| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross-ports [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu3] (no packageset) | 01:51 | |
| === lynxorian is now known as lyn||ian | ||
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| slangasek | nacc: php7.x-xml should be fixed to not Provide: php-xml, that's what was still holding php7.0 in main | 06:26 |
|---|---|---|
| acheronuk | contact SRU team in here, or somewhere else? | 07:21 |
| acheronuk | anyway... got an email about this on phased updates https://errors.ubuntu.com/?release=Ubuntu%2017.04&package=k3b&period=day&version=17.04.0-0ubuntu1 | 07:30 |
| acheronuk | can't see anything in the build and changes that would account for any increased crash rate there. | 07:30 |
| acheronuk | I suspect is it more a case of, "oooh, and update to something I don't normally use. I'll launch it and have a look". Then managing to trigger a crash I can't replicate, which they may well have got with the previous build had the bothered to do the same with that | 07:32 |
| acheronuk | oh, and if I look at a timescale of a week or more on that report page and look at all versions (i.e. from before the start of the update phasing or that version was uploaded), I see more occurrences or exactly the same reports | 07:50 |
| acheronuk | so if there is a crash (that I can't track or reproduce) evidence is very strong that it is not the SRU update build itself | 07:56 |
| apw | acheronuk, yes SRU is "here" | 08:06 |
| acheronuk | apw: thanks. glad I wasn't talking pointlessly into the void there :) | 08:07 |
| Laney | both things could be true :) | 08:07 |
| apw | acheronuk, there also is "a major uptick" but htat is from 1 to 3 reports if i am reading this right | 08:09 |
| apw | acheronuk, and i assuem that is because you had none in 17.04 before it released, and then got some users, who are hitting these rare bugs | 08:10 |
| apw | acheronuk, is it telling you the thing has been stopped ? | 08:10 |
| acheronuk | apw: agreed | 08:11 |
| acheronuk | or at least that is the way it seems to me | 08:11 |
| acheronuk | 2 secs | 08:11 |
| acheronuk | apw: email "Further phasing of this update has been stopped until the errors have either been fixed or determined to not be a result of this Stable Release Update." | 08:11 |
| apw | Laney, do you know one determines that ? | 08:12 |
| apw | or indicates one has .... | 08:13 |
| Laney | ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm | 08:15 |
| Laney | on a case by case basis AFAIK | 08:15 |
| infinity | acheronuk: You're reading it wrong. The double free is definitely new. | 08:15 |
| infinity | A few of these are new. | 08:15 |
| infinity | https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/ccf29ca2fc3a7fd8440f77fb469260998c2725bc is new. | 08:16 |
| acheronuk | link does not work for me ^^^ | 08:17 |
| infinity | acheronuk: And I'm not sure how you can confidently say that you see nothing in a 6MB diff to account for that. :P | 08:17 |
| acheronuk | infinity: the double free says 1 occurrence for version 17.04.0-0ubuntu1, but checking over all versions (which must be pre-SRU builds) it is 3 occurrences | 08:21 |
| acheronuk | infinity: and the other error certainly has occurrences prior to the SRU build | 08:22 |
| infinity | I may be having windowing issues indeed. | 08:23 |
| infinity | And also just diffed the sources to see it was pretty much all po updates. | 08:23 |
| infinity | Well, and some XML, which could cause random crashes in an XML parser, I suppose, but meh. | 08:24 |
| acheronuk | infinity: not saying I discount these crashes. I will be keeping an eye on bug reports to see if we get anything concrete to work with and that shows the affect users adversly | 08:24 |
| infinity | FWIW, one of these double-frees is "new", in that the identical signature hasn't been seen on a previous version, but this software seems to just randomly vomit double-frees all over the place, in many versions, so I don't think this is so much new as just a slightly different codepath with the same bug. :P | 08:27 |
| acheronuk | infinity: right. this is the 1st time I have really had to use that crash data pages, and can't log in anyway, so may have missed that :/ | 08:28 |
| infinity | Yeah, I'm not sure who you ask to get access, but you should ask nicely for access for things you can upload. | 08:28 |
| infinity | (It's locked down by default because stack traces of random user cores are potentially very sensitive, so I suspect there's some interview process where you have to promise to be a good person) | 08:29 |
| acheronuk | infinity: agreed. already submitted the canonical for asking for permission to view them on packages in the kubuntu set | 08:29 |
| infinity | Anyhow, I think I'm okay with phasing this back up. | 08:30 |
| infinity | After looking at the mess in more detail. | 08:30 |
| acheronuk | *canonical online form I mean | 08:30 |
| infinity | acheronuk: And done. | 08:31 |
| acheronuk | infinity: thank you. :) As said, will keep an eye on bug reports, forum posts etc. | 08:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | interesting, with windows style line endings the #!/bin/sh is not correctly interpreted | 08:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | is this a regression? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/v/vtk6/artful/amd64 | 08:49 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: /bin/sh^M is very much not a valid interpreter. :P | 08:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | well, it is the windows style line ending 0a0d, we might check it and use it anyway? | 08:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | in the meanwhile I'll ask anton to stop using that stuff, and I uploaded a fixed one | 08:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I was just curious | 08:51 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Or, don't write shell scripts in notepad. | 08:51 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Pretty sure you won't convince the kernel folks to parse DOS magic. | 08:52 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, right that is a windows line ending, linux uses unix line endings | 08:52 |
