[01:21] I created a simple Samba Server. From my Windows client I can access the server via " \\SERVER_IP " but not " \\SERVER_MACHINE_NAME ". I need to enter a credential. Is this because of my server or my client? [03:30] Does a user need a group that contains only itself? (Primary group) [03:31] no [03:31] the user must have a primary group but it could be a group of any sort [03:32] the use of per-user single-user groups was because far too many people didn't understand how permissions worked and would use e.g. 775 or 664 and never notice that they shared their primary group with a few thousand other users on the system.. [03:33] sarnold: If I were to make a user then I should set it's group too then? [03:33] ezethnesthrown: that's the safest approach, yes [03:33] Thank you [03:53] How do I 'smbpasswd' a group? [06:15] Good morning [13:49] coreycb, jamespage: all ubuntu jobs are broken for us [13:49] http://logs.openstack.org/80/460080/25/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/677b5d5/logs/neutron/neutron-server.txt.gz#_2017-05-12_11_20_58_737 [13:57] Is it me, or is anyone else having bad luck with Xenial's package system? [13:57] Either way, I'm pretty sure my system's sources.list is FUBAR [14:08] EmilienM: just had a peak and it looks like it cant connect to the database [14:09] zul: it sounds like apache fails to start correctly. everything was working on Wednesday, are you aware about changes in OpenStack packages? [14:09] EmilienM: hah no [14:10] http://logs.openstack.org/91/464191/1/check/gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-ubuntu-xenial/fbe28d8/logs/puppet.txt.gz#_2017-05-12_13_03_36 [14:11] i'm not sure that db error is the right one [14:11] zul: yes [14:11] zul: https://www.diffchecker.com/fU8PV39r [14:11] a lot of upgrades [14:12] EmilienM: thats to be expected though with artsy just opening....but i havent been pyaing attention [14:13] EmilienM: just commenting from the peanut gallery [14:16] Sorted out my problem: https://askubuntu.com/questions/705895 [14:17] My system was attempting to pull binaries that it couldn't support. [14:23] Well, it was trying to. But it didn't know where to get the binaries. [14:24] nacc: I'm going to take ownership back for LP: #1676884 if you don't mind [14:24] Launchpad bug 1676884 in makedumpfile (Ubuntu) "kdump-tools uses the wrong crashkernel command line parameter in ppc64le" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1676884 [14:24] nacc: I got a pretty good idea of what the problem is [14:30] Is it a good idea to crontab `apt update; apt upgrade`? [14:38] CarlenWhite: you should install and configure unattended-upgrades instead [14:39] CarlenWhite: ie https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/automatic-updates.html [14:39] caribou: +1 -- i'll follow along (so if you can subscribe me tht'd be great) -- manjo basically subscribed me toa ll of them [14:39] *assigned me [14:55] nacc: done! [15:02] nacc: on that topic, any reason why there is ppc64EL and ppc64LE (which is the root cause of this bug) ? [15:06] caribou, nacc ack [15:07] caribou: different distributions made different choices afaict [15:07] caribou: RH/SUSE vs. Debian [15:07] caribou: i believe for debian because of armel and maybe what is debian's manual, not sure [15:07] nacc: ah, ok [15:07] nacc: I can always filter on bothy [15:07] both [15:08] caribou: yeah, i would [15:08] caribou: there were lots of bugs do that a while ago :) [15:15] nacc: if you get a few moments can you check if these look okay? (It's the nagios security patch I was working on the other day, repackaged for the other releases) Trusty: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561043/ | Yakkety: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561066/ | Zesty: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561097/ [15:16] aaronr: on the phone, but will review right when i'm done [15:16] thanks! no rush. just drop me a mention here if they're okay and I'll attach them to the bug :) [15:24] aaronr: ack, thanks [15:58] aaronr: overall looks good, i think a few versions are a bit off [15:58] aaronr: trusty looks fine [15:58] aaronr: yakkety looks fine [15:59] aaronr: but zesty is incorrect [15:59] aaronr: for two reasons, 1) you want to follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging and 2) 3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu6 already exists in artful [16:16] aaronr: i think you want 3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu5.1 [16:17] ah right okay! I thought that looked weird when it gave me 1ubuntu6 :) [16:19] aaronr: yeah, that's what i was mentioning (late) before, that `dch -i` doesn't know about the SRU pattern (as it doesn't know