=== _salem is now known as salem_ === dja_ is now known as dja === salem_ is now known as _salem [02:23] sigh i should just always pass -sa to dpkg-buildpackage, at least when i have a fast connection on hand [02:27] I started doing debuild -tc -sa a bit ago too... Added it to pbuilderrc. [02:36] eh i think i ~always pass -S too, so -tc wouldn't get me much? [02:36] building is for chroots [02:43] Yeah, but I still do it. >_> [02:54] heh [04:41] hi [04:41] I read that Ubuntu will have GNOME by default [04:41] I contribute to GNOME [04:42] but I suppose that there must be some modifications of GNOME that are particular to Ubuntu [04:42] how can I contribute in those parts? [06:03] cfoch-always: I don't think any decisions have been made along those lines yet. [07:27] lo all. I have posted a message in #ubuntu-packaging but haven't had any reponse. Are packaging questions welcome in this channel ? === Orphis_ is now known as Orphis [07:29] yes [07:33] sarnold: If I wanted to change /etc/dpkg/origins/default (a symlink, not in alternatives) to something else without doing something gross, what'd be the best way? [07:35] Unit193: it looks like this is the thing you've got ot play nicely with http://sources.debian.net/src/base-files/9.9/debian/postinst.in/?hl=47#L47 [07:36] Unit193: .. in which case it feels a bit like you can just drop in your own file, re-set the link, and probably things will continue to work [07:36] Right, but if one didn't want to "fork" base-files? One would have to take into account removing of course. [07:36] sarnold: FWIW, I'm partially messing with you due to your answer. But, might be looking to do something like this. [07:37] I think the postinst script is prepared to live happily alongside your own deb dropping in your own file [07:39] Was thinking of moving the file, and in the pre/postrm move it back. [07:46] I think it looks set up to just accept a new file there, with a new symlink, without hassle [07:47] i am trying to package a PHP pecl extension for 16.04. previously i have used dh-make-pecl (i think) but that doesn't seem to be in the repos. Does anyone know if the process has changed or if there is a new tool or something that has replaced it ? [07:48] Just have to handle the case of removing package-2. === CRogers_________ is now known as CRogers [09:01] mapreri: why did freeipa need a rebuild against ldns2? [09:01] cjwatson, infinity told me to not be a jerk and to scootch over. [09:01] and make room for you === jtaylor_ is now known as jtaylor [11:57] cyphermox, hi, I'm having an issue with the zesty ubuntu-gnome installer. on my desktop it freezes at some point with the initial spinner [11:58] cyphermox, how can I debug what's blocking? [12:51] ackk: what do you mean by "the initial spinner"? the plymouth splash screen? [12:51] cyphermox, yes [12:52] cyphermox, I've tried both the beta2 iso and the daily one. the former hang at gnome startup, the latter at the splash screen === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:55] ackk: ok, did you file a bug? what hardware is that on? [12:56] cyphermox, I didn't because I don't have any info. I was wondering if there was a way to get some debug info [12:57] the best is to file a bug in the first place; use "ubuntu-bug ubiquity" to make sure it includes hardware info we'd need. [12:57] cyphermox, ok. is lshw output enough? [12:57] just from there I'd guess shell doesn't like your video hardware, and maybe it's something I could reproduce on my own laptop. [12:58] ackk: sure..., but ubuntu-bug does the right thing for you. [12:58] cyphermox, so I run it on yakkety and just mention the issue is with zesty? [12:59] yeah, that will do [13:00] I'm most interested in the hardware, what make/model especially, just in the off chance I have that at home. [13:00] tjaalton: my fault. I scheduled rebuilds on all packages mentioned by britney, I forgot to remove the arch:all ones (and I should have probably actually checked they build-dep on the relevant -dev…) [13:00] so I triggered at least 2 useless builds, including that. === NCommander is now known as Guest19549 [13:18] cyphermox, does it start X or wayland by default? [13:19] probably X, I suppose [13:19] jbicha: ^ [13:19] not that it would matter much, a bug is a bug [13:21] the installer does not use Wayland [13:25] cyphermox, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1681846 FTR [13:25] Launchpad bug 1681846 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Zesty Ubuntu-GNOME Installer hangs at plymouth splash" [Undecided,New] [13:28] thanks [13:32] ty for the info [13:48] mapreri: ok, no prob [14:32] jamespage, i think https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1681470 is a cloudarchive backport bug. Is there a specific way to file cloudarchive bugs? [14:32] Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #1681470 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681470). The error has been logged [14:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1681470 [14:45] xnox: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive [14:45] jamespage, tah. [14:49] yw [15:37] slangasek, kees, stgraber: Vote we skip the TB meeting today because release week and other drama. [15:37] infinity: fine with me [15:43] infinity: ok [15:44] infinity: fancy doing my DMB->TB tasks then? [15:44] infinity, kees, stgraber: updated on the wiki [15:44] You (the TB) missed an outstanding one last week, so one person has been waiting a