/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/04/06/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.27~16.10.1 => 1.28~16.04.1] (core)00:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.28~16.04.1]00:07
handsome_fengHi, Could anyone help approving ubuntukylin-theme? FinalFreeze is coming... Thank you in advance!00:55
tsimonq2Hey handsome_feng :)01:37
handsome_fengHi, tsimonq2 :)01:37
tsimonq2handsome_feng: Unfortunately I don't have the access, I just wanted to say hi ;)01:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.27~16.04.1 => 1.28~16.04.1] (core)01:38
handsome_fenghehe... Thanks anyway !01:39
Bashing-om\01:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eom [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1]04:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-terminal [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.20.2-1ubuntu7]04:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnutls28 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.5.6-4ubuntu4]04:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1]04:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.0~bzr482-0ubuntu1]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-babel [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.3.4+dfsg.1-2ubuntu1]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.28]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.11]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-control-center [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tbb [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.4~20160526-0ubuntu2]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pika [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-1ubuntu1]04:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cuneiform (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [1.1.0+dfsg-5build5 => 1.1.0+dfsg-5ubuntu4] (no packageset)04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cuneiform [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-5ubuntu4]04:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0.17.19 => 4.10.0.18.20] (core, kernel) (sync)06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-17.19 => 4.10.0-18.20] (core, kernel) (sync)06:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-17.19 => 4.10.0-18.20] (core, kernel) (sync)06:14
Saviqhi team, is there chance to push the packages from https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2668 through the queue? they've been waiting since last night06:26
Saviqit's all bugfixes06:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telegram-desktop (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.14-1 => 1.0.14-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)06:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telegram-desktop [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.14-1ubuntu1]06:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lm-sensors (zesty-proposed/main) [1:3.4.0-3 => 1:3.4.0-4] (core) (sync)07:29
LocutusOfBorgsomebody from release team, can you please ignore tests of r-cran-curl (blocking curl migration)?07:38
LocutusOfBorgrationale is: testsuite is bad, just not ordering cookies before checking them, and I don't want to upload such testsuite fix at this very moment07:38
LocutusOfBorghttps://github.com/jeroen/curl/commit/f885cdbd37e4361ec0f8de679223636e8ea6803007:38
LocutusOfBorgthe new release should be good but I prefer to don't touch r-* stuff07:38
LocutusOfBorgI could grab some patches, but meh, too risky at this point, it is a testsuite issue, the tool is good07:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libarchive (zesty-proposed/main) [3.2.1-6 => 3.2.2-2] (core) (sync)07:40
LocutusOfBorglibarchive is a new security release ^^07:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0.18.20]07:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-18.20]07:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-18.20]07:41
ypwonginfinity, could you take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntukylin-theme/+bug/1677157 when you have time, this package needs AA to approve.07:45
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1677157 in ubuntukylin-theme (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Update ubuntukylin-theme to 1.7.0" [Undecided,Fix committed]07:45
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
infinityypwong: I'll get there before the freeze today.07:55
ypwonginfinity, thanks!07:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-raspi2 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0.1003.5]08:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-raspi2 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-1003.5]08:00
LocutusOfBorgLaney, ^^ wrt curl :)08:06
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Why are you against fixing the testsuite?08:07
LocutusOfBorgbecause we are too late in the release cycle for doing such things, for zesty + 1 the new release will be uploaded anyway08:08
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Having an XFAIL makes the whole testsuite useless.  If there's a clear and obvious fix, JFDI?08:08
LocutusOfBorgthe end user won't benefit in any case from my upload08:08
infinityLocutusOfBorg: We're not too late in the release cycle.  I'm literally just telling you that.08:08
LocutusOfBorgoh ok08:08
