[00:00] infinity: Alright, well thanks for helping with this. :) [00:00] infinity: validated software-properties against ppa:vorlon/debconf-tests; accepted and unblocked; working through the component overrides now [00:00] (to repromote libgtk2-perl and friends) [00:01] slangasek: But my precious component-mismatches was empty! [00:01] Well, I guess it still is, cause this is all in proposed. ;) [00:01] ;) [00:01] (Seriously, though, EMPTY. Did you see that?) [00:02] I might have been excessively proud of that. It hasn't been empty for cycles. [00:02] yes, it's very confusing [00:02] :) [00:02] but not as confusing as the -proposed one telling me conntrack-tools-dbg needs demoted only in -proposed [00:03] Weird fallout from the php transition it's attempting in proposed? [00:03] btw, that svg at the bottom takes 95M to render in chromium [00:03] conntrack tied to php? not that I could tell [00:03] * infinity shrugs. [00:03] Fix your stuff, check the non-proposed report, ignore proposed, win. [00:03] yep, done [00:03] Or conntrack-tools-dbg might be NBS in proposed. [00:04] oh, quite [00:04] Oh. [00:04] It's not NBS in proposed, but it will become NBS when proposed migrates. [00:04] So, mystery solved. [00:04] technically, it is also Not Built from Source in -proposed [00:04] it's just also not present in -proposed ;) [00:05] Well, yes. But not what we mean by NBS, which is "cruft that's NBS". [00:05] Otherwise, the NBS set is infinite. [00:05] SO MANY THINGS NOT BUILT FROM SOURCE. [00:05] this cow? NBS. [00:05] Okay, I'm sick of these snapd tests and their flappiness. [00:05] Dpkg is getting a hint. [00:06] I'm glad LP didn't ever end up tracking NBS. Our DB servers aren't that big. [00:06] wgrant: Hey now. Don't sell them short. They're pretty big. [00:06] wgrant: Besides, who doesn't want to file an RT for "infinite disk, and infinite/10 RAM for hot caches"? [00:06] Heh [00:07] I was going to suggest lazy expansion as a solution, then I realized someone would be bound to write a query for it [00:07] infinity: software-properties accepted into zesty [00:08] slangasek: So, gnome-software was a failed experiment? [00:08] infinity: gnome-software is a partial fix; the recommends is still valid to add but does no good without code changes to tell aptd to actually use the gnome frontend [00:09] and that piece isn't installer-critical since it's not related to drivers, so we'll deal with it in SRU [00:09] "code changes" like just pushing DEBIAN_FRONTEND to gnome-software's env? [00:10] Or is it foiling that plan by forking aptdaemon in a clean env? [00:10] infinity: aptd is dbus-activated [00:10] Oh. [00:10] Derp. [00:10] But, wait. update-manager uses aptd, doesn't it? And it debconfs. [00:10] Maybe I'm living in the past. [00:10] * infinity shrugs. [00:11] so there's an api to tell it which frontend to use, which you have to call, and since gnome-software is !python I have to look up the deets and this is not something for you to block the respin on [00:11] infinity: yes, u-m calls the api to set the frontend, that's where I stole the one-liner to do it for software-properties [00:11] Ah. [00:11] Check. [00:11] Alright. [00:11] Well, let your half fix in, please. [00:11] If you didn't already. [00:12] And I'll go twiddle some thumbs while I wait on these langpacks and your stuff and my stuff to all converge in one spot. [00:13] infinity: k, gnome-software unblocked [00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysprof (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysprof [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [00:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bijiben (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.20.2-1build2 => 3.20.2-1.1] (desktop-extra) (sync) [00:31] ^ bijiben is unseeded, let me know if you'd rather I did an Ubuntu-specific upload instead https://tracker.debian.org/news/843188 [01:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra) [01:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: polari (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [01:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted polari [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [01:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bijiben [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.20.2-1.1] [01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dovecot [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:2.2.27-2ubuntu2] [01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-terminal [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.20.2-1ubuntu8] [01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-builder [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [01:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tomcat8 [source] (zesty-proposed) [8.0.38-2ubuntu2] [02:11] slangasek, infinity: around? [02:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.8 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.8-1ubuntu1 => 1.8.