/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/05/11/#xubuntu.txt

Chip_Hello .I have a question abou xfce power manager in xubuntu .I installed xubuntu in dell e4200 .I can control screen brightness with hotkey , but brightness setting in xfce power manager is not works , screen dim not works too.What should i do ?09:40
blip-Hi, after few hours of usage (and maybe related to screensaver or suspending my laptop) - Thunar takes like 10seconds to open and sometimes windows freeze forever.    I can't even find the process to kill it10:58
blip-any thoughts ?10:58
bonsaitreeIs there a fix for the network-manager problem in 17.04?12:29
martronHi, I installed Xubuntu 17.04 a couple days ago on my XPS 13 9360.  Since then every once in a while xorg uses 100% CPU for a while.  Primarily this occurs right after boot or resuming from suspend.  I've read through https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/HighCPU but none of those situations seem to match mine.14:11
martronDoes anyone have suggestions on how I can figure out what Xorg is trying to do?14:12
martronHere's my Xorg.0.log: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/826812e3808aa22f531cbfe19521f8b314:24
sorinelloHey guys, is there any xfce app that is the UI for gnome-keyring ?18:13
encomjonesnot a specific xfce app no, but there is always seahorse18:16
sorinellothanks18:18
encomjonesnp18:18
dpohlmanTrying to get window decorations to show up after enabling compiz, stuff I am seeing after googling is old and does not seem to work.  Anyone know how to do this on 17.04?18:34
=== pavlushka is now known as kindthree
=== kindthree is now known as kindfour
=== kindfour is now known as pavlushka
sugardrunkdiogenes_: get your gpu drivers correct, check for the fresh desktop-candy... you got the drivers good?18:46
sugardrunkdiogenes_: sorry wrong dude18:46
sugardrunkhe left...18:46
diogenes_sugardrunk, lol, I'm glad you didn't confuse me with your gf18:48
dpohlmanAnyone using compiz?18:48
diogenes_i do18:48
dpohlmanWhen I enable it, the windows decorations go away18:50
diogenes_install emeral18:51
diogenes_emerald18:51
sugardrunkdiogenes_: lol me too18:51
dpohlmanemerald doesn't seem to be in the default repos18:54
diogenes_dpohlman, what distro?18:55
dpohlmanxubuntu 17.0418:55
diogenes_dpohlman, try on github look for emerald wm and also look for ppa18:56
diogenes_xfce+compiz+emerald=the most awesome desktop experience ever18:56
dpohlmanadded webupd8 ppa and it says it has emerald but when i try to install it says package is not found.19:03
dpohlmanmaybe need to drop to xenial?19:03
diogenes_what ppa you added?19:04
dpohlmanhttps://launchpad.net/~nilarimogard/+archive/ubuntu/webupd819:04
diogenes_dpohlman, try this: https://github.com/compiz-reloaded/emerald19:06
diogenes_if  you don't know what to do then ask19:06
dpohlmanHad to go back to vivid and then it would install19:07
diogenes_ok19:07
sugardrunkwhat's the reason emerald was abandoned? it has been gone for some time I think19:08
sugardrunkbut seems to be updated well enough19:08
diogenes_sugardrunk, no clue, no one needed it but it's really cool19:08
sugardrunkyea, some people like the candy :)19:08
sugardrunkI don't :)19:08
diogenes_it's no about the candy19:08
sugardrunkusability?19:09
diogenes_it's a bneccesity when you use compiz19:09
sugardrunkoh ok, only tried compiz long time ago with p4 amd athlon :)19:09
sugardrunki just install debian or xubuntu (and get rid of lots of stuff)19:09
sugardrunkif I want a working lightweight system19:10
sugardrunkjust love the plain xfce :)19:10
diogenes_if xfwm4 would have had a good screen magnifier then I wouldn't need compiz but ...19:10
sugardrunk(of course it has some flaws...)19:10
sugardrunkdiogenes_: I get you... it is usability and such19:10
diogenes_sugardrunk, yes19:11
sugardrunknee customization... everyone has their needs19:11
sugardrunk*ned19:11
sugardrunk..19:11
sugardrunk:D19:11
diogenes_haha looks like the second part pf ypur nickname comes into play XD19:11
sugardrunk:)19:11
diogenes_your*19:11
=== pjneto is now known as yournick
=== yournick is now known as pjneto
=== pjneto is now known as yournick
=== yournick is now known as pjneto
hollaxubuntu 14.0.4.5 - firefox crashes immediatley. does someone know anything about this problem?21:24
mrkrampsholla, rename your profile directory and try starting the browser21:25
mrkrampsbest in terminal and check possible error messages21:26
hollamrkramps: hi, we tried rhat already. here's a crash report, if you're interested: bp-6920931e-a2a9-41a0-b141-18d74117051021:30
