[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (xenial-proposed/main) [0.90ubuntu0.5 => 0.90ubuntu0.6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.92ubuntu1.4 => 0.92ubuntu1.5] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[01:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (zesty-proposed/main) [0.93.1ubuntu2.1 => 0.93.1ubuntu2.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-78.99~14.04.2]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1]
[06:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk (yakkety-proposed/main) [16.07.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 16.07.2-0ubuntu0.16.10.2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-21.23~16.04.1] (kernel)
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-21.23~16.04.1]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-open-sans [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.11-1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openscap-daemon [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.6-1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-are-we-there-yet [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.4-1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: afterburner.fx [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tree-monad [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simple-obfs [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: imexam [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:29] <apw> bdmurray, was that note that yakkety was phasing meant to be a warning of badness ?
[11:34] <acheronuk> apw: would you maybe have some time to look at the new queue KDE applications packages?
[11:35] <acheronuk> they were the ones we were never able to get into zesty :/
[11:36] <acheronuk> but had to provide in a ppa post release http://kubuntu.org/news/kde-pim-update-now-available-for-zesty-zapus-17-04/
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted imexam [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted afterburner.fx [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.7.0-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-are-we-there-yet [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.4-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-open-sans [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.11-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tree-monad [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simple-obfs [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.0.3-1]
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openscap-daemon [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.6-1]
[11:39] <apw> acheronuk, right at this instant no, but i'll try and get to them a little at a time
[11:40] <acheronuk> apw: that is great, and appreciated. can't ask for more than that. :)
[12:06] <LocutusOfBorg> test queue is finally settling down
[12:08] <Laney> sad!
[12:08] <apw> i love how 700 items is "settling down"
[12:09] <apw> no more parties for ADT
[12:09]  * Laney loves a phat queue
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> at least that is the "huge" queue, lower priority, right?
[12:11] <ginggs> would someone please remove bio-tradis binaries on armhf and s390x ?
[12:13] <infinity> ginggs: Not without rationale.
[12:15] <ginggs> infinity: it was built on architectures where it is not installable, please see the ubuntu1 changelog entry
[12:15] <xnox> infinity, this is not how one holidays =)
[12:15] <infinity> ginggs: Also would have helped to specify "artful-proposed".
[12:15] <infinity> ginggs: Done.
[12:16] <infinity> xnox: Yeah, can't sleep.
[12:16] <ginggs> infinity: thanks!
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I would also remove from artful src:why on ppc64el and s390x please
[12:22] <LocutusOfBorg> they are not provided anymore in Debian and Upstream
[12:23] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Done ages ago.
[12:24] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: But again, when that was requested, someone failed to point out that artful-proposed also had NBS binaries, I cleaned those half an hour ago or so. :P
[12:24] <LocutusOfBorg> interesting, so it doesn't migrate because of something else, lets check
[12:24] <LocutusOfBorg> oh ok :)
[12:24] <LocutusOfBorg> "infinity thanks!"
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (precise-proposed) [0.76ubuntu1.3]
[13:03] <cpaelzer> rbasak: hi if you could take a look at the qemu in the xenial unapproved today that would be great
[13:03] <doko> hmm, gcc-7 migrated while it had a block-proposed bug, #1687912
[13:04] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I already wrapped a second SRU into this because it waited a while, but we now have found regression-update by a security fix of last summer
[13:04] <cpaelzer> rbasak: it would be great to sucessfully process the ongoing SRU out of the way until mdeslaur has prepared the next round that will fix this (and the usual set of CVEs)
[13:05] <rbasak> cpaelzer: OK, I'll take a look. Which bug is the regression-update?
[13:05] <cpaelzer> rbasak: regression-update is bug 1581936
[13:05] <ubot5`> bug 1581936 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "Frozen Windows 7 VMs with VGA CVE-2016-3712 fix (2.6.0 and 2.5.1.1)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581936
[13:05] <cpaelzer> was filed only with upstream qemu all the time, so no one did notice so far
[13:05] <jbicha> doko: I assume the block-proposed tag was added just a bit too late
[13:06] <infinity> doko: The bug was filed after it migrated.
