sorinello | hello. is there any xfce app to add a system wide proxy in xubuntu ? or do I have to manually edit /etc/environment ? | 06:51 |
---|---|---|
flocculant | not that I know of | 06:53 |
sorinello | just that... editing /etc/environment and rebooting the machine does not work | 06:55 |
sorinello | all the examples I find are like: http_proxy=http://myproxyserver.com:80 | 06:58 |
sorinello | dunny if my proxy server is to be accessed using http | 06:58 |
flocculant | sorinello: no idea - pretty much something that should be in #x or if no-one answers there then #ubuntu | 06:59 |
flocculant | bluesabre: seems that our terminal is broken by https://github.com/gnunn1/tilix/issues/916 | 16:05 |
flocculant | more words in xfce-dev | 16:06 |
akxwi-dave | bugger | 16:09 |
akxwi-dave | thats a big mess up | 16:10 |
flocculant | well not broken by that gtihub issue itself - the change in packages does it :) | 16:24 |
flocculant | now I'm not even sure where I got the updated terminal package from ... | 16:37 |
flocculant | downgraded terminal for the moment | 16:42 |
flocculant | that's driving me up the wall :) | 16:42 |
flocculant | bluesabre: comments re terminal issue in https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/05/16/%23xubuntu.html#t16:46 | 17:04 |
flocculant | from jbicha | 17:04 |
cyphermox | wxl: you had asked about ip, IIRC. I just found out about 'ip -br addr' and 'ip -br link', if it helps :) | 17:33 |
jbicha | cyphermox: could we get --color by default like: ip a --color | 17:42 |
cyphermox | jbicha: please file a bug, but I think we might as well leave that to users to alias as necessary | 17:49 |
cyphermox | colors typically don't work all that great on some architectures, and some servers. | 17:49 |
Unit193 | flocculant: Did you file a bug in vte for that? I don't see it. | 19:44 |
Unit193 | Would be nice if it wasn't prematurely updated, or even if it wasn't in main. :P | 19:44 |
flocculant | Unit193: didn't do anything but install 0.8.4 so I could use it | 19:44 |
Unit193 | Ah. | 19:44 |
flocculant | Unit193: I can do it now though if you want - report bug to what? terminal or something else? | 19:46 |
flocculant | vte2.91 I assume? | 19:48 |
flocculant | oh - so that doesn't work | 19:49 |
flocculant | *shrug* | 19:49 |
Unit193 | flocculant: I thought you had already, if you haven't than no issue. | 19:52 |
Unit193 | (I was looking at | 19:53 |
Unit193 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/~flocculant/+reportedbugs?field.searchtext=&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=OPINION&field.status%3Alist=INVALID&field.status%3Alist=WONTFIX&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&field.status%3Alist=TRIAGED&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RES | 19:53 |
Unit193 | PONSE&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=&field.structural_subscriber=&field.tag=&field.tags_combinator=ANY&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.has_cve.used=&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.affects_me.used=&field.has_patch.used=&field.has_branches.used=&field.has_branches=on&field.has_no_branches.used=&field.has_no_branches=on&field.has_ | 19:53 |
Unit193 | blueprints.used=&field.has_blueprints=on&field.has_no_blueprints.used=&field.has_no_blueprints=on&orderby=-id&start=0 in case someone already incorrectly marked it invalid.) | 19:53 |
Unit193 | Erm.... | 19:53 |
Unit193 | Wow. | 19:53 |
flocculant | what? | 19:53 |
flocculant | I'd have told you if I reported something - you didn't need to ping me with my reported bugs :D | 19:54 |
Unit193 | Right, that's what I was looking at and didn't see it. :P | 19:55 |
flocculant | :D | 19:55 |
Unit193 | And, url is tooooo loooong. | 19:55 |
flocculant | indeed it is :) | 19:55 |
flocculant | anyway - so do you want me to report it? and to what package and I'll do it now :) | 19:55 |
Unit193 | Nah, we'll just wait on LP 1636666 | 19:56 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1636666 in pcre2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] pcre2" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1636666 | 19:56 |
flocculant | but do something with terminal? | 19:57 |
flocculant | in the meantime | 19:57 |
Unit193 | Building now, want to test before I push? | 19:57 |
flocculant | I can yup | 19:57 |
flocculant | point me at it | 19:58 |
jbicha | Unit193: it's not a bug in vte2.91 | 20:05 |
Unit193 | jbicha: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/0.48.2-0ubuntu1 would disagree with you, but not my point anyway... | 20:44 |
jbicha | yes, but it's intentional | 20:46 |
Unit193 | Sure, but it's an intentional bug that breaks other things, thus still a bug in vte. | 20:47 |
jbicha | all you have to do is patch xfce-terminal to not assume that vte 1.48 uses pcre2, change the check to vte 1.99 or whatever made-up number you want instead | 20:49 |
Unit193 | That's what I did... | 20:49 |
jbicha | we'll eventually switch vte2.91 to pcre2 but the Security Team would rather that we postpone that for a while | 20:50 |
jbicha | pcre2 got a very high showing in https://opensource.googleblog.com/2017/05/oss-fuzz-five-months-later-and.html :( | 20:51 |
jbicha | https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/pcre2-main.html | 21:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!