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [02:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.8 [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.8.1-1ubuntu1] [02:31] mwhudson: anything I can help with? [02:32] cyphermox: wondering whether to upload the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.7/+bug/1681294 to zesty [02:32] Ubuntu bug 1681294 in golang-1.6 (Ubuntu Yakkety) "ugly "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable" running snaps" [Undecided,In progress] [02:33] i guess i can stick it in the queue and let the release team decide [02:33] ... after checking that it won [02:33] 't result in a transition [02:33] (it really shouldn't) [02:33] ah [03:13] mwhudson: hi [03:17] well what the heck, it does cause a transition [03:17] mwhudson: libgolang-1.7-std1 is seeded on cloud-image and server, so this impacts release; it's fine to upload it, but I think we should punt this to SRU (and doubly so given the transition) <-- infinity [03:17] i really need to look into making the go shared library abis more stable [03:17] slangasek: fair enough [03:34] argl bargl, the transition is because the change adds a new file to runtime/cgo [04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [04:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [05:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411) [06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wxwidgets3.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+dfsg-3 => 3.0.2+dfsg-4~build1] (edubuntu) [06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poedit (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1~exp1~build1 => 2.0.1-1~exp1] (no packageset) (sync) [06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poedit [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.1-1~exp1] [06:39] infinity, jbicha: yeah, so the set_debconf_frontend() bits are implemented entirely in python (python3-aptdaemon + python3-debconf), that's going to take a bit of work to implement for gnome-software (but still should be done) [06:40] n/m there is no python3-debconf, just a debconf.py in python3-aptdaemon [08:04] Laney: lp:autopkgtest-cloud don't seem to be accessible fore mere mortals [08:04] uh? [08:04] Laney: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+git/autopkgtest-cloud [08:04] https://code.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud ? [08:05] we just changed it recently [08:05] if you find a reference to that old one please fix it [08:05] Laney: thanks [08:05] Laney: i found it on launchpad search [08:05] Laney: not sure if i can fix that easily :-) [08:06] Laney: https://launchpad.net/+search?field.text=autopkgtest-cloud [08:06] maybe I could push a readme.txt there [08:06] can't hurt eh [08:08] hello release team, can you please unblock wxwidgets3.0? a rationale is explained on debian bug #860074 [08:08] Debian bug 860074 in release.debian.org "unblock: wxpython3.0/3.0.2.0+dfsg-4 wxwidgets3.0/3.0.2+dfsg-4" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/860074 [08:10] I did upload wxpy3.0, but the patch was touching a wxwidgets embedded code copy (sigh) [08:10] so, the real fix is to upload wxwidgets3.0, not wxpython [08:12] I will sync them later today, making the ubuntu delta useless and disappear [08:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [231-9ubuntu4] [08:24] Laney: botch's autopkgtest result shows OOM and I'd like to set it to use m1.large instance [08:25] Laney: should i somehow verify that it fixes the OOM before filing a merge for autopkgtest-cloud? [08:25] Laney: it may fail on my small VM-s, too [08:26] rbalint: Laney i'll give it a try, but i'm interested in understanding the general process [08:26] sure, try it [08:26] apw, can you please unblock wxwidgets3.0? http://bugs.debian.org/860074 the fix on wxpython3.0 was touching embedded code copy of wx, not the real one :( [08:26] Debian bug 860074 in release.debian.org "unblock: wxpython3.0/3.0.2.0+dfsg-4 wxwidgets3.0/3.0.2+dfsg-4" [Normal,Open] [08:27] I got two unblocks from release team in Debian [08:27] (and I'll sync them from here by today) [08:27] there's a --ram argument to autopkgtest-virt-qemu [08:27] is it 'expected' to use that much? would be good to know [08:33] can anybody please give me his opinion to a llvm-toolchain-4.0 sync? [08:33] I'm worried about: * change the min version of the libclang1 symbols to 1:4.0-3~ [08:33] this is because finally we are getting versioned symbols, but I dont' understand if a transition is needed or not [08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-themes (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.22.8-0ubuntu1 => 3.22.10-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) [08:51] flexiondotorg: you want to respin for that? [08:51] Laney, no thanks. Just being there for an update on day 1 is fine. [08:52] ok, then please put a bug number in the changelog :-) [08:52] There are no Ubuntu bugs, it is general fixes from upstream. [08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mate-themes [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.10-0ubuntu1] [08:55] right, but if it is to become an SRU it needs a bug [08:58] LocutusOfBorg, what is the impact of that wxwidgets thing, it looks like we respan after the previous attempt [08:59] Laney OK, then can I respin? :-) [09:00] filing a bug is that hard? [09:01] wx* will cause a studio respin. [09:02] LocutusOfBorg: We release in two days. If you have any questions about an upload, the answer should be "no", and you shouldn't ask the question. [09:04] LocutusOfBorg: As for wx*, it will cause a studio respin, which has no testing currently, so that's probably okay. But if you were implying you wanted to sync them both at different times, uhm, do them both now? :P [09:04] LocutusOfBorg: The llvm one should be a hard "no", unless it's actively buggy and causing issues right now. [09:04] infinity, I just uploaded them in unstable [09:04] just let lp catch them :) [09:05] infinity, for llvm-4.0 the answer is no also on my side, but I wanted to understand if a transition is required when symbols versions are bumped [09:05] If it is, symbols aren't versioned very well. :P [09:06] infinity, the problem is that various