[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: budgie-desktop (zesty-proposed/universe) [10.2.9-3ubuntu4 => 10.2.9-3ubuntu4.1] (no packageset)
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lomoco (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2 => 1.0.0-2ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, do you think we will ever have auto transition trackers like debian has? :)
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> I still don't like too much how britney talks to me :p
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. libpfm4 will probably migrate in a few hours, but meh, how can we discover transitions from excuses page?
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boinc-app-eah-brp [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.20170426+dfsg-2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boinc-app-eah-brp [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.20170426+dfsg-2]
[10:01] <rbasak> He's gone, but FTR, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boinc-app-eah-brp [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.20170426+dfsg-2]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boinc-app-eah-brp [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.20170426+dfsg-2]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [amd64] (artful-proposed) [20170330-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [armhf] (artful-proposed) [20170330-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [20170330-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libarchive-cpio-perl [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.10-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-memory-fs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webpack-sources [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boinc-app-eah-brp [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.20170426+dfsg-2]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [arm64] (artful-proposed) [20170330-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [s390x] (artful-proposed) [20170330-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-pbkdf2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.0.9-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted boinc-app-eah-brp [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.20170426+dfsg-2]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-jsprim [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eclib [i386] (artful-proposed) [20170330-1]
[10:02] <cjwatson> rbasak: auto trackers are a layer on top of that.
[10:02] <cjwatson> I don't know exactly how they work, but Debian has some logic to automatically create things.
[10:02]  * apw sees some spaggetti perl in his mind ...
[10:03] <cjwatson> Probably
[10:05] <rbasak> Oh, I see. Thanks.
[10:16] <fossfreedom> all - how often does the germinate output refresh? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu-budgie.artful/all says gnome-documents is in our seed - but it isnt - I removed it a couple of days ago!
[10:17] <cjwatson> Normally every four hours
[10:17] <cjwatson> ubuntu-archive@snakefruit:~/public_html/germinate-output/ubuntu-budgie.artful$ ls -l all
[10:17] <cjwatson> -rw-rw-r-- 1 ubuntu-archive ubuntu-archive 1793332 May  8 06:37 all
[10:18] <fossfreedom> k - thanks. scratching my head then what is going on.
[10:19] <xnox> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/auto-transition.git/ i think it is python. But I do not believe it was adjusted to work with overlay archives like experimental->unstable, or ubuntu's -proposed -> release.
[10:19] <cjwatson> the seed mirror seems to be out of date
[10:26] <cjwatson> fossfreedom: stuck lock; fixed now.  germinate-output should update in a few hours.  (I misspoke BTW - it's every six hours, not every four hours)
[10:26] <fossfreedom> thanks very much.
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pynac [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pynac [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pynac [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pynac [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pynac [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pynac [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pynac [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pynac [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pynac [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pynac [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pynac [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pynac [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.7.5-2]
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nagios-nrpe (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.15-1ubuntu2 => 2.15-1ubuntu3] (ubuntu-server)
[14:12] <slashd> For today's SRU vanguards (infinity, sil2100 or anyone available) : Good morning, could you (if possible) please prioritize theses 2 UA bugs Openssl (LP: #1674399) for Xenial and nagios-nrpe for Xenial (LP: #1555258) waiting in the upload queue ? That would be highly appreciated. The other affected releases for theses 2 bugs can be "SRU verified" later at your convenience. Thanks in advance !
[14:13] <sil2100> slashd: hey! Let me take a look in a moment
[14:13] <slashd> sil2100, thanks for your quick answer
[14:14] <slashd> sil2100, FYI, bdmurray started the verification for some releases last week.
[14:14] <slashd> but I don't think he started Xenial yet
[14:16] <sil2100> slashd: hm, do you know why he only handled single uploads for those?
[14:16] <sil2100> Were those the only ones available in the queues then?
[14:17] <slashd> sil2100, Xenial upload where already there in the queue for both bugs, yes. As of why he didn't look at the X upload that I don't know, if you prefer we can wait to talk to him.
[14:18] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! Would you prefer to review the openssl and nagios-nrpe uploads since you already handled single series of those? Or should I pick them up instead?
[14:18] <sil2100> I'll start looking at them but wait with pressing any buttons until I get some context from bdmurray
[14:18] <slashd> sil2100, sound good to me, thanks for looking at it, much appreciated
[14:18] <sil2100> yw!
[14:20] <bdmurray> sil2100: I think it was an oversight on my part, although they Y fix for the nagios-nrpe bug was just uploaded.