| apw | windows is of course wrong :) | 08:53 |
| infinity | Can't fathom how or why that upload changed ALL those line endings. | 08:53 |
| infinity | The diff is a mess. | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm not saying windows is right, of course :) | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, yes, I don't even find such changes in git | 08:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm cloning the repo right now | 08:54 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: He somehow did a unix2dos number on pretty much all of debian/patches and debian/tests. | 08:56 |
| apw | derp | 08:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | just on the patch headers, of course | 08:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this seems intentional | 08:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and intentionally wrong | 08:56 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: Some headers. A few complete patches. | 08:57 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: It's weird. | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I think quilt complains | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | or maybe they are not applied | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nice to see how science team can screw up things | 08:57 |
| infinity | Absolutely bizarre, at any rate. | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Applying patch 10_allpatches.patch | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (Stripping trailing CRs from patch; use --binary to disable.) | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | he did that because the source is probably wrong | 08:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gcc-7-cross-ports [i386] (artful-proposed) [0ubuntu3] | 09:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gcc-7-cross-ports [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0ubuntu3] | 09:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: x11proto-core (xenial-proposed/main) [7.0.28-2ubuntu1 => 7.0.31-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 09:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.70-1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 09:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxfont (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1 => 1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 09:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libxfont1 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:1.5.2-4~ubuntu16.04.1] | 09:18 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, please accept virtualbox-* in yakkety and zesty unapproved queues? :) | 09:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwacom (xenial-proposed/main) [0.18-1 => 0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop) | 09:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-4.0 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:4.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 09:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wayland (xenial-proposed/main) [1.9.0-1 => 1.12.0-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server, xorg) | 09:27 | |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, the SRU bug you have used for the zesty one is the same as for xenial, can you some how say the version pairs for the other srus which apply | 09:29 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, perhaps right at the top "Zesty affects version X and fixed in Y" | 09:29 |
| tjaalton | infinity: ^ uploaded the first batch of hwe-16.04 refresh. have a look when you're back from holidays | 09:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, will do shortly (meeting now) | 09:42 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can we please know what is the plan with src:location-service and boost-1.61^ | 09:42 |
| apw | xnox, ^ ? | 09:53 |
| sil2100 | Do we use location-service for anything besides the now-deprecated touch? | 09:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.1.22-dfsg-0ubuntu1.17.04.1] | 09:59 | |
| infinity | sil2100: Probably not, but following the rdep trail tears out basically all of touch. :P | 10:02 |
| infinity | sil2100: So, someone should either fix it, unentangle it, or decide WTF to do with the whole stack. | 10:02 |
| sil2100 | hah, I guess we might really start considering just thrashing touch altogether | 10:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.1.22-2ubuntu1.17.04.1] | 10:03 | |
| Laney | xn_ox is looking at the removals alreaady | 10:04 |
| infinity | Laney: Unless he's started on a second round, he was originally just looking at a shallow set that directly involved upstart. | 10:05 |
| Laney | Second round is correct. | 10:06 |
| infinity | Oh, shiny. | 10:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok I will disentangle location-service by making it build agasint boost-1.62 | 10:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and then ask removal of boost1.61 | 10:06 |
| infinity | Well, I won't lose sleep over it if it all gets torn out. | 10:06 |
