| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (xenial-proposed/main) [0.90ubuntu0.5 => 0.90ubuntu0.6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 01:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.92ubuntu1.4 => 0.92ubuntu1.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 01:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (zesty-proposed/main) [0.93.1ubuntu2.1 => 0.93.1ubuntu2.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 01:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-78.99~14.04.2] | 04:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1] | 04:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (yakkety-proposed/main) [16.07.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 16.07.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.2] (ubuntu-server) (sync) | 06:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-21.23~16.04.1] (kernel) | 07:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-21.23~16.04.1] | 08:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-open-sans [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.11-1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openscap-daemon [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.6-1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-are-we-there-yet [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.4-1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: afterburner.fx [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset) | 11:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset) | 11:13 | |
| apw | bdmurray, was that note that yakkety was phasing meant to be a warning of badness ? | 11:29 |
|---|---|---|
| acheronuk | apw: would you maybe have some time to look at the new queue KDE applications packages? | 11:34 |
| acheronuk | they were the ones we were never able to get into zesty :/ | 11:35 |
| acheronuk | but had to provide in a ppa post release http://kubuntu.org/news/kde-pim-update-now-available-for-zesty-zapus-17-04/ | 11:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1] | 11:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted afterburner.fx [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.0-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-are-we-there-yet [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.4-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-open-sans [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.11-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1] | 11:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openscap-daemon [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.6-1] | 11:37 | |
| apw | acheronuk, right at this instant no, but i'll try and get to them a little at a time | 11:39 |
| acheronuk | apw: that is great, and appreciated. can't ask for more than that. :) | 11:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | test queue is finally settling down | 12:06 |
| Laney | sad! | 12:08 |
| apw | i love how 700 items is "settling down" | 12:08 |
| apw | no more parties for ADT | 12:09 |
| * Laney loves a phat queue | 12:09 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | at least that is the "huge" queue, lower priority, right? | 12:09 |
| ginggs | would someone please remove bio-tradis binaries on armhf and s390x ? | 12:11 |
| infinity | ginggs: Not without rationale. | 12:13 |
| ginggs | infinity: it was built on architectures where it is not installable, please see the ubuntu1 changelog entry | 12:15 |
| xnox | infinity, this is not how one holidays =) | 12:15 |
| infinity | ginggs: Also would have helped to specify "artful-proposed". | 12:15 |
| infinity | ginggs: Done. | 12:15 |
| infinity | xnox: Yeah, can't sleep. | 12:16 |
| ginggs | infinity: thanks! | 12:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I would also remove from artful src:why on ppc64el and s390x please | 12:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | they are not provided anymore in Debian and Upstream | 12:22 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Done ages ago. | 12:23 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: But again, when that was requested, someone failed to point out that artful-proposed also had NBS binaries, I cleaned those half an hour ago or so. :P | 12:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | interesting, so it doesn't migrate because of something else, lets check | 12:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh ok :) | 12:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | "infinity thanks!" | 12:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (precise-proposed) [0.76ubuntu1.3] | 12:52 | |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: hi if you could take a look at the qemu in the xenial unapproved today that would be great | 13:03 |
| doko | hmm, gcc-7 migrated while it had a block-proposed bug, #1687912 | 13:03 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I already wrapped a second SRU into this because it waited a while, but we now have found regression-update by a security fix of last summer | 13:04 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: it would be great to sucessfully process the ongoing SRU out of the way until mdeslaur has prepared the next round that will fix this (and the usual set of CVEs) | 13:04 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: OK, I'll take a look. Which bug is the regression-update? | 13:05 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: regression-update is bug 1581936 | 13:05 |
| ubot5` | bug 1581936 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "Frozen Windows 7 VMs with VGA CVE-2016-3712 fix (2.6.0 and 2.5.1.1)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581936 | 13:05 |
