| cyphermox | imho, it's pretty late for rebuilding main packages just for PIE, perhaps if there are other bugfixes alongside.. | 00:57 |
|---|---|---|
| Ukikie | It depends on if its pumpkin pie.... | 01:26 |
| mwhudson | any release team people about? | 01:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.6 (xenial-proposed/main) [1.6.2-0ubuntu5~16.04 => 1.6.2-0ubuntu5~16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 02:11 | |
| cyphermox | mwhudson: it's either too late or too early I think; otherwise too weekend? ;D | 02:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (zesty-proposed/main) [17.04.8 => 17.04.9] (core) | 02:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (zesty-proposed/main) [123 => 124] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 02:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.6 (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1 => 1.6.3-1ubuntu1.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 02:51 | |
| mwhudson | cyphermox: yeah too weekend | 02:52 |
| estan | good morning folks. any release team member who could kindly have a look at qtbase-opensource-src 5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.4 in the xenial upload queue? it fixes a quite annoying bug i reported, so i'm eager to have it tested in proposed (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1598173). | 05:49 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1598173 in qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu Xenial) "Please consider SRU of "xcb: Compress mouse motion and touch update events"" [Undecided,New] | 05:49 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (zesty-proposed) [124] | 05:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.0-0ubuntu5] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.9] | 05:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnss-sdr (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.0.9-1 => 0.0.9-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnss-sdr [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.0.9-2] | 06:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-bioc-genomeinfodb (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.10.2-1 => 1.10.3-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 06:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-bioc-genomeinfodb [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.10.3-1] | 06:27 | |
| infinity | rbalint: I suspect your science is a bit off if glibc is in that list, given that dpkg and gcc didn't change since the last glibc upload. But also, waaaay too late to be asking to rebuild a bunch of stuff in main. It can wait for Anonymous Antelope. | 06:31 |
| === michi_ is now known as Guest48864 | ||
| ginggs | rbalint: yw, and thanks for the upload. i've sync'd r-bioc-genomeinfodb and will trigger the necessary tests | 06:51 |
| infinity | ginggs: Still hoping to get that whole R mess migrated under the wire? | 06:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-weather (zesty-proposed/universe) [0~20160325.gitb5415ec-2ubuntu2 => 0~20170402.git34506a6-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 07:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-weather [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0~20170402.git34506a6-1] | 07:22 | |
| ginggs | infinity: i think a big chunk of them will migrate now - but there are still a couple with bad tests | 07:39 |
| * apw yawns at the world | 07:40 | |
| infinity | ginggs: Yeah, I briefly looked at the mess when I was on the warpath to make glibc's rdeps all green. I got everything EXCEPT for r-* because I had better things to do. | 07:40 |
| infinity | apw: Did the world yawn back? | 07:42 |
| apw | seems not, seems i am not very interesting | 07:42 |
| jbicha | hi, what should we do to fix chrome-gnome-shell 8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.10.1 not actually being published for 16.10? | 08:18 |
| jbicha | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/c/chrome-gnome-shell/ | 08:18 |
| jbicha | https://github.com/nE0sIghT/chrome-gnome-shell-mirror/issues/44 | 08:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello infinity thanks for curl hint | 08:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: system-config-printer (zesty-proposed/main) [1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu8 => 1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu9] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dnscrypt-proxy (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.9.4-1 => 1.9.4-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-gnome-meta (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.77 => 0.78] (ubuntugnome) | 08:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dnscrypt-proxy [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.9.4-1build1] | 08:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dnstap-ldns (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2 => 0.2.0-2build1] (no packageset) | 08:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipa (zesty-proposed/universe) [4.4.3-3ubuntu1 => 4.4.3-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeipa [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.4.3-3ubuntu2] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opendnssec (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:2.0.3+-1ubuntu1 => 1:2.0.3+-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dnstap-ldns [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.0-2build1] | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzonemaster-perl (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.16-1 => 1.0.16-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: strongswan (zesty-proposed/main) [5.5.1-1ubuntu2 => 5.5.1-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libnet-ldns-perl (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.75-1 => 0.75-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pathspider (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libzonemaster-perl [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.16-1build1] | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libtrace (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.6+git20161027-1 => 1.6+git20161027-1build1] (no packageset) | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pathspider [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.1-1build1] | 08:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libnet-ldns-perl [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.75-1build1] | 08:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted opendnssec [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:2.0.3+-1ubuntu2] | 08:59 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-libtrace [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.6+git20161027-1build1] | 08:59 | |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Dude. A library transition three days before release? :( | 09:01 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: One that involves seeded packages, no less? | 09:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cluster-glue (zesty-proposed/main) [1.0.12-5ubuntu1 => 1.0.12-5ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 09:01 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, erm... not my fault, trying to fix other people mistakes | 09:02 |
