[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-docs (zesty-proposed/universe) [16.10 => 17.04] (xubuntu)
[00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwmf (zesty-proposed/main) [0.2.8.4-10.5ubuntu2 => 0.2.8.4-10.6ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[00:35] <doko> slangasek: hmm, I didn't see an email. sorry
[00:35] <slangasek> no worries
[01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pygobject-2 (zesty-proposed/main) [2.28.6-12ubuntu1 => 2.28.6-12ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[01:09] <bluesabre> Hello release team! Please ack xubuntu-docs and greybird-gtk-theme, we had some last minute fixes/commits roll in (and everything checks out)
[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-docs [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04]
[01:13] <slangasek> bluesabre: xubuntu-docs accepted; greybird-gtk-theme not in queue
[01:13] <slangasek> bluesabre: there was one accepted 8 hours ago
[01:14] <bluesabre> slangasek: thanks, it must have slipped in earlier, sorry about the extra noise
[02:36] <zul> barry: thats what happened
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-18.20 => 4.10.0-19.21] (core, kernel) (sync)
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-18.20 => 4.10.0-19.21] (core, kernel) (sync)
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0.18.20 => 4.10.0.19.21] (core, kernel) (sync)
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0.19.21]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-19.21]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-19.21]
[08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-19.21] (core, kernel)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-19.21]
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-requests-unixsocket [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.1.5-3]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keepass2 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.35+dfsg-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmatekbd [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwmf [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.8.4-10.6ubuntu1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygobject-2 [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.28.6-12ubuntu2]
[08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-applets (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-filemanager-app [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.4+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1]
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (zesty-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu503 => 20101020ubuntu504] (core)
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-applets [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: retro-gtk [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:48] <acheronuk> morning release team :)
[08:48] <acheronuk> currently staging a fix for bug #1680711
[08:50] <acheronuk> the fix I hope is just: https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/ubuntu/staging-misc/+sourcepub/7663362/+listing-archive-extra
[08:50] <acheronuk> with diff: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/314791460/k3b_2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu1~ubuntu17.04~ppa1_2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2~ubuntu17.04~ppa1.diff.gz
[08:50] <acheronuk> (ignore the ppa versioning that will go away in any upload to archive"
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: proftpd-dfsg (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.3.5b-3 => 1.3.5b-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (zesty-proposed/main) [2017a-1 => 2017b-1] (core) (sync)
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lirc (zesty-proposed/main) [0.9.4c-8 => 0.9.4c-9] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: manpages-zh (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-2 => 1.6.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:51] <acheronuk> so can I ask if that would be ok to upload and get accepted (pending review of course on actual upload)?
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manpages-zh [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted proftpd-dfsg [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.5b-4]
[08:52] <acheronuk> 1st time I have had proper upload permission at this point in a release, so sorry for asking maybe obvious questions.
[08:53] <Laney> acheronuk: if it's seeded (on kubuntu) then it'll get held in the queue for the release team to review
[08:53] <Laney> so feel free to upload
[08:54] <acheronuk> Laney: that is what I figured and hoped. thx for answering :)
[08:57] <ginggs> would someone from release team please look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmailtools-perl it failed autopkgtests against libmime-tools-perl/5.507-1, but passed against 5.508-1 which is already in zesty release - should it be unblocked?
[09:00] <infinity> ginggs: unblocking.
[09:00] <ginggs> infinity: thanks!
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted retro-gtk [i386] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: osmose-emulator (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0-2 => 1.0-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted osmose-emulator [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0-4]
[09:42] <acheronuk> does the freeze do anything odd to flavour uploads?
[09:43] <acheronuk> mine is just vanishing into nothingness
[09:43] <acheronuk> no accepted/rejected/waiting for review email etc
[09:43] <acheronuk> not getting to the queue
[09:43] <acheronuk> nothing
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lhapdf (zesty-proposed/universe) [5.9.1-4build1 => 5.9.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lhapdf [sync] (zesty-proposed) [5.9.1-5]
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: k3b (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (zesty-proposed/universe) [17.04.11 => 17.04.12] (ubuntu-mate)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: k3b (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: k3b (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: khmer (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0+dfsg-9ubuntu1 => 2.0+dfsg-10] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:46] <acheronuk> O.o
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted khmer [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.0+dfsg-10]
[09:47] <acheronuk> ok. leant something new this morning. did not realise you could get duplicates in the queue like that!