llvm-* implementations are using the same symbols, so people complains about crashes when different llvm are used at runtime [09:06] something like that [09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.6 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1.1] [09:06] anyway, I'll sync wx* in some hours, hopefully after britney run [09:06] I'll probably fakesync it now, if you really want it. [09:07] yes please if you can [09:07] At this point in the release, waiitng is not an option. [09:07] it is an important assert fix, various crashes because of that mutex issue [09:07] accepted by upstream and cherry-picked on stable branch 3.0 [09:07] I really trust poedit upstream developer and his work [09:09] infinity: I don't suppose you'd accept ms-gsl? :P [09:10] I would accept it, leaf package and hurray for new telegram-desktop not crashing anymore! [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wxpython3.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.2.0+dfsg-3ubuntu1 => 3.0.2.0+dfsg-4] (edubuntu) [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wxwidgets3.0 (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.2+dfsg-3 => 3.0.2+dfsg-4] (edubuntu) [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ms-gsl [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0~git20170403.ebab8ca-1] [09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wxwidgets3.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.2+dfsg-4~build1] [09:12] Ukikie: /win 77 [09:12] OK, you win. [09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxpython3.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.2.0+dfsg-4] [09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxwidgets3.0 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.2+dfsg-4] [09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ms-gsl [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [0~git20170403.ebab8ca-1] (no packageset) [09:19] infinity: i have added botch to big packages: lp:~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud [09:19] infinity: could you please merge? [09:23] infinity: hm, it seems i have to add it to multiple lists, please hold on [09:25] rbalint, yeah there are 3 or 4 [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-fields (zesty-proposed/universe) [8.10-1 => 8.10-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-fields [source] (zesty-proposed) [8.10-1ubuntu1] [09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stress-ng (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.07.28-1 => 0.07.28-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.07.28-1ubuntu1] [09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ms-gsl [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [0~git20170403.ebab8ca-1] [10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: telegram-desktop (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.14-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.29-1] (no packageset) (sync) [10:06] flexiondotorg: I'll take care of that respin for you when the archive is in the correct state. [10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telegram-desktop [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.29-1] [10:21] infinity, cyphermox: so other than the old issue that I added a work around for in the bug (be good to get it in the release notes) most of the installs are going without a hitch [10:22] davmor2: The old issue being the lack of "remove CD and press enter" prompt? [10:23] We've only fixed that about 17 times. [10:23] It's a horrible hack. [10:23] infinity: yeap it's a pain cause cyphermox can't reproduce it but it happens here on multiple machines but it's only a case of hitting the power button [10:23] davmor2, it doesn't respond to return even so ? [10:24] apw: it does for some but not for all [10:24] apw: on the dell xps13 the cursor just moves down a line but you can't type anything into it [10:24] such dodgy code, we should make a ramfs with the shutdown code in it, and chroot there really [10:26] apw: Yes, I was thinking the same thing, but I didn't want to say it out loud, because then Lennart wins. [10:27] infinity, he has to be right now and again even if it is luck [10:28] apw: But I don't have to be happy about it. [10:28] swing the bat often enough at some point you'll hit the pinata [10:29] davmor2: And the moral of this story is "CANDY!!"? [10:29] infinity: always candy [10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-adegraphics (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0-6-1 => 1.0-6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:49] Am I thinking correctly that the empty download for "Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2" should be http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-preinstalled/current/zesty-preinstalled-server-armhf+raspi2.img.xz [10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-adegraphics [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0-6-1ubuntu1] [10:50] ^ that is in the tracker [10:55] smb: Yeah I added it, thx for noticing [10:55] Laney, cool, then I also grabbed the right one [10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tome (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [2.4~0.git.2015.12.29-1.1ubuntu1 => 2.4~0.git.2015.12.29-1.1ubuntu2] (no packageset) [10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tome [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.4~0.git.2015.12.29-1.1ubuntu2] [11:05] Laney Sorry, I was in meetings and my bouncer crashed so I've missed some scrollback. [11:05] No worries hombre [11:05] it's gone in now [11:06] Ah, well