| LocutusOfBorg | trying to fix the mess :/ | 09:02 |
| mapreri | only strongswan is seeded, right? | 09:02 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: It wasn't a mess until you just now uploaded. | 09:03 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: One library stuck in proposed is not a "mess". | 09:03 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Now it's one library and a bunch of stuff that depends on it. | 09:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tigervnc (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.7.0+dfsg-6ubuntu1 => 1.7.0+dfsg-7ubuntu1] (edubuntu) | 09:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted system-config-printer [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.5.7+20160812-0ubuntu9] | 09:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-meta [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.78] | 09:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tigervnc [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.7.0+dfsg-7ubuntu1] | 09:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted strongswan [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.5.1-1ubuntu3] | 09:14 | |
| infinity | ginggs: Did you need to do something with gearhead for that last minute fpc upload of yours? | 09:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ta for tigervnc strongswan | 09:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | will make it smooth | 09:26 |
| ginggs | infinity: i don't think we need any rebuild for fpc, everything is statically linked. did you pick up a problem? | 09:48 |
| infinity | ginggs: NBS picked up a problem. gearhead build-deps on an fpc-source version you're about to remove. | 09:50 |
| ginggs | infinity: thanks, i'll look into that | 09:50 |
| mapreri | infinity: fyi, the top of britney has a "Trying easy from adconrad.... Version mismatch ... Not using hint" | 09:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-gnome-default-settings (zesty-proposed/universe) [17.04.2 => 17.04.3] (ubuntugnome) | 09:53 | |
| infinity | mapreri: Yeah, that's harmless. It's an old hint I haven't deleted. | 09:54 |
| === infinity1 is now known as infinity | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gearhead (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.302-3 => 1.302-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 10:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gearhead [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.302-3ubuntu1] | 10:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (xenial-proposed/main) [1.18.4ubuntu1.1 => 1.18.4ubuntu1.2] (core) | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (zesty-proposed/main) [1.18.10ubuntu1 => 1.18.10ubuntu2] (core) | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.18.10ubuntu1 => 1.18.10ubuntu1.1] (core) | 10:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-19.21~16.04.1] | 10:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.10ubuntu2] | 10:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cluster-glue [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.12-5ubuntu2] | 10:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-default-settings [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.3] | 10:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.18.4ubuntu1.2] | 10:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-117.164] | 10:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.18.10ubuntu1.1] | 10:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (zesty-proposed/universe) [17.04.6 => 17.04.7] (ubuntu-mate) | 11:25 | |
| ginggs | infinity: is forcing bad-test an option for r-bioc-annotationhub/2.6.4-1 ? this is holding up many of the R packages. i believe the current failure is also due to NCBI's FTP site reorganization, we already fixed debian bug #859864, but this looks like another. i'm pretty sure r-bioc-annotationhub/2.4.2-2 in zesty is affected too, so it's not a regression | 11:31 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 859864 in src:r-bioc-genomeinfodb "r-bioc-genomeinfodb: Reorganization of ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/all" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/859864 | 11:31 |
| ginggs | rbalint ^ | 11:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu12 => 9.6ubuntu13] (core) | 11:31 | |
| infinity | ginggs: Can the test not be fixed? | 11:33 |
| infinity | (Or the code the test is calling) | 11:33 |
| ginggs | infinity: i'll keep looking, but I don't know R from P or Q | 11:33 |
| jbicha | please unblock ubuntu-gnome-meta, thanks | 11:34 |
| infinity | ginggs: Well, the bug you referenced is fixed in a new upload... | 11:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.1.1-0ubuntu3] | 11:34 | |
| infinity | jbicha: Will unblock when I redo all the metas after lunch. | 11:34 |
| ginggs | infinity: yup, and i've sync'd that and re-run the tests, but there is still a failure (that appeared on the same date) | 11:35 |
| infinity | Fun. | 11:35 |
| infinity | ginggs: If you're positive it's not a regression from 2.4.2-2, yeah, we can badtest it for now. | 11:39 |
| ginggs | infinity: how can i make 100% sure? | 11:40 |
| infinity | Run the same tests with the same triggers, except for the r-bioc-annotationhub versions, and compare? | 11:40 |
| ginggs | do you mean on the ubuntu autopkgtest infra, or locally? | 11:42 |
| ginggs | infinity: i think http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/r-bioc-annotationhub/zesty/amd64 confirms it - autopkgtests haven't passed since 2017-01-16 | 11:44 |