LocutusOfBorgif you are confortable fine by me08:08
infinityLocutusOfBorg: End users benefit from regression testing not being broken.08:08
LocutusOfBorgok got it08:08
Laneydid I say something about curl before to deserve getting pinged about it? :P08:09
LocutusOfBorginfinity, just to abuse of your time, do you know why gcc is not complaining for this simple code?08:15
LocutusOfBorghttp://paste.ubuntu.com/24326368/08:15
LocutusOfBorgdoko, ^^08:15
LocutusOfBorgI would expect an int a[n] with n undefined to be a serious warning or error in gcc08:15
* LocutusOfBorg his world just crashed08:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected screen [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.5.0-5ubuntu2]08:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-curl (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1 => 2.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-curl [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1ubuntu1]08:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.23.6+17.04 => 2.23.6+17.04ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)08:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity8 (zesty-proposed/main) [8.15+17.04.20170328.3-0ubuntu1 => 8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync)08:42
Saviqhi again, team, is there still time to get things in the release? I know final freeze is today, just not sure when today :) - was told uploading last night should still allow for things to get in08:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.0~rc2+docker1.12.6-0ubuntu1~16.10.1]08:43
Laneywe're going to review the queue today08:44
Saviqso we've unity8, qtmir{,-gles}, qtubuntu{,-gles} and qmenumodel waiting in the queue, if you could please have a look08:44
LocutusOfBorgwhy did screen got rejected?08:45
LocutusOfBorgthe current patch is incomplete08:46
SaviqLaney, ack, thanks08:46
apwLocutusOfBorg, because there is a possible interaction with the screen we use for release-upgrading08:47
apwLocutusOfBorg, and until that has been discussed we did not want it accepted accidentaly08:47
LocutusOfBorgI discussed that screen stuff with the Debian maintainer, and he told me that the patch was "half correct", but incomplete, just forwarding that message to you :)08:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted runc [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.0~rc2+docker1.12.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]08:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-18.20] (core, kernel)08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.23.6+17.04ubuntu1]08:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-18.20]08:58
acheronukfreeze @ normal 21:00 UTC (ish)?09:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.23.6+17.04 => 2.23.6+17.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)09:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.23.6+17.04.1]09:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (zesty-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu502 => 20101020ubuntu503] (core)09:21
rbalintI would like to get in kodi 17.1, see details at: #85970809:25
rbalintdisclaimer: I'm kodi's maintainer :-)09:26
infinityrbalint: kodi's not seeded, it's fine to go in, so long as you don't break it all in the process.09:41
infinityrbalint: Although, pointing me at a Debian bug is curious.  Did you mean to ping the Debian release team? ;)09:42
Ukikiehttps://bugs.debian.org/859708?09:42
ubot5Debian bug 859708 in release.debian.org "unblock: kodi/2:17.1+dfsg1-2" [Normal,Open]09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-curl (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3-1ubuntu1 => 2.3-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-curl [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.3-1ubuntu2]09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tellico (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3.9+dfsg.1-1.1 => 2.3.9+dfsg.1-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tellico [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.3.9+dfsg.1-1.1ubuntu1]09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (zesty-proposed) [20101020ubuntu503]09:47
* Laney spanks LocutusOfBorg 09:49
infinityLaney: Should we be seeing this?09:49
* LocutusOfBorg agrees with Laney 09:50
LocutusOfBorgfixing testsuite with upstream cherry-picks and no upstream new code is PITA09:50
* LocutusOfBorg "PITA<->SPANKS", pun intended09:50
LocutusOfBorgsadly I'm with mobile tethering, can't test in my chroot because of too many r dependencies to drag :/09:51
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal-gtk [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.6-1]09:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xdg-desktop-portal [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.6-1]09:52
LaneyDon't get that pun :P09:57
LocutusOfBorg(after a spank you can get Pain In The Ass) :)09:59
Laneyoho09:59
rbalintinfinity: no, i meant asking for opinion in advance10:02
rbalintinfinity: i can open the LP bug as well for sync, but if it is rejected anyway there is no point10:03
infinityrbalint: I'm fine with it.10:04
LocutusOfBorgrbalint, sync from experimental?10:04
rbalintinfinity: IMO kodi is a killer app both on Debian and Ubuntu and and releasing latest stable point release would be the best10:04
rbalintLocutusOfBorg: yes, for now10:04