| cpaelzer | was filed only with upstream qemu all the time, so no one did notice so far | 13:05 |
| jbicha | doko: I assume the block-proposed tag was added just a bit too late | 13:05 |
| infinity | doko: The bug was filed after it migrated. | 13:06 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: the two bugs the current SRU in x-unapproved fixes are bug 1684239 and bug 1656112 | 13:07 |
| ubot5` | bug 1684239 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "vvfat core dump when enabling RW" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1684239 | 13:07 |
| ubot5` | bug 1656112 in linux (Ubuntu Xenial) "Power S822LC (8335-GTB) fails KVM guest cert test with kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1656112 | 13:07 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: OK, let me check I've got this straight. There are no in-flight SRUs, one unapproved regular SRU in bug 1684239, and one security regression-update bug 1581936. You're asking me to review/accept the fix for 239 from xenial unapproved, and then mdeslaur will deal with 936 through the security pocket? | 13:07 |
| ubot5` | bug 1581936 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "Frozen Windows 7 VMs with VGA CVE-2016-3712 fix (2.6.0 and 2.5.1.1)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581936 | 13:07 |
| cpaelzer | "fortunately" all other qemu issues open atm are actually fixed in libvirt so no further collisions known so far | 13:07 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: yes that summary matches my view | 13:08 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: OK, and you're fine with the aging period for an accept from xenial unapproved now? Or will mdeslaur trump that? | 13:08 |
| rbasak | Either way, as long as you know :) | 13:09 |
| infinity | doko: Oh, fun, and that overwrote libgphobos68 from gcc-6. :/ | 13:09 |
| mdeslaur | rbasak, cpaelzer: I won't get to my update before a couple of weeks anyway | 13:09 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I'm ok with a normal aging and so is mdeslaur according to our discussion if we start the aging period like now | 13:09 |
| doko | yep, noticed too late | 13:09 |
| infinity | doko: I can delete that and copy gcc-6 back overtop before it causes any real problems. | 13:09 |
| cpaelzer | mdeslaur: exactly, so if we start to process now it will be out of the way | 13:09 |
| doko | sure, that would be good | 13:09 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer, mdeslaur: understood, thanks. I'll review now. | 13:09 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: and ping me if there is anything unclear I can help to rule out | 13:10 |
| cpaelzer | especially the ppc bug went a few iterations back and forth | 13:10 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: I don't see that 2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.12 was ever published? | 13:14 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: indeed which is why the changelog has both | 13:15 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: as you see in the diff | 13:15 |
| infinity | doko: Okay, should fix itself on the next publisher run. | 13:15 |
| infinity | doko: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/amd64/libgphobos68 | 13:15 |
| rbasak | Ah. Does bileto stop you squashing the two together? | 13:15 |
| doko | ta | 13:16 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: yeah a bit like a burned version would do (only a bit) | 13:16 |
| cpaelzer | I'd need a new ppa and that was bad in this case as I had two external parties already having the links to them | 13:16 |
| cpaelzer | in many other cases I just fetch a new ticket and be good with it | 13:16 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: ^^ | 13:17 |
| rbasak | Trouble is the changes file lists only one (top) bug. I'm not sure what SRU tooling would make of it: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/316967280/qemu_2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13_source.changes | 13:17 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: but if you upload a second version it behave in the past like a dpkg-genversion -v<old> | 13:17 |
| cpaelzer | hmm | 13:17 |
| cpaelzer | the changes would mean not | 13:17 |
| rbasak | You can use -v manually when running dpkg-buildpackages. | 13:17 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I did in the past | 13:18 |
| infinity | cpaelzer: You would have had to manually do a dpkg-genchanges -v before uploading, bileto doesn't do anything fancy here, it just copies your upload around. | 13:18 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: we could kill it from the queue I upload the version with a -v set for a better .changes file | 13:18 |
| cpaelzer | infinity: thanks | 13:18 |
| * cpaelzer belived to much in bileto at this then | 13:18 | |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: cancel and dput then, I can do that like now and it would show up in the queue | 13:19 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: or is there a rule on minumum unapproved queue time? | 13:19 |
| infinity | cpaelzer: At the end of the day, bileto isn't doing anything more for you than provisioning a PPA and running 'copy-package -b' to get your stuff from the PPA to the archive. | 13:19 |
| infinity | cpaelzer: There's no magic. | 13:19 |
| * cpaelzer is crying for his world of magic is destroyed :-) | 13:19 | |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: no minimum unapproved queue time. | 13:20 |
| infinity | cpaelzer: As for "minimum unapproved queue time", it tends to amount to "the time required to generate a debdiff, if your reviewer doesn't want to download the source and diff it himself". :P | 13:20 |
