| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 03:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.10.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-server) | 03:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 03:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [i386] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [s390x] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | 05:10 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, question: I see a lot of "test in progress" on i386, but nothing on running, should I retry all of them? | 08:42 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | stuff 8 days old | 08:43 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello btw :) | 08:43 |
| Laney | hello | 08:47 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: do you have an example? | 08:51 |
| LocutusOfBorg | looking at artful excuses, search for "i386: test in progress" and start from the end | 08:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | "autopkgtest for magnum/4.1.1-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass, i386: Test in progress" | 08:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | 7 days ago, sqlalchemy (1.0.14+ds1-1ubuntu1 to 1.1.9+ds1-0ubuntu2) | 08:56 |
| Laney | magnum {"triggers": ["sqlalchemy/1.1.9+ds1-0ubuntu2"]} | 08:56 |
| Laney | it's being ground through afaics | 08:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes, actually the one 8 days old mentioned above was not on i386, my bad | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest for konqueror/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Test in progress (always failed), s390x: Test in progress (always failed) | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | for xorg-server | 08:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seems to have been removed, or something like that? | 08:59 |
| Laney | doesn't exist on those arches | 09:01 |
| Laney | probably shouldn't be requested, but not causing a problem in this case | 09:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 09:06 |
| Laney | that didn't happen for other konqueror requests in excuses | 09:07 |
| Laney | so something did go wrong | 09:07 |
| Laney | weird! | 09:07 |
| Laney | konqueror | 4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 | artful/universe | arm64, ppc64el, s390x | 09:37 |
| Laney | it's built from kde-baseapps | 09:38 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4 => 1.4.4~17.04.1] (core) | 09:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.20 => 1.2.23] (core) | 09:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.3.5 => 1.3.8] (core) | 09:45 | |
| apw | Laney, some of that kde stuff is being split from older sources into smaller multiple ones, no idea if that is one of them | 10:37 |
| Laney | looks like it | 10:43 |
| Laney | I don't quite understand why some of the requests in excuses have s390x/ppc64el and some don't | 10:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe they have been built/failed and then never picked up again? | 10:53 |
| Laney | If there was a request created you'd see it on excuses | 10:55 |
| apw | Laney, some of the newer packages don't build on some arches because tey gained new build-deps upstream which are limited arches | 11:06 |
| apw | dunno if that relates ... perhaps acheronuk can shed some light | 11:06 |
| Laney | apw: See http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kbookmarks vs http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kinit | 11:06 |
| Laney | konqueror, same version, second one has s390x/ppc64el requests | 11:07 |
| apw | Laney, that indeed does seem to be anomolous | 11:10 |
| Laney | dem cosmic rays | 11:11 |
| ginggs | morning! would someone please remove 64-bit binaries of pixbros and pixfrogger from artful? packages have changed from arch:all to 32-bit only | 11:22 |
| ginggs | also, please update force-badtest from r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1 to r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1ubuntu2/armhf in p.itti's hints file | 11:23 |
| acheronuk | apw: at the moment no light to shed. that as Laney says, is just 'weird' | 12:40 |
| wgrant | sil2100: For https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1674399, am I OK to upload the -proposed regression fix to xenial/yakkety/zesty? | 13:06 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1674399 in openssl (Ubuntu Zesty) "OpenSSL CPU detection for AMD Ryzen CPUs" [Medium,Fix committed] | 13:06 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: hey! You mean uploading a new one that's fixing the issues the previous upload introduced? | 13:08 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: yes, that should be fine, just give me a poke once those land in the queues | 13:08 |
| wgrant | sil2100: Yep, just the two line patch that I've tested on the affected hardware. | 13:09 |
| wgrant | Thanks, will do. | 13:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.7 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8] (core) | 13:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.2 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3] (core) | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (zesty-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.1 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2] (core) | 13:15 | |
| wgrant | sil2100: All three are there with diffs. | 13:15 |
| sil2100 | wgrant: excellent, let me take a look at those | 13:26 |
| wgrant | sil2100: To be clear, I've run the test suite on i386 and amd64 on Ryzen, and verified that OpenVPN (which exercises the broken code path) works again. | 13:27 |
| wgrant | The other codepaths that are newly enabled on Ryzen are well-tested. This one's only broken because Intel went all weird and still haven't added sha-ni to their big cores for some reason. | 13:28 |
