[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170426-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]
[07:27] <LocutusOfBorg> hello folks, I bring the autopkgtest question to a next level :) scr:screen is failing its autopkgtestsuite, but interestingly enough I can't reproduce with pbuilder, neither with autopkgtest --shell-fail --apt-upgrade screen -- lxc --sudo autopkgtest-artful
[07:30]  * LocutusOfBorg found that screen version is not the latest in his tries
[07:32] <LocutusOfBorg> should I pass it a dsc file to get the right version? it seems to be picking the package in release
[07:37] <LocutusOfBorg> ok I can reproduce now
[08:43] <xnox> LocutusOfBorg, http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html --apt-pocket=proposed=src:foo option to test something from proposed.
[08:44] <xnox> such that one can run combinations of things from proposed; sometimes e.g. autopkg for something in release, fails when e.g. src:gcc-6 is from proposed. hence it's a separate option what to fetch from proposed
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> got it thanks
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-nanospec [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-nanospec [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-nanospec [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-posix-pty [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-posix-pty [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-posix-pty [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-nanospec [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-nanospec [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-posix-pty [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-nanospec [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-posix-pty [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-posix-pty [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-protobuf [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-2]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-protobuf [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-2]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-protobuf [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-2]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-aws-sign2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-console-control-strings [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-wide-align [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-protobuf [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-2]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-async-each [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-ecc-jsbn [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-protobuf [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1.1-2]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-sparse [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-bcrypt-pbkdf [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[12:03]  * ogra_ sighs ... why is flashplugin-installer still so super slow in downloading ... 
[12:04] <ogra_> takes 0min already and is only at 57%
[12:04] <ogra_> *20min
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> because flash is slow
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> so, the download is slow too :p
[12:07] <ogra_> lol
[12:07] <ogra_> indeed
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> this way you get used to it even while downloading it
[12:07] <apw> ogra_, because it is only on one machine and you are alll downloading it at the same time
[12:08] <LocutusOfBorg> how many years takes downloading java?
[12:08] <davmor2> ogra_: because Adobe hate Linux, so puts you on the sack o'carp dialup server in the corner rather than wasting windows broadband connection ;)
[12:09] <davmor2> s/carp/crap
[12:09] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, why can't I download the artifacts for the first build here? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/q/qbzr/artful/ppc64el
[12:09] <ogra_> davmor2, nah, thats canonicals fault ... they must be patching flash with their own stuff i clearly see a canonical.com address!
[12:10] <ogra_> so typical!
[12:10] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, that is the "first" and represents a copy forward from the previous release
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> ack thanks
[12:10] <LocutusOfBorg> so you copy them but you don't copy the references and logs
[12:27] <apw> right
[15:59] <bdmurray> infinity: with regards to bug 1673557 - is the goal "how many users can only run the i386 version" still valid? I forgot I'd have to SRU apport and whoopsie.
[16:04] <nacc> bdmurray: can you reject the php7.0 for xenial? I have another bugfix I'd like to push in
[16:04] <nacc> bdmurray: up to you, i can also upload after
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected php7.0 [source] (xenial-proposed) [7.0.18-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[16:25] <nacc> bdmurray: thank you, uploading the fixed version shortly
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.0 (xenial-proposed/main) [7.0.15-0ubuntu0.16.04.4 => 7.0.18-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:35] <nacc> bdmurray: --^ thanks again
[16:40] <bdmurray> nacc: is that review a priority?
[16:41] <nacc> bdmurray: it's identical to the other releases (y and z already done). it would be good to get x done soon, if possible, so they are all consistent.