holla^rhat^all that21:31
mrkrampsholla, what's your firefox version?21:31
mrkrampsapt-cache policy firefox21:31
hollalates stable 5321:31
hollalatest21:31
hollait seems a common problem lately: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/signature/?platform=Linux&product=Firefox&signature=EnterBaseline&date=%3E%3D2016-06-01T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&date=%3C2017-05-11T20%3A09%3A00.000Z#graph21:33
mrkrampsholla, firefox addons in use?21:33
hollasee crash report - no addons atm21:33
mrkrampsstrange, i just know of a fixed issue after upgrading 51 to 5221:34
mrkrampsholla, have you tried reinstalling?21:34
hollayeap21:34
mrkrampssudo apt-get clean ; sudo apt-get install --reinstall firefox21:35
hollanew profile, safe-mode also21:35
hollastrange thing is - chromium also fails21:35
mrkrampshm, must be some shared lib then21:37
hollathink so - but the reason is unknown atm?21:37
hollais there an esr version?21:38
encomjonesif you run it from a terminal do you get any error messages21:39
hollaencomjones: lol - loads of .. have you ever tried it yourself? but most of them are irrelevant21:43
encomjonesmine does not crash so I don't have to, but I have done that with other applications and sometimes it produces errors messages that help21:44
encomjonesbut in your case I guess not21:44
mrkrampsonly the last messages befor the crash are interesting21:44
mrkrampsholla, do you have an old CPU?21:46
hollabut firefox is different - it's constantly complaining about something. but i could ask the user.21:46
hollamrkramps: yes, i think he does21:46
mrkrampscat /proc/cpuinfo | grep -i sse221:46
mrkrampslatest firefox requires a CPU with SSE321:47
mrkramps*SSE221:47
hollaokay, i'll have tk ask, but i think it's not that old - i mean sse2? that must be older than 15 years or so?21:48
mrkrampspentium 4 and such21:48
mrkrampsathlon xp21:48
holla10-15yrs21:48
mrkrampspentium 4 is not too rare even nowadays21:48
hollathat's very old - but i'll check that - thanks21:48
hollahow about esr under xubuntu?21:49
mrkrampsholla, manual install required, but possible21:49
holladirect dl?21:50
mrkrampsand chromium is afaik affected by the same issue21:50
mrkrampspalemoon might be an alternative as well21:50
hollapale is in apts?21:51
mrkrampsnope21:51
mrkrampsbut there might be appropiate ppas for firefox esr and pale moon21:51
holladillo works though, but somehow the user isn't satisfied with it ;)21:51
mrkramps=D21:52
hollabut i think you might be right - guess it's due to hw incompatibilty21:53
mrkrampsas chromium is affected as well this sounds reasonable21:53
hollamrkramps: thanks. i'll contact the user and report back, if he does ...21:54
mrkrampsholla, qupzilla is a webkit bowser which might help as well21:54
hollawebkit21:54
mrkrampsbut webkit from repository is quite old and less secure21:54
mrkrampsbut otherwise it is a good browser21:54
hollahow about opera21:54
mrkrampsdunno about opera's system requirements21:55
mrkrampsisn't is chromium based?21:55
hollaver 12.x is still without webkit21:55
xanguaOpera adds it's own repository when you install it21:55
hollaxangua: huh? own repo *after* installing?21:56
mrkrampsholla, opera DOES require SSE2 as well21:56
hollamrkramps: new or old one as well?21:56
hollaxangua: meta package in main repo?21:56
mrkrampsdo you think it is a good idea to install an "old" browser nowadays?21:56
xanguaNo21:57
mrkrampsoh, and pale moon does require SSE2 no as well :\21:57
hollaafaik - opera is still maintained in 2 versions - one with and one without webkit21:57
mrkrampsok, give it a try then21:58
hollaso the old version (12) only gets sec updated/patches21:58
xanguaWho knows 🤔21:58
hollaxangua: what vers of opera are available by default?21:59
xanguaIf you mean in official repository, I think 1222:00
hollacool, thanks22:01
hollaokay guys - thank you very much :D22:01
sleehi, just noticed there was an API change(and update) for the xfce4 weather plugin, any plans on xubuntu updating anytime soon?23:03
mrkramps17.04 ships the fixed xfce4-weather-plugin 0.8.923:04
Spass_slee: you can get a package from there > http://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/xfce4-weather-plugin23:15
sleethanks23:16
Spass_I don't see any difference in dependencies so it should install with no issues23:16
Spass_(comparing to version from 16.04)23:17
sleeconfirmed, that package does install/work on 16.0423:21
sleethanks again23:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!