| ezethnesthrown | I created a simple Samba Server. From my Windows client I can access the server via " \\SERVER_IP " but not " \\SERVER_MACHINE_NAME ". I need to enter a credential. Is this because of my server or my client? | 01:21 |
|---|---|---|
| ezethnesthrown | Does a user need a group that contains only itself? (Primary group) | 03:30 |
| sarnold | no | 03:31 |
| sarnold | the user must have a primary group but it could be a group of any sort | 03:31 |
| sarnold | the use of per-user single-user groups was because far too many people didn't understand how permissions worked and would use e.g. 775 or 664 and never notice that they shared their primary group with a few thousand other users on the system.. | 03:32 |
| ezethnesthrown | sarnold: If I were to make a user then I should set it's group too then? | 03:33 |
| sarnold | ezethnesthrown: that's the safest approach, yes | 03:33 |
| ezethnesthrown | Thank you | 03:33 |
| ezethnesthrown | How do I 'smbpasswd' a group? | 03:53 |
| lordievader | Good morning | 06:15 |
| EmilienM | coreycb, jamespage: all ubuntu jobs are broken for us | 13:49 |
| EmilienM | http://logs.openstack.org/80/460080/25/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/677b5d5/logs/neutron/neutron-server.txt.gz#_2017-05-12_11_20_58_737 | 13:49 |
| CarlenWhite | Is it me, or is anyone else having bad luck with Xenial's package system? | 13:57 |
| CarlenWhite | Either way, I'm pretty sure my system's sources.list is FUBAR | 13:57 |
| zul | EmilienM: just had a peak and it looks like it cant connect to the database | 14:08 |
| EmilienM | zul: it sounds like apache fails to start correctly. everything was working on Wednesday, are you aware about changes in OpenStack packages? | 14:09 |
| zul | EmilienM: hah no | 14:09 |
| mwhahaha | http://logs.openstack.org/91/464191/1/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/fbe28d8/logs/puppet.txt.gz#_2017-05-12_13_03_36 | 14:10 |
| mwhahaha | i'm not sure that db error is the right one | 14:11 |
| EmilienM | zul: yes | 14:11 |
| EmilienM | zul: https://www.diffchecker.com/fU8PV39r | 14:11 |
| EmilienM | a lot of upgrades | 14:11 |
| zul | EmilienM: thats to be expected though with artsy just opening....but i havent been pyaing attention | 14:12 |
| zul | EmilienM: just commenting from the peanut gallery | 14:13 |
| CarlenWhite | Sorted out my problem: https://askubuntu.com/questions/705895 | 14:16 |
| CarlenWhite | My system was attempting to pull binaries that it couldn't support. | 14:17 |
| CarlenWhite | Well, it was trying to. But it didn't know where to get the binaries. | 14:23 |
| caribou | nacc: I'm going to take ownership back for LP: #1676884 if you don't mind | 14:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1676884 in makedumpfile (Ubuntu) "kdump-tools uses the wrong crashkernel command line parameter in ppc64le" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1676884 | 14:24 |
| caribou | nacc: I got a pretty good idea of what the problem is | 14:24 |
| CarlenWhite | Is it a good idea to crontab `apt update; apt upgrade`? | 14:30 |
| mdeslaur | CarlenWhite: you should install and configure unattended-upgrades instead | 14:38 |
| mdeslaur | CarlenWhite: ie https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/automatic-updates.html | 14:39 |
| nacc | caribou: +1 -- i'll follow along (so if you can subscribe me tht'd be great) -- manjo basically subscribed me toa ll of them | 14:39 |
| nacc | *assigned me | 14:39 |
| caribou | nacc: done! | 14:55 |
| caribou | nacc: on that topic, any reason why there is ppc64EL and ppc64LE (which is the root cause of this bug) ? | 15:02 |
| manjo | caribou, nacc ack | 15:06 |
| nacc | caribou: different distributions made different choices afaict | 15:07 |
| nacc | caribou: RH/SUSE vs. Debian | 15:07 |