LocutusOfBorgnot sure if you have permissions or not, in case please ask :)10:04
rbalintLocutusOfBorg: i'm hoping to get it in Stretch, too, but this is another story10:05
LocutusOfBorgI know, I read the bug on debian-release before you posted it here :p10:05
infinityrbalint: Sync done.  Don't need a bug.10:06
infinityrbalint: Any other kodi-related bits that need to come with it, or just the base 'kodi' package?10:06
rbalintinfinity:  no, addons are fine it seems10:06
infinityKay.10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kodi (zesty-proposed/universe) [2:17.0+dfsg1-3 => 2:17.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset) (sync)10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kodi [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2:17.1+dfsg1-1]10:08
rbalintinfinity: thanks!10:08
KaleoLaney, you off today?10:22
KaleoLaney, I still have https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-terminal-app/+bug/1680114 :/10:22
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1680114 in ubuntu-terminal-app (Ubuntu) "[FFe] New ubuntu-terminal-app release with UX changes" [Undecided,New]10:22
LaneyKaleo: No, I'm working through the queue now10:23
LaneyYou can publish and get it in the queue if you want10:23
KaleoLaney, you mean publish the silo?10:23
KaleoI'm sorry I'm not familiar with the FFe process10:23
LaneyIt's fine at this point, since it'll get held in the queue and someone can review it there at the same time as they review the FFe10:24
Laney(since we are in freeze)10:24
Kaleooh I see10:24
jbichaKaleo: are you able to publish or do you need someone else to?10:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (zesty-proposed/main) [1.15.0-3ubuntu4 => 1.15.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)10:28
tjaalton^ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/168038510:31
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1680385 in sssd (Ubuntu) "FFE: sssd bugfix update 1.15.2" [Wishlist,New]10:31
infinityLaney: Should I infer from the above that you're looking at the silo landings in the queue?10:35
Laneyinfinity: Nope10:36
Laneyalthough I've ticked two boxes10:36
infinityLaney: Oh. :)10:36
infinityLaney: If you were, I was just going to point out the oddity of unity8 landing twice from two silos, and that one should be sure that the second includes the first.10:36
LaneyI will work through the queue but I would like it if I only had to do 50 or 33⅓% of it :P10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-session [sync] (zesty-proposed) [17.3.20+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu1]10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity8-desktop-session [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.13+17.04.20170328.1-0ubuntu1]10:37
infinityLaney: Fair.  I can take 2668 and 2705 (ie: the two with unity8)10:38
infinitytjaalton: That's quite the diff for a "bugfix release".10:39
tjaaltoninfinity: the translations?10:41
infinitytjaalton: No, the code. :P10:41
infinitytjaalton: Not a NACK, but I do want to verify some of your assertions.10:41
tjaaltonit added the files provider and socket responder helper, neither of which aren't used yet by default10:43
tjaaltonthey cut 1.15.0 for debian, without those features.. they were polished for .110:43
infinitytjaalton: Without reading the 1MB diff, do you know off-hand where to point me to code that indicated the files provider isn't used by default?10:44
tjaaltonit's not added to nsswitch.conf10:46
tjaaltonlibnss-sss postinst adds 'sss', but not 'files'10:47
tjaaltonthis has been in place for some time now10:48
tjaaltonalso there's no default sssd.conf installed10:48
infinityRight, okay.  And --enable-files-domain would universally enable it, I think, but you didn't add that to rules.10:48
tjaaltonfor buster & AA it'll probably happen10:48
tjaaltonoh indeed10:48
tjaaltonyeah that would probably mean no conffile needed10:49
infinitySure, I'm all for sssd eventually obsoleting nscd to the point where we can remove it from glibc upstream and forget it ever happened, but today isn't that day.10:49
tjaaltondidn't look yet10:49
tjaaltonyep10:49
infinityI'm curious if we could actually do a reliable nscd->sssd migration path and just replace the nscd package with a migration stub.10:50
infinityMight be something to consider for a future LTS.10:50
tjaaltonyeah10:50
infinityThough, nscd has had improvements for some of it's worse bugs, and it likely smaller.10:50
infinitySo, ... *handwavy*10:50
tjaaltonsssd daemon is split in smaller bits, so with just files it's smaller than when configured against ms ad10:51
tjaaltoni haven't tested this theory though. and socket activation etc isn't enabled either10:52
tjaaltonwhen that happens it'll only run what's needed10:52
infinitySocket activation for a resolver sounds like a really stupid idea.10:52
infinityOf all the things on my system that I want to respond INSTANTLY, the resolver is at the top of the list.10:53
tjaaltonwell, used for some of the bits10:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.15.2-1ubuntu1]10:55
tjaaltonthanks10:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-47.50] (core, kernel)10:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-themes (zesty-proposed/main) [16.10+17.04.20170309-0ubuntu1 => 16.10+17.04.20170406-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync)11:00