| infinity | ginggs: Except while I see 404s in the old tests, I see something very different in new tests? | 11:45 |
| infinity | ginggs: And, indeed, the new failure seems specific to the migration being attempted. | 11:47 |
| ginggs | infinity: yes, the 404 is gone, but it is the same test that still fails - FAILURE in test_tidyGRanges: Error in checkIdentical(setNames(rep(c(FALSE, TRUE), c(4, 1)), chr), GenomeInfoDb::isCircular(gr1)) : | 11:47 |
| infinity | Or maybe the underlying library just doesn't bubble up the 404s anymore. | 11:48 |
| infinity | Which would be annoying. | 11:48 |
| infinity | Meh. I'm going to run 2.4.2-2 with a self-trigger to be sure. | 11:48 |
| ginggs | infinity: ok, thanks | 11:48 |
| xnox | infinity, https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/unity/no-more-upstart-dep/+merge/322283 | 12:05 |
| === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (zesty-proposed/main) [2.20.4-0ubuntu3 => 2.20.4-0ubuntu4] (core) | 12:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.7] | 12:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.20.4-0ubuntu4] | 12:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (zesty-proposed) [9.6ubuntu13] | 12:36 | |
| jbicha | I'm rebuilding the GNOME iso's to verify the ubiquity theme fix | 12:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libphysfs (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0.3-4 => 2.0.3-5] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libphysfs [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.3-5] | 13:07 | |
| infinity | jbicha: Kay. There will be a mass rebuild later today, but that's fine. | 13:11 |
| jbicha | right, I just wanted to make sure that if there was a problem, I didn't wait until the last moment! | 13:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170410) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170410) | 13:15 | |
| infinity | jbicha: A noble goal. | 13:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: command-not-found (zesty-proposed/main) [0.3ubuntu17.04.1 => 0.3ubuntu17.04.2] (core) | 13:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-panel (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) | 13:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: labplot (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-2ubuntu1 => 2.3.0-2ubuntu2] (kubuntu) | 13:19 | |
| === jgrimm-away is now known as jgrimm | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twisted (zesty-proposed/main) [16.6.0-2 => 16.6.0-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync) | 13:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: txzmq (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-1 => 0.7.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted txzmq [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.4-1ubuntu1] | 13:21 | |
| infinity | jbicha: FYI, that chrome-gnome-shell oops looks fixed now. | 13:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libmatekbd (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) | 13:29 | |
| infinity | rbasak: Does anyone care that the ppc64el server ISO is 5MB over CD size? | 13:33 |
| rbasak | powersj: ^ | 13:34 |
| infinity | rbasak: He usually submits MPs to change the limit, I was asking if you wanted to change seeds to trim the size. :P | 13:35 |
| rbasak | I don't know. powersj may know better if we care :) | 13:36 |
| infinity | Fair enough. | 13:36 |
| rbasak | Or jgrimm may also know if we care ^ | 13:37 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-logs (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntugnome) | 13:37 | |
| * rbasak knows little about the ppc64el install process | 13:37 | |
| jgrimm | infinity, rbasak yeah i was just starting to type | 13:37 |
| jgrimm | TL;DR we don't care | 13:37 |
| infinity | rbasak: Well, the "process" is the same as most places. In that real sysadmins use netboot of some sort, but they *can* boot optical media too. | 13:38 |
| infinity | We could fix this if IBM fixed their machines to love compressed kernels. | 13:38 |
| infinity | (The giant kernels are why it's always larger than x86) | 13:38 |
| infinity | jgrimm: Not caring works for me. | 13:39 |
| jgrimm | we'll still 'monitor' for crazy growth that indicates something wildly has gone wrong, but no longer the specific size tied to CD media | 13:40 |
| infinity | jgrimm: Mmkay. | 13:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-meta (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.189 => 1.190] (ubuntu-mate) | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-meta (zesty-proposed/main) [1.378 => 1.379] (core) | 14:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-meta (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.212 => 2.213] (xubuntu) | 14:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-meta (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.167 => 0.168] (ubuntustudio) | 14:05 | |
| infinity | seb128: Langpacks? | 14:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.190] | 14:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.379] | 14:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.168] | 14:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected twisted [sync] (zesty-proposed) [16.6.0-2ubuntu1] | 14:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-meta [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.213] | 14:15 | |
| apw | infinity, you want that command-not-found "reviewed" ? | 14:18 |
| infinity | apw: Please. | 14:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-panel [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu2] | 14:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twisted (zesty-proposed/main) [16.6.0-2 => 16.6.0-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 14:19 | |
| Laney | Review each line explicitly please | 14:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-logs [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] | 14:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmatekbd [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.2-0ubuntu1] | 14:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted labplot [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.3.0-2ubuntu2] | 14:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twisted [source] (zesty-proposed) [16.6.0-2ubuntu1] | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted command-not-found [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.3ubuntu17.04.2] | 14:26 | |