[09:48] <acheronuk> sorry about that. I was blaming my cra**y connection so retried
[09:48] <acheronuk> obviously the duplicates can be binned
[09:48] <acheronuk> sorry for the noise :/
[09:54] <infinity> acheronuk: The third one has different checksums from the first two.  Is it actually different, or did you just re-run dpkg-buildpackage?
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2017b-1]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.12]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lirc [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.9.4c-9]
[10:01] <acheronuk> infinity: yep. I re-ran our package release script (inc dpkg-buildpackage)
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected k3b [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected k3b [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2]
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted k3b [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2]
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-games-app [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-games-app [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-games-app [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-games-app [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-games-app [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-games-app [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [armhf] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [arm64] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [s390x] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-games-app [i386] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (zesty-proposed) [20101020ubuntu504]
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (zesty-proposed/restricted) [340.102-0ubuntu1 => 340.102-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 (zesty-proposed/restricted) [375.39-0ubuntu3 => 375.39-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (zesty-proposed/main) [6.3.0-10ubuntu1 => 6.3.0-12ubuntu1] (core)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 [source] (zesty-proposed) [340.102-0ubuntu2]
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 [source] (zesty-proposed) [375.39-0ubuntu4]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-6 [source] (zesty-proposed) [6.3.0-12ubuntu1]
[12:24] <acheronuk> hi. could k3b be let through please?
[12:24] <acheronuk> excuses says "Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact #ubuntu-release if update is needed)"
[12:27] <jbicha> hi, Ubuntu GNOME 17.04 is waiting on a new version of ubiquity to be pushed for LP: #1675210
[12:35] <infinity> cyphermox: ^-- ubiquity probably needs a trunk release, plus translations pull, plus any other bits you can knock out while you're there.
[12:35] <infinity> acheronuk: I'll be doing a mess of unblocks over the next 24h as proposed settles.
[12:37] <acheronuk> infinity: thx. I wasn't paying this close attention at this stage in yakkety, so I'm slightly uncertain how this goes
[12:43] <jbicha> acheronuk: I believe from now on, you should make sure your zesty seeded uploads have an LP bug number in their changelog in case the Release Team wants to handle them as SRUs instead
[12:45] <acheronuk> jbicha: yep. I made a point of putting that in k3b upload
[12:45] <jbicha> that's fine,, I didn't mean that as criticism, just fyi :)
[12:46] <acheronuk> jbicha: well I had sort of assumed it would be wise from this stage, but confirmation of that thought is great :)
[12:46] <acheronuk> thank you
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-raspi2 (zesty-proposed/universe) [4.10.0-1003.5 => 4.10.0-1004.6] (kernel) (sync)
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-raspi2 (zesty-proposed/universe) [4.10.0.1003.5 => 4.10.0.1004.6] (kernel) (sync)
[13:06] <barry> zul: thanks for the confirmation
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-raspi2 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0.1004.6]
[13:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-raspi2 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-1004.6]
[13:44] <cyphermox> infinity: yeah, I know, I already have jbicha's fixes
[13:44] <cyphermox> so, I'm working on it...
[13:44] <jbicha> no problem, I was just letting infin_ity or whoever know that we were waiting on that for a true RC
[13:47] <infinity> jbicha: We're waiting on a few things. ;)
[13:47] <infinity> (like the kernel, no big deal)
[13:51] <Laney> who needs one of those?