ginggsLaney: LP: #1676923 i think all the info is there now.  andt BTW tzdata 2017b-1 just uploaded https://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tzdata/news/20170406T100345Z.html11:05
ubot5Launchpad bug 1676923 in python-tz (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync python-tz 2016.7-0.3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/167692311:05
rbalintinfinity: could lxml be hinted to migrate despite snapcraft autopkgtest issues?11:05
rbalintinfinity: they seem to be testbed network related problems11:05
infinityrbalint: "network related problems"?11:05
rbalintinfinity: it keeps failing in different ways related to the proxy11:05
rbalinthttps://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty/zesty/armhf/s/snapcraft/20170404_231948_bb766@/log.gz11:06
rbalintinfinity:  now the wiki pull which used to be working: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty/zesty/armhf/s/snapcraft/20170406_071511_dffe9@/log.gz11:06
infinityrbalint: We'll just retry it a few times and see if it fixes itself. :P11:07
rbalintinfinity: ok11:07
rbalintinfinity: i asked cyphermox to restart it 2 times alreade11:08
rbalinty11:08
rbalintinfinity: what is the usual upper limit? :-)11:08
infinityrbalint: 37.11:09
Laneywhy is it so crap on armhf?11:09
infinityDifferent network?  lxd dropping connections prematurely?11:10
rbalintLaney: good question, maybe testbed location?11:10
Laney"socket.gaierror: [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution"11:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1:7.3p1-1ubuntu0.1]11:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: greybird-gtk-theme (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.22.2-1 => 3.22.2-1ubuntu1] (xubuntu)11:11
rbalintinfinity: 37: ok :-)11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.2]11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adwaita-icon-theme (zesty-proposed/main) [3.23.91.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.0-0ubuntu1] (core)12:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-terminal-app (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.218ubuntu2 => 0.7.218+17.04.20170405.7-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)13:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphviz (trusty-proposed/main) [2.36.0-0ubuntu3.1 => 2.36.0-0ubuntu3.2] (core)13:21
infinityLaney: Where are ppc64el and s390x tests going?  It seems like they get queued, and the queue gets drained without tests actually happening.13:27
Laneycan you give me an example?13:27
apw"    " <- :)13:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librsvg (zesty-proposed/main) [2.40.16-1 => 2.40.16-2~svn1] (core)13:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lazarus (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.6.2+dfsg-1 => 1.6.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)13:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lazarus [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.6.2+dfsg-2]13:32
infinityLaney: All?13:39
LaneyI get that13:39
infinityLaney: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r-cran-curl13:39
LaneyBut it's much quicker for me to look up a specific request that you're noticing a problem with13:39
LaneyTa13:39
infinityLaney: I didn't make those requests, but I assume they included all arches.  I made other requests that seem to have similar "where did they go?" issues.13:39
Laneyhttps://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty/?format=plain&prefix=zesty/ppc64el/r/r-cran-curl/13:40
LaneyThere's results there that aren't in the web UI13:40
infinityAh-ha.13:40
LaneyI guess britney is seeing them okay?13:41
infinityProbably.13:41
* infinity goes to look.13:41
LaneyRight, so probably a problem there, let's see13:41
infinityLaney: Yep, as you suspected, britney has results for that.13:41
Laneyif you want to know, this is juju ssh autopkgtest-web/0 from prod-ues-proposed-migration@wendigo13:41
infinityI feel like I won't remember that.13:42
infinityIs there a cheat sheet for casual autopkgtest maintenance?13:42
Laneysomewhat: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure#Administration13:43
LaneyERROR:root:Failure to fetch swift results from http://10.24.0.175:8080/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-zesty?marker=zesty%2Farmhf%2Fc%2Fcinder%2F20161028_120634_e00b4%40&delimiter=%40: Remote end closed connection without response13:43
LaneySeems like some acid rain in the cloud13:43
* Laney pinged a sysadmin and will go have lunch now while it gets looked at13:48
LaneyI think it recovered itself13:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (xenial-proposed/main) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3 => 4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.1] (core)13:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iproute2 (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3 => 4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.10.1] (core)13:54
LocutusOfBorgwill anybody merge systemd from Debian? I'm worried about the dnssec change mentioning zesty but apparently not uploaded there13:55
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho
=== slashd- is now known as slashd
=== akxwi-dave_ is now known as akxwi-dave