| infinity | apw: Did you read every line of that diff? | 14:27 |
| infinity | apw: I have my doubts. | 14:27 |
| apw | infinity, i grepped out the -powerpc, the ripped the 'same lines' diff from movement, and eyeballed the rest | 14:28 |
| apw | it seemed sane | 14:28 |
| apw | some movement to univere, some commands dropped and some added in line with waht i expected | 14:29 |
| apw | (plus i started before i offered :)) | 14:30 |
| apw | but, i may have not read every line as well as Laney would have | 14:30 |
| infinity | apw: We're just messing with you. :P | 14:31 |
| apw | infinity, :) | 14:32 |
| apw | infinity, | 14:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Zesty Final] (20101020ubuntu504) has been added | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Zesty Final] (20101020ubuntu504) has been added | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Zesty Final] (20101020ubuntu504) has been added | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Zesty Final] (20101020ubuntu504) has been added | 14:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Zesty Final] (20101020ubuntu504) has been added | 14:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Zesty Final] (20101020ubuntu504) has been added | 14:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (zesty-proposed/main) [123 => 124] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 14:59 | |
| infinity | cyphermox: Did the s/Muon Discover/Discover/ change not suffer the same msgid invalidation problem? | 15:07 |
| cyphermox | am I not Derpy McDerpface? | 15:07 |
| infinity | You might be. Are you? | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | looks that way | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | derpty derp . | 15:08 |
| infinity | Shall I reject? | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | yeah, I'll go touch it again | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | right after the DMB meeting | 15:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (zesty-proposed) [124] | 15:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (zesty-proposed/main) [123 => 124] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 16:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (zesty-proposed) [124] | 16:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wxpython3.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.2.0+dfsg-3 => 3.0.2.0+dfsg-3ubuntu1] (edubuntu) | 16:40 | |
| apw | ^ that really ought to have a bug# so it can be an SRU | 16:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxpython3.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.2.0+dfsg-3ubuntu1] | 16:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poedit (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0-1~exp1 => 2.0.1-1~exp1~build1] (no packageset) | 17:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poedit [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.1-1~exp1~build1] | 17:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gui-ufw (zesty-proposed/universe) [17.04.1-1 => 17.04.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) | 17:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, you right :) unfortunately this has been an omygodkitten issue, so I did it quick | 17:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | anyhow, a bug report is on Debian BTS now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860043 | 17:36 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 860043 in src:wxpython3.0 "" [Important,Open] | 17:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (I read irclogs when possible, don't rely on it :) ) | 17:37 |
| * LocutusOfBorg leaves, he is on train | 17:38 | |
| === bregma__ is now known as bregma | ||
| === timp is now known as t1mp | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: content-hub (zesty-proposed/main) [0.3+17.04.20170317.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.3+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 18:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (xenial-proposed/main) [8.0.32-1ubuntu1.3 => 8.0.32-1ubuntu1.4] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 19:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (zesty-proposed/main) [8.0.38-2ubuntu1 => 8.0.38-2ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 19:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: epiphany-browser (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu2 => 3.24.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) | 19:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tomcat8 (yakkety-proposed/main) [8.0.37-1ubuntu0.1 => 8.0.37-1ubuntu0.2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 19:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (zesty-proposed/universe) [137-3 => 138-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 19:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [138-1] | 19:17 | |
| xnox | my laptop did something really weird | 19:37 |
| xnox | ext4 started to detect journal errors and filesystem got remounted readonly | 19:37 |
| xnox | and from that point onwards I am enable to run df or gain root via sudo | 19:37 |
| xnox | all results in input/output errors | 19:37 |
| xnox | rebooting now..... | 19:37 |
| xnox | however, this is quite old kernel, not 4.10 =/ | 19:38 |
| Bashing-om | xnox: Off topic for this channel . Suggest ya seek support in your OS channel . | 19:43 |
| * ogra_ lols | 19:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ms-gsl (zesty-proposed/primary) [0~git20170403.ebab8ca-1] | 19:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (zesty-proposed/universe) [57-1 => 57-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 20:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock [source] (zesty-proposed) [57-1ubuntu1] | 20:12 | |
| slangasek | infinity, seb128: based on conversation with cyphermox, I understand that at least part of why we get so many bug reports on shim-signed related to debconf prompts not happening is that the gnome frontend is still broken by default due to missing libgtk2-perl. This is not an opportune time to discover this vs. release, but the problem affects older releases also and will need SRUed. opinions on | 20:15 |
| slangasek | seeding libgtk2-perl onto ubuntu-desktop for 17.04? | 20:15 |
| slangasek | infinity, seb128: this makes a difference in the UX of installing dkms packages (nvidia) from the liveCD, so seems worth pushing in | 20:15 |
| cyphermox | assuming we get another respin, seems like a relatively easy and safe fix? | 20:16 |
