[03:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[03:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.10.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-server)
[03:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [i386] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [s390x] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:42] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, question: I see a lot of "test in progress" on i386, but nothing on running, should I retry all of them?
[08:43] <LocutusOfBorg> stuff 8 days old
[08:43] <LocutusOfBorg> hello btw :)
[08:47] <Laney> hello
[08:51] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: do you have an example?
[08:55] <LocutusOfBorg> looking at artful excuses, search for "i386: test in progress" and start from the end
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> "autopkgtest for magnum/4.1.1-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass, i386: Test in progress"
[08:56] <LocutusOfBorg> 7 days ago, sqlalchemy (1.0.14+ds1-1ubuntu1 to 1.1.9+ds1-0ubuntu2)
[08:56] <Laney> magnum {"triggers": ["sqlalchemy/1.1.9+ds1-0ubuntu2"]}
[08:57] <Laney> it's being ground through afaics
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, actually the one 8 days old mentioned above was not on i386, my bad
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest for konqueror/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Test in progress (always failed), s390x: Test in progress (always failed)
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> for xorg-server
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> seems to have been removed, or something like that?
[09:01] <Laney> doesn't exist on those arches
[09:01] <Laney> probably shouldn't be requested, but not causing a problem in this case
[09:06] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[09:07] <Laney> that didn't happen for other konqueror requests in excuses
[09:07] <Laney> so something did go wrong
[09:07] <Laney> weird!
[09:37] <Laney>  konqueror      | 4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 | artful/universe | arm64, ppc64el, s390x
[09:38] <Laney> it's built from kde-baseapps
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4 => 1.4.4~17.04.1] (core)
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.20 => 1.2.23] (core)
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.3.5 => 1.3.8] (core)
[10:37] <apw> Laney, some of that kde stuff is being split from older sources into smaller multiple ones, no idea if that is one of them
[10:43] <Laney> looks like it
[10:44] <Laney> I don't quite understand why some of the requests in excuses have s390x/ppc64el and some don't
[10:53] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe they have been built/failed and then never picked up again?
[10:55] <Laney> If there was a request created you'd see it on excuses
[11:06] <apw> Laney, some of the newer packages don't build on some arches because tey gained new build-deps upstream which are limited arches
[11:06] <apw> dunno if that relates ... perhaps acheronuk can shed some light
[11:06] <Laney> apw: See http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kbookmarks vs http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kinit
[11:07] <Laney> konqueror, same version, second one has s390x/ppc64el requests
[11:10] <apw> Laney, that indeed does seem to be anomolous
[11:11] <Laney> dem cosmic rays
[11:22] <ginggs> morning! would someone please remove 64-bit binaries of pixbros and pixfrogger from artful? packages have changed from arch:all to 32-bit only
[11:23] <ginggs> also, please update force-badtest from r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1 to r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1ubuntu2/armhf in p.itti's hints file
[12:40] <acheronuk> apw: at the moment no light to shed. that as Laney says, is just 'weird'
[13:06] <wgrant> sil2100: For https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1674399, am I OK to upload the -proposed regression fix to xenial/yakkety/zesty?
[13:08] <sil2100> wgrant: hey! You mean uploading a new one that's fixing the issues the previous upload introduced?
[13:08] <sil2100> wgrant: yes, that should be fine, just give me a poke once those land in the queues
[13:09] <wgrant> sil2100: Yep, just the two line patch that I've tested on the affected hardware.
[13:09] <wgrant> Thanks, will do.
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.7 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8] (core)
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.2 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3] (core)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (zesty-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.1 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2] (core)
[13:15] <wgrant> sil2100: All three are there with diffs.
[13:26] <sil2100> wgrant: excellent, let me take a look at those
[13:27] <wgrant> sil2100: To be clear, I've run the test suite on i386 and amd64 on Ryzen, and verified that OpenVPN (which exercises the broken code path) works again.
[13:28] <wgrant> The other codepaths that are newly enabled on Ryzen are well-tested. This one's only broken because Intel went all weird and still haven't added sha-ni to their big cores for some reason.
