[00:04] infinity: when can i start doing go 1.8 transitions bits for artful? (not yet, i assume) [00:06] mwhudson: Probably sometime tomorrow. [00:06] mwhudson: Which I guess is the weekend for you, so Monday? [00:06] monday for me then [00:06] cool [00:06] Jinx. [00:16] infinity: Apologies if it seems like I'm pushing too hard, but do we have an ETA as to when artful opens? :D [00:25] tsimonq2: See above. [00:25] tsimonq2: Though the exact time is extended by an hour every time someone asks. [00:27] \o/ [00:27] infinity: So if I ping you every hour about it, can I extend it until release? [00:28] Ukikie: Yup. [00:28] Sweet! I'm gonna cron it! (Not really. :3 ) [00:28] Ukikie: I suppose it's a race then to see how quickly I'd get replaced, but I'm willing to take that chance. [00:28] Ahaha. :D [00:31] infinity: What if I want to be evil and ask just enough times to land it at like 3 am Saturday morning with you being up all Friday? :P [00:32] tsimonq2: I'm counting this as you asking again when it'll open. [00:32] infinity: XDDDD [00:32] LOL [00:33] * tsimonq2 takes infinity's piece of chalk, runs up to the chalkboard, rambles to himself, makes a few tallies, then drops the chalk in a 50 gallon drum of hot water and sprints away [00:34] YAY base-files \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ \o/ [00:34] I'll see myself out... :P [00:36] tsimonq2: damn. was going to post https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/artful-changes/2017-April/000000.html [00:36] acheronUK: lol === Guest94094 is now known as RAOF [00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (artful-proposed/main) [1.18.10ubuntu2 => 1.18.23ubuntu1] (core) [01:02] infinity: Thank you for the above. [01:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (artful-proposed/main) [10.2.2ubuntu1 => 10.2.5ubuntu1] (core) [01:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.23ubuntu1] [01:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.81ubuntu3 => 1.0.81ubuntu4] (core) [01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (artful-proposed/main) [2.28-3ubuntu1 => 2.28-4ubuntu1] (core) [01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (artful-proposed/main) [6.3.0-12ubuntu2 => 6.3.0-14ubuntu2] (core) [01:21] tumbleweed: Not a huge deal, but your dates for zesty release and artful rollover are a week late (which I guess is why my tools only starting hating me today instead of release day :P) [01:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (artful-proposed/main) [0.33 => 0.34] (core) [01:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debhelper [source] (artful-proposed) [10.2.5ubuntu1] [01:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (artful-proposed/main) [1.18.10ubuntu2 => 1.18.23ubuntu2] (core) [01:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.23ubuntu2] [01:55] infinity: I was wondering why things seemed busy here a week ago :P [03:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (artful-proposed/main) [1.18.23ubuntu2 => 1.18.23ubuntu3] (core) [03:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.23ubuntu3] [03:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.6 => 0.18ubuntu0.7] (core) [03:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.2 => 0.28ubuntu0.3] (core) [03:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (artful-proposed/main) [10.2.5ubuntu1 => 10.2.5ubuntu2] (core) [03:11] tumbleweed: [03:11] + - Fix EOL date of Ubuntu 17.04 (9 months, not 18) [03:12] tumbleweed: I see no such change in the actuall diff. [03:12] (That is, the EOL was correct both before and after) [03:12] yeah, I just realised that [03:12] if you want to drop those 2, I can re-upload [03:12] Will do. [03:12] the yakkety one I just uploaded has the rgiht changelog [03:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.7] [03:13] tumbleweed: Rejectified. [03:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.29ubuntu0.1 => 0.29ubuntu0.2] (core) [03:14] I trusted the "Copy data from 0.30" previous changelog entry :) [03:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.3] [03:14] tumbleweed: Thank you for using Adam's rejection service. We understand you have a choice in which archive admin will flip your packages the bird, and we appreciate your loyalty. [03:15] lol, I must take advantage of this more often :) [03:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (trusty-proposed/main) [0.18ubuntu0.6 => 0.18ubuntu0.7] (core) [03:16] (I might be losing my mind after a couple of days of reconciling dpkg and debhelper bugs/misfeatures to get them to behave the way I need them to) [03:17] * tsimonq2 hands infinity a cup of coffee [03:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (xenial-proposed/main) [0.28ubuntu0.2 => 0.28ubuntu0.3] (core) [03:19] On the plus side, I now have a handy test package called "bollocks" that produces "bollocks.deb, bollocks-udeb.udeb, and