm... maybe I can trick 1.9 into thinking 1.6 is already installed thereby upgrading the DB at least
[13:04] <Martijn1234> food for thought
[13:04] <Martijn1234> kiko, thanks for the info anyway
[13:28] <dakj> Pmatulis, Hi. I've try to re-install everything and the issue is the same. Impossible to make the download of 16.04 image from MAAS, while for 14.04 there isn't an error.
[13:56] <pmatulis> dakj, hi. that's really odd
[13:57] <pmatulis> dakj, i tried yesterday and it worked fine. although i'm using 2.2
[13:57] <pmatulis> dakj, i will have a 2.1 system available to me today or tomorrow. i'll try
[13:58] <pmatulis> dakj, would be interesting if you could upgrade to 2.2 and try. is this a test system?
[13:58] <dakj> pamatulis, I've used 16.04.2 as OS, no it's a lab
[13:59] <dakj> pmatulis, this time I didn't add papa stable of MAAS.
[13:59] <dakj> ppa
[14:01] <dakj> pmatulis, its dashboard reports that "MAAS Version 2.1.3+bzr5573-0ubuntu1 (16.04.1)" but it's a 16.04.2
[14:01] <pmatulis> interesting
[14:08] <dakj> pmatulis, I'm making the update via ppa stable of MAAS, when it' finished I'll try with the download
[14:14] <mup> Bug #1589042 changed: UX: User preference screen truncates SSH keys poorly <MAAS:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1589042>
[14:32] <dakj> pmatulis
[14:33] <dakj> Pmatulis, the command lsb_release -a reports 16.04.2, anyway after the update the result is the same
[15:04] <dakj> Pmatulis, 14.04 yes 16.04 no :-( I don't understand why? Anyone has my same issue?
[15:04] <Martijn1234> kiki, in case you're interested... (and anyone else) upgrading from 1.6.0 to 1.9.5 by starting with a clean machine, copying over backed-up config files and manually creating maasdb in Postresql... then restoring the DB backup... then doing an apt-get install maas... tricks 1.9.5 into thinking it needs to upgrade and results in a (seemingly) workin
[15:04] <Martijn1234> g 1.9.5
[15:05] <Martijn1234> kiko, :p
[15:06] <Martijn1234> I'll have to verify the installation further of course but the initial result is that the web ui is up and the data appears to be all there and (from initial inspection) correct
[15:14] <dakj> Pmatulis, is there another way to test the download? thanks
[15:19] <kiko> Martijn1234, I hope you move to 2.x pretty quickly!
[15:24] <Martijn1234> kiko that is certainly my intention! :D
[15:25] <kiko> dakj, what's the question?
[15:26] <dakj> Kiko, I can't make the download of 16.04 via MAAS with 14.04 any issue, I don't know why
[15:27] <kiko> I don't think I understood your question
[15:27] <kiko> "via MAAS with 14.04"?
[15:32] <dakj> kiko, Via MAAS I can make the download of 14.04 but no if I try to download the 16.04 (http://askubuntu.com/questions/899073/maas-dont-make-the-download-of-ubuntu-16-04-lts-image)
[15:38] <dakj> Kiko, I've also force that via maas $PROFILE boot-resources import
[15:38] <dakj> Kiko, I've also force that using maas $PROFILE boot-resources import but nothing.
[15:41] <kiko> what do your logs say?
[15:42] <dakj> Kiko, where can I run that?
[15:43] <kiko> run what sorry? :)
[15:44] <mup> Bug #1408106 opened: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs <aa-kernel> <aa-parser> <aa-tools> <kernel-da-key> <AppArmor:In Progress by jjohansen> <MAAS:New> <apparmor (Ubuntu):Confirmed for sbeattie> <linux (Ubuntu):Triaged by jjohansen> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1408106>
[15:47] <mup> Bug #1408106 changed: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs <aa-kernel> <aa-parser> <aa-tools> <kernel-da-key> <AppArmor:In Progress by jjohansen> <MAAS:New> <apparmor (Ubuntu):Confirmed for sbeattie> <linux (Ubuntu):Triaged by jjohansen> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1408106>
[15:56] <mup> Bug #1408106 opened: attach_disconnected not sufficient for overlayfs <aa-kernel> <aa-parser> <aa-tools> <kernel-da-key> <AppArmor:In Progress by jjohansen> <MAAS:New> <apparmor (Ubuntu):Confirmed for sbeattie> <linux (Ubuntu):Triaged by jjohansen> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1408106>
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk
[17:57] <mup> Bug #1580405 changed: set_initial_networking_configuration shouldn't raise ValidationError <MAAS:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1580405>
[20:13] <dakj> Kiko, sorry I lost the connection, I mean where do I see the log?
[20:20] <dakj> Kiko, I pasted the Maas.log here https://paste.ubuntu.com/24315569/
[20:23] <kiko> dakj, how do you know you are missing images?
[20:28] <dakj> Kiko, look the post here http://askubuntu.com/questions/899073/maas-dont-make-the-download-of-ubuntu-16-04-lts-image
[20:29] <dakj> Kiko, 14.04 finishes the download and run the sync, 16.04 starts then around 96% kill the process
[20:32] <kiko> dakj, is your network really slow or limited?
[20:32] <kiko> dakj, look at all the logs in /var/log/maas
[20:34] <dakj> Kaki, the network has not any limitation, I've posted https://paste.ubuntu.com/24315569/ it's the log when I run the download
[20:40] <kiko> dakj, I'm stumped. is there a proxy in the way?
[20:49] <dakj> No, there is a firewall but as MAAS makes the download of 14.04 why not for 16.04. This issue was not for the my last lab
[20:49] <dakj> Kaki, I've this issue from 2 days when is published Openstack Autopilot
[20:50] <dakj> With 16.04
[21:00] <dakj> Kiko, then if the problem is the firewall/proxy the download can't begin, instead it starts and then kill
[21:30] <mup> Bug #1679844 opened: [2.2] Pressing <enter> in the UI should not cancel actions <ui> <ux> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1679844>
[21:31] <dakj> Kiko, I post the var/log/maas/regiond.log (https://paste.ubuntu.com/24315974/) there is a lot of errors
[21:43] <dakj> Kiko, have you seen that paste? Any suggests?
[22:01] <pmatulis> dakj, looks like a network protocol error. but, if so, why just with 16.04 images? quite odd. how is your network set up (proxies, nat, etc)?
[22:01] <pmatulis> consider using tcpdump during a download
[22:07] <dakj> pmatulis, there is just a firewall between the host and internet, it's so strange because if the issue is that I don't undestand why the download starts and around 95% it stops. Then this issue is present after the canonical has published Openstack autopilot because before that the download works well also for 16.04
[22:12] <pmatulis> dakj, you did something with autopilot?
[22:28] <roaksoax> b/win 5