jianghuaw | hi does charm-nova-compute support VMware? | 04:03 |
---|---|---|
jianghuaw | or have to use this charm - nova-compute-vmware? It seems nova-compute-vmware has no update since 2014-06-24. https://code.launchpad.net/~openstack-charmers/charms/precise/nova-compute-vmware/trunk | 04:05 |
jianghuaw | @jamespage | 04:06 |
jianghuaw | jamespage, Do you have an answer about the above question? thanks. | 04:06 |
blahdeblah | jianghuaw: It will probably be a few more hours before he's around (assuming he's not travelling at the moment) | 04:07 |
jianghuaw | blahdeblah, thanks for the information. | 04:07 |
jam | menn0: if you're around https://github.com/juju/txn/pull/32 allows us to use RemoveAll($in) instead of Bulk when Bulk isn't really supported | 05:36 |
chatter29 | hey guys | 07:32 |
chatter29 | allah is doing | 07:32 |
chatter29 | sun is not doing allah is doing | 07:32 |
chatter29 | to accept Islam say that i bear witness that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and Muhammad peace be upon him is his slave and messenger | 07:32 |
kjackal | Good morning Juju world! | 07:45 |
=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban | ||
SimonKLB | is it possible to access relation conversations from multiple charms related using the same interface? | 11:31 |
SimonKLB | or is it only possible to access one conversation at a time? | 11:31 |
kjackal | SimonKLB: I think you have access to a list of all conversations | 11:37 |
kjackal | let me grab an exmple of that | 11:37 |
kjackal | SimonKLB: https://github.com/juju-solutions/interface-dfs/blob/master/provides.py#L37 | 11:39 |
SimonKLB | kjackal: this is only going to grab the conversations of the units, not multiple charms, right? | 11:40 |
SimonKLB | of the units (in one charm)* | 11:40 |
SimonKLB | i believe a mix of relation_ids() and relation_get() will do the trick | 11:44 |
kjackal | SimonKLB: you are right this will give you the conversations the unit participates in. I've never seen a unit grabbing conversations of other units. | 11:50 |
SimonKLB | kjackal: no that is not what i want, i want all of the conversations between a charm and other charms related with a specific relation | 11:51 |
SimonKLB | for example, if wordpress was related to both mysql and mariadb, i would like the username and password from both databases in wordpress | 11:52 |
kjackal | i see | 11:53 |
SimonKLB | looks like youre blocked from accessing the relation when it's not in the correct context though | 11:55 |
=== bdx_ is now known as bdx | ||
lazyPower | SimonKLB: so long as you're in reactive, and using reactive states, you can iterate through the cached conversation data objects | 17:10 |
lazyPower | thats something cory work on when implementing reactive, was to remove the requirement to be in context to access that data. | 17:10 |
lazyPower | s/work/worked/ | 17:10 |
lazyPower | SimonKLB: an example case: https://github.com/juju-solutions/interface-elasticsearch/blob/master/requires.py#L48-L51 | 17:11 |
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk | ||
kjackal | cory_fu: question on conjure-up. Is it posible for a partner to create a spell that would modify an already deployed k8s cluster? | 18:08 |
cory_fu | So, there's this: https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/issues/624 | 18:18 |
cory_fu | That was planned for 2.2 but I really doubt that's going to happen. | 18:18 |
cory_fu | But it's definitely in the plan. | 18:18 |
cory_fu | Though, I realize that maybe that's not exactly what you were asking about. Are you talking about capturing a non-Juju deployed k8s cluster? | 18:20 |
cory_fu | kjackal: ^ | 18:20 |
cory_fu | I guess it's actually targeted at 2.2.1 and not 2.2.0 | 18:21 |
lazyPower | cory_fu: well its targeted at milestone: later | 18:22 |
lazyPower | is it later yet? | 18:22 |
cory_fu | Oh yeah, apparently I can't read. | 18:23 |
lazyPower | <3 | 18:25 |
lazyPower | just poking at ya buddy :) | 18:25 |
cory_fu | :) | 18:25 |
kjackal | cory_fu: lazyPower: so if a partner just wants to "kubectl create -f <my_special_yaml>" he could write up a spell to do so? | 18:25 |
lazyPower | I believe that's possible today, you skip the yaml def and only declare the scripted spell componentry, right cory_fu? | 18:25 |
lazyPower | or am i making too many assumptions here, because there are a lot compacted into that statement | 18:26 |
cory_fu | lazyPower: I don't know if it's possible to skip the deployment portion completely, but you also can't choose an existing deployed model in the GUI yet, either. | 18:27 |
lazyPower | ah right thats only headless with flags | 18:27 |
cory_fu | That was going to be part of that issue | 18:27 |
cory_fu | Right | 18:27 |
lazyPower | well, for POC they could get started... | 18:27 |
lazyPower | but you're right the curses portion is going be a trail of tears | 18:27 |
cory_fu | lazyPower: There's nothing technically challenging about that feature, it's just a matter of designing the user experience and the prioritization of it, though stokachu might correct me on that | 18:28 |
stokachu | yea thats pretty much it | 18:29 |
=== med_ is now known as Guest76746 | ||
lazyPower | cory_fu: CORYYYYYY | 19:02 |
lazyPower | got a sec? :) | 19:02 |
cory_fu | omg | 19:03 |
cory_fu | What's up? | 19:03 |
lazyPower | cory_fu: can you join us in the group hangout? | 19:03 |
cory_fu | Yeah, one sec | 19:03 |
cory_fu | Erin's on the phone in the background, but I'll use headphones so hopefully it won't be an issue | 19:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!