bollocks-dgbsym.ddeb". [03:19] infinity: May I ask why you strip buildinfo from changes? [03:20] Ukikie: Because the LP buildinfo support turned out to be buggy. I'll revert that revision after Colin fixes the infra. [03:20] Ukikie: Should be back on in a few days, I imagine. [03:20] Ah fantastic, sounds great. Thanks muchly! [03:21] Yeah that's fine, I was just hoping this wouldn't diverge. As long as it doesn't release with it, is what I was looking forward to. :) [03:22] (Sounds fun, LP breaking. :3 ) [03:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (zesty-proposed/main) [0.33 => 0.33ubuntu0.1] (core) [03:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [source] (artful-proposed) [10.2.5ubuntu2] [03:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (artful-proposed/main) [10.2.5ubuntu1 => 10.2.5ubuntu2] (core) [03:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debhelper [source] (artful-proposed) [10.2.5ubuntu2] [03:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.18ubuntu0.7] [03:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.28ubuntu0.3] [03:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.29ubuntu0.2] [03:34] tumbleweed: All accepted. Lemme know when you've verified they actually work. [03:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.33ubuntu0.1] [03:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (artful-proposed) [0.34] [03:38] infinity: righto, thanks [03:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (artful-proposed) [1.0.81ubuntu4] [03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (artful-proposed) [2.28-4ubuntu1] [04:13] infinity: all verified [04:15] tumbleweed: Shiny. [04:17] tumbleweed: All released. [04:17] thanks [05:53] the qemu SRU 2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.11 in xenial unapproved got surpassed by a security update [05:53] I'm re-preparing with a new version number [05:54] does this need to be rejected in the queue, or will a sync of a newer one just supersede it? [06:06] cpaelzer, if there is something in the queue which is definatly bad, rejecting it is best then it cannot be accepted by accident [06:08] apw: yeah if accepted now (that the sec update is in) it will at best version conflict and the new version is building [06:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.11] [06:08] cpaelzer, ^ [06:08] thanks! === maclin1 is now known as maclin [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-49.52] (core, kernel) [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-75.96~14.04.1] (kernel) [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.8.0-49.52~16.04.1] (kernel) [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-20.22~16.04.1] (kernel) [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-75.96] (core, kernel) [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-20.22~16.04.1] [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-75.96] [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-49.52~16.04.1] [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-49.52] [10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-75.96~14.04.1] [11:01] slangasek, on Ubuntu system, after $ sudo apt install debian-archive-keyring; do you expect for apt to trust all debian signing keys? [11:01] or do you expect for them to be /available/ but not trusted. [11:04] hm, is there anything wrong with autopkgtests? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running gives me 'A server error occured' and my ubuntu-image PR didn't get tests run (still waiting) [11:04] I'm updating it for artful, wait a few minutes. [11:07] ACK [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6 [source] (artful-proposed) [6.3.0-14ubuntu2] [12:03] xnox: I'd expect them to be trusted. [12:03] ok [12:03] Though I'm questioning why they're in xubuntu-desktop, ubuntustudio-desktop ... [12:04] infinity, i think in the past, the /etc/apt/trusted.gpg was not updated with debian keys upon installing debian-archive-keyring, now they are shipped as snippets in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d and are trusted. [12:05] but i need to verify that claim on something old. [12:05] also i'm still pondering if /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/* key snippets should be conffiles or not. [12:06] xnox: We never modified the package on import from Debian, so I imagine it was added to the system keyring before it was switched to snippets. [12:08] i believe it used to call apt-key, which has a different master keyring for the apt-key update. and the ubuntu/debian master keyrings were encoded in apt-key, and thus src:apt [12:08] but yeah, need to re-verify this. [12:08] xnox: As for them being conffiles, it means the local admin can delete a key hey doesn't like and upgrades respect that. [12:11] xnox: But yeah, I could see arguments for not trusting it. I'd want that pushed back to Debian, though (ie: some dpkg-vendor magic to install to /etc/apt on Debian and /usr/share on Ubuntu) cause carrying a delta forever on a package we fundamentally don't care about is icky. [12:12] yes. [12:12] xnox: Well, /etc/apt on Debian, and /usr/share on *all* non-Debian derivatives seems the sensible split there. [12:13] infinity, well, they still ship /usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg and /usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-removed-keys.gpg [12:13] and things like facy cowbuilders / pbuilders / schroots what not use that to authenticate debian debootstraps [12:13] Ahh. So it would just be a matter of not shipping the conffile ones. Sure. Same argument, though. [12:13] yeap. [12:13] i will follow up with debian about it, after verifying past behaviour. [12:14] xnox: From my POV, my carefactor is low. We implicitly trust Debian in so many ways that it doesn't bug me. But not trusting their binary archives by default at least is maybe a small deterrent to users accidentally shooting themselves in the foot by installing from them? [12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-20.22] (core, kernel) [12:15] it's 7 more keys we do not control, which can be compromised and execute impersanation attack on all ubuntu zesty systems. [12:15] which have that package isntalled..... [12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (artful-proposed/main) [3.3+git50-g3c0349b-2 => 3.4-1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) (sync) [12:16] xnox: Yeah, the security surface bugs me a lot less than it bugs you. If Debian had a key compromised, I think we'd all care even if no one used it to attack Ubuntu users. :P [12:16] xnox: And we'd sort it ASAP. [12:16] infinity, also I do not see it in the xubuntu-desktop =) [12:17] where do you see that? [12:17] $ apt-cache show debian-archive-keyring | grep ^Task [12:17] Task: xubuntu-desktop, ubuntustudio-desktop [12:17] Being pulled in as a dep of something else, I'm sure. Didn't look closely. [12:17] fun. the metapackage does not have it directly. [12:17] =/ [12:17] yeah. [12:21] Laney: Oh, your assertion that "block-all source" would prevent tests being triggered is clearly untrue, as all stable series' have that hint in place and get tests. [12:21] Laney: But I haven't made britney run for artsy yet, so no big deal. [12:22] (Working on that after I sort out why I'm awake at 6am) [12:27] infinity: Oh well. [12:27] They won't work anyawy, since no cloud image and no LXD image. [12:28] Laney, i thought for archive opening pitti would do some hack to copy zesty images locally somehow and tweak the sources. [12:28] or i wonder if Odd_Bloke can magically build artful images for us =) [12:29] I know. I could do that for cloud images if there weren't 9999 jobs running. [12:29] yeah =) [12:30] Don't really fancy doing it for lxd though. [12:30] Maybe stgraber can turn that on quickly. [13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (zesty-proposed/main) [1.0.81ubuntu3 => 1.0.81ubuntu3.1] (core) [13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.28+17.04 => 2.29+17.04] (no packageset) [13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.0.81ubuntu2.1 => 1.0.81ubuntu2.2] (core) [13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.28+16.10 => 2.29+16.10] (no packageset) [13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.2 => 1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.3] (core) [13:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (trusty-proposed/main) [1.0.59ubuntu0.6 => 1.0.59ubuntu0.7] (core) [14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (precise-proposed/main) [1.0.40~ubuntu0.11 => 1.0.40~ubuntu0.12] (core) [14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.28 => 2.29] (no packageset) [14:19] sergiusens, hey does that snapcraft upload for zesty fix the ADT test failures, the hard version on package hello ? [14:19] sergiusens, i assume not as there is no delta from yakkety to zesty [14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (artful-proposed/main) [2.16.8ubuntu2 => 2.17.5ubuntu1] (core) [14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted devscripts [source] (artful-proposed) [2.17.5ubuntu1] [14:29] xnox: I have debian-archive-keyring installed here on my laptop; therefore, no [14:30] slangasek, can you expand on the "therefore no"? [14:30] slangasek, or you mean you run debian =))))) [14:30] * xnox exposes slangasek [14:30] xnox: I have it installed, I don't recall why, but I definitely don't have it installed with the intent of trusting Debian sources [14:30] ack [14:31] slangasek, you have it installed because you installed ubuntu-dev-tools [14:31] ok [14:31] then I *definitely* don't want apt trusting it just because [14:33] * apw reviews zesty gnome bits ... [14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [14:41] jbicha, gnome-control-center seems