/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/05/16/#xubuntu-devel.txt

sorinellohello. is there any xfce app to add a system wide proxy in xubuntu ? or do I have to manually edit /etc/environment ?06:51
flocculantnot that I know of06:53
sorinellojust that... editing /etc/environment and rebooting the machine does not work06:55
sorinelloall the examples I find are like: http_proxy=http://myproxyserver.com:8006:58
sorinellodunny if my proxy server is to be accessed using http 06:58
flocculantsorinello: no idea - pretty much something that should be in #x or if no-one answers there then #ubuntu 06:59
flocculantbluesabre: seems that our terminal is broken by https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/issues/91616:05
flocculantmore words in xfce-dev 16:06
akxwi-davebugger16:09
akxwi-davethats a big mess up16:10
flocculantwell not broken by that gtihub issue itself - the change in packages does it :)16:24
flocculantnow I'm not even sure where I got the updated terminal package from ...16:37
flocculantdowngraded terminal for the moment16:42
flocculantthat's driving me up the wall :)16:42
flocculantbluesabre: comments re terminal issue in https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/05/16/%23xubuntu.html#t16:4617:04
flocculantfrom jbicha17:04
cyphermoxwxl: you had asked about ip, IIRC. I just found out about 'ip -br addr' and 'ip -br link', if it helps :)17:33
jbichacyphermox: could we get --color by default like:  ip a --color17:42
cyphermoxjbicha: please file a bug, but I think we might as well leave that to users to alias as necessary17:49
cyphermoxcolors typically don't work all that great on some architectures, and some servers.17:49
Unit193flocculant: Did you file a bug in vte for that?  I don't see it.19:44
Unit193Would be nice if it wasn't prematurely updated, or even if it wasn't in main. :P19:44
flocculantUnit193: didn't do anything but install 0.8.4 so I could use it19:44
Unit193Ah.19:44
flocculantUnit193: I can do it now though if you want - report bug to what? terminal or something else?19:46
flocculantvte2.91 I assume?19:48
flocculantoh - so that doesn't work19:49
flocculant*shrug*19:49
Unit193flocculant: I thought you had already, if you haven't than no issue.19:52
Unit193(I was looking at 19:53
Unit193https://bugs.launchpad.net/~flocculant/+reportedbugs?field.searchtext=&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=OPINION&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RES19:53
Unit193PONSE&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_19:53
Unit193blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on&orderby=-id&start=0 in case someone already incorrectly marked it invalid.)19:53
Unit193Erm....19:53
Unit193Wow.19:53
flocculantwhat?19:53
flocculantI'd have told you if I reported something - you didn't need to ping me with my reported bugs :D19:54
Unit193Right, that's what I was looking at and didn't see it. :P19:55
flocculant:D19:55
Unit193And, url is tooooo loooong.19:55
flocculantindeed it is :)19:55
flocculantanyway - so do you want me to report it? and to what package and I'll do it now :)19:55
Unit193Nah, we'll just wait on LP 163666619:56
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/163666619:56
flocculantbut do something with terminal?19:57
flocculantin the meantime 19:57
Unit193Building now, want to test before I push?19:57
flocculantI can yup19:57
flocculantpoint me at it 19:58
jbichaUnit193: it's not a bug in vte2.9120:05
Unit193jbicha: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/0.48.2-0ubuntu1 would disagree with you, but not my point anyway...20:44
jbichayes, but it's intentional20:46
Unit193Sure, but it's an intentional bug that breaks other things, thus still a bug in vte.20:47
jbichaall you have to do is patch xfce-terminal to not assume that vte 1.48 uses pcre2, change the check to vte 1.99 or whatever made-up number you want instead20:49
Unit193That's what I did...20:49
jbichawe'll eventually switch vte2.91 to pcre2 but the Security Team would rather that we postpone that for a while20:50
jbichapcre2 got a very high showing in https://opensource.googleblog.com/2017/05/oss-fuzz-five-months-later-and.html :(20:51
jbichahttps://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/pcre2-main.html21:00

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!