[16:41] <nacc> bdmurray: beyond this new fix (which is a backport of what is in y and z already as well)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debug-me [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.20170505-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-dot [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-call-stack [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-call-stack [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-call-stack [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-call-stack [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debug-me [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.20170505-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debug-me [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.20170505-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-call-stack [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debug-me [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.20170505-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-foundation [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-call-stack [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-foundation [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-foundation [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debug-me [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.20170505-1] (no packageset)
[17:59] <fossfreedom> jbicha, everyone gtk+3.22.13 is causing major issues with ubuntu budgie (crashes) and clipboard issues for other desktops.  Just a heads up if we are thinking of introducing this into artful/zesty anytime soon - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782453
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-foundation [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-foundation [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.8-1] (no packageset)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debug-me [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.20170505-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debug-me [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.20170505-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debug-me [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.20170505-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-call-stack [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-call-stack [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-call-stack [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-foundation [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-foundation [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-dot [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.1-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debug-me [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.20170505-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-call-stack [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-call-stack [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-foundation [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debug-me [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.20170505-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-foundation [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-call-stack [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-foundation [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calendar (zesty-proposed/main) [3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1 => 3.24.2-0ubuntu0.1] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop)
[18:55] <jbicha> fossfreedom: thanks, by the way, #ubuntu-desktop is perhaps a better place for that announcement :)
[18:59] <fossfreedom> jbicha so many channels ... :)
[19:02] <jbicha> fossfreedom: yes, but that one's a good one for you to hang out in since Budgie shares so many components with Ubuntu GNOME
[19:02] <fossfreedom> aye - its now in my open list from now on.
[19:37] <infinity> bdmurray: Pretty valid still, yeah.
[20:04] <slangasek> there was discussion of schroot and sbuild; is someone planning to seed those for artful?
[20:09] <jbicha> infinity: xnox: ^
[20:12] <xnox> done
[20:48]  * rbasak wonders why we're seeding those
[20:50] <infinity> rbasak: Makes sense to support our own development toolchain?
[20:51] <rbasak> Fair enough. Did something change?
[20:52] <infinity> rbasak: Well, schroot was accidentally seeded, due to some other random thing depending on it.  That was fixed, and schroot was going to fall out of main, and I suggested that maybe we wanted to keep it in main by way of sbuild.
[20:53] <infinity> rbasak: Ultimately, I'd say it was a longstanding bug that we didn't support sbuild (well, officially, unofficially we have done so for years, at least ever since LP switched to using the distro version instead of an ancient fork)
[20:54] <rbasak> That makes sense, thanks.
[20:55] <infinity> 2015-05-13 being when we switched from the fork to the distro package.
[20:55] <infinity> Should have MIRed sbuild then.
[20:58] <slangasek> xnox: so are yo ugoing to drive the MIR of the related packages now? :)
[20:58] <infinity> The perl modules are usually a no-brainer MIR.
[20:59] <xnox> i knew there was a catch.
[20:59] <xnox> slangasek, have those things not been in MIR before?!
[20:59]  * xnox guess that it was in touch seed that did not follow recommends.
[20:59] <infinity> I thikn the only thing there that might want a more interesting MIR is sbuild itself.
[20:59] <infinity> xnox: touch only pulled in schroot, pulling in sbuild is new.
[20:59] <slangasek> xnox: previously we had schroot in, not sbuild
[21:00] <infinity> Anyhow, I'm happy to do an informal MIR of all the perl modules with cyphermox.  I'll bribe him with the promise of not giving him poutine.
[21:00] <slangasek> mmm, not-poutine
[21:01] <xnox> libclass-data-inheritable-perl -> same deb was in main in trusty and vivid; so can be reseeded back in no?
[21:01] <infinity> xnox: Yeah.
[21:01] <cyphermox> hmm, not-poutine
[21:01] <infinity> xnox: Most of them can just promote, some might need a subscriber and a 5-minute review, then a promotion.
[21:01] <xnox> stacktrace-perl is very big jump in numbers.
[21:02] <infinity> Big jump in numbers doesn't really matter, unless it was demoted because the new version sucks.  And I'm sure it was just demoted because it fell out naturally.
[21:02] <cyphermox> perl module version numbers are usually meaningless
[21:02] <cyphermox> what counts for a lot is that perl modules are usually well maintained in debian to being with
[21:02] <infinity> xnox: Anyhow, file an MIR for sbuild itself?  I'll handle the perl modules out of band with cyphermox's approval.
[21:02] <xnox> ok
[21:03] <infinity> (My personal view on perl modules is that if they're maintained by the Debian Perl team and seem to be vaguely up to date with CPAN, and don't do crazy weird root things, the review they need is about 10 seconds and a bug subscriber, but I quit the MIR team, so now I need soeone else to make that call :P)
[21:05] <infinity> doko: Is a switch to gcc-7 in the cards for artful?  Trying to decide if I should demote all the gcc-7 binaries that want to fall out of main, or if it's pointless because they'll just come back in a week.
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-caller [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2] (no packageset)