| cpaelzer | hehe | 13:20 |
| rbasak | Well, there is that :) | 13:20 |
| rbasak | But for bileto syncs I have to download the source and diff it myself anyway :) | 13:20 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I'll do that then - pelase reject the current one | 13:20 |
| cpaelzer | wow pelase - please I meant | 13:20 |
| rbasak | My git import tooling is capable of making this easier, but currently we have the git empty directory issue and this qemu upload seems to hit it :-/ | 13:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13] | 13:22 | |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: this issue grows wider and wider | 13:22 |
| cpaelzer | the empty dir one | 13:22 |
| rbasak | Yeah :-/ | 13:22 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: ok the changes now holds both as it should by manually creating it this time | 13:24 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: should show up here any minute - I'll ping you then | 13:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.11 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 13:25 | |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: here it is | 13:26 |
| rbasak | Looking | 13:26 |
| rbasak | Waiting for the debdiff :-) | 13:26 |
| cpaelzer | which confirms infinity theory on minimal aging time :-) | 13:27 |
| rbasak | And Launchpad has gone and diffed against < 0.11 :-/ | 13:31 |
| * rbasak downloads from the queue manually | 13:32 | |
| infinity | rbasak: It diffs against the last version that was in proposed. It's not super smart about interim security updates. | 13:32 |
| rbasak | Ah, so that's the logic. | 13:32 |
| rbasak | The git stuff will make this moot as soon as I fix the empty directory issue :-/ | 13:32 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: are all three patches committed in upstream's master branch? | 13:37 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: also, are they in stable-2.5? | 13:37 |
| rbasak | I could check, but if you know, that's quicker :) | 13:37 |
| tjaalton | what would it need to promote debhelper 10 backport to xenial-updates? | 13:38 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I know, just a sec for my log to read | 13:40 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: master for sure | 13:40 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: checking on stable branch details | 13:40 |
| rbasak | http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=heads suggests that stable-2.5 is no longer maintained upstream? | 13:41 |
| cpaelzer | yeah I haven't seen anything in a while | 13:41 |
| cpaelzer | still patches are old and could be in before if you need to now | 13:42 |
| rbasak | cpaelzer: have you reviewed the patches themselves yourself? | 13:42 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: yes | 13:42 |
| rbasak | That's good enough for me then, thanks :) | 13:42 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: that is me doing the work from upstream commit to d/p/patch | 13:42 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: otherwise the Author in the dep3 would not hold me | 13:43 |
| rbasak | Oh, it didn't apply directly? | 13:43 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: but I guess you can never rely on dep3 as it is optional | 13:43 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: of the three one had fuzz that was unrelated IIRC | 13:43 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: the others applied as is - maybe with offset - I don't remember | 13:43 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: memory is hard on that as interim-wise that was like 9 patches | 13:44 |
| rbasak | No problem. | 13:44 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: until I challenged IBM for their trick to sneak in power performance patches | 13:44 |
| rbasak | So I think that would be, in dep3, "Origin: upstream, <url>" | 13:44 |
| cpaelzer | yet by said patch review I identified they were not needed and dropped to the SRU-minimum | 13:44 |
| rbasak | (no need to change now) | 13:44 |
| rbasak | If you'd had to massage the patches, then it'd be "Origin: backport, <url>" and an additional "Author: Christian ..." line. | 13:45 |
| rbasak | (multiple Author lines are permitted) | 13:45 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I'm kind of proud of my dep3 compared to most I see | 13:45 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: but always good to get more | 13:45 |
| cpaelzer | I usually have Author and Original-Author | 13:45 |
| rbasak | I do very much appreciate what you're put there already, thanks :) | 13:45 |
| cpaelzer | rbasak: I keep an ~/work/patch-template-dep8.patch that I always use as base | 13:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13] | 13:51 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | can anybody look at virtualbox* in xenial unapproved queue? | 13:51 |