| slangasek | I'm not asking about including it opportunistically, I'm asking about committing to a respin for this issue | 20:18 |
| seb128 | slangasek, no objection in principle from me, did anyone check if that would pull in other things as well? (we still have gtk2 on the iso so that's ok) | 20:18 |
| slangasek | Depends: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.12.4), libc6 (>= 2.14), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.24.0), libpango-1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0), libpangocairo-1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0), perl (>= 5.22.2-1), perlapi-5.22.2, libcairo-perl, libglib-perl (>= 3:1.280), libpango-perl, shared-mime-info | 20:18 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: I understand that, what I'm saying is it's a moot point if we already are going to respin. my opinion in this case isn't gospel, but I'd respin | 20:19 |
| seb128 | so basically that gtk-perl bindings stack, which is probably small enough | 20:19 |
| seb128 | I don't have data to know if that's worth a respin though, so letting that decision to others | 20:20 |
| seb128 | installing nvidia drivers in a live session doesn't seem an important usecase to me at least | 20:21 |
| slangasek | isn't the common case that if you're going to install nvidia drivers, you do it during the install? | 20:21 |
| slangasek | thinking further, maybe this should be a dep of ubuntu-software instead of directly seeded | 20:24 |
| dmj_s76 | When upgrading from 16.10 to 17.04 the nvidia dkms modules don't get rebuilt. | 20:25 |
| slangasek | that impacts ubuntukylin (and would impact edubuntu) | 20:25 |
| slangasek | dmj_s76: have you filed a bug report with upgrade logs? | 20:26 |
| dmj_s76 | slangasek: Not yet, we just identified this now. | 20:27 |
| slangasek | ok | 20:27 |
| seb128 | I don't have nvidia hardware so I don't know how the installer is dealing with those, I know you can enable them from software-properties on an installed system though | 20:27 |
| dmj_s76 | The end result is that there are dkms modules for 4.8 but not 4.10 installed. | 20:27 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, ^ do you know what the installer is doing? | 20:27 |
| cyphermox | seb128: afaik it's running ubuntu-drivers uninteractively, to get the list of packages to install towards the end of the install process | 20:29 |
| cyphermox | (when you click "Install third-party drivers" | 20:29 |
| seb128 | so what wouldn't work without libgtk2-perl? | 20:29 |
| slangasek | seb128: installing nvidia drivers through the gui on a machine that has SecureBoot enabled will blow up | 20:29 |
| cyphermox | but the installer is "special" in that if you can fallback to Dialog if necessary (given that you have a shell window under the slideshow) and possibly a bit more is done to go uninteractively. | 20:30 |
| slangasek | falling back to Dialog is horrendous | 20:30 |
| seb128 | slangasek, k, that seems worth a respin indeed | 20:30 |
| cyphermox | (and furthermore, the default if secure boot is detected is to try to convince the user to set a password for mokutil) | 20:30 |
| slangasek | if it falls back to dialog, it won't crash on install | 20:30 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: I have never seen an install fallback to anything | 20:31 |
| seb128 | so that issue is in the LTS and nobody investigated until now? | 20:31 |
| cyphermox | I think in that case it runs uninteractive | 20:31 |
| jackpot51 | cyphermox: We are talking about `update-manager`, not the installer | 20:31 |
| dmj_s76 | slangasek: Are you guys talking about a separate nvidia issue here? | 20:31 |
| slangasek | seb128: it's a new consequence of the changes to enforce kernel module signing in the secureboot policy | 20:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (zesty-proposed/main) [3.22.7-0ubuntu2 => 3.22.7-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:31 | |
| jackpot51 | cyphermox: `nvidia-375` is installed, then `update-manager -d`, then after reboot the nvidia driver does not load | 20:32 |
| seb128 | slangasek, ok, thanks for the details, so yeah +1 from me to respin with libgtk2-perl | 20:32 |
| slangasek | cyphermox, seb128: ok, I forgot that this is integrated in ubiquity itself, which means the installer doesn't depend on the debconf gnome frontend for prompting... so now it seems to me maybe we /don't/ need it in 17.04 images | 20:32 |
| cyphermox | jackpot51: seb128 asked with the words "installer" | 20:32 |
| slangasek | jackpot51, dmj_s76: you've joined a conversation already in progress that has nothing to do with the upgrade bug you're talking about | 20:33 |
| jackpot51 | ok | 20:33 |
| dmj_s76 | ah, okay...now that makes sense | 20:33 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: why? isn't it still needed that drivers recommends libgtk2-perl or something? | 20:34 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: why is that not SRUable? | 20:36 |
| Bashing-om | seb128: Ya need a ginny pig ? I do have a 17.04 install on a nVidia GT710 card running the nouveau driver . I could reboot and see what results in installing the proprietary driver . | 20:36 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: oh, it most definitely is; it's just going to be ugly for the installs without network that can't get updates | 20:36 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: if that debconf prompt is not used in the installer path, even for 'install third-party drivers', it seems a post-release update is fine | 20:36 |
| cyphermox | I don't think there are very many network drivers depending on dkms | 20:37 |
| seb128 | Bashing-om, thanks, unsure if that's needed, seems people have a good understanding of the problem and when it's an issue | 20:37 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: right, I think the practical impact of that is nil | 20:37 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: I think we'll get in a state where the system is installable for most cases; but maybe not all that usable | 20:38 |
| cyphermox | yes, it's a very small portion of users | 20:38 |
| cyphermox | only r8168-dkms comes to mind, assuming that's still relevant. | 20:38 |
| Bashing-om | seb128: K; I do little enough to help .. So I help where I can :) | 20:38 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: that *might* impact willcooke, if I remember well; could be worth asking him how he does his installs. | 20:39 |
