=== klebers_ is now known as klebers === ivan_ is now known as ivan === RAOF is now known as Guest94094 [11:54] cking: congrats once again [11:55] or perhaps nice job is better [11:55] jjohansen, it's just simple fixes, nothing amazing, really. [11:55] thanks :-) [11:56] cking: sure, but it nice to see the contribution happening, Canonical even made it into the top 20 for 2nd time since well forever [11:57] i've got another 60+ lined up for the next merge, so hopefully it may happen again :-) [11:59] cking: well likely not for 4.12 but get another 50 or 60 lined up for 4.13 and we should [11:59] fingers crossed. mind you, it is a meaningless index of productivity [12:01] sure, but still its some visibility, and a bit of a counter to the common refrain of us doing nothing [15:09] is there any fast kernel build host (shell access) for ubuntu community use? [15:09] oh yeah i saw that, nice :) [15:22] ugh. people who define "struct wahtever\n{" really mess with my searching [15:27] * hallyn lines up a big gce instances, but doesn't expect it to perform very well [15:42] is a kernel build automatically parallelized to ncpu when doing a fakeroot debian/rules binary-generic, or are there env variables worth setting? [15:53] DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=8 ./debian/rules [15:53] hallyn, would be Debian Policy compliant.... [15:54] hallyn, https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules-options [15:57] oh, i thought that was obsoleted long ago, but i guess not. thanks, i'll try that and see if it makes a difference :) [15:57] thanks [15:57] i think last i asked about this was like 6 years ago with kees [16:03] hallyn, debhelper 10 finally defaults to parallel by default, but we are not using that level of compat widely enough yet. [16:03] i think it about 4 years time, things will finally build parallel by default [16:13] xnox: thanks [17:03] xnox: heh, yeah so fwiw no change in time with that option so i guess kernel debian/rules must dtrt [17:30] hallyn, the kernel self parallelises if you don't tell it [17:33] apw: and that's appreciated :) [18:32] ah interesting