| Laney | https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/ubuntu-seeds/unity8-removals/+merge/323615 | 10:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.1.22-1ubuntu1.17.04.1] | 10:07 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | reject? :( | 10:07 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, version numbers of the support packages are newer than artful | 10:09 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: I suspect the version you were looking for there was 5.1.22-1~17.04.1 (or, if there really are Ubuntu changes and it's not just a straight backport, 5.1.22-1~ubuntu17.04.1) | 10:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the first one is good, reuploading | 10:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, please accept virtualbox/yakkety and reject the other two :) | 10:14 |
| infinity | LocutusOfBorg: The verb you're looking for is "review", not "accept". ;) | 10:14 |
| apw | infinity, i've nearly correct that a couple of times too :) | 10:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | s/accept/review/g :) | 10:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I forgot, -i irclogs.ubuntu.com/* :D | 10:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.1.22-2ubuntu1.16.10.1] | 10:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.1.22-1ubuntu1.16.10.1] | 10:19 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | and reuploaded :) | 10:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-1 => 5.1.22-2~17.04.1] (no packageset) | 10:20 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | fortunately the virtualbox-* don't suffer from strange versioning schemes | 10:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (they don't suffer anymore) | 10:20 |
| infinity | They do, however, still suffer from being virtualbox. | 10:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-ext-pack (yakkety-proposed/universe) [5.1.6-2ubuntu1 => 5.1.22-2~16.10.1] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (zesty-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.18-1 => 5.1.22-1~17.04.1] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [5.1.6-1 => 5.1.22-1~16.10.1] (no packageset) | 10:21 | |
| ginggs | would someone please bump the pysam hint to 'force-badtest python-pysam/0.10.0+ds-2/armhf python-pysam/0.10.0+ds-2/i386' ? | 10:21 |
| ginggs | and please rm deepnano:armhf from artful-proposed - it built where it is not installable | 10:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, I meant, there was a automatically-evaluated version check in ext-pack against the same virtualbox minor release, but I fixed it | 10:22 |
| infinity | Laney: ^-- Can we make britney/autopkgtest/whoever forget those arches had results? Hinting them forever because they're no longer built isn't super sane. | 10:22 |
| apw | i seem to remeber we have to remove the results in-toto from swift to do that currently (or something) | 10:23 |
| infinity | ginggs: Removal done. | 10:23 |
| ginggs | infinity: thanks | 10:23 |
| Laney | infinity: No, but you can use 'all' for the version | 10:24 |
| infinity | Laney: Sure, but then if it *does* build on those arches in the future, we'll continue ignoring it until someone notices. | 10:24 |
| infinity | Laney: Which is why I didn't use /all | 10:24 |
| Laney | It's that or go hack swift and delete the results | 10:24 |
| === darkxst_ is now known as darkxst | ||
| ginggs | Laney: would one have to delete all the past results, or just for the current series? | 10:25 |
| apw | i wonder if there is something we can do outside to extract the /all/ hints and verify them | 10:25 |
| infinity | Seems like a bit of a weird bug that we request tests on an arch that has no binaries. | 10:26 |
| apw | i assume it has some via _all | 10:27 |
| infinity | Oh, indeed, python-pysam-tests is arch:all. | 10:27 |
| infinity | Though, that's not the bug. | 10:29 |
| Laney | ginggs: You would delete all passed results for the series in question so it's alwaysfailed, and then I think there's a cache in britney to remove too. | 10:29 |
| infinity | I've ignored other stuff that has no arch:all bits. | 10:29 |
| infinity | We seem to just keep requesting tests on all arches forever. | 10:29 |
| infinity | Though, it also looks like I used foo/all/arch for lots of those, so not sure why python-pysam is special in my mind. | 10:30 |
| infinity | I'll /all it for now. | 10:30 |
| Laney | Write a test for it: tests/test_autopkgtest.py | 10:30 |
| Laney | Assuming this bug exists and therefore it's not tested for | 10:31 |
| apw | infinity, i think in the short term we should perioducally check the /all/ for good and rip them, i recon we could that prgramtically pretty easy | 10:31 |
| infinity | Anyhow, updated the hint for now. That's all the energy I have for it at 4:30am. | 10:32 |
| ginggs | infinity: thanks | 10:33 |
| Laney | I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1688516 | 10:37 |
| ubot5` | Ubuntu bug 1688516 in Auto Package Testing "No way to mark a test as 'accepted regression'" [Undecided,New] | 10:37 |
| infinity | Laney: That sounds like a reasonable feature. I'd bikeshed the key as "force-failtest" to match badtest and skiptest, though. | 10:40 |
| Laney | Makes sense | 10:41 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| apw | infinity, that was the name i came up with too | 10:59 |
| infinity | apw: Fools seldom differ. | 11:01 |
| apw | so very true, and we are that :) | 11:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-lbaas (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2:9.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:9.0.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 12:11 | |
| ginggs | location-service has migrated, can src:boost1.61 be removed from artful please? | 12:29 |
| apw | won't that show up automatically on the nbs report if you are right it is no longer needed | 12:36 |
| apw | no i am mixing my metaphors, ignore me | 12:37 |
