[00:07] <bluesabre> Unit193: I think it made it in
[00:07] <bluesabre> Feel free to bump version numbers
[00:07] <bluesabre> Let me know when you've uploaded so I can do the 2nd upload (https://launchpad.net/gtk-theme-config/1.2/1.2.2)
[01:37] <Unit193> bluesabre: Right-o.  Pushed all the things.
[01:38] <Unit193> bluesabre: That doesn'tlook related though.  And, next up: Splitting out elementary-xfce-icon-theme! :P
[01:46] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: [artful] r324 Bump version number to 17.10 (by Unit 193)
[02:56] <bluesabre> Unit193: nah, no need for it to be related :D
[02:56] <Unit193> If you're talking Xubuntu uploads, I already got thunar. :P
[02:57] <Unit193> https://launchpad.net/~unit193/+uploaded-packages
[02:58] <Unit193> New gtk-theme-config sounds fun to try though.
[03:00] <bluesabre> Unit193: awesome
[03:00] <bluesabre> the new gtk-theme-config might have some issues, but works better than it did since the last update was wily
=== sorinello__ is now known as sorinello_
[10:51] <akxwi-dave> flocculant: re bug 1687075 not sure if this has been patched into today's iso..  As looking at xfce bug 13535  it appears it may.. I can confirm that Thunar on todays iso is not leaving copies behin in trash any more.. (However still think the actual wording of the warning dialog could be better,,
[10:51] <ubottu> bug 1687075 in thunar "Restoring non-empty folders spawns warning - leaves copy behind" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687075
[10:51] <ubottu> bugzilla.xfce.org bug 13535 in apr "Restoring non-empty folders spawns a warning about modification/restores folder and leaves copy in Trash" [Normal,New] https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13535
[10:53] <Unit193> Should only be the one for LP: #1679488, Xfce bz #13481
[10:53] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1679488 in thunar (Ubuntu) "Thunar freezes when left inactive for a while" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1679488
[10:59] <akxwi-dave> ahh.. even weirder then...   as the other bug wasn't bugging today.. although it did  on older ones.. (unless that fix, fixed the other as well)  :)
[11:26] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: I still see the bug btw
[11:30] <knome> akxwi-dave, flocculant: qa admin tab should be fixed
[12:01] <akxwi-dave> knome: :-)
[12:03] <akxwi-dave> flocculant:  hmm.. deffo not leaving anything behind for me on 32bit vm on virtualbox ( windows)  just about to do the 64bit install so will check on there
[13:05] <akxwi-dave> flocculant:  Nope .. not bugging out on either 32 or 64 for me on todays iso..
[13:27] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: http://tinypic.com/r/14vrcc8/9
[13:33] <akxwi-dave> doh..  you can tell I've had too much beer over the weekend.. I've forgot to test against the cancel option...  did virtually every other one..    some one slap me..
[13:38] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: yea - but when the warning shows up - the thing has already been restored
[13:40] <flocculant> anyway - I tested the patch yesterday in the xfce bug
[13:42] <akxwi-dave> aye same here now...  I was doing the skip and skip all
[13:45] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: wording is odd - or that's a different issue, to me if something warns me and option is skip, yes or yes to all - that would imply it would not restore
[13:47] <akxwi-dave> exactly.. which I think needs looking at as well.. As I would think the same..... to be honest does it need a dialog box at all?? or just a are you sure? one..
[13:47] <flocculant> mmm
[13:47] <flocculant> need to check with folders that include root owned stuff maybe?
[13:48] <flocculant> need someone like bluesabre or ochosi to try and give a defnitive it 'should' do foo
[13:49] <flocculant> I suspect that the warning is useful in the situation it's there for 
[14:03] <akxwi-dave> yes If you were trying to edit them, but not really for restore...   8-)
[15:26] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: sso what you want to do re package testing? 
[15:29] <akxwi-dave> in what way bud?
[15:30] <akxwi-dave> you'll have to forgive me.. had a few skin fulls over teh weekend celebrating a few things
[15:30] <flocculant> in what way do you want the packages on the tracker? same as lts? new order?
[15:30] <akxwi-dave> seems to have lost some brain cells along the way]
[15:30] <akxwi-dave> ahh yes..
[15:31] <akxwi-dave>   I would go for the same as LTS...  its familar to people, and if we do want to change bits/order  they can be done in small steps
[15:32] <akxwi-dave> lets not frighten the testers that we do have too much.. :-)
[15:34] <flocculant> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/377/builds
[15:42] <flocculant> pretty simple to fiddle with the sections - though not as simple as it could be
[15:48] <flocculant> knome: thanks btw :)
[15:54] <akxwi-dave> chhers
[16:08] <flocculant> np
[18:02] <knome> flocculant, no problem
[21:27] <Unit193> 00~https://bugs.debian.org/86170201~
[21:27] <ubottu> Error: debian bug 86170201 not found