[14:22] <slashd> Yep the nagios-nrpe "Y" was uploaded this morning. X is really the important bit for UA right now, the other could be verified at your convenience.
[14:22] <bdmurray> Having the fixed version in X and not in Y isn't really great for people upgrading from X to Y - granted that's not many people now.
[14:26] <slashd> bdmurray, make total sense, if you guys prefer doing the verification on Y first and then X for upgrade reason it's totally fine, I don't want to skip any of your SRU procedure in place. I basically wanted to point out that this 2 bugs are a priorities for STS today.
[14:27] <bdmurray> slashd: accepting them both into the archive at the same time is fine, our concern is Y (or any affected release) being neglected.
[14:28] <slashd> bdmurray, yep make total sense.
[14:34] <slashd> bdmurray, sil2100 so to recap "nagios-nrpe" for Y was missing and I have uploaded it this morning meaning that in the upload queue we have X & Y waiting and openssl was uploaded for all affected release in the same time a couple of days ago, and Y is already in -proposed meaning X & Z is in the upload queue.
[14:35] <sil2100> bdmurray: you want to handle this as you already did a review, or should I? ^
[14:38] <ahasenack> hi, can someone please accept my zesty nomination for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1677329 ? Affected versions are summarized in comment #5
[14:39] <bdmurray> sil2100: I have no preference - if you are already looking at one carry on, otherwise I'll do it since I missed it earlier.
[14:40] <rbasak> ahasenack: done, thanks
[14:40] <ahasenack> rbasak: cheers
[15:01] <sil2100> bdmurray: sorry, got dropped - did you get my question about handling those 2 SRUs? Is that on your plate now?
[15:01] <bdmurray> sil2100: I have no preference - if you are already looking at one carry on, otherwise I'll do it since I missed it earlier.
[15:02] <sil2100> I'll take care of it then since today I'm doing some SRU work anyway
[15:03] <bdmurray> sil2100: thanks!
[15:04] <slashd> sil2100, tks
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.1]
[15:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.7]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios-nrpe [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.15-1ubuntu3]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios-nrpe [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.15-1ubuntu1.1]
[16:31] <slashd> thanks sil2100 bdmurray for the quick verification, much appreciated
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (zesty-proposed/partner) [140.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 154.0.0-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (xenial-proposed/partner) [140.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 154.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: google-cloud-sdk (yakkety-proposed/partner) [140.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.10 => 154.0.0-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (no packageset)
[18:18] <slashd> rbasak, hi do you have an idea when you would be able to look back at my isc-dhclient debdiff(s) ? Once I have your final "Go", I can upload the debdiff(s) myself  ==> LP: #1176046
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-desktop3 (zesty-proposed/main) [3.24.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.2-0ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:51] <mapreri> there is a lomoco_1.0.0-2ubuntu0.16.04.1_source.changes in zesty's unapproved.  I realized I forgot `update-maintainer`, if you reject it I'll run that and upload again.
[18:54] <slangasek> sil2100: still around?
[18:54] <slangasek> mapreri: done
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lomoco [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0-2ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[18:55] <mapreri> slangasek: ta.
[18:57] <jbicha> slangasek: you said you might push the gnome-software SRU into -updates today, so I'm just reminding you now :)
[18:58] <mapreri> ahem
[18:58] <slangasek> jbicha: yes, thanks for the reminder, willcooke hadn't pestered me yet :)  releasing now
[18:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lomoco (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2 => 1.0.0-2ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[18:59] <mapreri> slangasek: I'm stupid, now I read that again I see I used *16*.04 while targetting zesty -.-'  could you right again? :)
[18:59] <slangasek> mapreri: zot
[18:59] <slangasek> (rejected)
[19:00] <mapreri> slangasek: could you expand zot? :)
[19:00] <slangasek> mapreri: that's the sound of it being nuked from the queue from above
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lomoco [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.0-2ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[19:00] <mapreri> :D
[19:00] <slangasek> infinity: you're my last hope of not doing bad self-accepty things on my SRUs
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lomoco (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2 => 1.0.0-2ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset)
[19:03] <willcooke> thanks jbicha slangasek
[19:03] <mapreri> this time should be fine :3
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-113-g513e99e0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:9.1.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:10] <infinity> slangasek: Which SRU are you threatening to self-accept?
[19:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.82.1ubuntu2.5]
[19:18] <slangasek> infinity: unattended-upgrades !precise; software-properties xenial
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.90ubuntu0.6]
[19:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.92ubuntu1.5]
[19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.93.1ubuntu2.2]
[19:30] <infinity> slangasek: Why did you do software-properties through the security PPA for yakkety, but via proposed for xenial?