smoserbdmurray, i've updated those now. sorry for leaving them so sparse.14:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdialog (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kfind (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keditbookmarks (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: konqueror (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)14:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (zesty-proposed/main) [2.28-2ubuntu1 => 2.28-3ubuntu1] (core)14:30
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bamf (zesty-proposed/main) [0.5.3+16.10.20160929-0ubuntu1 => 0.5.3+17.04.20170406-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)14:55
stgrabercan someone look at lxd and btrfs-progs in the queue, would like those fixes in the archive soon :)15:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-theme [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.7.0]15:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted btrfs-progs [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.9.1-1ubuntu1]15:51
apwstgraber, ^15:51
Laney diff from 56.0.2924.76-0ubuntu2.1343 to 57.0.2987.98-0ubuntu1.1348 (48.4 MiB)15:53
LaneyWhat. On. Earth.15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.12-0ubuntu3]15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-app-launch [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu1]15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-panel [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1]15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-api [sync] (zesty-proposed) [8.7+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]15:53
stgraberapw: thanks15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kfilereplace (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: klinkstatus (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kimagemapeditor (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kommander (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:16.12.1-0ubuntu1 => 4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:57
Laneybarry: how come this python-requests-unixsocket is the same upstream version as is already in the archive but has different upstream contents?16:00
LaneySeems to only be metadata ...16:00
LaneyI think it's okay otherwise. Not sure why all the empty dh_ overrides...16:03
LaneySomeone else could accept that if they wanted to, if the explanation is sane16:04
* Laney back in a couple of hours16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-filemanager-app [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.4+17.04.20170323-0ubuntu1]16:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.28-3ubuntu1]16:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected unity8 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu1]16:15
barry 16:18
barryLaney: that's weird.  it certainly shouldn't be different and i can't think of what i might have done to cause that16:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librsvg [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.40.16-2~svn1]16:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdialog [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keditbookmarks [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kfind [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted konqueror [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kfilereplace [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kimagemapeditor [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova-lxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [14.2.0-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 14.2.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (ubuntu-server)16:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted klinkstatus [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kommander [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1]16:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libqapt (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.2-0ubuntu5 => 3.0.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)16:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: muon (zesty-proposed/universe) [4:5.6.0-0ubuntu2 => 4:5.7.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)16:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keystone (xenial-proposed/main) [2:9.2.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:9.3.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)16:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (xenial-proposed/main) [2:9.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 2:9.1.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)16:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qmenumodel [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.12+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtmir [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtubuntu [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.64+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtmir-gles [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtubuntu-gles [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.64+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity8 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu2]16:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accounts-qml-module [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.6+17.04.20170405-0ubuntu1]16:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-action-api [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0+17.04.20170405-0ubuntu1]16:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libarchive [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.2.2-2]16:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chromium-browser [source] (zesty-proposed) [57.0.2987.98-0ubuntu1.1348]16:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-themes [sync] (zesty-proposed) [16.10+17.04.20170406-0ubuntu1]16:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bamf [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.3+17.04.20170406-0ubuntu1]16:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted muon [source] (zesty-proposed) [4:5.7.0-0ubuntu1]17:02