while. [15:44] bug 1674440 [15:44] bug 1674440 in ubuntu-community "[TB/DMB] ACL for ~ubuntu-sru-developers" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674440 [15:45] rbasak: infinity is release managing in London today, so probably not him [15:45] Ah, I didn't realise there was a sprint. [15:47] tyhicks: hey, are you planning any apparmor uploads for zesty? [15:47] jdstrand: no, I don't believe so [15:50] tyhicks: I was going to fix aa-notify and verify the wayland abstraction. is there anything else you'd like incorporated in that upload? === jgrimm is now known as jgrimm-away [15:51] jdstrand: I can't think of anything - thanks for asking! [15:52] np [16:06] rbasak: Thanks! [16:23] stgraber: would you be able to sort out bug 1674440 please? [16:23] bug 1674440 in ubuntu-community "[TB/DMB] ACL for ~ubuntu-sru-developers" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674440 [16:23] We've been waiting a while - it was missed at the last TB meeting. === JanC_ is now known as JanC === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [19:47] rbasak: triaging a mysql 5.7 upgrade failure in #ubuntu; why does the postinst not capture (at least) the output in run_init_sql and display it in case it fails? [19:47] rbasak: as that's the failing step here [19:48] or at least say "mysqld failed to start" ? [19:48] * nacc thinks anytime a user ends up seeing only a dpkg returned 1 message and the log has nothing, there is something to improve :( [20:00] nacc: we usually get fairly descriptive things in bug reports now. So I'm not sure what's missing in that case. [20:00] Could it be a really old installation that doesn't write error logs at all? [20:00] rbasak: i'm not sure, they said they were on 16.04 and the `apt-get upgrade` just ran recently [20:00] We fixed that an LTS or two ago, but users may not have picked up the conffile update. [20:00] /var/log/mysql/error.log should have the details [20:01] nacc: what was the dpkg output? [20:02] http://paste.ubuntu.com/24362260/ [20:02] well taht was the first output [20:02] we got to this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24362788/ [20:02] and now we're asking them to hack the postinst a bit to not /dev/null that run [20:08] rbasak: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24362893/ [20:09] it seems like mysqld is not starting properly [20:09] That's odd. [20:10] Skuggen: ^ [20:11] nacc: anything in /var/log/mysql/error.log? [20:11] Is that file being touched? [20:11] oh right, let me ask [20:16] rbasak: "Fatal error: mysql.user table is damaged. Please run mysql_upgrade." [20:16] We should perhaps capture the log and print it on failure in this case. [20:17] I'd like Skuggen's input, but in the meantime, a bug report is welcome. [20:17] rbasak: i'll ask them to file [20:17] Thanks! [20:17] A bug for the lack of useful error message of course. [20:17] I don't know that there is any other bug (yet). [20:17] yeah [21:35] cyphermox: Hi :) [21:40] hey [21:41] cyphermox: You around to do this debugging, or later? [21:43] tsimonq2: so, could you file a new bug, add "systemd-resolve --status" and try 'sudo systemctl stop systemd-resolved' and finally running 'SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /usr/sbin/systemd-resolved > /tmp/resolved.log 2>&1' and trying to resolve something again? [21:44] these command lines are approximate from memory, maybe there's not quite right [21:45] wow, my grammar is bad today === salem_ is now known as _salem [21:45] super bad [21:45] cyphermox: But at the moment I overwrote my /etc/resolv.conf to make this work. [21:45] cyphermox: Do I need a fresh file to do this on? === _salem is now known as salem_ === salem_ is now known as _salem [22:16] nacc: I got a better stacktrace in bug 1667892. Should I flip it back to New? [22:16] bug 1667892 in apache2 (Ubuntu) "apache2 crashed with SIGSEGV in ()" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1667892 [22:20] bdmurray: yeah, sounds right [23:41] cyphermox: You saw my above ping, right? :) [23:43] tsimonq2: yeah, I don't think you need to touch resolv.conf at all there [23:43] cyphermox: Ok, I'll continue now :) [23:43] if you use the dig command to issue DNS requests you can point it right to 127.0.0.53 [23:44] ie. [23:44] dig www.google.com @127.0.0.53 [23:44] cyphermox: What should I title the bug? [23:44] Ok [23:46] Ok wat >__< -- this is weirdf [23:46] *weird [23:46] It works fine now... [23:46] O__o [23:46] Oh lol [23:46] cyphermox: bash: /usr/sbin/systemd-resolved: No such file or directory [23:46] Where is it really? [23:47] oh, right [23:47] /lib/systemd/systemd-resolved ? [23:47] Yes. [23:47] sarnold: Trying. [23:47] /lib/systemd/systemd-resolved [23:47] silly place to put a binary. [23:48] > systemd [23:48] Unit193: yeah, just need to retrain to not always /usr/sbin. [23:48] But... there's nothing in the log and I can dig everything fine? [23:48] nothing in the log? [23:48] Plus, I'm talking to you now, soo [23:49] Nope, nada [23:49] $ cat /tmp/resolved.log [23:49] simon@semantic ~ $ [23:49] hold on, let me try this here. [23:49] Ok. [23:50] systemd is really "fun," at least this part of it is ^__^ [23:50] you're missing sudo [23:51] Gah, that would explain it... [23:51] but not only that [23:52] Oh? [23:55] arf [23:55] sudo SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug SYSTEMD_LOG_TARGET=console /lib/systemd/systemd-resolved 2>/tmp/resolved.log [23:55] because just honoring redirects would be too easy.