[19:30] <infinity> And more hilariously, despite the yakkety one being done via security, it wasn't *released* to yakkety-security?
[19:31] <jbicha> slangasek: are you going to push gnome-software for xenial & yakkety today too?
[19:33] <infinity> slangasek: I can solve the latter with a copy.  The former, I can sponsor the upload via security-proposed if you want it to go the same way as yakkety?
[19:34] <infinity> slangasek: Of course, if the intent was to release to security, you also missed the copy-and-promote of libgtk2-perl in *-security.
[19:34]  * infinity goes to get a hamburger while he waits on responses.
[19:34] <slangasek> infinity: we originally thought software-properties would be published to -security, then you corrected us, so we published it only to -proposed
[19:35] <slangasek> slash -updates
[19:35] <infinity> slangasek: I corrected you?  Kay.  Memory fading.  I don't recall that particular conversation.
[19:36] <slangasek> infinity: wrt new packages not being installed from anywhere but -security
[19:36] <infinity> slangasek: Oh, right.
[19:36] <slangasek> so none of this needs to go to -sec
[19:36] <infinity> slangasek: Yeah, I was looking for other reasons this should be in security.  Looks like the shim-signed goo is only in updates, so that wouldn't be an argument.
[19:37] <slangasek> jbicha: AIUI the gnome-software was in zesty for the full 7 days, so got its bake time; then got reset with the smaller SRU; so has had 10 days total bake time.  xenial and yakkety show as only having been uploaded on Friday. Are we comfortable that these are also baked?
[19:38] <slangasek> jbicha: also, I can't see a reason for the other gnome-software SRUs to queue jump a bunch of other stuff that needs releasing
[19:39] <infinity> slangasek: Although, update-secureboot-policy shipped with yakkety (I think?), which might make an argument for why even security-only users should get this change for >= yakkety.
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.96.20.7]
[19:41]  * slangasek handwaves
[19:41] <infinity> slangasek: So, that doesn't affect xenial, but it might be an argument for yakkety having been done correctly in the first place. :P
[19:41]  * infinity shrugs.
[19:42] <slangasek> infinity: I don't mind if it goes to -security, but I haven't heard any complaints
[19:42] <infinity> slangasek: I suppose the more interesting question is if we intend to push newer shim/shim-signed to security ever.
[19:42] <infinity> slangasek: If so, we need to be pretty careful to find all the other moving parts.
[19:43] <jbicha> slangasek: the critical bug is LP: #1672424 but that's been broken for several months
[19:43] <jbicha> zesty was the most important because most people first try to install software just after installing Ubuntu
[19:44]  * infinity really goes for that burger now.
[20:31] <sil2100> slangasek: aroundish
[20:31] <sil2100> slangasek: what's up?
[20:31] <slangasek> sil2100: infinity took care of them now, thanks
[20:31] <slangasek> sil2100: needed some reviews of SRUs I uploaded
[20:33] <sil2100> slangasek: ah, ok, good! Sorry I was AFK, we had to do some grocery shopping before the shop was closing
[20:48] <sil2100> slangasek: while we're at the topic of SRUs, did you have a moment to take a look at the gce-c-i-p SRUs in the queues? The sooner those go to -proposed the better I suppose
[20:51] <slangasek> sil2100: I had not, sorry - cloud-init ate my attention for the rest of Friday.  probably better if infinity can look at them now, as I'm trying to turn last week's sprint into notes for the team
[20:52] <sil2100> infinity, bdmurray: if anyone of you could take a look at the gce-compute-image-packages SRUs - they're straight rude backports from artful
[20:53] <infinity> sil2100: Yeah, I'll have a gander in a bit.
[20:53] <sil2100> The packages have an MRE so the bug is also a bit hm, vague
[20:53] <sil2100> Thanks! In case you find anything you don't like in those, just give me a poke and I'll fix it up
[20:54] <infinity> sil2100: There's a lot in those packages I don't like.  I suspect none of that will relate to the SRU. :P
[21:32]  * rbasak tries to avoid touching packages like that :-/
[22:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-maps (zesty-proposed/universe) [3.24.0-0ubuntu1 => 3.24.2-0ubuntu0.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntugnome)
[22:38] <infinity> rbasak: I try to avoid it too, but then people annoy me until I do it anyway.
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170426-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20170426-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20170426-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20170426-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]