[13:07] <cpaelzer> rbasak: the two bugs the current SRU in x-unapproved fixes are bug 1684239 and bug 1656112
[13:07] <ubot5`> bug 1684239 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "vvfat core dump when enabling RW" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1684239
[13:07] <ubot5`> bug 1656112 in linux (Ubuntu Xenial) "Power S822LC (8335-GTB) fails KVM guest cert test with kvm_init_vcpu failed: Invalid argument" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1656112
[13:07] <rbasak> cpaelzer: OK, let me check I've got this straight. There are no in-flight SRUs, one unapproved regular SRU in bug 1684239, and one security regression-update bug 1581936. You're asking me to review/accept the fix for 239 from xenial unapproved, and then mdeslaur will deal with 936 through the security pocket?
[13:07] <ubot5`> bug 1581936 in qemu (Ubuntu Xenial) "Frozen Windows 7 VMs with VGA CVE-2016-3712 fix (2.6.0 and 2.5.1.1)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1581936
[13:07] <cpaelzer> "fortunately" all other qemu issues open atm are actually fixed in libvirt so no further collisions known so far
[13:08] <cpaelzer> rbasak: yes that summary matches my view
[13:08] <rbasak> cpaelzer: OK, and you're fine with the aging period for an accept from xenial unapproved now? Or will mdeslaur trump that?
[13:09] <rbasak> Either way, as long as you know :)
[13:09] <infinity> doko: Oh, fun, and that overwrote libgphobos68 from gcc-6. :/
[13:09] <mdeslaur> rbasak, cpaelzer: I won't get to my update before a couple of weeks anyway
[13:09] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I'm ok with a normal aging and so is mdeslaur according to our discussion if we start the aging period like now
[13:09] <doko> yep, noticed too late
[13:09] <infinity> doko: I can delete that and copy gcc-6 back overtop before it causes any real problems.
[13:09] <cpaelzer> mdeslaur: exactly, so if we start to process now it will be out of the way
[13:09] <doko> sure, that would be good
[13:09] <rbasak> cpaelzer, mdeslaur: understood, thanks. I'll review now.
[13:10] <cpaelzer> rbasak: and ping me if there is anything unclear I can help to rule out
[13:10] <cpaelzer> especially the ppc bug went a few iterations back and forth
[13:14] <rbasak> cpaelzer: I don't see that 2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.12 was ever published?
[13:15] <cpaelzer> rbasak: indeed which is why the changelog has both
[13:15] <cpaelzer> rbasak: as you see in the diff
[13:15] <infinity> doko: Okay, should fix itself on the next publisher run.
[13:15] <infinity> doko: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/amd64/libgphobos68
[13:15] <rbasak> Ah. Does bileto stop you squashing the two together?
[13:16] <doko> ta
[13:16] <cpaelzer> rbasak: yeah a bit like a burned version would do (only a bit)
[13:16] <cpaelzer> I'd need a new ppa and that was bad in this case as I had two external parties already having the links to them
[13:16] <cpaelzer> in many other cases I just fetch a new ticket and be good with it
[13:17] <cpaelzer> rbasak: ^^
[13:17] <rbasak> Trouble is the changes file lists only one (top) bug. I'm not sure what SRU tooling would make of it: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/316967280/qemu_2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13_source.changes
[13:17] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but if you upload a second version it behave in the past like a dpkg-genversion -v<old>
[13:17] <cpaelzer> hmm
[13:17] <cpaelzer> the changes would mean not
[13:17] <rbasak> You can use -v manually when running dpkg-buildpackages.
[13:18] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I did in the past
[13:18] <infinity> cpaelzer: You would have had to manually do a dpkg-genchanges -v before uploading, bileto doesn't do anything fancy here, it just copies your upload around.
[13:18] <cpaelzer> rbasak: we could kill it from the queue I upload the version with a -v set for a better .changes file
[13:18] <cpaelzer> infinity: thanks
[13:18]  * cpaelzer belived to much in bileto at this then
[13:19] <cpaelzer> rbasak: cancel and dput then, I can do that like now and it would show up in the queue
[13:19] <cpaelzer> rbasak: or is there a rule on minumum unapproved queue time?
[13:19] <infinity> cpaelzer: At the end of the day, bileto isn't doing anything more for you than provisioning a PPA and running 'copy-package -b' to get your stuff from the PPA to the archive.
[13:19] <infinity> cpaelzer: There's no magic.