| nacc | caribou: i believe for debian because of armel and maybe what is debian's manual, not sure | 15:07 |
| caribou | nacc: ah, ok | 15:07 |
| caribou | nacc: I can always filter on bothy | 15:07 |
| caribou | both | 15:07 |
| nacc | caribou: yeah, i would | 15:08 |
| nacc | caribou: there were lots of bugs do that a while ago :) | 15:08 |
| aaronr | nacc: if you get a few moments can you check if these look okay? (It's the nagios security patch I was working on the other day, repackaged for the other releases) Trusty: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561043/ | Yakkety: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561066/ | Zesty: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561097/ | 15:15 |
| nacc | aaronr: on the phone, but will review right when i'm done | 15:16 |
| aaronr | thanks! no rush. just drop me a mention here if they're okay and I'll attach them to the bug :) | 15:16 |
| nacc | aaronr: ack, thanks | 15:24 |
| nacc | aaronr: overall looks good, i think a few versions are a bit off | 15:58 |
| nacc | aaronr: trusty looks fine | 15:58 |
| nacc | aaronr: yakkety looks fine | 15:58 |
| nacc | aaronr: but zesty is incorrect | 15:59 |
| nacc | aaronr: for two reasons, 1) you want to follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging and 2) 3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu6 already exists in artful | 15:59 |
| nacc | aaronr: i think you want 3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu5.1 | 16:16 |
| aaronr | ah right okay! I thought that looked weird when it gave me 1ubuntu6 :) | 16:17 |
| nacc | aaronr: yeah, that's what i was mentioning (late) before, that `dch -i` doesn't know about the SRU pattern (as it doesn't know about released vs. in-development releases) | 16:19 |
| aaronr | yeah that makes sense, I suppose it just increments whatever it sees | 16:21 |
| nacc | aaronr: right | 16:22 |
| aaronr | so if i just `dch --edit`, edit the version number, and recompile, and redo the debdiff is that sufficient to fix it? | 16:24 |
| nacc | aaronr: yeah | 16:25 |
| aaronr | great, here's that update then: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561545/ | 16:25 |
| nacc | aaronr: looks good | 16:26 |
| aaronr | great | 16:26 |
| aaronr | i'll get these added to the bug | 16:26 |
| aaronr | nacc: was it ubuntu-sponsors i'm supposed to subscribe to this bug now? | 16:30 |
| nacc | aaronr: yep! | 16:33 |
| aaronr | nacc: okay that's all done now | 17:02 |
| DK2 | raid5 mdraid on 4x 6TB drives on a E5 2407 seems to be too much haha | 17:10 |
| DK2 | load of 6 on a freshly installed ubuntu | 17:10 |
| bindi | y u no zfs | 17:12 |
| toyowheelin | can someone point me in the right direction to get assistance with echoping | 17:51 |
| === mhcerri is now known as mhcerri|brb | ||
| === mhcerri|brb is now known as mhcerri | ||
| dmeijboom | What is it exactly you need assistance with? | 17:53 |
| toyowheelin | it is throwing a strange error and Google is not being helpful in telling me what it means | 17:57 |
| toyowheelin | I am trying to setup a new test in smokeping | 17:58 |
| toyowheelin | but it seems that the echoping command for it is failing | 17:58 |
| dmeijboom | What error? | 17:59 |
| toyowheelin | HTTP error "H" | 17:59 |
| toyowheelin | root@WP-SEA-vnetmon:/var/log# /usr/bin/echoping -P 0xa0 -p 6 -w 1 -t 20 -4 -C -h / -A -a -R -n 5 online2.khamsoft.com:443 | 18:00 |
| toyowheelin | HTTP error "H" | 18:00 |
| toyowheelin | thats all of it | 18:00 |
| dmeijboom | Then you're server is not working properly. I've looked at the source code of echoping and it throws that error if a wrong http status code is returned. | 18:03 |
| toyowheelin | fantastic | 18:03 |
| dmeijboom | The first line of the http response should look like this: "HTTP/1.x 200 OK" or something like that | 18:03 |