| apw | (it is not the same source) | 12:38 |
| infinity | ginggs: Be a bit more patient for it to stop showing up in reverse-depends. | 12:38 |
| apw | that | 12:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-119.166] | 12:45 | |
| * ginggs waits patiently | 12:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cgroup-lite [source] (trusty-backports) [1.11~ubuntu14.04.3] | 12:55 | |
| apw | ^ duplicate in the queue | 12:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.1.22-2~17.04.1] | 13:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (zesty-proposed) [5.1.22-1~17.04.1] | 13:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrome-gnome-shell (xenial-proposed/universe) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.04.1 => 9-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.04.2] (no packageset) | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrome-gnome-shell (yakkety-proposed/universe) [8-2ubuntu4~ubuntu16.10.1 => 9-0ubuntu1~ubuntu16.10] (no packageset) | 13:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrome-gnome-shell (zesty-proposed/universe) [8.2.1-1ubuntu1 => 9-0ubuntu1~ubuntu17.04] (ubuntugnome) | 13:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.20 => 1.2.22] (core) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4 => 1.4.2~17.04.1] (core) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.3.5 => 1.3.7] (core) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (yakkety-proposed/main) [2:14.0.4-0ubuntu1.2 => 2:14.0.5-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-perftools (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.4-0ubuntu5 => 2.4-0ubuntu5.16.10.1] (ubuntu-server) | 14:30 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | soooo somebody please kick boost1.61 out from Ubuntu? :) | 14:34 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, still showing up in reverse-depends | 14:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nah | 14:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | location-service is fixed and migrated one hour ago | 14:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ubuntu-location-service-bin | 3.0.0+16.10.20160912-0ubuntu3 | artful/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el | 14:36 |
| apw | and it is still showing up in reverse speends | 14:36 |
| apw | presuambly because it is out of date, and one wants it to be in date | 14:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | a mistake in my upload or I just need to wait? | 14:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ah ok :( | 14:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | s/:(/:) | 14:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (dear, isn't this a fork bomb?) | 14:37 |
| apw | till the location poop goes away one cannot tell what all else in there is a lie | 14:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seems legit | 14:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.62.html | 14:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this page is good now | 14:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is why I requested it | 14:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I'll prod again when reverse-depends is happy | 14:38 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, right i am sure it is good, but either i have to work it out myself, or i can ignore it for an hour and let reverse-depends sort it out | 14:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I prefer the latter | 14:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | :) | 14:39 |
| jamespage | o/ | 14:54 |
| jamespage | the MIR for vine is blocking quite a large number of packages in artful-proposed related to OpenStack | 14:54 |
| jamespage | via http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#python-amqp | 14:54 |
| jamespage | if soneone in the MIR team has cycles to review that would be awesome: | 14:55 |
| jamespage | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#python-amqp | 14:55 |
| jamespage | bug 1688091 | 14:55 |
| ubot5` | bug 1688091 in vine (Ubuntu) "[MIR] vine" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1688091 | 14:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | infinity, when you are back from VAC, something for you :) LP: #1669578 your opinion is needed :p | 14:57 |
| ubot5` | Launchpad bug 1669578 in screen (Ubuntu) "Get ttyname() to work properly in containers" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1669578 | 14:57 |
| nacc | slangasek: i think that's intentional, in case someone does remove php-defaults, php7.1-xml, e.g., will still satisfy php-xml depends? I'll ask ondrej though | 15:08 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: fwiw, I see trusty's shim update is still in the queue for review, not even in proposed. | 15:30 |
| === didrocks1 is now known as didrocks | ||
| slangasek | nacc: it may be intentional but it's still busted (and inconsistent across different modules built from php7.x) | 15:57 |
| nacc | slangasek: ack, do you have handy an example of a binpkg that doesn't do that? the few i looked at did it like php7.1-xml | 15:58 |
| slangasek | nacc: uh... ok maybe they all do it but germinate walked a different path in some cases. I was assuming the bins we did successfully demote didn't have this problem but spot check says they do also | 15:59 |
| slangasek | nacc: anyway, it's super confusing to have a metapackage that depends on a real package that provides the metapackage | 15:59 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: is the shim in trusty queue current wrt the last round of xenial+ changes? | 15:59 |
| nacc | slangasek: yeah it's confusing, i agree :) | 16:00 |