| cyphermox | (so we know if we're completely forgetting something important) | 20:39 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: ah - I assumed the set of dkms network drivers in the archive was zero. If it's not, I think that's sufficient justification for a respin | 20:43 |
| cyphermox | it's definitely non-zero | 20:44 |
| cyphermox | I see rtl8812au-dkms too which I don't particularly care about, but I have hardware that requires it | 20:44 |
| cyphermox | it's some wireless dongle | 20:44 |
| cyphermox | oh, and broadcom-sta-dkms | 20:45 |
| cyphermox | I think it will need to be there; STA used to be required for quite a bunch of people. | 20:46 |
| slangasek | so, if I fix this properly, it's a new Recommends: on gnome-software; that impacts lubuntu, ubuntustudio, ubuntukylin, ubuntu-budgie, xubuntu in addition to ubuntu | 20:50 |
| cyphermox | on gnome-software? | 20:51 |
| slangasek | yes | 20:51 |
| cyphermox | seems odd; but ok | 20:51 |
| slangasek | ubuntu-software is just a thin layer around gnome-software, it's gnome-software that has the dep on aptdaemon | 20:51 |
| jbicha | slangasek: gnome-software isn't the right place, maybe software-properties-common? | 20:52 |
| cyphermox | I don't think we're talking about the same thing | 20:52 |
| jbicha | I don't believe gnome-software supports debconf | 20:52 |
| slangasek | jbicha: gnome-software depends on aptdaemon without providing it a frontend | 20:53 |
| cyphermox | it shouldn't have to | 20:53 |
| slangasek | jbicha: this isn't an aptdaemon bug, because aptdaemon doesn't know /which/ gui toolkit frontend you want; that's a property of whatever depends on aptdaemon | 20:53 |
| jbicha | software-properties-gtk also depends on aptdaemon | 20:53 |
| slangasek | yes, and that package should *also* Recommends: libgtk2-perl | 20:54 |
| cyphermox | jbicha: gnome-software still probably ought to pull the package in, because you *might* install some dkms package from there. | 20:54 |
| jbicha | because I'm pretty sure that you can't install NVIDIA drivers using gnome-software/zesty but you can with software-properties-gtk | 20:55 |
| slangasek | this problem is not limited to software-properties-gtk | 20:55 |
| slangasek | jbicha: LP: #1679435 | 20:55 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1679435 in gnome-software (Ubuntu) "installing dkms package from software-center, no debconf frontend: package shim-signed 1.27~16.10.1+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1679435 | 20:55 |
| slangasek | should fix the title though, since it's not actually "software center" being used :P | 20:55 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: what of things that use packagekit instead? do we care? | 20:56 |
| cyphermox | uh-oh, frozen | 20:56 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: which are those? | 20:56 |
| jbicha | I think we're miscommunicating there; I don't think anything available in gnome-software uses dkms and I don't believe gnome-software supports debconf at all | 20:56 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: I'm not sure, I thought there was | 20:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.7-0ubuntu3] | 20:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (zesty-proposed/main) [3.22.7-0ubuntu2 => 3.22.7-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:58 | |
| cyphermox | slangasek: jbicha seems to have a point; it doesn't look like you can pick a dkms package to install via Software. | 21:01 |
| === acheronuk is now known as acheronUK | ||
| cyphermox | maybe I'm doing this wrong though; but quick searches when it does work don't turn up anything useful; I tried "dkms", "broadcom", "driver"... | 21:02 |
| slangasek | cyphermox, jbicha: virtualbox. QED | 21:02 |
| slangasek | as detailed in the bug I linked | 21:02 |
| cyphermox | oh, of course. | 21:02 |
| jbicha | ok, but my second concern is whether gnome-software supports debconf | 21:03 |
| cyphermox | jbicha: it doesn't have to | 21:03 |
| slangasek | I don't know what you think that means | 21:03 |
| slangasek | it is inexcusable for a frontend for installing Debian packages to NOT support debconf | 21:03 |
| jbicha | please file a bug then | 21:04 |
| infinity | "suporting debconf" is probably just a question of having libgtk-perl installed. | 21:04 |
| slangasek | to be clear, you're right that gnome-software doesn't install drivers and therefore it's not release-critical to fix gnome-software for 17.04. But if we're respinning anyway we could as well fix both | 21:04 |
| infinity | Maybe. | 21:04 |
| jbicha | I had this problem when working on the steam/zesty package where I had to drop the mandatory debconf question | 21:04 |
| slangasek | jbicha: like the one I linked to above already? | 21:04 |
| slangasek | infinity: yes, that's basically how I'm solving it (one package in queue, another in progress now) | 21:05 |
| infinity | slangasek: Mmkay. | 21:06 |
| slangasek | infinity: so you had respins planned anyway? cool | 21:07 |
| infinity | slangasek: Yeah. Was waiting for all the unblocks in the stack to wind through, final langpacks seb gave us earlier today, etc. | 21:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.7-0ubuntu3] | 21:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gui-ufw [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.1-1ubuntu1] | 21:10 | |
| slangasek | infinity: software-properties also uploaded | 21:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (zesty-proposed/main) [0.96.24.11 => 0.96.24.12] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 21:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted content-hub [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu1] | 21:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted epiphany-browser [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] | 21:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.96.24.12] | 21:15 | |
| cyphermox | slangasek: the gnome-software change makes sense, but did it work for you? | 21:15 |
| cyphermox | because http://imgur.com/a/6qqkP | 21:15 |
| cyphermox | disregard the "Secure Boot not enabled" message, I hacked the script to run anyway -- this is because my desktop does EFI but not Secure Boot. | 21:16 |
| jbicha | yes, that's similar to what I saw with steam | 21:16 |
| slangasek | well | 21:16 |
| slangasek | yeah, perhaps there are other problems here | 21:17 |
| cyphermox | (but that's a bug in gnome-software anyway) | 21:17 |