| cpaelzer | LocutusOfBorg: only one hypervisor at a time so people can fall back :-P | 13:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yeah, queue is now at 558 :) | 14:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (xenial-proposed/main) [10.2.2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 10.2.2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.2] (core) | 14:21 | |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, is that just for X | 14:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.38-0ubuntu1.16.04.2] | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.38-0ubuntu1.16.04.2] | 14:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.40-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 14:32 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, sorry ENOPARSE | 14:33 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, is that just for xenial, am i expecting any other series | 14:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nobody complained for yakkety and zesty | 14:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | artful is good | 14:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I can do the same there | 14:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (updating to 5.1.22) | 14:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | now we also have a testsuite :) | 14:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.40-0ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 14:35 | |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: by the way, did you see https://bugs.debian.org/861683 ? | 14:35 |
| ubot5` | Debian bug 861683 in src:xorg "Install xserver-xorg-legacy by default for stretch" [Serious,Fixed] | 14:35 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.40-0ubuntu1.16.04.1] | 14:36 | |
| ginggs | LocutusOfBorg: suite! | 14:36 |
| slangasek | so who accepted the unattended-upgrades SRU in precise when we currently have no SRU test case on the bug? | 14:48 |
| slangasek | infinity, apparently | 14:49 |
| apw | slangasek, not me | 14:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, yes, and sad story | 14:55 |
| jbicha | LocutusOfBorg: yes, but it looks like there's a workaround now so it's not as bad | 14:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the workaround has always been there | 14:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I also had that dependency in vbox-guest-* for some time | 14:57 |
| jbicha | if you did a clean install of stretch any time in the past several months in VBox, gdm would not start | 14:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | It starts if you install virtuabox-guest-x11 | 14:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I override the *GL libraries there | 14:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so the vbox implementation works | 14:59 |
| jbicha | right, but how are people going to do that? :( | 14:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | vbox people are trying to upstream the relevant patches | 14:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, merge src:xorg please? | 15:00 |
| tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: for artful? | 15:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yeah | 15:01 |
| tjaalton | k | 15:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I can do it, but meh, better ask :p | 15:01 |
| tjaalton | it's in git | 15:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nobody wants to sponsor a deboostrap upload? LP: #1685873 | 15:03 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1685873 in debootstrap (Ubuntu) "please merge debootstrap from Debian" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1685873 | 15:03 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, there is a heck of a lot of merges and merging going on atm | 15:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack | 15:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | BTW I'm building vbox for yakkety/zesty FWIW | 15:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll setup two VM to test tonight | 15:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I have to admit, I lost interest in fixing bugs between an LTS and the other one :) | 15:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I would like to know popcon for yakkety/zesty and compare them with xenial | 15:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [source] (xenial-proposed) [10.2.2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.2] | 15:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.6-dfsg-2 => 5.1.22-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud) | 15:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (yakkety-proposed/universe) [5.1.6-2ubuntu1 => 5.1.22-2ubuntu1.16.10.1] (no packageset) | 15:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-1 => 5.1.22-2ubuntu1.17.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.6-1 => 5.1.22-1ubuntu1.16.10.1] (no packageset) | 15:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-dfsg-1build1 => 5.1.22-dfsg-0ubuntu1.17.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud) | 15:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-1 => 5.1.22-1ubuntu1.17.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core) | 15:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core) | 16:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core) | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core) | 16:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core) | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core) | 16:13 | |
| nacc | woo, fixed the last regression from src:php-defaults update | 16:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dh-autoreconf (xenial-proposed/main) [12~ubuntu16.04.1 => 12~ubuntu16.04.2] (core) | 16:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-artwork (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7.1 => 0.7.2] (no packageset) | 16:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-artwork [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.2] | 16:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-browserify-rsa [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 17:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-cryptiles [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.1-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-extsprintf [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-vm-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-elliptic [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [6.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-getpass [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpll [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0+20160909+ds1-1] (no packageset) | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (zesty-proposed/main) [1:7.4p1-10 => 1:7.4p1-10ubuntu0.1] (core) | 17:59 | |