to have some alsa bits in it, is that right ? [14:42] apw: yes it does -> the SRU but has a link to this, but here is my home work https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/in-progress-snapcraft-2-29/346?u=sergiusens [14:43] apw: all adt runs for the final commit that made this a deb to dput are documented there [14:44] apw: I would appreciate this being accepted, we can all be happy with the green in there ;-) [14:45] apw: yes, that's mentioned (briefly) in LP: #1682138 as changes to the Sound panel [14:45] Launchpad bug 1682138 in gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) "Update gnome-control-center to 3.24.1" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1682138 [14:45] sergiusens, so did you remove the hello=version in the snapcraft.yaml's in the tests ? as they would have to differ now in zesty and yakkety and do not seem to [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-photos [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [14:46] jbicha, thanks [14:46] apw: no, I use an rmadison style of check to get the version for hello [14:47] apw: it comes from the 2 libgnome-volume-control commits (which aren't loading for me right now) [14:47] apw: https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1269/files [14:49] sergiusens, thanks that covers it ... [14:49] sergiusens, will re-review those after i've done the gnome ones [14:50] Laney: I'll sort out the LXD images (images: remote) [14:50] cheers [14:51] thanks [14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-desktop3 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1] [15:08] jbicha, ^ ok i think that is all the gnome PR bits accepted ... have fun testing [15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.29+17.04] [15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-20.22] [15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.29+16.10] [15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.29] [15:14] sergiusens, ^ all yours [15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.6.4-3ubuntu4] [15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.1.5-5055683-1ubuntu1.1] [15:30] apw: thanks! [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-welcome [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.12] === maclin1 is now known as maclin [16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-autohidetopbar [source] (zesty-proposed) [20161203-1ubuntu1] [16:23] acheronUK, hey ... i take it the version change is expected [16:27] apw: k3b? yes. previous git snapshots were that 17.04 stable branch in reality anyway. now using that release tarball instead, we can call it what it really is [16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted k3b [source] (zesty-proposed) [17.04.0-0ubuntu1] [16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-tx-tftp [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.1~bzr47-0ubuntu1] [16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caja [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.18.1-0ubuntu2] [16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (zesty-proposed/main) [2:10.0.0-0ubuntu5 => 2:10.0.0-0ubuntu5.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [16:51] autopkgtest is good now [16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.0-0ubuntu5.1] [16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (zesty-proposed) [2:10.0.0-0ubuntu5.1] [17:23] Laney: Excellent. [17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.81ubuntu3.1] [17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (precise-proposed) [1.0.40~ubuntu0.12] [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.59ubuntu0.7] [17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.3] [17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.81ubuntu2.2] [18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (artful-proposed/main) [1.18.23ubuntu3 => 1.18.23ubuntu4] (core) [18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dpkg [source] (artful-proposed) [1.18.23ubuntu4] [18:11] stgraber@castiana:~$ lxc image list images: | grep artful [18:11] | ubuntu/artful (3 more) | 81b35bcddd7f | yes | Ubuntu artful amd64 (20170421_14:51) | x86_64 | 81.99MB | Apr 21, 2017 at 12:00am (UTC) | [18:11] | ubuntu/artful/arm64 (1 more) | baf9f38b9100 | yes | Ubuntu artful arm64 (20170421_14:51) | aarch64 | 75.98MB | Apr 21, 2017 at 12:00am (UTC) | [18:12] | ubuntu/artful/armhf (1 more) | f47e3c98e88c | yes | Ubuntu artful armhf (20170421_14:51) | armv7l | 77.37MB | Apr 21, 2017 at 12:00am (UTC) | [18:12] | ubuntu/artful/i386 (1 more) | 64479ceb774a | yes | Ubuntu artful i386 (20170421_14:51) | i686 | 82.68MB | Apr 21, 2017 at 12:00am (UTC) | [18:12] | ubuntu/artful/ppc64el (1 more) | 53ffa4274eb1 | yes | Ubuntu artful ppc64el (20170421_14:51) | ppc64le | 80.38MB | Apr 21, 2017 at 12:00am (UTC) | [18:12] | ubuntu/artful/s390x (1 more) | 9e0cca6b9f75 | yes | Ubuntu artful s390x (20170421_14:51) | s390x | 77.33MB | Apr 21, 2017 at 12:00am (UTC) | [18:12] Laney: ^ very much untested [18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-artwork (artful-proposed/universe) [17.04.12 => 17.10.0] (ubuntu-mate) [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.2.9-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (zesty-proposed/main) [2.2.6-0ubuntu1 => 2.2.9-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.2.6-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 2.2.9-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (trusty-proposed/main) [2.2.6-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 => 2.2.9-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [18:26] apw I see you rejected my SRU upload for Caja. [18:27] I'm a bit confused, the bug is referenced in Changes. [18:32] flexiondotorg: it was referenced in the changelog but somehow not in .changes, and it is that the tools key off of [18:32] i don't know quite how that is possible [18:32] I've download the change and the LP reference is there. [18:33] in .changes? [18:33] From the rejection email, yes. [18:33] flexiondotorg: It's not in .changes [18:34] flexiondotorg: Did you build on Debian? [18:34] infinity I built on Zesty. [18:34] flexiondotorg: in the changelog fragment or the foo-bugs: header [18:34] it is the latter which matters [18:35] and there was none to my eye [18:35] I'll double check debian/changelog and rebuild. [18:36] check for a launchpad-bugs: header in _changes [18:37] flexiondotorg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24428437/ [18:37] flexiondotorg: When I regen your changes on zesty, I get that. [18:38] flexiondotorg: Also, if you aren't a masochist, you might want to avoid "-sa". [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-welcome (artful-proposed/universe) [17.04.11 => 17.10.0] (ubuntu-mate) [18:38] flexiondotorg: That just forces you to reupload .orig every time. [18:39] infinity Not clear if I should I still re-upload? [18:40] Well, I could upload this for you. *shrug* [18:40] I've done nothing different to how I'd normally upload, so I'm curious why this wasn't correctly formatted. [18:41] Pretty much the only way to not get that header is for you to be running on !ubuntu. [18:41] infinity I prepare uploads as follows: dpkg-buildpackage -d -S -sa [18:41] Or for dpkg-vendor to not claim you're using Ubuntu. [18:41] What would you suggest? [18:41] flexiondotorg: Drop the '-sa' if you're uploading something that already has an orig in the archive, but that's not the source of this issue. Just a convenience thing. [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate) [18:42] infinity I will re-upload and drop the '-sa'. [18:42] flexiondotorg: I already did. [18:42] Or not :-) [18:42] See above. [18:42] Thanks infinity. [18:42] flexiondotorg: But, like I said, the '-sa' isn't the problem here, it's the lack of Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: field. [18:42] flexiondotorg: Which implies your dpkg-dev doesn't think you're using Ubuntu. [18:43] Well, I've been uploading everything from that zesty VM for weeks, and some new packages for artful just now. [18:43] flexiondotorg: Output of "dpkg-vendor --is ubuntu && echo Yay" and "ls -l /etc/dpkg/origins/" might be enlightening. [18:47] infinity OK, found the issue. [18:47] Colour me curious. [18:47] I use direnv to switch DEBNAME, DEBEMAIL etc [18:48] Because these packages are sent to Debian git direnv sets DEB_VENDOR="Debian" [18:48] When in that directory tree. === med_ is now known as Guest76746 [19:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) [19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja-extensions (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) [19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-icon-theme (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) [19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-screensaver (artful-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-0ubuntu1 => 1.18.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate) [19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (xenial-proposed/main) [1.157.9 => 1.157.10] (core, kernel) [19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (zesty-proposed/main) [1.164 => 1.164.1] (core, kernel) [20:32] infinity: I guess zesty-proposed -> artful-proposed copies aren't done yet? [20:32] (don't know where this is on the list without digging it up; vaguely interested in having the pending-sru report restored to sanity) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: acl (artful-proposed/main) [2.2.52-3 => 2.2.52-3build1] (core) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aspell (artful-proposed/main) [0.60.7~20110707-3build1 => 0.60.7~20110707-3build2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: acpid (artful-proposed/main) [1:2.0.26-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.0.26-1ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: attr (artful-proposed/main) [1:2.4.47-2 => 1:2.4.47-2build1] (core) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bcache-tools (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.8-2 => 1.0.8-2build1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cdrkit (artful-proposed/main) [9:1.1.11-3ubuntu1 => 9:1.1.11-3ubuntu2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dctrl-tools (artful-proposed/main) [2.24-2 => 2.24-2build1] (core) [20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cron (artful-proposed/main) [3.0pl1-128ubuntu2 => 3.0pl1-128ubuntu3] (core) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: diffstat (artful-proposed/main) [1.61-1 => 1.61-1build1] (core) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fcitx-configtool (artful-proposed/main) [0.4.8-3 => 0.4.8-3build1] (input-methods, ubuntu-desktop) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmraid (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.0.rc16-4.2ubuntu3 => 1.0.0.rc16-4.2ubuntu4] (core) [20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: geoclue (artful-proposed/main) [0.12.99-4ubuntu1 => 0.12.99-4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gfxboot (artful-proposed/main) [4.5.2-1.1-5 => 4.5.2-1.1-5build1] (core) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gparted (artful-proposed/main) [0.25.0-1 => 0.25.0-1build1] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-system-log (artful-proposed/main) [3.9.90-4 => 3.9.90-4build1] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (artful-proposed/universe) [17.04.7 => 17.10.0] (ubuntu-mate) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gzip (artful-proposed/main) [1.6-4ubuntu1 => 1.6-4ubuntu2] (core) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: irqbalance (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.0-2ubuntu1 => 1.1.0-2ubuntu2] (core) [20:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ipvsadm (artful-proposed/main) [1:1.28-3 => 1:1.28-3build1] (ubuntu-server) [20:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: joyent-mdata-client (artful-proposed/main) [0.0.1-0ubuntu2 => 0.0.1-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdumbnet (artful-proposed/main) [1.12-7 => 1.12-7build1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpaper (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.24+nmu4ubuntu1 => 1.1.24+nmu4ubuntu2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lsscsi (artful-proposed/main) [0.27-3 => 0.27-3build1] (ubuntu-server) [20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lockfile-progs (artful-proposed/main) [0.1.17 => 0.1.17build1] (ubuntu-server) [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lupin (artful-proposed/main) [0.57 => 0.57build1] (core) [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: min12xxw (artful-proposed/main) [0.0.9-9 => 0.0.9-9build1] (desktop-core) [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maas-enlist (artful-proposed/main) [0.4+bzr38-0ubuntu2 => 0.4+bzr38-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server) [20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mlocate (artful-proposed/main) [0.26-1ubuntu2 => 0.26-1ubuntu3] (core) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mouseemu (artful-proposed/main) [0.16-0ubuntu9 => 0.16-0ubuntu10] (core) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mscompress (artful-proposed/main) [0.4-3 => 0.4-3build1] (desktop-core) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mousetweaks (artful-proposed/main) [3.12.0-1ubuntu2 => 3.12.0-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: msr-tools (artful-proposed/main) [1.3-2 => 1.3-2build1] (ubuntu-server) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: notify-osd (artful-proposed/main) [0.9.35+16.04.20160415-0ubuntu1 => 0.9.35+16.04.20160415-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (artful-proposed/main) [2.7.5-1 => 2.7.5-1build1] (core) [20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2 => 1.1.8-3.2ubuntu3] (core) [20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcmciautils (artful-proposed/main) [018-8 => 018-8build1] (core) [20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkg-config (artful-proposed/main) [0.29.