[00:32] evening all [00:33] flocculant: correct, land it AA, SRU back to everything we care about [00:34] ochosi: I had mentioned last cycle that it would be cool if we shipped with some xubuntu avatars [00:35] ..Ro..robots? :3 Xubuntu killer robots? :3 [01:15] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [greybird] r510 xfwm4-a11y: Fix broken symlink (Fixes #183)... (by Simon Steinbeiß) [18:22] tracker is up - added core for better or worse [20:12] Now we just poke knome to poke on that! [20:16] poke [20:47] Unit193: any feedback on the notifyd thingy yet? [20:48] did it eat your ram already? :D [20:56] ochosi: I actually had a cron job that'd plot the memory usage, but I still haven't extensivly used it yet so not sure if it's quite useful. That being said, having the default to stay running is the right move (though might be cool to have a hidden option, but meh.) I'll have the latest results in 4 minutes. [20:57] yeah, i know it's the right behavior, killing the daemon is maybe hiding leaks, but resource usage is really irrelevant with notifyd [20:58] Or, it's killing it when it's not needed. Depending on how you look at it. But, it does very well. [20:59] (Give me just a sec more, I was even going to poke you!) [21:00] * ochosi gives a sec to Unit193 [21:00] http://paste.openstack.org/show/608139/ [21:01] For that last bump, finaly used it again (with a for i in $(seq 1 30);do notify-send $i $i;done) [21:02] right [21:03] left [21:03] ..Though it seems I don't slam it hard, and flocculant is great at breaking things. :> [21:03] dunno, the mem usage doesn't look absurd [21:04] No, it looks pretty fine to me. [21:04] very comparable to what i have here [21:05] Except the usage percent I'm sure, and the username. :3 [21:05] flocculant: Also in case you read scrollback, I'm kidding. Just doing some upstream testing. :)