thanks :-) [11:06] flexiondotorg: I'll be respinning for you shortly. [11:06] flexiondotorg: Waiting on some archive settle. [11:06] infinity Thanks. [11:06] infinity Are you in London now? [11:07] flexiondotorg: Ate. [11:07] flexiondotorg: Also aye. [11:07] Ale [11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-sp (zesty-proposed/universe) [1:1.2-4-1 => 1:1.2-4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-sp [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:1.2-4-1ubuntu1] [11:26] Laney infinity I'll be in the office on Thursday. Beers on me. [11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pbh5tools (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.8.0+dfsg-5 => 0.8.0+dfsg-5build1] (no packageset) [11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pbh5tools [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.0+dfsg-5build1] [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: garmin-plugin (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.23-4 => 0.3.23-4ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:56] infinity, want that reviewed ? [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted garmin-plugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.23-4ubuntu1] [11:56] apw: It reviewed itself. [11:57] oh heh, so it did, back in my box [12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411.1) [12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411.1) [12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-location-provider-here (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.1+15.10.20150601.3-0ubuntu1 => 0.1+15.10.20150601.3-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) [12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-location-provider-here [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.1+15.10.20150601.3-0ubuntu2] [12:19] infinity: there isn't gonna be another respin for ubuntu is there? AMD64 is done moving onto I386 [12:23] davmor2: It's only Tuesday, so dunno. [12:23] davmor2: But I have no respins planned. [12:24] * davmor2 hugs infinity just leave like that ;) [12:41] infinity, we have some kernels pending in stables for publishing to proposed, are you happy for those to hit with the associated pu [12:41] pu [12:41] publisher gummage ? [12:42] apw: Better now than later. [12:42] infinity, ack [12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.23.6 => 2.24] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.23.6+16.10 => 2.24+16.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.23.6+17.04.1 => 2.24+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [12:52] davmor2: I managed to reproduce it after all, but I still have no idea why it works on the live session and breaks otherwise [12:52] well, I have an idea why, but still not sure how. [12:52] cyphermox: works on manual keep home too :) [12:53] I'm talking about the shutdown promot. [12:53] *prompt. [12:53] cyphermox: yeap [12:53] hrm [12:54] cyphermox: do a manual install and then do a manual install keeping home over that and the popup appears too [12:54] infinity, i'll look at those snapd uploads [12:54] cyphermox: so litterally just fresh install nothing kept [12:54] ok, so in only-ubiquity you do an install with keeping home and that works? [12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-xml2 (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:54] the only thing that could be is systemd blocking waiting for stuff to be unmounted [12:55] I'll keep looking then, that might be easy to fix. [12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-xml2 [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.1.0-1ubuntu1] [12:57] cyphermox: so everything oem-mode, fresh install, overwrite install, auto-resize and manual install (normal) all had no prompt, manual reuse home and install from desktop both did [12:58] davmor2: How much RAM does your VM have? [12:58] I *think* the common thread in those successes is that both probably had swap active. [12:58] Maybe. [12:58] infinity: hardware 4gig [12:58] 4G should be more than enough for our stupid caching tricks, though. :P [12:58] infinity: and hardware 8gig [12:58] yep, it should [12:59] infinity: the 8GB on the xps13 should be more than enough [12:59] I'd be surprised if you need much more than 100Mb. [12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.23.1~14.04 => 2.24~14.04] (no packageset) === NCommander is now known as Guest19549 [13:16] infinity: I get a crash on unity date-time indicator on i386 I'll try another install and see if it happens again and double check my iso versions [13:20] infinity: it's still a revision behind D'oh only looked at the amd64 this morning as that was where I was starting updating now and I'll try again [13:23] davmor2: The indicator hasn't changed, so I assume the segv also hasn't. :P [13:23] infinity: I'll find out in a minute [13:24] davmor2: Is there a bug for that? I don't see anything on the tracker. [13:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411.1) [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Zesty Final] has been updated (20170411.1) [13:25] infinity: I sent the crash file but after checking my md5sum I noticed the numbers didn't match so stopped looking at it then. If I get it on this install too I'll be sure it is filed and added to the tracker [13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6-cross (zesty-proposed/main) [19ubuntu1 => 21ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [13:33] bdmurray, it would not be strictly necessary, but it went in first. and then the user contributed a fix to support