notinuse | leave | 07:02 |
---|---|---|
=== JanC is now known as Guest51396 | ||
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
=== infinity changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Zesty Released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-zesty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: | ||
juliank | infinity: Yay. I assume auto syncs don't run yet? Want to fix bug 1681231 (sync package, and upload it as an SRU to yakkety) | 09:23 |
ubottu | bug 1681231 in cracklib2 (Ubuntu) "package cracklib-runtime 2.9.2-3 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving triggers unprocessed" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681231 | 09:23 |
Unit193 | ...Is there a way to mark a package as expected to fail to build on an arch? | 09:23 |
infinity | Unit193: Let it fail? | 09:23 |
infinity | juliank: autosyncs probably won't be on for a day or two while people do some manual merges first. | 09:24 |
Unit193 | Right, but it keeps emailing me... | 09:24 |
juliank | Great. I synced manually now, and will prepare an SRU for yakkety shortly. | 09:24 |
juliank | Also I'm not sure how we can have a reproducible test case here | 09:24 |
juliank | s/yakkety/zesty/ | 09:25 |
juliank | Or well, both even it seems | 09:25 |
juliank | Although: If we only see the issue in zesty, probably no need to work around it in yakkety too | 09:26 |
acheronUK | no artful template yet in /usr/share/python-apt/templates/Ubuntu.info | 09:27 |
acheronUK | I know it's a bit early to nag about that :P | 09:27 |
juliank | acheronUK: It's not been that long :D | 09:27 |
acheronUK | but it did just break our CI builds | 09:28 |
acheronUK | juliank: yep. I know. :) | 09:28 |
juliank | Oh well, I'll SRU cracklib2 to both yakkety and zesty it seems, one of the linked bug reports complains about yakkety | 09:29 |
juliank | If no one is working on the python-apt thing, I can do this quickly | 09:36 |
acheronUK | juliank: if you have the time, that would be great | 09:37 |
Unit193 | Actually, if I'm looking at this correctly then the issue should be fixed with golang 1.8 | 09:46 |
juliank | Change is committed, upload is coming | 10:07 |
juliank | acheronUK: Uploaded | 10:10 |
acheronUK | juliank: thank you :) | 10:10 |
juliank | Hmm, I guess I should just SRU (more parts of) cracklib 2.9.2-4 to xenial (2.9.2-1) too. (-2 fixes a CVE, -3 fixes a buffer overflow) | 11:01 |
jaydemir | do programs written in java make it onto the ubuntu repos? or is it usually just c and python? | 12:13 |
juliank | lol | 12:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | cpaelzer, will you take care of strongswan please? :) (I'm listed as last uploader, but I just did a no change rebuild) | 12:33 |
acheronUK | juliank: test regression on python-apt against update-notifier on s390x | 12:57 |
juliank | acheronUK: retried it | 12:58 |
acheronUK | thx. hoping it is just random weirdness of s390x | 12:58 |
juliank | It's definitely not a python-apt regression | 12:58 |
juliank | Could not connect to localhost:52117 (127.0.0.1). - connect (111: Connection refused) | 12:58 |
juliank | Ah no, that happens everywhere | 12:59 |
juliank | Anyway, no downloading changes anywhere | 12:59 |
acheronUK | ooh. new retry button http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/update-notifier/artful/s390x | 13:00 |
juliank | yeah, just saw that too | 13:00 |
juliank | acheronUK: And it passed | 13:03 |
acheronUK | juliank: yep. just saw :) | 13:03 |
juliank | acheronUK: Oh well, now snapcraft failed, but no new regression, already happened in prev build too (for squashfs-tools) | 14:22 |
acheronUK | juliank: can that get through then? | 14:24 |
juliank | Some tests are still in progress AFAICT | 14:26 |
acheronUK | juliank: I meant the snapcraft fails being badtested | 14:28 |
acheronUK | as at the moment looks like they would hold it back, regression or not | 14:29 |
juliank | It looks like snapcraft itself regresses on armhf | 14:30 |
juliank | On amd64 the upload run worked, but the python-apt caused one failed. | 14:30 |
juliank | on armhf the upload run failed, with different errors than on amd64 | 14:31 |
acheronUK | fun! | 14:31 |
acheronUK | ok. if python-apt is going to be stuck in proposed for a bit, will have to start thinking about workarounds for our CI | 14:39 |
=== mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
Unit193 | ginggs: I don't suppose you're around? | 23:20 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!