[13:52] <apw> i always like at least 1/2
[13:53] <Laney> greedy
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (zesty-proposed/main) [6.3.0-10ubuntu1 => 6.3.0-12ubuntu2] (core)
[13:56] <infinity> +SOURCE_VERSION:= 6.3.0-12ubuntu1.1
[13:56] <infinity> +gcc-6 (6.3.0-12ubuntu2)
[13:57] <infinity> doko: ^
[13:57] <doko> oops, let me fix that
[13:57] <infinity> doko: Not super happy about a compiler upload 6 days before release, but if you fix that bit, at least it'll be worth reviewing.
[13:58] <doko> hmm, where do you see that?
[13:58]  * Laney wonders what 12ubuntu1 did to offend
[13:58] <infinity> Laney: Other than failing to build?
[13:59] <infinity> doko: rules.parameters
[13:59] <infinity> doko: All the versions are 1.1 instead of 2.
[13:59] <doko> ahh, you can ignore that. it's autogenerated during the build
[13:59] <infinity> doko: Unless a clean fixes that, and you just cleaned locally after uploading. :P
[13:59] <Laney> Don't see that version
[14:00] <infinity> Laney: Because it's not in the archive.
[14:00] <Laney> Right then.
[14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-73.94] (core, kernel)
[14:01] <doko> anyway, uploaded again
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (zesty-proposed/main) [6.3.0-10ubuntu1 => 6.3.0-12ubuntu2] (core)
[14:07] <doko> infinity: would you still accept a gdb update? just newer trunk version. it's not yet branched
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-6 [source] (zesty-proposed) [6.3.0-12ubuntu2]
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.1.1-0ubuntu2 => 2:8.1.1-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:08] <infinity> doko: Other than "yay, new", is there an argument for it?
[14:08] <doko> no, planning to propose the final 8.0 version as a SRU anyway
[14:09] <infinity> doko: Yeah, if what we have works, I wouldn't bother.  I probably also wouldn't bother with the SRU for a non-LTS release, but it's your time.
[14:09] <doko> ok
[15:44] <doko> apw, infinity: is linux-hammerhead still used by something?
[15:46]  * apw is supprised to hear that is still a thing
[15:49] <infinity> doko: That sounds like a thing we probably forgot to remove, but I'll confirm with devices types.
[15:50] <doko> thanks, produce a compiler ICE, but I'm not interested to investigate, if we remove it
[15:51] <apw> infinity, cirtainly that is not suitibly maintained
[15:52] <infinity> apw: Oh, it's very much not maintained.  But need to make sure somebody doesn't think it's a thing before I delete it.
[15:54] <infinity> apw: Okay, hammerhead was Nexus 5.  Pretty sure that was never a thing Canonical supported, just a community phone port.  So, I'm going to dlete, and if anyone yells, they can yell at me.
[15:55] <apw> infinity, works for me
[15:55] <infinity> doko: Removing.
[16:00] <acheronuk> infinity: do you think we can maybe get a change to our settings package in before the iso's are baked?
[16:04] <acheronuk> would be something like: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24334630/
[16:05] <infinity> acheronuk: If autostart is undesirable, that doesn't seem like the right way to turn it off.
[16:06] <infinity> acheronuk: Desired default behaviours should be default.  User configs should be used by users to revert those decisions.
[16:07] <infinity> acheronuk: (ie: you want a code change here, not a use config snippet)
[16:07] <infinity> s/use/user/
[16:08] <apw> are you doing it that way to avoid rebuilding something large ?
[16:09] <infinity> I'd make the same argument for the kwinrc already in there...
[16:09] <infinity> Why was that not a code patch?
[16:10] <infinity> (fresh installs and upgrades won't have the same behaviour when you do it this way)
[16:11] <acheronuk> infinity: ok. will have to leave it then. plasma does not respect putting those rc files in a defaults folder as it used to when I tested
[16:12] <infinity> acheronuk: I'm not talking about files, I'm talking about the default being wrong.
[16:13] <infinity> acheronuk: If you're saying "all users should want this off by default, and the few who want it on should turn it on", then the code should reflect that.  Shipping a user config file that inverts the default is useless, as it only applies to users created after the package is installed.
[16:13] <infinity> Which is why /etc/skel is pretty empty on most systems, cause it's a very bad way to distribute system defaults.