| toyowheelin | hmm I wonder if echoping is sending a weird useragent or something | 18:04 |
| dmeijboom | However the fact that it prints "H" as the error is kinda strange. | 18:04 |
| toyowheelin | doubt its possible to change the string it sends | 18:04 |
| dmeijboom | It's not. It sends "Echoping" as the user agent. | 18:05 |
| toyowheelin | hmm alright | 18:05 |
| dmeijboom | Maybe echoping doesn't support SSL? That could be the reason of the strange error string | 18:06 |
| toyowheelin | -C tells it to use ssl | 18:07 |
| oerheks | toyowheelin, see the manual, "-6 Use only IPv6 " as you have used "6" | 18:07 |
| oerheks | http://www.ubuntugeek.com/echoping-small-test-tool-for-tcp-servers.html | 18:08 |
| toyowheelin | -p 6 | 18:08 |
| oerheks | ... and you used -4 too, whqat is the use of '6' ??? | 18:08 |
| toyowheelin | socket priority | 18:09 |
| oerheks | oh, my bad, i see it now | 18:09 |
| toyowheelin | hmm I think I see the issue | 18:17 |
| toyowheelin | had to use openssl s_client to figure it out | 18:17 |
| toyowheelin | haha | 18:17 |
| tomreyn | use curl / ab to test HTTPS | 18:22 |
| toyowheelin | tomreyn: this is part of a bigger solution | 18:23 |
| toyowheelin | smokeping is calling echoping to draw graphs | 18:23 |
| tomreyn | i see | 18:23 |
| toyowheelin | monitoring one of our vendors servers for SLA reasons | 18:24 |
| tomreyn | i know smokeping for network link / route monitoring, not so much as an application omintoring tool | 18:25 |
| tomreyn | maybe you're rather looking for something like nagios, cacti, zabbix ... | 18:27 |
| toyowheelin | yeah I might setup another monitoring service as well | 18:27 |
| === NickHasBeenTaken is now known as ezethnesthrown | ||
| === ezethnesthrown is now known as msg | ||
| === msg is now known as ezethnesthrown | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === Malediction_ is now known as Malediction | ||
| yotux | looking to build a new home server anyone offer some insights on hardware? | 23:05 |
| tomreyn | /j ##hardware | 23:06 |
| cncr04s | i got a Dell Poweredge-C2100, works nice | 23:06 |
| yotux | I have an old opti desktop was free, kvm is not supported on the intel E4500 | 23:08 |
| ikonia | doesn't it really depend on your requirements | 23:11 |
| ikonia | as raspberry pi would be fine for a large many people for example | 23:11 |
| nacc | yeah "new home server" doesn't actually describe anything | 23:11 |
| yotux | nacc: sorry worried mostly about the kvm image hosting and running | 23:12 |
| nacc | yotux: well, then you need new enough hardware to run kvm :) | 23:12 |
| sarnold | i'm quite happy with my supermicro but i'm glad I don't have to live in the same room with it | 23:12 |
| nacc | heh | 23:13 |
| sarnold | i mean yeah you can hear it through the whole house | 23:13 |
| sarnold | but it's worse in that room :) | 23:13 |
| yotux | nacc: correct I do, my current box doesn't support it :( | 23:13 |
| nacc | yotux: i mean, i think all modern intel and amd do now? | 23:13 |
| yotux | does one handle the load better than the other? | 23:13 |
| sarnold | xeons are king of the datacenter for a reason | 23:14 |
| sarnold | but maybe you don't need that | 23:14 |
| sarnold | amd's rhyzons or whatefver they're called look alright but they feel limited in pcie lanes compared to the xeons | 23:15 |
| tomreyn | and IF you need it, wait for naples and save a lot. | 23:15 |
| ikonia | yotux: what sort of load | 23:15 |
| ikonia | yotux: you could get a high end xeon - but then you'd end up with a monster power bill for example | 23:16 |
| ikonia | it's all about requirements | 23:16 |
| sarnold | cncr04s: oh yeah I looked at those for a while; I efventually got suckered by the 'newer chips run faster on less power' hehe | 23:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!