[04:36] <NetworkNoob> Hello
[04:37] <NetworkNoob> Anyone have any idea what this means?: i2c i2c-1: sendbytes: NAK bailout.
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson
=== ghostcube__ is now known as ghostcube
=== ghostcube is now known as schlaugekiffter_
=== schlaugekiffter_ is now known as ghostcube
[15:56] <dmj_s76> sforshee: Hey, I'll try to test the package to fix #1686815 soon.  I might need to bring in some new hardware due to the nature of the bug.
[15:57] <sforshee> dmj_s76: thanks
[15:58] <dmj_s76> And apologies for the delayed response.  I've had my head deep in some hidpi work for the last couple weeks.
[15:59] <sforshee> dmj_s76: np, I knew you were insterested in getting that fixed so just wanted to make sure you saw the comment on the bug
[16:00] <dmj_s76> yeah, thanks for the reminder :)
=== cachio is now known as cachio_afk
=== cachio_afk is now known as cachio
[21:30] <manjo> kamal, how does the zesty kernel even build.. you should be getting compile errors on iommu.c .. due to incompatible types passed 
[21:38] <manjo> kamal, anyways.. it is a trivial patch but I wanted to make sure I am not on crack.. so checking with developer 1st before I submit any patch
[22:00] <kamal> manjo, zesty appears to build fine afaict -- what compile errors specifically?
[22:12] <manjo> kamal, do you have a zesty tree ? 
[22:12] <kamal> manjo, yes
[22:13] <manjo> kamal, go to include/linux/iommu.h and look for extern void iommu_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list);
[22:14] <manjo> kamal, then go to drivers/iommu/iommu.c line #242
[22:14] <manjo> you see the issue ? 
[22:16] <kamal> manjo, my line #242 isn't very interesting:
[22:16] <kamal>  240 static ssize_t iommu_group_show_resv_regions(struct iommu_group *group,
[22:16] <kamal>  241                                              char *buf)
[22:16] <kamal>  242 {
[22:16] <kamal>  243         struct iommu_resv_region *region, *next;
[22:16] <kamal>  244         struct list_head group_resv_regions;
[22:16] <manjo> so iommu_get_resv_regions() takes struct device * ...
[22:17] <manjo> but I think what is being passed in struct device 
[22:19] <kamal> manjo, since my line #242 is that ^^, I suspect that we're not actually looking at the same thing
[22:19] <kamal> I'm looking at 605d269 (HEAD -> master, tag: Ubuntu-4.10.0-20.22, origin/master, origin/HEAD) UBUNTU: Ubuntu-4.10.0-20.22
[22:19] <kamal> what are you looking at?  :-)
[22:20] <manjo> kamal, oops I know what is going on .. I have a few patches applied ! crap
[22:20] <kamal> *cough*
[22:20] <kamal> ;-)
[22:20] <manjo> kamal, some of the patches I backported changed the declarations .. omg .. sorry 
[22:21] <manjo> kamal, I guess I will report this upstream .. zesty is good linux-next is broken 
[22:21] <kamal> manjo, oh, I've known you long enough to know that when you come asking whether or not you're on crack . . .  well . . .   ;-)
[22:21] <manjo> lol.. fscking Friday 
[22:22] <kamal> manjo, np man.  have a good weekend.
[22:22] <manjo> kamal, you too.. btw still roasting ? 
[22:23] <kamal> manjo, COFFEE, you mean!    ;-)   yep -- its the only way to go.
[22:24] <manjo> yeah ☺ 
[22:44] <manjo> kamal, thanks for the help .. I fired off a patch upstream .. lets see what they asay