[13:29] <wgrant> So due to the combination of Intel being silly and the feature check not working on AMD CPUs, the code only operated on Intel Apollo Lake.
[13:29] <wgrant> Which like nobody uses.
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3]
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-os-brick (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.6.1-0ubuntu1.2 => 1.6.1-0ubuntu1.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-caracalla (xenial-proposed/primary) [4.4.0-2002.2]
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-caracalla [sync] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-2002.2]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-53.56~16.04.1]
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-79.100]
[15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-53.56]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.22]
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170509.0.8292905-0ubuntu1~xenial1]
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170509.0.8292905-0ubuntu1]
[20:40] <slangasek> cyphermox: LP: #1684341> does this change drop installation of fb.efi entirely?  Are you planning to reintroduce fb installation later?
[20:40] <cyphermox> not reintroducing for SRUs, no
[20:41] <slangasek> ah
[20:41] <cyphermox> or at least, not yet, needs more brainpower.
[20:41] <slangasek> well, ok
[20:41] <cyphermox> but yeah, right now, just dropping the fallback, it would have been missing boot.csv anyway
[20:41] <slangasek> if it were going to be reintroduced, I would ask for a smaller diff because it seems we'd just be reverting most of these changes later
[20:42] <cyphermox> it was an addition to begin with
[20:42] <slangasek> yeah, but smaller SRU diffs later would tend to go more easily
[20:42] <cyphermox> yes
[20:42] <cyphermox> it would be a tiny diff to reintroduce if done properly
[20:42] <slangasek> do we need to worry about any cleanup on upgrade for users who *did* get fb.efi installed?
[20:43] <cyphermox> but I do not think reintroducing it is worth the trouble
[20:44] <slangasek> I think the situation now is that users who had the previous SRU installed will wind up with a stale fb.efi on disk
[20:44] <cyphermox> slangasek: zesty at least handles that removal/migration
[20:44] <slangasek> which will therefore not be signed with the right ephemeral key?
[20:45] <slangasek> zesty handles> but the SRU to xenial doesn't
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.7 => 1:17.04.8] (core)
[20:45] <cyphermox> I wasn't sure
[20:45] <cyphermox> we don't care about the key, since that fb is not in the right location anyway
[20:46] <cyphermox> so, in that case, yeah it should include the removal in the xenial SRU too
[20:46] <slangasek> ok, shall I reject this and let you reupload?
[20:47] <cyphermox> yes please.
[20:48] <cyphermox> please leave grub2-signed; no sense in rejecting that since it will remain the same
[20:48] <slangasek> indeed
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.10]
[20:56] <slangasek> tjaalton: libxfont, thanks for the changes, accepting now - will we get build tests of the packages in xenial that currently build-depend ond libxfont-dev but aren't being updated? (mtools, xfonts-utils)
[20:57] <tjaalton> slangasek: yeah that's missing from the sru bug
[20:57] <tjaalton> and thanks
[20:57] <tjaalton> I'll add a note
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.10] (core)
[21:00] <tjaalton> slangasek: actually, xfonts-utils needs to build-depend on libxfont1-dev then
[21:00] <slangasek> tjaalton: perfect, I trust you'll add that to the SRU
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfont [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:01] <tjaalton> done
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-user-docs [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.2-0ubuntu2] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-user-docs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.2-0ubuntu2]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [i386] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:08] <flocculant> infinity: earlier this week I saw you and slang asek talking about 16.04 point releases and wiki - are they actually listed somewhere - cos all the wikis ... :(
[22:30] <slangasek> flocculant: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/<FullReleaseName>/ReleaseSchedule
[22:31] <slangasek> e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule
[22:32] <flocculant> slangasek: ack - so no dates going forward yet then - which was what I was trying to get a handle on, I assume there'll be a .3 soonish
[22:34]  * flocculant wishes for a big release wiki :)
[22:36] <slangasek> right; the milestone dates should be set there and in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial, I guess infinity hasn't gotten that done yet
[22:42] <flocculant> slangasek: okey doke that's cool actually - hadn't really caught on to the dates being there on lp
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]