=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
alan_g | RAOF: ping | 09:07 |
---|---|---|
RAOF | yo! | 09:08 |
alan_g | did you see my email about the Mir SRU? | 09:08 |
RAOF | alan_g: I did. Sorry for not replying today. It looked like you got some support for it here last week? | 09:11 |
alan_g | RAOF: some, but I'm still trying to figure out who I need to progress it further | 09:12 |
RAOF | Ok. | 09:12 |
tjaalton | alan_g: I was about to ask about that too, because it affects the hwe stack backports :) with mir backported I could re-enable support for the new stuff | 09:14 |
RAOF | alan_g: it's current waiting in a silo? Or are you going to avoid the bileto bang? | 09:16 |
alan_g | RAOF: it's in silo 2736 | 09:16 |
alan_g | tjaalton: that sounds like another benefit. | 09:19 |
tjaalton | yep | 09:20 |
RAOF | alan_g: I think I know how to push that to the archive. I'll test that hypothesis first thing tomorrow. | 09:31 |
alan_g | RAOF: thanks | 09:32 |
alan_g | RAOF: have a good evening! | 09:32 |
alan_g | anpok: @{the patch I pasted yesterday} - this fixes the Mir bug: https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/mir/fix-mirtest.pc/+merge/324097 | 10:31 |
anpok | oh nice .. i also stumbled over a mirprotobuf problem | 10:34 |
anpok | if you look at the patch I added yesterday to the android platform - I took your change and still had to add mirprotobuf | 10:34 |
* alan_g just has to find someone left that can review MPs | 10:42 | |
anpok | yeah hire someone! | 11:06 |
anpok | ok me continues fencing.. | 11:07 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
alan_g | anpok: https://launchpad.net/mir-android-platform/+activereviews | 14:24 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
blaze | Finished 1 minute ago (took 2 minutes, 12.8 seconds) | 17:39 |
blaze | woops, sorry | 17:39 |
anpok_ | hi | 21:41 |
bschaefer | anpok_, ill need to poke you at some point about the libinput patches ... such as... do we want to upstream that umm specific phone patch one? | 21:43 |
bschaefer | i.e 0003-Fix-premature-flushing-of-evdev-event-on-mx4-touchsc.patch | 21:43 |
bschaefer | that one | 21:43 |
anpok_ | that was not really mx4 specific | 21:45 |
anpok_ | that patch changed the treatment of specfic button events | 21:45 |
bschaefer | anpok_, looks like you correctly handled a none type | 21:45 |
bschaefer | for fallback? | 21:46 |
anpok_ | hm I think mx4 emits a button event on touch.. and libinput than thinks it is a key | 21:46 |
bschaefer | + if (type == EVDEV_KEY_TYPE_NONE) { then check if we are a touch then fall back | 21:46 |
bschaefer | anpok_, o that makes sense | 21:46 |
anpok_ | as a result it would flush the touch contact state | 21:46 |
anpok_ | and generate an incomplete update.. | 21:46 |
anpok_ | I think libinput upstream has reworked that code and they have fixed that already in a different way | 21:46 |
bschaefer | o yeah i should attempt to double check the code here to see if its already been fixed | 21:47 |
bschaefer | anpok_, i think the main would be 0001-libinput-add-orientation-and-size-of-touch-point-and.patch | 21:47 |
bschaefer | ? | 21:47 |
bschaefer | (thats a pretty large patch) | 21:47 |
anpok_ | yup | 21:48 |
anpok_ | and you have to change a few chunks there because the naming of the evdev internals changed | 21:48 |
bschaefer | o dangs well shouldnt be to bad | 21:49 |
anpok_ | what is lacking here is an udev property to somehow scale the touch contact sizes | 21:49 |
* bschaefer still side tracked by other work but needs to get on getting these patches working | 21:49 | |
bschaefer | anpok_, i see, well ive never had to do much digging into libinput (just minorly) hopefully its not to bad | 21:50 |
=== anpok_ is now known as anpok |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!