[00:02] <askb> I am running into the following errors with cloud-init start up on centos7
[00:02] <askb> 2017-05-18 23:00:53,931 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed forking and calling callback NoneType
[00:02] <askb> 2017-05-18 23:00:54,059 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed to disable password for user centos
[00:02] <askb> 2017-05-18 23:00:54,062 - util.py[WARNING]: Running users-groups (<module 'cloudinit.config.cc_users_groups' from '/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_users_groups.pyc'>) failed
[00:02] <askb> therefore not running the init script once the instance is brought up ?
[00:03] <askb> Is this a bug with Cloud-init v. 0.7.5 on centos7 ?
=== sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts
[09:55] <askb> can anyone help with this please http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44059479/cloud-init-fails-on-util-pywarning-failed-to-disable-password-for-user-cento
[12:17] <csfeathers> can anyone confirm that this is a bug or that i'm being stupid
[12:18] <csfeathers> i'm adding adapters to a cloud image in VirtualBox's slot 4+, they end up as enp0s10, enp0s11 etc
[12:19] <csfeathers> then /etc/network/interfaces.d/50-cloud-init.cfg tries to bring up enp0s10 where w/o the additional adapter it would be enp0s3
[12:19] <csfeathers> which renders my VMs unusable b/c enp0s3 is never brought up
[12:19] <csfeathers> i suspect there's a sorted() somewhere which sorts enp0s10 ahead of enp0s3
[12:20] <csfeathers> am i even making sense heh
[12:31] <rharper> csfeathers: you're making sense, the networking documentation may be of help if you want to control which interface is configured: http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/network-config.html
[12:39] <csfeathers> i'm not doing the config myself, i use the "ubuntu/xenial64" cloud image in vagrant
[12:40] <csfeathers> i'm then using vagrant to add NICs and it breaks
[12:40] <csfeathers> i dunno who is doing the configuration for those images :\
=== rangerpbzzzz is now known as rangerpb
=== sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk
[19:20] <blackboxsw> rharper: do we want to allow the following ntp config:
[19:20] <blackboxsw> #cloud-config
[19:20] <blackboxsw> ntp:
[19:20] <blackboxsw> we do allow it (and install ntp with default 4 distro pools
[19:20] <rharper> just the key?  I *think* so;
[19:21] <rharper> yeah; that is what I would expect with just the key;  take the defaults
[19:21] <blackboxsw> ok the code allows it, I was just wondering if we wanted to make that approved valid schema
[19:21] <rharper> we provide distro templates
[19:21] <blackboxsw> ok good deal
[19:21] <blackboxsw> just encoding it to make sure
[19:21] <rharper> ack
[19:25] <rharper> smoser: when do you think we'll have a 0.8.0 release?
[19:25] <smoser> i think i'd call it 0.7.10 next
[19:25] <smoser> but yeah, we are in need of one.
[19:25] <smoser> and i have no good reason to not call one
[19:27] <rharper> ok
=== rangerpb is now known as rangerpbzzzz