[19:13] <teward> hggdh: bdmurray: can one or both of you break up the argument taking place on the discussion thread about the bug guide rewrites?  And maybe forcibly silence the thread for a few days?
[19:13] <teward> this is going on several-weeks of arguments
[19:13] <teward> and i'm starting to get annoyed at it (but don't want to unsub from the list)
[19:16] <flocculant> teward: ... I was filtering a person to trash - but then I see the posts in replies
[19:16] <teward> flocculant: and herein lies why i'm pinging both a CC member *and* the bug master
[19:24] <flocculant> :)
[19:26] <teward> one because bdmurray can make a "Leave the guide alone for now" decision, and hggdh because this is a continuing ongoing issue that needs intervention
[19:29] <flocculant> yea I know
[19:29] <flocculant> I'm all for making wiki pages more useful - but castrating them isn't imo useful
[19:30] <flocculant> some of those bug pages I look at and facepalm tbh - and I've looked at them for years :)
[19:31] <flocculant> I think the idea is a good one - implementation is key :D
[19:55] <teward> just gonna say this, wxl said what was on all our minds, not me.  I have no part in stating that about Alberto.
[19:55] <teward> stating what was stated*
[19:55] <teward> (though he's pretty accurate with his reply)
[19:55] <wxl> i tried to be fair
[19:55] <wxl> but honest
[19:55] <flocculant> reads fine wxl :)
[19:56] <teward> wxl: indeed. i meant the last paragraph.
[19:56] <teward> s/meant/was referring to/
[19:56] <wxl> yeah
[19:56] <wxl> i wasn't trying to say "get out"
[19:56] <wxl> but more like "the grass is always greener on the other side"
[19:56] <teward> ^
[19:57] <wxl> i just hope he gets it
[19:57] <flocculant> indeed
[19:57] <wxl> i've been trying to keep my mouth shut but that last one
[19:57] <wxl> ugh
[19:57] <wxl> "i'm gonna save ubuntu singlehandedly by totally ripping out this wiki page"
[19:57] <wxl> give me a break

[19:58] <bdmurray> I thought somebody mentioned bringing him up to the CC in #ubuntu-devel yesterday.
[19:58] <flocculant> it was always going to go wrong when wwII invoked
[19:58] <teward> bdmurray: IIRC he's already at the CC level
[19:58] <wxl> that is true and it did happen, bdmurray
[19:58] <teward> i've poked hggdh previously
[19:58] <teward> it's on the verge of me asking it to be escalated again
[19:58] <teward> regardless, we need the argument squished
[19:58] <teward> i'm tired of reading it.
[19:58] <teward> and I bet everyone else is too
[19:58] <flocculant> ...
[19:58] <wxl> gsilvapt mentioned something to them (twice) and i provided a rather long analysis including measuring his actions against the CoC
[19:59] <wxl> the CC often doesn't move very quickly
[19:59] <wxl> that's actually a good thing
[19:59] <wxl> but in this case, we deal with the irritation in the meanwhile
[20:00] <wxl> i don't think it would be a bad thing if more people pinged the cc about it
[20:01] <flocculant> consider yourself pinged then
[20:01] <wxl> s/yourself/them/ ?
[20:01] <bdmurray> I think the process is to send them an email
[20:01] <wxl> yes that
[20:01] <flocculant> I thought you were CC ?
[20:01] <wxl> not i
[20:02] <wxl> i'm lococouncil (not for long) and membership board
[20:02] <wxl> i've applied but no one wanted me :'''(
[20:02] <flocculant> oh - got that wrong then
[20:02] <wxl> (just kidding)