=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [09:07] RAOF: ping [09:08] yo! [09:08] did you see my email about the Mir SRU? [09:11] alan_g: I did. Sorry for not replying today. It looked like you got some support for it here last week? [09:12] RAOF: some, but I'm still trying to figure out who I need to progress it further [09:12] Ok. [09:14] alan_g: I was about to ask about that too, because it affects the hwe stack backports :) with mir backported I could re-enable support for the new stuff [09:16] alan_g: it's current waiting in a silo? Or are you going to avoid the bileto bang? [09:16] RAOF: it's in silo 2736 [09:19] tjaalton: that sounds like another benefit. [09:20] yep [09:31] alan_g: I think I know how to push that to the archive. I'll test that hypothesis first thing tomorrow. [09:32] RAOF: thanks [09:32] RAOF: have a good evening! [10:31] anpok: @{the patch I pasted yesterday} - this fixes the Mir bug: https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/mir/fix-mirtest.pc/+merge/324097 [10:34] oh nice .. i also stumbled over a mirprotobuf problem [10:34] if you look at the patch I added yesterday to the android platform - I took your change and still had to add mirprotobuf [10:42] * alan_g just has to find someone left that can review MPs [11:06] yeah hire someone! [11:07] ok me continues fencing.. === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [14:24] anpok: https://launchpad.net/mir-android-platform/+activereviews === JanC_ is now known as JanC [17:39] Finished 1 minute ago (took 2 minutes, 12.8 seconds) [17:39] woops, sorry [21:41] hi [21:43] anpok_, ill need to poke you at some point about the libinput patches ... such as... do we want to upstream that umm specific phone patch one? [21:43] i.e 0003-Fix-premature-flushing-of-evdev-event-on-mx4-touchsc.patch [21:43] that one [21:45] that was not really mx4 specific [21:45] that patch changed the treatment of specfic button events [21:45] anpok_, looks like you correctly handled a none type [21:46] for fallback? [21:46] hm I think mx4 emits a button event on touch.. and libinput than thinks it is a key [21:46] + if (type == EVDEV_KEY_TYPE_NONE) { then check if we are a touch then fall back [21:46] anpok_, o that makes sense [21:46] as a result it would flush the touch contact state [21:46] and generate an incomplete update.. [21:46] I think libinput upstream has reworked that code and they have fixed that already in a different way [21:47] o yeah i should attempt to double check the code here to see if its already been fixed [21:47] anpok_, i think the main would be 0001-libinput-add-orientation-and-size-of-touch-point-and.patch [21:47] ? [21:47] (thats a pretty large patch) [21:48] yup [21:48] and you have to change a few chunks there because the naming of the evdev internals changed [21:49] o dangs well shouldnt be to bad [21:49] what is lacking here is an udev property to somehow scale the touch contact sizes [21:49] * bschaefer still side tracked by other work but needs to get on getting these patches working [21:50] anpok_, i see, well ive never had to do much digging into libinput (just minorly) hopefully its not to bad === anpok_ is now known as anpok