either. [13:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6-cross-ports (zesty-proposed/main) [17ubuntu1 => 19ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross-ports [source] (zesty-proposed) [19ubuntu1] [13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6-cross [source] (zesty-proposed) [21ubuntu1] [14:11] infinity: still crashing https://errors.ubuntu.com/oops/280c3984-1ec0-11e7-990e-fa163ed44aae trying to figure out why it isn't reporting a bug and only sending to errors [14:12] davmor has incremented [14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libhmsbeagle (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.1.2+20160831-5 => 2.1.2+20160831-5ubuntu1] (no packageset) [14:13] apport bug reporting gets disabled for the release [14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libhmsbeagle [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.1.2+20160831-5ubuntu1] [14:13] Laney: nope it looks to be enabled but it isn't when I manually trigger ubuntu-bug either [14:15] could someone please review LP: #1680577 ? [14:15] Launchpad bug 1680577 in autopkgtest (Ubuntu) "Autopkgtest fails on s390x due to long PATH in test config" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1680577 [14:16] rbalint: Please file it in Debian and get it fixed there [14:18] I hope that other one bit of delta forwarded too [14:18] was [14:18] english good [14:19] Laney: i hoped to get it fixed here first to let tests pass before the release, but ok [14:21] davmor3: Is that only on i386? [14:21] infinity: yeap [14:21] Failed to retrace. Helpful. [14:23] doko: Your gcc-5-cross has been FTBFS for a month too. [14:23] doko: Or gcc-5-cross-ports, I guess. [14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kamoso (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.2.1-1] (kubuntu) (sync) [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kamoso [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.2.1-1] [14:30] infinity: I'll have a look tomorrow, or today [14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (zesty-proposed/main) [2:10.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:10.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [14:46] davmor2: Do you still have the .crash file? I could manually retrace it. [14:48] infinity, bdmurray: see pm desktop is currently having the popup I can hit the button to report it if you want [14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.1-0ubuntu1] [15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: youker-assistant (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.2.7-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.7-0ubuntu2] (ubuntukylin) [15:08] infinity, bdmurray, Laney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1681870 [15:08] Error: ubuntu bug 1681870 not found [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted youker-assistant [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.7-0ubuntu2] [15:08] infinity, bdmurray, Laney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1681870 [15:08] thx [15:08] should be public now [15:09] advantage of a machine here have ssh access :D [15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-music (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.1.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome) [15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phyml (zesty-proposed/universe) [3:3.2.0+dfsg-7 => 3:3.2.0+dfsg-7ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phyml [source] (zesty-proposed) [3:3.2.0+dfsg-7ubuntu1] [15:13] I was able to manually retrace the indicator-datetime crash if the LP retracers fail [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (zesty-proposed/partner) [1:20170314.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20170411.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rcppgsl (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-1 => 0.3.2-2] (no packageset) (sync) [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rcppgsl [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.2-2] [15:36] Great, why did it fail to retrace. [15:37] bdmurray: it hates me [15:39] I'm sure the hate for me is stronger. [15:40] jbicha: gnome-music is on your images. Did you want to accept that and respin for it? [15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20170411.1-0ubuntu1] [15:42] infinity: is it ok if you accepted it into proposed for 0-day SRU and we can promote it if there's a need for respin? [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (precise-proposed/partner) [1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1 => 1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] (no packageset) [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) [15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1:20170314.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset) [15:43] jbicha: Sure. [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-music [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1.1-0ubuntu1] [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (precise-proposed) [1:20170411.1-0ubuntu0.12.04.1] [15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.24+17.04] [15:45] Okay, bug 1681870 has been retraced [15:45] bug 1681870 in indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) "indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGABRT in __malloc_assert()" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681870 [15:46] woohoo [15:49] infinity: I noticed u-r-u has been uploaded in months. I think I should do another upload to get new mirrors / promotions & demotions. [15:49] bdmurray: That'll trigger a world respin. But yeah, perhaps you should lob it at the queue, and we'll pull it in if we have a critical mass of things that seem worth respinning for. [15:50] infinity: it'd be fine to do it as a 0-day SRU [15:50] bdmurray: Yeah, but upload early, and we can make the call. [15:51] infinity: okay, working on it === jgrimm is now known as jgrimm-away [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-rcppgsl (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-2 => 0.3.