| axw | hml: we can't hear you | 01:49 |
|---|---|---|
| axw | hml: still there? | 01:49 |
| thumper | happy birthday axw :) | 02:12 |
| axw | thanks thumper :) | 02:12 |
| axw | thumper jam menn0: speaking of, I'm going out for lunch, so won't be able to make tech board today | 02:13 |
| thumper | ack | 02:13 |
| menn0 | axw: np | 02:14 |
| babbageclunk | axw: Oh yeah, happy birthday! Hope the birthday lunch is super delish. | 02:31 |
| axw | babbageclunk: thanks | 02:31 |
| thumper | fuck, fuck, fuckity fuck | 02:42 |
| thumper | does anyone here understand leadership as it was in 1.25? | 02:42 |
| blahdeblah | thumper: You really know how to brighten my day. :-) | 02:44 |
| thumper | :) | 02:44 |
| thumper | blahdeblah: don't suppose you understand it? | 02:44 |
| blahdeblah | I don't, but axino might. :-) | 02:44 |
| thumper | looks like there should be an entry in the leases collection for it | 02:46 |
| thumper | but I don't see entries there for the services I expect | 02:46 |
| thumper | like... | 02:46 |
| thumper | there aren't any | 02:46 |
| thumper | just one for a clokc | 02:46 |
| thumper | clock | 02:46 |
| thumper | this is crack | 02:47 |
| veebers | Happy Birthday axw :-) | 02:47 |
| axw | thanks veebers | 02:47 |
| anastasiamac | thumper: dunno about 1.25 but in 2., leases collection has an aaplication-leader "clock" , there is also a "clock" and a "lease" per model in that collection... these r both tagged as "singular-controller" | 02:49 |
| * thumper sighs | 03:25 | |
| thumper | FFS | 03:25 |
| thumper | my old DB dump didn't have any leases | 03:25 |
| thumper | but now they are there | 03:25 |
| thumper | why?... | 03:25 |
| thumper | I've got nothing | 03:25 |
| jam | menn0: btw, I'm no longer sure that deleting documents as you iterate was the cause of the problem vs the bson.M vs bson.D issue. | 04:41 |
| menn0 | jam: could it have happened at any time? | 04:42 |
| jam | menn0: what I mean is that using the old "Id interface{}" meant that some % of the time documents would fail to be removed | 04:43 |
| jam | which might have been the actual cause of them not getting removed | 04:43 |
| jam | rather than deletions causing my iteration to be wrong. | 04:43 |
| menn0 | jam: ok right | 04:44 |
| jam | menn0: so I've pushed up the changes from your review. IF you could look at it today so I can land this and then iterate on the next steps? | 05:15 |
| menn0 | jam: looking now | 05:15 |
| menn0 | jam: ship it on the first one | 05:24 |
| menn0 | jam: why does the second one mention ericsnowcurrently? :) | 05:26 |
| menn0 | jam: done | 05:27 |
| jam | menn0: I've seen something like that as well. Things like "this change was updated by ericsnowcurrently" | 07:13 |
| jam | thanks for the review | 07:13 |
| === frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
| menn0 | jam: could be the reviewboard integration as eric set that up? | 09:24 |
| jam | menn0: yeah, probably | 09:25 |
| jam | menn0: I wanted to run something by you | 09:25 |
| jam | menn0: I did find a few things running on a live controller | 09:25 |
| jam | one interesting thing | 09:25 |
| jam | is that it is actually reasonably to get down to 0 transactions in txns | 09:25 |
| jam | which means "pruneFactor" starts to become meaningless | 09:25 |
| jam | and it just causes pruning to run all the time | 09:25 |
| jam | menn0: yeah, I bet that's it, because it adds the reviewboard link to the pull request | 09:26 |
| jam | menn0: I'm thinking to add something that would make the behavior configurable / default to a minimum of 100/1000 transactions | 09:26 |
| jam | and maybe a maximum ignoring pruneFactor | 09:27 |
| SimonKLB | will LXC containers always show hardware specs as 0 ? | 09:35 |
| hoenir | After writing a provider and a api client from scratch it's amazing how well juju is structured in interfaces. | 09:55 |
| hoenir | And how easy is to embed and compose the functionalities. I really didn't need to look up on some docs or anything like that. I just watched and readed the code... on some places it laks comments but overall a good experience. | 09:56 |
| hoenir | Good job done guys ! | 09:56 |
| hoenir | Well done.. | 09:57 |
| hoenir | * | 09:57 |
| hoenir | Did anyone noticed this when writing a provideR? | 09:57 |
| Dmitrii-Sh | Hi. Question: https://jujucharms.com/docs/2.1/reference-charm-hooks#leader-elected <- this doc says "If the election process is done internally to the service, other code should be used to signal the leader to Juju.". However, I don't see any hook tools to assert leadership http://paste.ubuntu.com/24319908/ So, as far as I understand, there is no manual way | 12:08 |