| nacc | slangasek: I *believe* now that php-defaults has migrated, src:php7.0 can be demoted to universe? `reverse-depends -c main src:php7.0` is still saying the php-defaults binaries depend on it, but i think that's just a tooling catch-up issue. | 18:33 |
| nacc | slangasek: and the c-m has flipped around :) | 18:33 |
| slangasek | nacc: yeah, c-m is gospel; demoting | 18:33 |
| slangasek | nacc: it does show it as binary-only demotions however | 18:34 |
| slangasek | implying there are binaries still held in main by something | 18:34 |
| slangasek | nacc: and this is true on both c-m and c-m-proposed | 18:34 |
| slangasek | so not tied to the recent migration | 18:34 |
| nacc | slangasek: ok, i'll check again | 18:39 |
| nacc | slangasek: hrm, woulnd't either reverse-depends src:php7.0 or reverse-depends -b show whatever was holding it? I also did a grep-dctrl for the old phpapi and all the revdeps are themselves from src:php7.0 or one universe pacakge (sassphp) which is sort of buggy (and new in artful) that i'm working with debian on | 18:48 |
| slangasek | nacc: certainly, reverse-depends should show what the issue is | 19:24 |
| slangasek | but since that cache hasn't yet updated with the results of the php-defaults change, it's hard to see | 19:25 |
| slangasek | nacc: what I do see is that php.*dev were not in the list of binaries to be downgraded | 19:25 |
| nacc | slangasek: ah ok, i'll look into that, thanks for the hint | 19:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpll [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0+20160909+ds1-1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-cryptiles [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.1.1-1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-extsprintf [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.0-1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-vm-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.4-1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-browserify-rsa [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.1-1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-getpass [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.7-1] | 19:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-elliptic [amd64] (artful-proposed) [6.4.0+dfsg-1] | 19:31 | |
| nacc | slangasek: so it would appear that php7.0-cli php7.0-common php7.0-dev php7.0-json php7.0-opcache php7.0-readline php7.0-xml all are still in main. I'm not sure why, all of the reverse-depends appear to be src:php7.0. Does the migrater need a hint to demote src:php7.0 itself? I expected it would notice it was all self-entangled and figure it out, but perhaps I am wrong | 21:31 |
| slangasek | nacc: I see php-all-dev/php-dev depends: php7.0-dev depends: php7.0-{cli,common}, [...] so how do you expect these to be dropped out? | 21:51 |
| nacc | slangasek: php-all-defaults 1:52ubuntu1 (now in a) depends on php7.1-dev, php7.1-json | 21:52 |
| nacc | slangasek: similarly php-dev 1:52ubuntu1 depends on php7.1-dev | 21:52 |
| nacc | slangasek: where do you see the php7.0 dependencies? | 21:52 |
| slangasek | nacc: in my stale packages files | 21:54 |
| nacc | slangasek: :) | 21:54 |
| slangasek | nacc: and in reverse-depends output which is also stale | 21:54 |
| nacc | slangasek: yeah, the r-d output is driving me crazy, since i can see in my chdist that it's incorrect ;) | 21:55 |
| slangasek | E: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/artful/universe/source/Sources 403 Forbidden [IP: 91.189.88.152 80] | 21:55 |
| * slangasek eyes IS | 21:55 | |
| slangasek | yeah, ok, sources files appear to be awol | 21:58 |
| slangasek | that might explain some of the issues? | 21:59 |
| nacc | slangasek: ah that could be | 21:59 |
| slangasek | eh wait | 21:59 |
| nacc | hrm, i have deb-src lines in my chdist and it was `apt update`-ing earlier | 21:59 |
| slangasek | Sources.xz is there, Sources is not, sorry, this is just a local proxy issue that I didn't finish diagnosing before opening my big mouth | 22:00 |
| nacc | slangasek: ah ok | 22:00 |
| nacc | slangasek: nothing to apologize for! you're helping me verify my own sanity, as I feel like I've been going in circles on this for a bit now :) | 22:01 |
| slangasek | nacc: so, everything now LGTM in packages and I'm going to wait for reverse-depends to sort itself before trying to investigate further | 22:04 |
| nacc | slangasek: ok, that's fine with me | 22:06 |
| nacc | slangasek: i just wanted to have someone else agree that things look right :) | 22:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gcc-7 (artful-proposed/primary) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] | 22:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [source] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] | 22:11 | |
| === sgclark_sleeping is now known as sgclark | ||
| slangasek | nacc: reverse-depends now returns clean. seeded-in-ubuntu? | 22:54 |
| slangasek | nacc: ahhh it's germinate vs. the archive publisher. I think these should all fall out on the next publisher run | 22:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-caseless [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 23:29 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!