[13:19]  * cpaelzer is crying for his world of magic is destroyed :-)
[13:20] <rbasak> cpaelzer: no minimum unapproved queue time.
[13:20] <infinity> cpaelzer: As for "minimum unapproved queue time", it tends to amount to "the time required to generate a debdiff, if your reviewer doesn't want to download the source and diff it himself". :P
[13:20] <cpaelzer> hehe
[13:20] <rbasak> Well, there is that :)
[13:20] <rbasak> But for bileto syncs I have to download the source and diff it myself anyway :)
[13:20] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I'll do that then - pelase reject the current one
[13:20] <cpaelzer> wow pelase - please I meant
[13:21] <rbasak> My git import tooling is capable of making this easier, but currently we have the git empty directory issue and this qemu upload seems to hit it :-/
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected qemu [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13]
[13:22] <cpaelzer> rbasak: this issue grows wider and wider
[13:22] <cpaelzer> the empty dir one
[13:22] <rbasak> Yeah :-/
[13:24] <cpaelzer> rbasak: ok the changes now holds both as it should by manually creating it this time
[13:24] <cpaelzer> rbasak: should show up here any minute - I'll ping you then
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.11 => 1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:26] <cpaelzer> rbasak: here it is
[13:26] <rbasak> Looking
[13:26] <rbasak> Waiting for the debdiff :-)
[13:27] <cpaelzer> which confirms infinity theory on minimal aging time :-)
[13:31] <rbasak> And Launchpad has gone and diffed against < 0.11 :-/
[13:32]  * rbasak downloads from the queue manually
[13:32] <infinity> rbasak: It diffs against the last version that was in proposed.  It's not super smart about interim security updates.
[13:32] <rbasak> Ah, so that's the logic.
[13:32] <rbasak> The git stuff will make this moot as soon as I fix the empty directory issue :-/
[13:37] <rbasak> cpaelzer: are all three patches committed in upstream's master branch?
[13:37] <rbasak> cpaelzer: also, are they in stable-2.5?
[13:37] <rbasak> I could check, but if you know, that's quicker :)
[13:38] <tjaalton> what would it need to promote debhelper 10 backport to xenial-updates?
[13:40] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I know, just a sec for my log to read
[13:40] <cpaelzer> rbasak: master for sure
[13:40] <cpaelzer> rbasak: checking on stable branch details
[13:41] <rbasak> http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=heads suggests that stable-2.5 is no longer maintained upstream?
[13:41] <cpaelzer> yeah I haven't seen anything in a while
[13:42] <cpaelzer> still patches are old and could be in before if you need to now
[13:42] <rbasak> cpaelzer: have you reviewed the patches themselves yourself?
[13:42] <cpaelzer> rbasak: yes
[13:42] <rbasak> That's good enough for me then, thanks :)
[13:42] <cpaelzer> rbasak: that is me doing the work from upstream commit to d/p/patch
[13:43] <cpaelzer> rbasak: otherwise the Author in the dep3 would not hold me
[13:43] <rbasak> Oh, it didn't apply directly?
[13:43] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but I guess you can never rely on dep3 as it is optional
[13:43] <cpaelzer> rbasak: of the three one had fuzz that was unrelated IIRC
[13:43] <cpaelzer> rbasak: the others applied as is - maybe with offset - I don't remember
[13:44] <cpaelzer> rbasak: memory is hard on that as interim-wise that was like 9 patches
[13:44] <rbasak> No problem.
[13:44] <cpaelzer> rbasak: until I challenged IBM for their trick to sneak in power performance patches
[13:44] <rbasak> So I think that would be, in dep3, "Origin: upstream, <url>"
[13:44] <cpaelzer> yet by said patch review I identified they were not needed and dropped to the SRU-minimum
[13:44] <rbasak> (no need to change now)
[13:45] <rbasak> If you'd had to massage the patches, then it'd be "Origin: backport, <url>" and an additional "Author: Christian ..." line.
[13:45] <rbasak> (multiple Author lines are permitted)
[13:45] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I'm kind of proud of my dep3 compared to most I see
[13:45] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but always good to get more
[13:45] <cpaelzer> I usually have Author and Original-Author
[13:45] <rbasak> I do very much appreciate what you're put there already, thanks :)
[13:46] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I keep an ~/work/patch-template-dep8.patch that I always use as base
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.13]
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody look at virtualbox* in xenial unapproved queue?