[16:13] <ogra_> it is almost always the wrong place for stuff
[16:14] <infinity> acheronuk: Anyhow, the answer to your original question is that it's not too late to get changes in.  I'm just disagreeing with the change itself. :P
[16:16] <ogra_> infinity, well, reading the changelog entry this actually wants to be a kubuntu specific casper setting rather than in kubuntu-settings ...
[16:16] <ogra_> "stops ... autoloading in a live session"
[16:17] <infinity> Well, yes, if this is JUST about the live session, casper is the place to fix it.
[16:17] <infinity> acheronuk: ^
[16:18] <infinity> And it can be fixed the same way in casper.
[16:18] <infinity> Well, minus skel, and instead dropping it right in the ubuntu user's home.
[16:18] <ogra_> yeah
[16:18] <acheronuk> not just about the live session. and don't want to mess with users defaults on upgrade
[16:19] <ogra_> well, then you want to adjust the defaults of the app itself
[16:21] <acheronuk> we used to do that by setting a korgacrc file in our setting, but that location is ignored now for that. as it was for the kwinrc
[16:22] <infinity> It should be simple C to make it check a global location first.
[16:22] <infinity> Well, C++, I guess, because KDE.
[16:22] <infinity> Using user defaults in skel for this kind of thing is just plain wrong.
[16:23] <acheronuk> and out policy is or has been not to hack the kde/plasma code if we can avoid it and change behaviour in our setting package when possible
[16:23] <infinity> I mean, it's your flavour, and I won't block you from doing it this way.  I'll just argue a bit and explain why it's not right.
[16:23] <infinity> acheronuk: Sure, "when possible".  I'm arguing this doesn't qualify.  skel is a Bad Way to do this sort of thing.
[16:23] <acheronuk> infinity: points taken on board, believe me :)
[16:25] <infinity> Anyhow, your call in the end.  RCs probably won't spin until late tonight or early tomorrow.  We're still squeezing some vaguely useful things in like a kernel and a libc.
[16:25] <infinity> And maybe a compiler, cause why not.
[16:26] <acheronuk> if people had not said, "can we change this behaviour?" a but earlier than a few hrs before the RC, then maybe it would be another way
[16:26] <acheronuk> *a bit earlier
[16:28] <acheronuk> yikes at those changes!
[16:37] <acheronuk> infinity: well... one priority for 'Agoraphobic Anaconda' will be a complete review and reworking of our settings package. a lot of obsolete stuff in there that does no harm, but does no good either.
[16:37] <acheronuk> plus to get some better artwork/customisations maybe
[16:38] <acheronuk> so I think part of that will also be to lose if we can any suboptimal methods like this
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: retro-gtk (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-1 => 0.10.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted retro-gtk [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.10.0-1]
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-games-app (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.0.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-games-app [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0.2-1]
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:17.04ubuntu5 => 1:17.04ubuntu6] (kubuntu)
[17:09] <tyhicks> infinity: hi - thanks for axing linux-{mako,flo,hammerhead}! would it be helpful if I tracked down if linux-goldfish is still needed?
[17:11] <ogra_> tyhicks, unlikely ... that was for the emulator
[17:12] <tyhicks> ogra_: is it completely unused now?
[17:12] <tyhicks> (I'd assume so...)
[17:12] <ogra_> well, it would emulate some android 4.4 based env ... i doubt thats helpful for anyone
[17:13] <tyhicks> yeah, that's of little use
[17:29] <ginggs> any ideas on how to get r-cran-igraph to migrate please? it is holding up a whole bunch of r-cran, r-bioc packages.  tests pass on armhf and s390x (and amd64 in debian), but get Killed on other arches
[17:30] <nacc> ginggs: is this one of the r packages that needs to be rerun with others?
[17:30] <nacc> rbalint: --^ ?