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-rcppgsl [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.3.2-2ubuntu1] [16:00] bdmurray: I can drop the link to the machine now then right? [16:01] davmor2: let me double check one thing [16:02] davmor2: yes, thanks again [16:02] bdmurray: no worries [16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1] (kernel) [16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.6 => 1:17.04.7] (core) [16:17] 'k, we know how to fix that and we'll upload [16:23] Laney: woohoo that'll need a respin for i386 right infinity [16:26] davmor2: 64 too, to keep it in sync [16:26] & kylin [16:26] & Adam's talking about maybe doing one for snapd which will be everything, but not sure yet [16:26] woohoo retesting the world [16:27] moar testing is moar fun [16:40] It's only Tuesday, if we weren't respinning, it would feel weird. [16:40] infinity: no really [16:42] don't worry [16:42] I'm testing ppc64el server right now and I can't complete the install. [16:43] just making sure with mini; but it looks like something grub-installer :( [16:44] only on multipath? [16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtcreator (zesty-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-3ubuntu1~2 => 4.1.0-3ubuntu1] (qt5) [16:45] infinity: How does one even start to debug this? https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/2017-April/011186.html [16:45] CC cyphermox ^ [16:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04.7] [16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtcreator [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.1.0-3ubuntu1] [16:47] strace? [16:48] tsimonq2: Fun. I use wine daily, and have no such issues. [16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-73.94~14.04.1] [16:52] infinity: Wwweeeiiirrrddd. [16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ostree (zesty-proposed/universe) [2016.15-3ubuntu2 => 2016.15-3ubuntu3] (ubuntugnome) [16:54] cyphermox: It was kind of rhetorical, but ok. :P [16:54] you don't have much option but to take the big guns to debug this [16:56] valorie: Can you reproduce this? Is it even worth looking in to? [17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ostree [source] (zesty-proposed) [2016.15-3ubuntu3] [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: content-hub (zesty-proposed/main) [0.3+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu1 => 0.3+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-transfer (zesty-proposed/main) [0.2+17.04.20170215-0ubuntu1 => 0.2+17.04.20170215-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pay-service (zesty-proposed/universe) [15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu1 => 15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtmir (zesty-proposed/main) [0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1 => 0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-datetime (zesty-proposed/main) [15.10+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu1 => 15.10+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtmir-gles (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu1 => 0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libertine-scope (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.3.2+17.04.20170228-0ubuntu1 => 1.3.2+17.04.20170228-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-app-launch (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu1 => 0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7+17.04.20170308.2-0ubuntu2 => 0.7+17.04.20170308.2-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: url-dispatcher (zesty-proposed/main) [0.1+17.04.20170328-0ubuntu1 => 0.1+17.04.20170328-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-push (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.68+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu1 => 0.68+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity8 (zesty-proposed/main) [8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu2 => 8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync) [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libertine-scope [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.2+17.04.20170228-0ubuntu2] [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-push [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.68+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2] [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pay-service [sync] (zesty-proposed) [15.10+17.04.20170211-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted content-hub [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.3+17.04.20170403-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-transfer [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.2+17.04.20170215-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtmir [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.7+17.04.20170308.2-0ubuntu3] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted url-dispatcher [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.1+17.04.20170328-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-datetime [sync] (zesty-proposed) [15.10+17.04.20170322-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-app-launch [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtmir-gles [sync] (zesty-proposed) [0.5.1+17.04.20170404-0ubuntu2] [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity8 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [8.15+17.04.20170404.7-0ubuntu3] [17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flashplugin-nonfree (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [25.0.0.127ubuntu1 => 25.0.0.148ubuntu1] (no packageset) [17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashplugin-nonfree [source] (zesty-proposed) [25.0.0.148ubuntu1] [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-caffeine (zesty-proposed/universe) [0~git20161228-1ubuntu1 => 0~git20161228-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) [17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-user-docs (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.22.0-1 => 3.24.0-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) [17:39] fossfreedom: do you have an opinion on LP: #1681896 ? [17:39] Launchpad bug 1681896 in gnome-user-docs (Ubuntu) "Update gnome-user-docs to 3.24.0" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681896 [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-caffeine [source] (zesty-proposed) [0~git20161228-1ubuntu2] [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: eog-plugins (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.16.5-1 => 3.16.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eog-plugins [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.16.6-0ubuntu1] [18:09] jbicha: not really important enough to respin imho [18:10] fossfreedom: I get the feeling they are respinning anyway, are you ok with that update landing in 17.04? [18:10] sure. why the respin? this mornings respin is working well. [18:13] jbicha: including a new version of docs? [18:15] cyphermox: yes, do you disagree with that? [18:16] my personal opinion is that it's quite late for that, but I'm not in the release team, and this doesn't break translations if it's indeed directly translated in the package [18:16] ie. not my decision. [18:17] well it does break its own translations which I don't like but I'm not sure the existing pkg is that much better [18:17] I'm just expressing doubt while I try to fix things [18:17] I'm fine with the Release Team deciding either way [18:18] I think GNOME's so desperate for docs contributors that they don't want to discourage them with inconveniences like string freezes [19:20] jbicha: we have those "inconveniences" for a reason though [19:21] of course, and someone should encourage GNOME to have a docs string freeze too [19:23] well, it doesn't need to be up to GNOME necessarily, you don't need to be precisely in sync with every new release [19:23] yes, I am ok with the Release Team saying no on this update [19:25] I got you; I'm not saying one way or another. if it was up to me; I'd say okay, but let's try to avoid very late uploads [19:25] jbicha: back when I was in desktop; we used http://people.canonical.com/~platform/desktop/versions.html to track things, not all was up to date with the latest gnome [19:27] jbicha: aren't you a release manager for ubuntu-gnome? [19:27] yes [19:27] AIUI part of it comes up to you, if you think this is worth respinning and re-testing. [19:54] For SRU, LP #1317491 has landed in -proposed on "2017-02-22" and has been tag "verification done" the following day "2017-02-23", and the package is languishing in -proposed since then "libvirt | 1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.20 | trusty-proposed". Could someone please have a look this bug and let tinoco and I (slashd) know the outcome ? [19:54] Launchpad bug 1317491 in libvirt (Ubuntu Trusty) "virsh blockcommit hangs at 100%" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1317491 [19:59] slashd: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html shows non-green bugs [19:59] slashd: meaning some are not marked v-d [20:00] tinoco: --^ [20:00] nacc: mine is green [20:00] the other is won't fix [20:01] tinoco: there are three bugs listed [20:01] nacc: 2 wont fix and mine, green [20:01] ah that might need a special sru reminder, i'm not sure [20:01] rbasak: --^ ? [20:02] Yeah if pending-sru doesn't show all green, ~ubuntu-sru will generally ignore it and will need a special prod. [20:02] * rbasak looks [20:03] won't fix seems like it should be struck-through or something on the pending-sru page (or there shouldn't be a task for trusty at all) [20:03] it seems odd [20:03] Yeah [20:03] The report could do with that fixing. [20:09] Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 1317491 [20:09] So I'm not sure why the other bugs appear anyway [20:09] i see it's a jump of several versions, is it possible that one of the older versions fixes them (18 or 19)? [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gajim-omemo (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gajim-omemo [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0-2] [20:10] rbsak, 1483071 used to have a libvirt pkg in -proposed, and then has been tag to won't fix, maybe this is the reason ? [20:10] rbasak ^ [20:11] but a year ago [20:11] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1483071/comments/37 [20:11] Ubuntu bug 1483071 in libvirt (Ubuntu) "Error creating new VM with OVMF" [High,Fix released] [20:11] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1483071/comments/39 [20:12] I'm not sure where the report gets the bug references from. I thought it was from the corresponding changes file only. [20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fgrun (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.4.0.final-3 => 2016.