| Dmitrii-Sh | to designate a leader and the doc is wrong. Does anyone know if it is supposed to be that way and if this has not been implemented for a reason? | 12:08 |
| Dmitrii-Sh | "Authors can use this hook to take action if their protocols for leadership, consensus, raft, or quorum require one unit to assert leadership." - this doesn't make much sense as well as if you have a network partition you may actually have multiple leaders in separated clusters. If Juju has access to both clusters, for example, it may get conflicting | 12:14 |
| Dmitrii-Sh | requests for leadership from that 'other code that signals internal notion of leadership to juju' | 12:14 |
| === akhavr1 is now known as akhavr | ||
| admcleod | sinzui: fyi, magpie now does MTU | 15:34 |
| sinzui | admcleod: interesting. I will look soon | 15:34 |
| cmars | morning folks, could i get a review of https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7195 please? | 15:38 |
| === frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
| sinzui | babbageclunk: did you see bug 1680046 | 21:04 |
| mup | Bug #1680046: Bootstrap failed on maas 1.9 because invalid character '<' looking for beginning of value <bootstrap> <ci> <maas-provider> <regression> <juju:Triaged by 2-xtian> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1680046> | 21:04 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: no I hadn't - looking now | 21:11 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: is the test running against maas 1.9.5? | 21:13 |
| * sinzui looks | 21:15 | |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: no, 1.9.4+bzr4592-0ubuntu1~trusty1. It is scheduled to be upgraded to 1.9.5+bzr4599-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 this weekend | 21:17 |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: I can make it upgrade right now | 21:18 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: hmm, that might be it then. I ran my smoke test against 1.9.5. | 21:18 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: Is breaking juju for 1.9.4 a problem? | 21:19 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: (I can see that it might be.) | 21:19 |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: Awkward answer. the answe no we should not, but we do love the maas team when they say the only fix for a bug is to upgrade to the latest maas | 21:20 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: yeah, sure - it would be pretty annoying for a user who has a working 1.9.4 maas | 21:21 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: I'll roll back to my 1.9.4 snapshot and try to work out why it's broken against it. | 21:21 |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: 1.9.5 is only 6 days old. so few will have it. Like us we don't get updated every day. BUT.... | 21:22 |
| sinzui | if you don't fix the issue soon, my maas will go to 1.9.5 anyway | 21:22 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: yay easy fix! | 21:22 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: j/k | 21:22 |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: I am half serious myself. I think the issue will fix itself if I don't interviene with the servers update schedule | 21:23 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: well, I guess we can discuss more in about 5 mins | 21:25 |
| anastasiamac | babbageclunk: sinzui: it's on the list \o/ | 21:25 |
| anastasiamac | (minutes)* | 21:25 |
| cmars | morning folks, can i get a review of https://github.com/juju/description/pull/11 please? | 21:55 |
| cmars | https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7202 will soon follow | 21:56 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: weirdly, I can bootstrap on 1.9.4, although it requires a lot of retries for the bootstrap to successfully ssh to the deployed controller machine | 22:05 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: Could I get access to the maas where this test was failing? | 23:03 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: no worries, I worked it out - bootstrapping against it now. | 23:16 |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: you may already have,. did I send you the snippetsmfrom cloud-city to get into munna? | 23:16 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: I eventually remembered to look in there. | 23:17 |
| sinzui | babbageclunk: are you in? | 23:17 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: yup yup | 23:18 |
| babbageclunk | sinzui: ok, I see why my smoke test didn't find this now. | 23:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!