| slangasek | and no, I didn't actually test it | 21:17 |
| slangasek | how is it a bug in gnome-software? | 21:17 |
| cyphermox | not properly setting a frontend? | 21:17 |
| cyphermox | (or running non-interactively here) | 21:18 |
| jbicha | to me, it's unclear whether gnome-software not supporting debconf is a design decision or a bug | 21:18 |
| infinity | Design decisions can also be bugs. | 21:18 |
| infinity | Anyhow, I'm going to let you guys sort this out for a bit, I'll be back in 1.5 hours or so to see the state of proposed and start respins once I massage it to how I like before bed. | 21:19 |
| cyphermox | probably more an oversight, because most developers working on Software are probably more used to RPM distros, I suppose. | 21:19 |
| infinity | slangasek: Feel free to self-accept followups, so long as you get a positive review from someone sane. | 21:19 |
| cyphermox | but I'm just guessing, I have no idea | 21:19 |
| Laney | I think you can call setDebconfFrontend or something on aptdaemon transactions | 21:20 |
| jbicha | is it mandatory to show debconf prompts? or is the bug in the package that won't install completely without answering a debconf question? | 21:20 |
| Laney | FYI | 21:20 |
| slangasek | infinity: check. if we miss the 1.5 window, feel free to throw the respin list to me | 21:20 |
| slangasek | Laney: any chance you can point me to an example? | 21:20 |
| cyphermox | jbicha: any software may ask debconf questions; for things it needs to know to properly install -- for instance MAAS will ask you for some details about your setup | 21:21 |
| slangasek | Laney: n/m, I should obviously be looking at update-manager | 21:21 |
| slangasek | Laney: thanks | 21:21 |
| slangasek | yield trans.set_debconf_frontend("gnome") | 21:21 |
| jbicha | cyphermox: right, but does it cause problems if it doesn't get an answer? | 21:24 |
| Laney | NFI if that makes aptdaemon magically work or not though | 21:24 |
| jbicha | I tried looking through Debian Policy earlier about this issue, but I couldn't find a clear guideline | 21:25 |
| slangasek | cyphermox, Laney: software-properties reuploaded, setting the debconf frontend; anyone have a good way to test this? | 21:26 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (zesty-proposed/main) [0.96.24.12 => 0.96.24.13] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 21:26 | |
| cyphermox | jbicha: you might get exactly what you saw before with update-secureboot-policy, crash or other kind of failure because it's non-interactive, or it might work because of sensible defaults, priority, etc. | 21:27 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: nvidia? | 21:27 |
| cyphermox | I'm not sure I still have hardware to test that | 21:27 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: yes, I don't either; only nvidia box here is non-UEFI, that's why I was talking earlier about putting together a test case | 21:29 |
| jbicha | slangasek: isn't installing VBox the test case on a clean UEFI install? | 21:30 |
| cyphermox | yeah, I figured | 21:30 |
| cyphermox | jbicha: that won't allow you to test software-properties, it only knows about modaliases | 21:30 |
| slangasek | jbicha: for gnome-software, but not for software-properties - check | 21:30 |
| jbicha | ok | 21:30 |
| slangasek | so I'm going to work up a test ppa for all of this | 21:30 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: short of uploading a fake driver that does dkms, that could be recognized by software-properties, I can't think of a way | 21:31 |
| slangasek | in the meantime, if someone could test that software-properties still DTRT on a *non* UEFI box, that would be good | 21:31 |
| cyphermox | fortunately, that fake driver part is not too hard | 21:31 |
| slangasek | because I made that code change totally blind | 21:31 |
| cyphermox | yeah | 21:31 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: do you have anything you can test on for the non-SB case? | 21:31 |
| cyphermox | maybe, need to go upstairs look at my wife's machine | 21:32 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: When we have the new codename, I call dibs on creating all the new wiki pages (like I've done for the past 3 or 4 releases :P). | 21:35 |
| slangasek | dmj_s76, jackpot51: is there a bug w/ logs yet for the nvidia dkms upgrade issue? | 21:36 |
| jackpot51 | Yep, come to #ubuntu-devel to see | 21:36 |
| slangasek | ok; if another dev is working it now, I don't need to get in the middle :) | 21:36 |
| jackpot51 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1681566 | 21:36 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1681566 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "nvidia-375 DKMS module not recompiled on upgrade to 17.04" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:36 |
| jackpot51 | Still, we could use more help | 21:37 |
| jackpot51 | bdmurray is helping out | 21:37 |
| bdmurray | yeah, cause I'm not to sure what is up | 21:38 |
| bdmurray | slangasek: or because I'm reviewing cloud-init. ;-) | 21:38 |
| slangasek | yeah, but I'm head-down on a bugfix we're trying to land in the 17.04 image, which takes precedence over an upgrade issue | 21:39 |
| bdmurray | okay | 21:39 |
| dmj_s76 | infinity: any ideas? | 21:42 |
| tsimonq2 | Release team: any chance the Lubuntu team could get some help with bug 1681178? Is it just adding something to the seed, or is it more complex? | 21:45 |
| ubot5 | bug 1681178 in lubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "The alternate installer does not install man" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681178 | 21:46 |
| rbalint | ginggs: i wrote a simple python script for generating autopkgtest rerun links: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/24356986/ | 21:46 |
| rbalint | ginggs: this is current output: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/24357014/ | 21:47 |
| rbalint | ginggs: could you please trigger those? | 21:47 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: yeah, I have a system that can probably test this | 21:48 |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox: Do you think we should be concerned about this? https://pad.lv/1667453 | 21:53 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1667453 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Lubuntu Zesty ubiquity welcome dialog not shown" [Undecided,New] | 21:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-terminal (zesty-proposed/main) [3.20.2-1ubuntu7 => 3.20.2-1ubuntu8] (ubuntu-desktop) | 21:56 | |