[13:52] <cpaelzer> LocutusOfBorg: only one hypervisor at a time so people can fall back :-P
[14:06] <LocutusOfBorg> yeah, queue is now at 558 :)
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (xenial-proposed/main) [10.2.2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 10.2.2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.2] (core)
[14:22] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, is that just for X
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.38-0ubuntu1.16.04.2]
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.38-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.38-0ubuntu1.16.04.2]
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.40-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, sorry ENOPARSE
[14:33] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, is that just for xenial, am i expecting any other series
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> nobody complained for yakkety and zesty
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> artful is good
[14:33] <LocutusOfBorg> but I can do the same there
[14:34] <LocutusOfBorg> (updating to 5.1.22)
[14:34] <LocutusOfBorg> now we also have a testsuite :)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.40-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[14:35] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: by the way, did you see https://bugs.debian.org/861683 ?
[14:35] <ubot5`> Debian bug 861683 in src:xorg "Install xserver-xorg-legacy by default for stretch" [Serious,Fixed]
[14:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.0.40-0ubuntu1.16.04.1]
[14:36] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: suite!
[14:48] <slangasek> so who accepted the unattended-upgrades SRU in precise when we currently have no SRU test case on the bug?
[14:49] <slangasek> infinity, apparently
[14:49] <apw> slangasek, not me
[14:55] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, yes, and sad story
[14:56] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: yes, but it looks like there's a workaround now so it's not as bad
[14:57] <LocutusOfBorg> the workaround has always been there
[14:57] <LocutusOfBorg> I also had that dependency in vbox-guest-* for some time
[14:58] <jbicha> if you did a clean install of stretch any time in the past several months in VBox, gdm would not start
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> It starts if you install virtuabox-guest-x11
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I override the *GL libraries there
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> so the vbox implementation works
[14:59] <jbicha> right, but how are people going to do that? :(
[14:59] <LocutusOfBorg> vbox people are trying to upstream the relevant patches
[15:00] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, merge src:xorg please?
[15:00] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: for artful?
[15:01] <LocutusOfBorg> yeah
[15:01] <tjaalton> k
[15:01] <LocutusOfBorg> I can do it, but meh, better ask :p
[15:01] <tjaalton> it's in git
[15:03] <LocutusOfBorg> nobody wants to sponsor a deboostrap upload? LP: #1685873
[15:03] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1685873 in debootstrap (Ubuntu) "please merge debootstrap from Debian" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1685873
[15:13] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, there is a heck of a lot of merges and merging going on atm
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> BTW I'm building vbox for yakkety/zesty FWIW
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll setup two VM to test tonight
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> I have to admit, I lost interest in fixing bugs between an LTS and the other one :)
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to know popcon for yakkety/zesty and compare them with xenial
[15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [source] (xenial-proposed) [10.2.2ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.2]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.6-dfsg-2 => 5.1.22-dfsg-0ubuntu1.16.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (yakkety-proposed/universe) [5.1.6-2ubuntu1 => 5.1.22-2ubuntu1.16.10.1] (no packageset)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-1 => 5.1.22-2ubuntu1.17.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.6-1 => 5.1.22-1ubuntu1.16.10.1] (no packageset)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-dfsg-1build1 => 5.1.22-dfsg-0ubuntu1.17.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-1 => 5.1.22-1ubuntu1.17.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core)
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnutls28 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1] (core)
[16:23] <nacc> woo, fixed the last regression from src:php-defaults update
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dh-autoreconf (xenial-proposed/main) [12~ubuntu16.04.1 => 12~ubuntu16.04.2] (core)
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-artwork (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.7.1 => 0.7.2] (no packageset)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-artwork [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.2]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-browserify-rsa [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-cryptiles [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-extsprintf [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-vm-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-elliptic [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [6.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-getpass [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpll [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0+20160909+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssh (zesty-proposed/main) [1:7.4p1-10 => 1:7.4p1-10ubuntu0.1] (core)
[18:33] <nacc> slangasek: I *believe* now that php-defaults has migrated, src:php7.0 can be demoted to universe? `reverse-depends -c main src:php7.0` is still saying the php-defaults binaries depend on it, but i think that's just a tooling catch-up issue.