about released vs. in-development releases) [16:21] yeah that makes sense, I suppose it just increments whatever it sees [16:22] aaronr: right [16:24] so if i just `dch --edit`, edit the version number, and recompile, and redo the debdiff is that sufficient to fix it? [16:25] aaronr: yeah [16:25] great, here's that update then: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24561545/ [16:26] aaronr: looks good [16:26] great [16:26] i'll get these added to the bug [16:30] nacc: was it ubuntu-sponsors i'm supposed to subscribe to this bug now? [16:33] aaronr: yep! [17:02] nacc: okay that's all done now [17:10] raid5 mdraid on 4x 6TB drives on a E5 2407 seems to be too much haha [17:10] load of 6 on a freshly installed ubuntu [17:12] y u no zfs [17:51] can someone point me in the right direction to get assistance with echoping === mhcerri is now known as mhcerri|brb === mhcerri|brb is now known as mhcerri [17:53] What is it exactly you need assistance with? [17:57] it is throwing a strange error and Google is not being helpful in telling me what it means [17:58] I am trying to setup a new test in smokeping [17:58] but it seems that the echoping command for it is failing [17:59] What error? [17:59] HTTP error "H" [18:00] root@WP-SEA-vnetmon:/var/log# /usr/bin/echoping -P 0xa0 -p 6 -w 1 -t 20 -4 -C -h / -A -a -R -n 5 online2.khamsoft.com:443 [18:00] HTTP error "H" [18:00] thats all of it [18:03] Then you're server is not working properly. I've looked at the source code of echoping and it throws that error if a wrong http status code is returned. [18:03] fantastic [18:03] The first line of the http response should look like this: "HTTP/1.x 200 OK" or something like that [18:04] hmm I wonder if echoping is sending a weird useragent or something [18:04] However the fact that it prints "H" as the error is kinda strange. [18:04] doubt its possible to change the string it sends [18:05] It's not. It sends "Echoping" as the user agent. [18:05] hmm alright [18:06] Maybe echoping doesn't support SSL? That could be the reason of the strange error string [18:07] -C tells it to use ssl [18:07] toyowheelin, see the manual, "-6 Use only IPv6 " as you have used "6" [18:08] http://www.ubuntugeek.com/echoping-small-test-tool-for-tcp-servers.html [18:08] -p 6 [18:08] ... and you used -4 too, whqat is the use of '6' ??? [18:09] socket priority [18:09] oh, my bad, i see it now [18:17] hmm I think I see the issue [18:17] had to use openssl s_client to figure it out [18:17] haha [18:22] use curl / ab to test HTTPS [18:23] tomreyn: this is part of a bigger solution [18:23] smokeping is calling echoping to draw graphs [18:23] i see [18:24] monitoring one of our vendors servers for SLA reasons [18:25] i know smokeping for network link / route monitoring, not so much as an application omintoring tool [18:27] maybe you're rather looking for something like nagios, cacti, zabbix ... [18:27] yeah I might setup another monitoring service as well === NickHasBeenTaken is now known as ezethnesthrown === ezethnesthrown is now known as msg === msg is now known as ezethnesthrown === JanC_ is now known as JanC === Malediction_ is now known as Malediction [23:05] looking to build a new home server anyone offer some insights on hardware? [23:06] /j ##hardware [23:06] i got a Dell Poweredge-C2100, works nice [23:08] I have an old opti desktop was free, kvm is not supported on the intel E4500 [23:11] doesn't it really depend on your requirements [23:11] as raspberry pi would be fine for a large many people for example [23:11] yeah "new home server" doesn't actually describe anything [23:12] nacc: sorry worried mostly about the kvm image hosting and running [23:12] yotux: well, then you need new enough hardware to run kvm :) [23:12] i'm quite happy with my supermicro but i'm glad I don't have to live in the same room with it [23:13] heh [23:13] i mean yeah you can hear it through the whole house [23:13] but it's worse in that room :) [23:13] nacc: correct I do, my current box doesn't support it :( [23:13] yotux: i mean, i think all modern intel and amd do now? [23:13] does one handle the load better than the other? [23:14] xeons are king of the datacenter for a reason [23:14] but maybe you don't need that [23:15] amd's rhyzons or whatefver they're called look alright but they feel limited in pcie lanes compared to the xeons [23:15] and IF you need it, wait for naples and save a lot. [23:15] yotux: what sort of load [23:16] yotux: you could get a high end xeon - but then you'd end up with a monster power bill for example [23:16] it's all about requirements [23:18] cncr04s: oh yeah I looked at those for a while; I efventually got suckered by the 'newer chips run faster on less power' hehe