[01:38] <masber> good morning all
[01:38] <masber> I am trying to bring up a network interface but somehow it is not working
[01:38] <masber> https://pastebin.com/raw/hD7BT3r0
[01:39] <masber> it says "Unknown interface ens224"
[01:39] <masber> do I need to add ens224 to my interfaces file?
[01:53] <Poster> that would be my guess yes
[02:52] <transhuman> hi, small problem my /etc/resolv.conf doesnt seem to get populated, how do i fix correctly?
[02:53] <cncr04s> add 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 to it
[03:06] <transhuman> that doesnt survive a reboot added dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 to interface seems to take care of it
[03:07] <transhuman> next question does kvm /ubuntu guests have a guests tools ...I  know centos has a guest tool for kvm?
[05:31] <cpaelzer> goo dmorning
[05:31] <cpaelzer> uh space(-time) is distorted
[06:46] <tohuw> Has anyone seen an issue in 16.04.2 where postfix-ldap and similar packages deploy modules with paths like "/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-ldap.so.1.0.1" when postfix expects "/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-ldap.so"?
[06:47] <tohuw> I can resolve the immediate problem with symlinking, but I'm keen to know if there's something wrong in my installation base or in the package triggers or what
[06:53] <sarnold> hrm I think those symlinks should be created by ldconfig which should be called as a trigger after packages are installed
[06:54] <tohuw> sarnold: Interesting. I wonder why they wouldn't be? dpkg-reconfigure didn't help, but I don't know enough about packaging to say more
[06:56] <tohuw> I'll be building a fresh instance tomorrow for other purposes; I'll re-test then and report a bug if it doesn't create the symlinks at that point.
[06:57] <sarnold> tohuw: if this instance is then fair for testing, give a try to just running 'sudo ldconfig' or 'sudo ldconfig -n /usr/lib/postfix/' and see what changes...
[06:58] <sarnold> fair warning while i'm pretty sure that's a no-op at worst and fixes your problem at best, there's a chance my memory is wrong on this point..
[06:58] <tohuw> sarnold: too late D: instance was for temporary flight testing of something else and has been destroyed. I'll test on another tomorrow with your suggestion.
[06:58] <sarnold> tohuw: hooray no consequences if I was wrong :)
[06:58] <sarnold> (it's late. I should be in bed..)
[06:58] <tohuw> likewise. Thanks for the help!
[07:00] <cpaelzer> soahccc: go to bed, I'll quickly look at it
[07:00] <sarnold> cpaelzer: thanks! :)
[07:04] <cpaelzer> tohuw: I can already confirm that it doesn't get its symlink as other libs
[07:05] <cpaelzer> also it is about the first name in /usr/lib I've seen for ages that is not starting with lib
[07:05] <cpaelzer> maybe that falls through some wildcards now
[07:05] <cpaelzer> tohuw: can you directly point me to the reference where it is expecting it as /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-ldap.so
[07:06] <cpaelzer> I'd have expected /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-ldap.so.1
[07:07] <cpaelzer> Ah I see those .sos are integrated otherwise - /etc/postfix/dynamicmaps.cf directly holds the reference to postfix-ldap.so.1.0.1
[07:07] <cpaelzer> tohuw: even more, could you point me to where it expects it without the soname version?
[07:13] <cpaelzer> ok the diff in lib vs non lib files there is normal .so for libs and those starting with postfix... for postfix database plugins
[08:07] <zioproto> jamespage: are you around ?
[08:08] <zioproto> I refreshed the nova package
[08:08] <zioproto> https://code.launchpad.net/~zioproto/+git/nova/+ref/stable/newton
[08:18] <zioproto> I need to refresh the all thing
[08:42] <zioproto> jamespage: https://code.launchpad.net/~zioproto/ubuntu/+source/nova/+git/nova/+merge/323018
[08:48] <jamespage> zioproto: please can you push your tags as well
[08:49] <zioproto> sure
[08:50] <zioproto> done
[08:50] <zioproto> jamespage: done
[08:51] <jamespage> zioproto: ok I merged your updated branches
[08:51] <zioproto> thank you
[08:51] <jamespage> zioproto: is there a bug ref for this already?
[08:51] <zioproto> I dont know
[08:54] <jamespage> I'll take that as a no then - normally the person preparing the upload for a new point release would also raise the bug paperwork
[09:03] <jamespage> zioproto: I'll cover that with any other newton minor point releases that are pending but unlikely to get to those until wednesday
[09:03] <jamespage> dealing with a few other sru's and pike-1/artful opening today
[09:03] <zioproto> jamespage: ok !
[09:04] <jamespage> and then need to switch to prepping for the london openstack meetup on tuesday evening
[11:27] <cpaelzer> any native spanish speaker that might be able to help understanding what is going on in bug 1685507 ?
[12:34] <cpaelzer> rbasak: nacc: could you look into bug 1683237 to sponsor a sync to aa?
[12:35] <cpaelzer> if you can't atm you might subscribe sponsors or ping me to update things to be catched later
[12:48] <rbasak> Looking
[12:53] <rbasak> Synced, and accepted the Zesty nomination. Thanks!
[15:09] <rbasak> cpaelzer: fyi, bug 1685136 is a dupe of bug 1580794. I've marked it and tagged it "triage" to make it easier to find next time.
[16:10] <roelof> hello,  I have this main.cf for postfix on Ubuntu Server 16.04. http://paste.ubuntu.com/24448737
[16:10] <roelof> but when I do telnet localhost 25 and then ehlo localhost I do not see the 250 - auth response
[16:11] <roelof> Can someone help me figure out where things get wrong ?