[18:33] <nacc> slangasek: and the c-m has flipped around :)
[18:33] <slangasek> nacc: yeah, c-m is gospel; demoting
[18:34] <slangasek> nacc: it does show it as binary-only demotions however
[18:34] <slangasek> implying there are binaries still held in main by something
[18:34] <slangasek> nacc: and this is true on both c-m and c-m-proposed
[18:34] <slangasek> so not tied to the recent migration
[18:39] <nacc> slangasek: ok, i'll check again
[18:48] <nacc> slangasek: hrm, woulnd't either reverse-depends src:php7.0 or reverse-depends -b show whatever was holding it? I also did a grep-dctrl for the old phpapi and all the revdeps are themselves from src:php7.0 or one universe pacakge (sassphp) which is sort of buggy (and new in artful) that i'm working with debian on
[19:24] <slangasek> nacc: certainly, reverse-depends should show what the issue is
[19:25] <slangasek> but since that cache hasn't yet updated with the results of the php-defaults change, it's hard to see
[19:25] <slangasek> nacc: what I do see is that php.*dev were not in the list of binaries to be downgraded
[19:29] <nacc> slangasek: ah ok, i'll look into that, thanks for the hint
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpll [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0+20160909+ds1-1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-cryptiles [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.1.1-1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-extsprintf [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-vm-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.4-1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-browserify-rsa [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.1-1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-getpass [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.7-1]
[19:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-elliptic [amd64] (artful-proposed) [6.4.0+dfsg-1]
[21:31] <nacc> slangasek: so it would appear that php7.0-cli php7.0-common php7.0-dev php7.0-json php7.0-opcache php7.0-readline php7.0-xml all are still in main. I'm not sure why, all of the reverse-depends appear to be src:php7.0. Does the migrater need a hint to demote src:php7.0 itself? I expected it would notice it was all self-entangled and figure it out, but perhaps I am wrong
[21:51] <slangasek> nacc: I see php-all-dev/php-dev depends: php7.0-dev depends: php7.0-{cli,common}, [...] so how do you expect these to be dropped out?
[21:52] <nacc> slangasek: php-all-defaults 1:52ubuntu1 (now in a) depends on php7.1-dev, php7.1-json
[21:52] <nacc> slangasek: similarly php-dev 1:52ubuntu1 depends on php7.1-dev
[21:52] <nacc> slangasek: where do you see the php7.0 dependencies?
[21:54] <slangasek> nacc: in my stale packages files
[21:54] <nacc> slangasek: :)
[21:54] <slangasek> nacc: and in reverse-depends output which is also stale
[21:55] <nacc> slangasek: yeah, the r-d output is driving me crazy, since i can see in my chdist that it's incorrect ;)
[21:55] <slangasek> E: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/artful/universe/source/Sources  403  Forbidden [IP: 91.189.88.152 80]
[21:55]  * slangasek eyes IS
[21:58] <slangasek> yeah, ok, sources files appear to be awol
[21:59] <slangasek> that might explain some of the issues?
[21:59] <nacc> slangasek: ah that could be
[21:59] <slangasek> eh wait
[21:59] <nacc> hrm, i have deb-src lines in my chdist and it was `apt update`-ing earlier
[22:00] <slangasek> Sources.xz is there, Sources is not, sorry, this is just a local proxy issue that I didn't finish diagnosing before opening my big mouth
[22:00] <nacc> slangasek: ah ok
[22:01] <nacc> slangasek: nothing to apologize for! you're helping me verify my own sanity, as I feel like I've been going in circles on this for a bit now :)
[22:04] <slangasek> nacc: so, everything now LGTM in packages and I'm going to wait for reverse-depends to sort itself before trying to investigate further
[22:06] <nacc> slangasek: ok, that's fine with me
[22:06] <nacc> slangasek: i just wanted to have someone else agree that things look right :)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gcc-7 (artful-proposed/primary) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [source] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1]
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnutls28 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.5.8-5ubuntu1]
[22:54] <slangasek> nacc: reverse-depends now returns clean.  seeded-in-ubuntu?
[22:56] <slangasek> nacc: ahhh it's germinate vs. the archive publisher.  I think these should all fall out on the next publisher run
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-caseless [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)