apwacheronuk, are are pushing that freeze ...17:03
acheronukapw: are are what?17:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-terminal-app [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.218+17.04.20170405.7-0ubuntu1]17:04
apws/are/you ...17:04
apwacheronuk, also i am hating on a 0.5MB diff for muon17:05
acheronukapw: what are you asking? if I have more to upload? answer to that is no17:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lm-sensors [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1:3.4.0-4]17:06
apwacheronuk, i am interested you are not indeed doing more, but i was just being exasperated :)17:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adwaita-icon-theme [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1]17:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted greybird-gtk-theme [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.2-1ubuntu1]17:09
acheronukapw: apologies. never intend these things to be this late. then stuff happens.... or actually sometimes doesn't when you WANT it to17:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libqapt [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1]17:11
apwacheronuk, indeed17:11
rbalintpython-boto autopkgtest has a lot of forbidden-s, while it is passing on Debian18:06
rbalintit does not let 2.44.0-1ubuntu1 to migrate to zesty18:07
rbalintshould not those test results be ignored?18:07
naccjgrimm: --^ ?18:11
jgrimmrbalint, i believe they can be ignored too18:13
jgrimmthey were ignored/skipped on previous upload. not new18:13
naccyeah, i think we decided that a hint update was needed18:14
naccas the hint was versioned18:14
naccin pitti's hints18:14
rbalinti think phyml autopkgtests should be ignored for everything other than amd64 and i386 since a dep is not available (pocl-opencl-icd)18:16
rbalinti think this can be unversioned18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: khmer (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0+dfsg-9 => 2.0+dfsg-9ubuntu1] (no packageset)18:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted khmer [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.0+dfsg-9ubuntu1]18:41
rbalintit looks like many R packages have circular autopkgtest blocks18:57
rbalintadding versioned dependencies where they are missing may clean up the picture a bit18:57
rbalintor a set could be hinted in together18:58
rbalintshould i start adding patches for the missing dependencies or hinting is the usual resolution18:58
rbalint?18:58
rbalintexample: r-bioc-summarizedexperiment 1.4.0-2 is waiting for r-bioc-iranges but lists r-bioc-summarizedexperiment/1.2.0-1 test failure as a regression19:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (zesty-proposed/universe) [134-1 => 137-3] (no packageset) (sync)19:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [137-3]19:14
ginggsrbalint: you can re-run the tests with additional triggers19:26
rbalintginggs: how?19:27
rbalintginggs: when i tried it failed due to not having upload rights yet19:27
ginggsrbalint: are you looking at update_excuses.html ?19:27
rbalintginggs: yes19:27
ginggsrbalint: ah, then you are going to have to ask someone19:28
ginggsbut you can make it easy for them by crafting the URL and just asking them to click on it19:28
nacchttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#How_to_re-run_autopkgtests_with_dependencies_on_other_packages_in_the_proposed_pocket19:28
naccrbalint: if you can generate the URL you need, i can run them19:29
ginggsrbalint: so let's look at your example19:29
rbalintnacc: thanks19:29
naccrbalint: np19:29
rbalintginggs: i think it does not help because iranges from proposed is tested with summarizedexperiment from zesty which fails19:30
rbalintginggs: but when they enter together they will both pass19:31
ginggsrbalint: this will help for that19:31
naccright, you basically need to hint hat for excuses purposes -- and then update_output will dtrt for the actual migration19:31
nacc(aiui)19:31
rbalintginggs: reading the link19:31
rbalintginggs: got that, thanks19:32
Laneybarry: Maybe one is from a git tag and one's from somewhere else?19:32
naccrbalint: basically each trigger you add is a srcpkg to use from -proposed for the test19:32
ginggshttps://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=zesty&arch=amd64&package=r-bioc-summarizedexperiment&trigger=r-bioc-biocgenerics%2F0.20.0-1&trigger=r-bioc-iranges%2f2.8.1-119:33
ginggsi've just requested this ^19:34
LaneyIf this indicates a problem with dependencies, that should also be fixed imho19:34
ginggsi manually added &trigger=r-bioc-iranges%2f2.8.1-119:34
rbalinti have to follow all cycles to see if all the packages are only blocked by this problem19:34