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync) [20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fgrun [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2016.4.0-1] [20:19] slashd, tinoco: released to trusty-updates. I see there's a separate libvirt SRU that may be ready in yakkety-proposed. I'll look at that tomorrow (it's my SRU day tomorrow). [20:19] rbasak: tku very much Robie. [20:19] rbasak thank you very much, I appreciate it [20:19] rbasak: this shall me fast for you (its a small one) [20:20] analysis was way bigger then the fix itself [20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sleekxmpp (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-5 => 1.3.1-6] (no packageset) (sync) [20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sleekxmpp [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.1-6] [20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub-installer (zesty-proposed/main) [1.128ubuntu7 => 1.128ubuntu8] (core) [20:24] infinity: grub-installer fix for ppc64el multipath installs ^^ [20:33] jbicha: so; now that this is in the queue, I'm going to have another look at the bugs in iso.qa.u.c, and I'll spend a bit of time to check out gdm3/shell again [20:33] is there something in particular you'd want me to try? [20:34] I would possibly make a new install with the daily too. [20:35] at least for the GNOME release notes, it would be interesting to know if Radeon broke with gdm3 from 16.10 to 17.04 [20:35] mine is not radeon [20:36] well [20:36] not *only& [20:36] I have two systems affected, one of which is intel graphics. [20:36] the other is indeed radeon, but I'd rather not reinstall that now [20:37] I need to keep at least one untouched system to do work :) [20:37] oh, Intel only is broken for you? when was the last time you tried gdm with it? [20:37] not only for me; I think Beret also has the same issue [20:38] Beret: can you comment on the last time you tried gdm, was that today and/or the most recent version in zesty? [20:38] jbicha: I'll do the test here *now* [20:40] I'm sadly not a graphics guy, so the most I'll probably be able to do is ask you to file a bug and work with GNOME or Ubuntu's driver maintainers about the issues [20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apparmor (zesty-proposed/main) [2.11.0-2ubuntu3 => 2.11.0-2ubuntu4] (core) [20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-user-docs [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1] [20:41] jbicha: yeah, I fear it's a graphics driver issue, but the fact that it works in unity and not gnome looks suspect [20:41] (I know, it's not quite the same bits) [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.11.0-2ubuntu4] [20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub-installer [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.128ubuntu8] [20:44] possible slideshow update coming up from xubuntu... [20:45] barry: I'm literally having the exact same problem with systemd-resolved as I did before. [20:45] barry: I can't tell if this is a regression or an error on my part... [20:46] tsimonq2: REFUSED responses? [20:47] err, I mean, fails to resolve some things, and succeeds at others? [20:48] mmm let me reboot quick, I needed to access email etc. so I just overwrote my /etc/resolv.conf quick, rebooting restores it [20:48] Be back on my phone in a min or so [20:50] tsimonq2: or point me to a bug so I can look tonight [20:50] I need to quickly go take a shower so when my wife gets home I don't look like I'm some homeless person squatting the house :) [20:51] lmao [20:51] lol [20:52] cyphermox: Yep, can't ping Google but I can ping 8.8.8.8 [20:52] * tsimonq2 pokes around a bit [20:56] Yep, got nothing. [20:56] * tsimonq2 finds a bug report [20:58] cyphermox: bug 1647031 [20:58] bug 1647031 in systemd "systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 [20:59] cyphermox: And I *do* have libnss-resolve installed. [21:00] cyphermox, today [21:01] cyphermox: FWIW I have systemd 232-21ubuntu2 on my system. [21:05] ok [21:05] tsimonq2: let's move debugging this to #ubuntu-devel [21:06] jbicha: ^^ [21:06] (I mean, Beret's tried gdm3 today, fails in a similar way than my system) [21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:16.10.9 => 1:16.10.10] (core) [21:19] arges: hi, I'm not able to build a vlc for yakkety which does not have that silly ffmpeg "diff". pull-lp-source pulls two ffmpeg tarballs as you can see, but for some reason extracting 0.16.10.1 doesn't extract the newer ffmpeg, but creating a new version does include it in .dsc.. [21:20] hm no [21:20] where did that come from.. [21:21] extracting a pkg from a remote path copies the tarballs.. weird [21:22] ok, problem solved then :) [21:22] caused by having the tarballs for zesty in the same path when I originally created these.. [21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlc (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.4-4ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 2.2.4-4ubuntu0.16.10.2] (mozilla, mythbuntu) [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pbcore (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.2.11+dfsg-1 => 1.2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pbcore [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu1] [23:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (zesty-proposed/main) [124 => 125] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)