| wgrant | So due to the combination of Intel being silly and the feature check not working on AMD CPUs, the code only operated on Intel Apollo Lake. | 13:29 |
| wgrant | Which like nobody uses. | 13:29 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2] | 13:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3] | 14:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8] | 14:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-os-brick (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.6.1-0ubuntu1.2 => 1.6.1-0ubuntu1.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-caracalla (xenial-proposed/primary) [4.4.0-2002.2] | 15:36 | |
| === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-caracalla [sync] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-2002.2] | 15:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-53.56~16.04.1] | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-79.100] | 15:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-53.56] | 15:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | 17:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.22] | 20:12 | |
| === Ukikie_ is now known as Ukikie | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170509.0.8292905-0ubuntu1~xenial1] | 20:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170509.0.8292905-0ubuntu1] | 20:27 | |
| slangasek | cyphermox: LP: #1684341> does this change drop installation of fb.efi entirely? Are you planning to reintroduce fb installation later? | 20:40 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1684341 in grub2 (Ubuntu Zesty) "EFI fallback binary should not be installed in --removable mode" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1684341 | 20:40 |
| cyphermox | not reintroducing for SRUs, no | 20:40 |
| slangasek | ah | 20:41 |
| cyphermox | or at least, not yet, needs more brainpower. | 20:41 |
| slangasek | well, ok | 20:41 |
| cyphermox | but yeah, right now, just dropping the fallback, it would have been missing boot.csv anyway | 20:41 |
| slangasek | if it were going to be reintroduced, I would ask for a smaller diff because it seems we'd just be reverting most of these changes later | 20:41 |
| cyphermox | it was an addition to begin with | 20:42 |
| slangasek | yeah, but smaller SRU diffs later would tend to go more easily | 20:42 |
| cyphermox | yes | 20:42 |
| cyphermox | it would be a tiny diff to reintroduce if done properly | 20:42 |
| slangasek | do we need to worry about any cleanup on upgrade for users who *did* get fb.efi installed? | 20:42 |
| cyphermox | but I do not think reintroducing it is worth the trouble | 20:43 |
| slangasek | I think the situation now is that users who had the previous SRU installed will wind up with a stale fb.efi on disk | 20:44 |
| cyphermox | slangasek: zesty at least handles that removal/migration | 20:44 |
| slangasek | which will therefore not be signed with the right ephemeral key? | 20:44 |
| slangasek | zesty handles> but the SRU to xenial doesn't | 20:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.7 => 1:17.04.8] (core) | 20:45 | |
| cyphermox | I wasn't sure | 20:45 |
| cyphermox | we don't care about the key, since that fb is not in the right location anyway | 20:45 |
| cyphermox | so, in that case, yeah it should include the removal in the xenial SRU too | 20:46 |
| slangasek | ok, shall I reject this and let you reupload? | 20:46 |
| cyphermox | yes please. | 20:47 |
| cyphermox | please leave grub2-signed; no sense in rejecting that since it will remain the same | 20:48 |
| slangasek | indeed | 20:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.10] | 20:48 | |
| slangasek | tjaalton: libxfont, thanks for the changes, accepting now - will we get build tests of the packages in xenial that currently build-depend ond libxfont-dev but aren't being updated? (mtools, xfonts-utils) | 20:56 |
| tjaalton | slangasek: yeah that's missing from the sru bug | 20:57 |
| tjaalton | and thanks | 20:57 |
| tjaalton | I'll add a note | 20:57 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.10] (core) | 20:58 | |
| tjaalton | slangasek: actually, xfonts-utils needs to build-depend on libxfont1-dev then | 21:00 |
| slangasek | tjaalton: perfect, I trust you'll add that to the SRU | 21:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfont [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:01 | |
| tjaalton | done | 21:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) | 21:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 21:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-user-docs [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.2-0ubuntu2] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) | 21:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-user-docs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.2-0ubuntu2] | 21:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 21:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [i386] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) | 21:54 | |
| flocculant | infinity: earlier this week I saw you and slang asek talking about 16.04 point releases and wiki - are they actually listed somewhere - cos all the wikis ... :( | 22:08 |
| slangasek | flocculant: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/<FullReleaseName>/ReleaseSchedule | 22:30 |
| slangasek | e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule | 22:31 |
| flocculant | slangasek: ack - so no dates going forward yet then - which was what I was trying to get a handle on, I assume there'll be a .3 soonish | 22:32 |
| * flocculant wishes for a big release wiki :) | 22:34 | |
| slangasek | right; the milestone dates should be set there and in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial, I guess infinity hasn't gotten that done yet | 22:36 |
| flocculant | slangasek: okey doke that's cool actually - hadn't really caught on to the dates being there on lp | 22:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] | 22:54 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!