| cyphermox | tsimonq2: I don't know from that bug | 21:56 |
| cyphermox | I'll sync the world to my system and test this after dinner | 21:56 |
| bdmurray | cyphermox: which "this"? | 21:57 |
| cyphermox | bdmurray: tsimonq2's | 21:57 |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox: Thank you. :) | 22:03 |
| bdmurray | smoser: Is the change in bug 1665773 necessary if bug 1665694 is fixed? | 22:08 |
| ubot5 | bug 1665773 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Xenial) "wrong configuration example for cc_set_passwords module" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1665773 | 22:08 |
| ubot5 | bug 1665694 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Yakkety) "cc_set_passwords fails to change passwords specified as chpasswd['list'] in cloud-config" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1665694 | 22:08 |
| bdmurray | As I understand it either a list (the way it was supposed to be) or a string will work now and the docs are switching from string to list, while list was the original intent. So it seems strange to me to "fix" the docs. | 22:15 |
| bdmurray | Given that the documentation isn't wrong I'll let it in. | 22:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] | 22:22 | |
| tsimonq2 | bdmurray: Re: bug 1674796, what do you think the fix might be? | 22:25 |
| ubot5 | bug 1674796 in lubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "After alternate install two network applets show up" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674796 | 22:25 |
| tsimonq2 | bdmurray: Any clue what the problem is internally? | 22:25 |
| bdmurray | tsimonq2: I don't know, sorry | 22:25 |
| * cyphermox -> dinner, bbl | 22:26 | |
| fossfreedom | tsimonq2: in lubuntu do you run both a X11 system tray and an appindicator in the panel ? | 22:28 |
| slangasek | ok what am I doing wrong here? | 22:29 |
| slangasek | db_fget "$question" seen | 22:29 |
| slangasek | if [ "$RET" = false ]; then | 22:29 |
| slangasek | [...] | 22:29 |
| slangasek | because I am certainly seeing the question immediately before this | 22:29 |
| slangasek | n/m, still not sure why it didn't work but found a workaround | 22:33 |
| === coreycb is now known as coreycb_vaca | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-90-g61eb03fe-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 22:46 | |
| tsimonq2 | fossfreedom: I'm not 100% sure... | 22:48 |
| fossfreedom | tsimonq2: the reason for the question is that on Ubuntu Budgie we saw the same thing - sometime double network icons - the network-manager applet gets confused between appindicators and the system tray and shows two icons | 22:49 |
| fossfreedom | in the end I just coded around it - hid the network-manager appindicator version in our appindicator applet implementation | 22:50 |
| fossfreedom | anyway - may not be your issue - but just putting that bit of info out there. | 22:51 |
| tsimonq2 | Ah ok :) | 23:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dovecot (zesty-proposed/main) [1:2.2.27-2ubuntu1 => 1:2.2.27-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server) | 23:12 | |
| slangasek | hmm, well, I have an affirmative test of a debconf prompt through software-properties now (so, accepting); but my negative test passes even when libgtk2-perl is not installed | 23:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.96.24.13] | 23:21 | |
| slangasek | because debconf says "sure, I'm going to display that question, trust me" | 23:22 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: That "doesn't install man" bug is because your ISO's preseed doesn't include standard. | 23:44 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: I can fix that, but you'll also get recommends, which you hate :P | 23:45 |
| infinity | (Which might be why it wasn't done?) | 23:45 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Didn't we talk about this a while back but somebody was supposed to do something? Rings a bell but isn't clear... | 23:45 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: It's hardly a new bug, though. | 23:45 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Why does including the standard task bring in everything? | 23:46 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: And weren't we supposed to follow up the other week re: opening floodgates by bringing in all recommends? | 23:47 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: It's doesn't bring in "everything", it brings in all of the standard task. | 23:47 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: Which, if you look at "ubuntu-standard" is half recommends. | 23:47 |
| infinity | Oh. | 23:48 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh? | 23:48 |
| infinity | But your livefses already install the whole task. | 23:48 |
| infinity | Not the package minus recommends. | 23:48 |
| infinity | So, meh. | 23:48 |
| tsimonq2 | But we're talking Alternate, here, I think. | 23:48 |
| infinity | Yes. | 23:48 |
| infinity | I'm comparing behaviour. | 23:49 |
| * cyphermox -> back | 23:49 | |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox: \o/ | 23:49 |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox: Welcome back. :) | 23:49 |
| cyphermox | hey, I'm in a good mood, I have a Mille-feuille to boot :) | 23:51 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Like I said, I think we had this discussion at one point and afaicr it led into "let's get alternate out of here" sooo :P | 23:51 |
| tsimonq2 | cyphermox: :D | 23:51 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: Well, committed a fix anyway. | 23:53 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Got a link? "fix" is kinda generic... | 23:54 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Also, does this need a respin? | 23:54 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: The world is respinning shortly anyway. | 23:58 |
| wxl | oh noes | 23:58 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: And the link will be in the bug when the branch is mirror to the public copy. | 23:59 |
| infinity | wxl: "Oh noes"? It's Monday. :P | 23:59 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: Oh, more last-minute low-level kernel thingies? :P | 23:59 |
| infinity | tsimonq2: No. | 23:59 |
| infinity | slangasek: How did your battle go? | 23:59 |
| tsimonq2 | infinity: I was joking, but ok. :) | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!