[16:11] <nacc> roelof: is postfix running (see `sudo netstat -pan | grep postfix` )
[16:13] <roelof> nacc I see then this output :  unix 2   [ ]  dgram  15448 101/rsyslogd /var/spool/postfix/dev/log
[16:14] <roelof> so I suppose its running
[16:14] <nacc> roelof: well, you'd see postfix itself listening, afaict
[16:14] <nacc> roelof: so it's not, afaict
[16:15] <nacc> roelof: after making the chagnes to main.cf did you run `sudo systemctl start postfix` ?
[16:16] <roelof> no,  I did sudo systemctl restart postfix
[16:16] <nacc> roelof: ok, that's fine
[16:16] <nacc> roelof: did it succeed?
[16:16] <roelof> and according to systemctl status postfix is running
[16:16] <nacc> roelof: ok
[16:16] <nacc> roelof: you can also do `sudo netstat -pan | grep 25` and see if anything is listening on port 25
[16:17] <roelof> I see all the headers when testing except the 250 - auth one
[16:17] <nacc> roelof: oh i see
[16:18] <roelof> nacc:  and according to a tutorial I schould see that one
[16:20] <roelof> according to these answers https://serverfault.com/questions/296298/why-doesnt-postfix-announce-auth-during-ehlo
[16:21] <roelof> it schould be smtpd_tls_auth_only = no
[16:21] <roelof> and that one I have already
[16:21] <roelof> see sentence 51
[16:33] <roelof> aha, I now see a error in the mail log :  sasl per-process initialization failed
[16:33] <roelof> someone a idea how to solve this one
[16:42] <roelof> soneone who can help me with this one
[16:47] <nacc> roelof: possibly this: https://www.howtoforge.com/community/threads/problem-with-posfix-smtp-auth-and-tls.19421/ ?
[16:47] <sarnold> roelof: are there logging options that you can turn up? maybe generic logging verbosity, maybe something specific to sasl?
[16:50] <roelof> I solved the sasl by disabeling a line in master.cf
[16:51] <roelof> but still the problem is that I still do not see the 250 - auth line
[16:56] <roelof> and now it worked : I enabled this line in master.cd : -o smptd-sasl-auth-enable = yes
[16:57] <roelof> now I see 250 - auth plain login  and 250 auth=plain login
[16:59] <roelof> I hope this is solved or is there a big difference between 250 - auth and 250 auth plain login ?
[17:29] <roelof> another problem :  I have this in my vmaps file :  info@example.com     example1.com/info
[17:30] <roelof> but as soon as I try to send a email to that adress I see this is my log status : bounced (unknown user 'info')
[17:31] <roelof> what can now be going wrong ?
[17:33] <roelof> solved it, I used the wrong domainname
[17:45] <roelof> is this still a valid tutorial for spam and virus scanning and spf with postfix : https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/mail-filtering.html
[17:56] <cpaelzer> rbasak: thanks
[17:56] <cpaelzer> rbasak: for the dup and tag info
[18:07] <axisys> is it still true?
[18:07] <axisys> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2009/CVE-2009-2410.html
[18:07] <axisys> says does not apply to ubuntu
[18:07] <nacc> sarnold: --^ i believe you looked at that one?
[18:07] <sarnold> nacc: yeah, thanks
[18:08] <sarnold> axisys: indeed, that was fixed before sssd was imported into ubuntu
[18:08] <axisys> sarnold: thanks for the confirmation!
[18:24] <cpaelzer> rbasak: do we also already ahve an example for "alternative path /etc/mysql/my.cnf.fallback doesn't exist"
[18:31] <jathan>  Hello ubuntu-server channel. I am trying to execute an ansible playbook but I get the next error related to my Ubuntu machine and SSH:
[18:31] <jathan> http://paste.debian.net/929152/
[18:32] <nacc> jathan: can you ssh directly (not using ansible)?
[18:32] <jathan> Yes
[18:34] <nacc> jathan: to 10.128.0.12 ?
[18:40] <axisys> jathan: have you checked with #ansible ?
[18:41] <axisys> jathan: you might be using some proxycommand in your .ssh/config and not using the same with ansible
[18:43] <teward> what's the probability there's a memory lean in landscape-client?
[18:44] <teward> because I found that landscape-client ended up consuming almost 400MB of swap, and 40% of a 1GB server's RAM
[18:44] <teward> and that's... not good.
[18:44] <jathan> Yes, I have already asked in #ansbile channel, but they told me it is not a problem of Ansible. I am directing to that IP, because I am trying to do a SSH forward from a Google Cloud instance using its external IP address and from here to three instances using just their internal IP addresses in my ansible ssd_config file:
[18:45] <jathan> http://paste.debian.net/929123/
[18:49] <axisys> jathan: you want to make sure .ssh/config has a stanza for hdfs-master
[18:51] <jathan> Thanks axisys. Let me try that.
[18:55] <jathan> axisys: How can I set an entry for hdfs-master in my ssh config file if that it is a Google Cloud instance with only internal IP address access?
[18:58] <axisys> you can ssh to hdfs-master directly, correct?
[19:04] <rbasak> cpaelzer: I think there are a few bugs I've closed as Incomplete or Invalid for those.
[19:05] <rbasak> Generally it's because mysql-common is not from Ubuntu (eg. upstream MariaDB or something) or it's because the user has deleted /etc/mysql manually.
[19:54] <jathan> axisys: Not from my local computer. I need to enter first to another Google Cloud instance and from here go to hdfs-master.
[20:35] <axisys> you have a proxycommand setup, so ssh from local computer to hdfs-master does not work?
[23:14] <nacc> cpaelzer: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/BugSquashingDay, and added to the serverteam header
[23:44] <nacc> cpaelzer: please help me flesh it out as you see fit