[17:31] <ginggs> it seems to be the root of all the problems
[17:31] <jbicha> no, there's a lot of failing r autopkgtests that I ran together earlier but it wasn't enough
[17:31] <jbicha> my no was to n_acc's question
[17:32] <nacc> jbicha: ah ok
[17:32] <rbalint> i'm making progress with the trigger generator
[17:33] <nacc> seems like rbalint ginggs and jbicha should coordinate :)
[17:35] <jbicha> I'm not looking at r any more, my retries were months ago
[17:35] <nacc> jbicha: oh ok -- rbalint was looking yesterday
[17:36] <nacc> iirc
[17:39] <ginggs> rbalint: do you think r-cran-igraph is waiting for anything from proposed? it predates all the others and has always passed autopkgtests in debian
[17:40] <nacc> uh
[17:40] <nacc> https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/r/r-cran-igraph/20170407_065422.autopkgtest.log.gz
[17:40] <nacc> the test fails there too
[17:40] <nacc> but for some reason is not being marked as a failure
[17:41] <nacc> oh it gets killed specifically, i see
[17:41] <nacc> it seems weird that 9 fails in print.igraph don't fail the test :)
[17:42] <jbicha> it'll be nice for Ubuntu once Debian starts enforcing autopkgtests :)
[17:42] <nacc> jbicha: yeah :)
[17:42] <ginggs> won't help here though :(
[17:43] <nacc> ginggs: sorry, misread the output
[17:43] <nacc> ginggs: have you reproduced it locally (since it does fail on amd64 acc'g to excuses)?
[17:43] <rbalint> let me debug igraph manually
[17:44] <ginggs> i built it locally and ran the tests, they completed and returned 0
[17:45] <ginggs> on amd64, that is.  the output looked much like the armhf results -  15 failed tests, but a PASS
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (zesty-proposed/main) [17.04.7 => 17.04.8] (core)
[17:51] <rbalint> ginggs: i'm giving it a try, too
[18:15] <rbalint> ginggs: i think igraph is failing due to low memory
[18:17] <ginggs> rbalint: thanks, weird that it doesn't happen on armhf
[18:19] <ginggs> would someone please configure r-cran-igraph to run on m1.large ?
[18:25] <rbalint> ginggs: at lease at test case R goes up to ~1.8G memory
[18:27] <ginggs> rbalint: i don't have any other suggestions, let's see what happens if it is run on VM with more resources
[18:29] <rbalint> ginggs: i get the folowing error, while the test passes:
[18:30] <rbalint> ginggs: system call failed: Cannot allocate memory
[18:30] <rbalint> ginggs: in a 2G VM
[18:31] <ginggs> why don't we get nice error messages like that?
[18:35] <rbalint> ginggs: could you please trigger this?: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=zesty&arch=armhf&package=snapcraft&trigger=python-requests-unixsocket%2F0.1.5-3
[18:36] <rbalint> ginggs: (maybe a few times:-)) it is temporary
[18:51] <ginggs> rbalint: submitted
[19:45] <dmj_s76> sforshee: I'll test the proposed linux-firmware when I can.  Right now we're running all our machines through 17.04 tests.
[19:54] <Odd_Bloke> cyphermox: o/ I've just posted an updated debdiff to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1679252; gaughen said you might have the cycles to upload that to -proposed to bake over the weekend?
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-73.94]
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-47.50]
[19:59] <cyphermox> Odd_Bloke: xenial only?
[20:03] <Odd_Bloke> cyphermox: Yeah, these fixes landed in the yakkety cycle.
[20:03] <cyphermox> ok
[20:03] <cyphermox> I
[20:03] <cyphermox> ugh
[20:03] <Odd_Bloke> But the original change which introduced the bugs only recently made it back to xenial.
[20:03] <cyphermox> I'm happy to sponsor, but you will still need to have someone from the SRU team review them to get them in -proposed
[20:08] <cyphermox> Odd_Bloke: ok, I'm reviewing it now, just need to make sure I have the right code branch
[20:12] <Odd_Bloke> cyphermox: Aha, of course.
[20:14] <cyphermox> just one thing; you should have opened a new release in that case, since 2.408.10 was already uploaded to proposed
[20:15] <rbalint> could someone tell if r-cran-igraph gets a bigget testbed?