| nacc | slangasek: i'll work with ondrej on it in debian | 16:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kexec-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.10-1ubuntu2.2] | 16:01 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | please also review vbox* yakkety? I just setup my VM to test | 16:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | qpga | 16:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.04.1] | 16:22 | |
| * apw looks at vbox | 16:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iproute2 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [4.3.0-1ubuntu3.16.10.1] | 16:26 | |
| cyphermox | slangasek: as far as I know, only missing your extra apport changes. | 16:33 |
| slangasek | cyphermox: ok | 16:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-perftools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.4-0ubuntu5.16.10.1] | 16:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted google-perftools [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4-0ubuntu5.16.04.1] | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.0.0-0ubuntu2] | 16:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: e-mem [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0+20160706-1] (no packageset) | 17:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-create-hash [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.2+20170429gitd433cd382e6-1] (no packageset) | 17:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-verror [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: e-mem [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0+20160706-1] (no packageset) | 17:13 | |
| santa_ | hi | 17:23 |
| santa_ | dear release managers, | 17:24 |
| santa_ | may I poke you about the kdepim new reviews? | 17:24 |
| santa_ | http://gpul.grupos.udc.es/ka-iron-hand_reports/applications_archive/16.12.3_artful_retry_builds.pdf | 17:24 |
| santa_ | ↑ it would be nice if we could get this flying spaggheti monster built | 17:24 |
| santa_ | if we need to correct something in our packaging, just let us know, so we will correct it | 17:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.7-0ubuntu3.17.04.2] | 17:29 | |
| jbicha | ^ oh, I guess that's going to clobber the other gnome-software/zesty SRU :( | 17:30 |
| jbicha | is it too late now to promote the older verified one? | 17:31 |
| jbicha | slangasek: ^ | 17:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted e-mem [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0+20160706-1] | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-create-hash [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.2+20170429gitd433cd382e6-1] | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted e-mem [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.0+20160706-1] | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-verror [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.10.0-1] | 17:45 | |
| xnox | Laney, did you review that removals package list? I will start working on filing removal bugs. | 17:56 |
| jbicha | that's a lot of bugs… | 18:01 |
| slangasek | jbicha: it's technically not too late, but AIUI this is a high-priority regression for the desktop team and so I'm ok with also pushing out both SRUs on Monday-ish | 18:20 |
| slangasek | jbicha: (I don't really want to release an SRU on Friday, so...) | 18:21 |
| jbicha | ok, that's fine with me | 18:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:9.3.0-0ubuntu1] | 18:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aodh (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.0.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 3.0.2-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | 19:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceilometer (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinder (yakkety-proposed/main) [2:9.1.2-0ubuntu2 => 2:9.1.4-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: horizon (yakkety-proposed/main) [3:10.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 3:10.0.3-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: heat (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:7.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:7.0.3-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-fwaas (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:9.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 1:9.0.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 19:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (yakkety-proposed/main) [2:9.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:9.3.1-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 20:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron-lbaas (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2:9.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:9.2.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 20:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.4-1] (kubuntu) | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.4-1] (kubuntu) | 21:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.4-1] (kubuntu) | 21:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.4-1] (kubuntu) | 21:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.4-1] (kubuntu) | 21:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x265 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.4-1] (kubuntu) | 21:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (trusty-proposed/main) [0.25ubuntu1.14.04.1 => 0.25ubuntu1.14.04.2] (ubuntu-server) | 21:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [0.27ubuntu1.3 => 0.27ubuntu1.4] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 21:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.30ubuntu1.1 => 0.30ubuntu1.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 21:28 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!