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.29.1-0ubuntu2] (core) [20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: psmisc (artful-proposed/main) [22.21-2.1build1 => 22.21-2.1build2] (core) [20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: procmail (artful-proposed/main) [3.22-25 => 3.22-25build1] (ubuntu-server) [20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pxljr (artful-proposed/main) [1.4+repack0-4 => 1.4+repack0-4build1] (desktop-core) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: quota (artful-proposed/main) [4.03-2 => 4.03-2build1] (core) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rasqal (artful-proposed/main) [0.9.32-1 => 0.9.32-1build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: raptor2 (artful-proposed/main) [2.0.14-1 => 2.0.14-1build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rfkill (artful-proposed/main) [0.5-1ubuntu3 => 0.5-1ubuntu4] (desktop-core) [20:57] slangasek: They're happening shortly. [20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtkit (artful-proposed/main) [0.11-4 => 0.11-4build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squashfs-tools (artful-proposed/main) [1:4.3-3ubuntu2 => 1:4.3-3ubuntu3] (core) [20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sbc (artful-proposed/main) [1.3-1 => 1.3-1build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: syslinux-legacy (artful-proposed/main) [2:3.63+dfsg-2ubuntu8 => 2:3.63+dfsg-2ubuntu9] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: time (artful-proposed/main) [1.7-25.1 => 1.7-25.1build1] (core) [20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tone-generator (artful-proposed/main) [1.5.4+15.10.20150731-0ubuntu1 => 1.5.4+15.10.20150731-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-lens-files (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0+16.04.20151217-0ubuntu1 => 7.1.0+16.04.20151217-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tinycdb (artful-proposed/main) [0.78 => 0.78build1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) [20:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-geoip (artful-proposed/main) [1.0.2+14.04.20131125-0ubuntu2 => 1.0.2+14.04.20131125-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop) [20:59] infinity: sounds good [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-lens-music (artful-proposed/main) [6.9.1+16.04-0ubuntu1 => 6.9.1+16.04-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-scope-home (artful-proposed/main) [6.8.2+16.04.20160212.1-0ubuntu1 => 6.8.2+16.04.20160212.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity-lens-video (artful-proposed/main) [0.3.15+16.04.20160212.1-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.15+16.04.20160212.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unzip (artful-proposed/main) [6.0-20ubuntu1 => 6.0-20ubuntu2] (core) [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbmuxd (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.0-2 => 1.1.0-2build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: uucp (artful-proposed/main) [1.07-23 => 1.07-23build1] (core) [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbutils (artful-proposed/main) [1:007-4 => 1:007-4build1] (core) [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie-preferences (artful-proposed/main) [0.18 => 0.18build1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireless-tools (artful-proposed/main) [30~pre9-8ubuntu1 => 30~pre9-8ubuntu2] (core) [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x11-session-utils (artful-proposed/main) [7.7+2 => 7.7+2build1] (desktop-core) [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wvdial (artful-proposed/main) [1.61-4.1 => 1.61-4.1build1] (ubuntu-desktop) [21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x11-utils (artful-proposed/main) [7.7+3 => 7.7+3build1] (core) [21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-user-dirs (artful-proposed/main) [0.15-2ubuntu6 => 0.15-2ubuntu7] (core) [21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x11-xserver-utils (artful-proposed/main) [7.7+7 => 7.7+7build1] (desktop-core, xorg) [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-user-dirs-gtk (artful-proposed/main) [0.10-1ubuntu1 => 0.10-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zip (artful-proposed/main) [3.0-11 => 3.0-11build1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xinput (artful-proposed/main) [1.6.2-1 => 1.6.2-1build1] (desktop-core) [21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zip [source] (artful-proposed) [3.0-11build1] [23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlc (artful-proposed/universe) [2.2.4-14ubuntu2 => 2.2.5-1] (mozilla, mythbuntu, ubuntu-mate) (sync) [23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlc (artful-proposed/universe) [2.2.4-14ubuntu2 => 2.2.5-3] (mozilla, mythbuntu, ubuntu-mate) (sync) [23:42] The person who did that looked at my bug, thank you whoever that is :D [23:43] (vlc) [23:43] For the record, it's not urgent to get in right away, as I was just looking at merges.ubuntu.com, but it should go in when the archive opens for development. [23:49] tsimonq2: it won't be approved anyway. It'll stay in the queue with all the other ~80 uploads currently there waiting until the base toolchain for artful is laid, and then the queue will be disabled and emptied. [23:50] mapreri: Ah ok, I didn't know what happened to uploads pre-archive opening.