[20:15] <cyphermox> Odd_Bloke: ... it was already *published* in xenial-proposed, to be precise, as just uploaded and in the queue it wouldn't be an issue.
[20:16] <Odd_Bloke> cyphermox: Ah, right, I always get the queue and proposed confused for that.
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-117.164] (core, kernel)
[20:16] <Odd_Bloke> cyphermox: Want me to spin a new debdiff?
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1] (kernel)
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.10 => 2.408.11] (desktop-core)
[20:19] <cyphermox> Odd_Bloke: no, this is simple enough ;)
[20:20] <Odd_Bloke> :)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adacontrol (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.17r3.1-4 => 1.17r3.1-4build1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dbusada (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-1build1 => 0.3.3-1build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnat-gps (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.1.1-1ubuntu1 => 6.1.1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: asis (zesty-proposed/universe) [2015-1build2 => 2015-1build3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dh-ada-library (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.8 => 6.8build1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libalog (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2ubuntu1 => 0.5.2-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libaws (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.3.2-2build4 => 3.3.2-2build5] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgmpada (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0-3build1 => 1.0-3build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgtkada (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.8.3-1ubuntu2 => 3.8.3-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libncursesada (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0.20150808-2ubuntu1 => 6.0.20150808-2ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libaunit (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-1build2 => 3.7.2-1build3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgnatcoll (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7gpl2015-2ubuntu2 => 1.7gpl2015-2ubuntu3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libflorist (zesty-proposed/universe) [2016-1build1 => 2016-1build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: liblog4ada (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.3-1build2 => 1.3-1build3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libaws [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.3.2-2build5]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgmpada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0-3build2]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgtkada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.8.3-1ubuntu3]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libncursesada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [6.0.20150808-2ubuntu2]
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtexttools (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-8build1 => 2.1.0-8build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxmlezout (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.06.1-8build1 => 1.06.1-8build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libflorist [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2016-1build2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted liblog4ada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3-1build3]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxmlada (zesty-proposed/universe) [4.5.2015-8build1 => 4.5.2015-8build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgnatcoll [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.7gpl2015-2ubuntu3]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtemplates-parser (zesty-proposed/universe) [11.10-4build1 => 11.10-4build2] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adacontrol [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.17r3.1-4build1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dbusada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.3-1build2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnat-gps [sync] (zesty-proposed) [6.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libaunit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.7.2-1build3]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcscada (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1ubuntu2 => 0.7.3-1ubuntu3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted asis [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2015-1build3]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libalog [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.2-2ubuntu2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polyorb (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.11~20140418-3.2 => 2.11~20140418-3.2build1] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dh-ada-library [sync] (zesty-proposed) [6.8build1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opentoken (zesty-proposed/universe) [6.0b-5build2 => 6.0b-5build3] (no packageset) (sync)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtemplates-parser [sync] (zesty-proposed) [11.10-4build2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [4.5.2015-8build2]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opentoken [sync] (zesty-proposed) [6.0b-5build3]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polyorb [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.11~20140418-3.2build1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtexttools [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.1.0-8build2]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcscada [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.3-1ubuntu3]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlezout [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.06.1-8build2]
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04ubuntu6]
[20:36] <cyphermox> Odd_Bloke: not sure who of the SRU team might be around to check this out now though
[20:36] <cyphermox> slangasek would be my usual victim, but he's out :)
[20:37] <cyphermox> bdmurray: you around?
[21:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: imagemagick (zesty-proposed/main) [8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-2ubuntu3 => 8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-3ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[21:48] <ginggs> infinity: around? are you able to do this -> <ginggs> would someone please configure r-cran-igraph to run on m1.large ?
[22:02] <bdmurray> cyphermox: i may have some time in my evening.
[22:24] <Laney> ginggs: I did it
[22:25] <Laney> You can do merge proposals against lp:autopkgtest-cloud (git) for that kind of change if you want
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nyquist (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.05-2ubuntu1 => 3.05-2.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nyquist [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.05-2.1]