barryLaney: possibly.  maybe my tool to gitify apt-get source is wonky (tho it's always worked until now).  gotta walk the dog then i'll try to do straight up a-g source and apply the patch that way.  maybe 20m19:34
rbalintginggs: please try that one, too: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=zesty&arch=amd64&package=r-cran-treescape&trigger=rcpp%2F0.12.9-1&trigger=r-cran-phangorn=%2F2.1.1-119:38
ginggsYou submitted an invalid request: Malformed trigger19:39
ginggsyou want &trigger=r-cran-phangorn%2F2.1.1-1 there19:40
ginggsrequested19:40
rbalintginggs: yes, thanks19:40
ginggsrbalint: watch out for versions with '+' in them, replace with %2B19:41
rbalintginggs: yes, I'll encode the links19:41
rbalintginggs: i think I'll compile a list after i see the results19:42
rbalintginggs: there are several dozen triggers which will be needed19:42
ginggspaste.ubuntu.com19:43
ginggsrbalint: do you by any chance know what is happening with LP: #1640320 ?  It would be really nice to kick out boost1.6119:46
ubot5Launchpad bug 1640320 in location-service (Ubuntu) "FTBFS in zesty" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164032019:46
rbalintginggs: AFAIK location-service fix is merged, l-s devs need to release new version19:51
ginggsrbalint: thanks19:52
rbalintginggs: removed the misleasing assignmet to me since I can't release and a different patch got accepted19:52
barryLaney: could it be an tar.gz/tar.xz thing?20:05
barry 20:05
ginggsrbalint: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/r-bioc-summarizedexperiment/zesty/amd64 success20:24
ginggsi've requested that combination on the other arches20:26
Laneybarry: Well, that's why it's allowed to change I presume - I don't know why it *did* change though...20:36
LaneyDid one of you generate the tarball yourselves or something?20:36
LaneyI suppose if you eyeball the changes and make sure they're all okay then we can roll with this20:37
barryLaney: no, i just syncpackaged it from unstable (sorry, i previously got it mixed up with a few other packages i've been ftbfs-fixing).20:37
barry% syncpackage -f -b 1679842 python-requests-unixsocket20:37
Laneyok, maybe not *you*, but the maintainer or whoever uploaded it to Ubuntu the first time20:38
* barry looks at zul :)20:38
Laneylike maybe someone used one of the auto-tarballs from github and the other person found a released version on a website20:38
slangasekinfinity: around?20:39
barryLaney: do you have a link to a page for exactly the differences you're seeing?  i'm happy to eyeball them, but i want to make sure i'm looking at what you're looking at20:39
Laneybarry: Download the two packages and debdiff them20:39
barryLaney: ack20:39
slangasekinfinity: discussing subiquity livefs builds with cyphermox; I'm suggesting this should be PROJECT=ubuntu-server, SUBPROJECT=live, since there is already an ubuntu-server livefs build which differs (and must do).  Opinions?20:40
Laneybarry: Suggest you give your findings to slangasek or infinity if they're around when you get them - I'm off for the night now20:41
Laneysee you!20:41
barryLaney: thanks!20:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmatekbd (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin)20:46
barryLaney, slangasek, infinity oh, yeah, i bet that's exactly this.  zul probably got 0.1.5 from pypi, but zigo spins openstack packages from git so the two don't match.  :( :(  have i mentioned how much i disagree with that approach?20:57
slangasekcan't imagine anyone ever finding anything objectionable about any of the 15 different approaches to openstack packaging20:58
barryfortunately there is broad consensus that all those general python library packages should be folded back into dpmt and use the consistent workflow.  that'll happen after stretch most likely20:59
barryslangasek: so yeah, outside of debian/ it looks like metadata only differences, e.g. some files missing (e.g. AUTHORS, ChangeLog, PKG-INFO).  http://paste.ubuntu.com/24330003/21:03
barrylooks okay to me, and local builds had no problem21:04
infinityslangasek: I'm not overburdened with opinion on the matter.21:11
barryi'm also totally fine waiting until aardvark.  this mostly just fixes a ftbfs in doko's rebuild21:17
valorieaha, so it *will* be aardvark!21:19
barryvalorie: well, if it were up to me, which it rarely is <wink>21:19
barryaamazing aardvark21:19
valorie\o/21:19
valorielove it21:20
valorieI can already see the artwork in my mind21:20
* acheronuk is still hoping for an Anaconda21:21
barryoh, i got a million of them.  bbubbly bbabboon, ccrazy ccougar, ddangerous ddingo.  i really don't understand why mark never uses my suggestions21:22
barryalthough i did get yakkety right (but it was the obvious choice :)21:23
jbichabarry: I helped pick maverick! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DevelopmentCodeNames?action=diff&rev1=594&rev2=59521:24
barryjbicha: :)21:25
barrythere should be some kind of prize!21:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: keepass2 (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.35+dfsg-1 => 2.35+dfsg-2] (cli-mono) (sync)22:48
dokoslangasek, infinity: please could you review the binutils update in the unapproved queue?23:07
slangasekdoko: there isn't one; there was one accepted 7 hours before your ping?23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!