=== ryan is now known as Guest74555
[04:07] <mgedmin> yay 17.04
[04:07] <mgedmin> at last wayland sessions load my ~/.profile and I can work
[04:08] <mgedmin> I'll have to get used to vim not having access to my clipboard :(
[04:21] <Menzador> darkxst and jbicha - Hi. You guys know me well, I used to be SonikkuAmerica. I knew amjjawad, who was one of the original Ubuntu GNOME people. Just wanted to stop by and say thanks for all you've done to make Ubuntu GNOME a reality and I wish you all well as we become the vanilla Ubuntu release in 17.10 and eventually 18.04 LTS. :)
[04:36] <rohit403> sir, I want to upgrade from ubuntu gnome 16.10 to 17.04 pls assist me
[04:37] <mgedmin> have you seen https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/GetUbuntuGNOME/Upgrade ?
[08:16] <BinaryMaster> Question: I installed gnome3 on my 16.04 install but have one problem. Can anyone tell me how to remove the launcher thing that is on the left of my screen (screen shot: http://picpaste.com/desktop-6URTuKqk.png) it is not the dock at least not the same one that comes up when you press the super key
[10:27] <alien2003> BinaryMaster: remove DashToDock extension :)
[10:28] <alien2003> Question: I upgraded 16.10 to 17.04 and Qt apps now look ugly. Anybody has this issue? Also how is QT5 theme set in 17.04 by default? What variable?
=== janne_ is now known as dylo
[12:25] <dylo> alien2003, do you mean kde applications? :o
[12:26] <alien2003> dylo: quasselclient I mean. It's qt5
[12:27] <dylo> ugly like how? no icons?
[12:27] <alien2003> dylo: doesn't match gtk3 theme
[13:17] <darkxst> hey jbicha
[13:22] <jbicha> darkxst: good evening
[13:23] <darkxst> security wise doesnt matter where the database is
[13:24] <darkxst> oops
[13:24] <darkxst> wrong channel
[13:25] <darkxst> I spent most of the day driving
[13:25] <jbicha> oh good, because I didn't have a database :)
[13:26] <darkxst> had a short play with the nvidia kms stuff
[13:26] <darkxst> not convinced it is actually working properly at all even with Igor's workaround
[13:27] <darkxst> I also can't work out if its meant to work? fedora have been working on wayland support, but Xorg did work previously
[13:27] <Menzador> Hey both of ya
[13:27] <darkxst> Hey Menzador
[13:28] <Menzador> For once we have almost all of the latest GNOME :)
[13:28] <jbicha> darkxst: if you've got bandwidth and time, maybe you could try Fedora 26 Alpha to see if things work any better there?
[13:28] <darkxst> Menzador, most of the core is there yes
[13:28] <jbicha> Menzador: howdy :)
[13:30] <darkxst> jbicha, will see how I go, I have bandwidth, and apparently a 12.04 partition I could install it on
[13:35] <darkxst> also wondering about the lang pack stuff
[15:42] <gmickelson> Hello all, I am trying to find assistance with an issue I am seeing on 17.04. I have a binary that is dependent on libssl.so.10 and libcrypto.so.10. This binary runs fine on CentOS 7 but I am not a big fan of running CentOS and would prefer a flavor of Ubuntu. When I go to run this binary, the system complains that the libraries are not in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/. If I create sym-links to the libssl.so.1.0.0 and libcrypto.so.1.0.0 called
[15:42] <gmickelson> libssl.so.10 and libcrypto.so.10 and run ldconfig the binary sees the libssl.so.10 library but fails to recognize the libcrypto.so.10 linked library. Anybody have any ideas on how to get past this? ldd shows that only the libcrypto library is missing so I'd like to get past this one hurdle. Thanks!
[17:08] <InventorTechie> Am I able to upgrade to 17.04 from 16.10 now?
[17:09] <jbicha> yes
[18:15] <InventorTechie> Sweet
[20:44] <janne_> hmm
[20:45] <janne_> does it safe to upgrade to 17.04 with these instructions: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/ReleaseNotes
[20:46] <janne_> or does ubuntu gnome has its own way to upgrade?
[20:48] <janne_> oh i find one: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/ReleaseNotes/UbuntuGNOME :D
[20:48] <janne_> sorry *)
[20:50] <JockeTF> Either is fine. :)