[03:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server) [03:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.10.2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-server) [03:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu2 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (ubuntu-server) [05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [i386] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [s390x] (artful-proposed/none) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [05:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [05:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) [08:42] Laney, question: I see a lot of "test in progress" on i386, but nothing on running, should I retry all of them? [08:43] stuff 8 days old [08:43] hello btw :) [08:47] hello [08:51] LocutusOfBorg: do you have an example? [08:55] looking at artful excuses, search for "i386: test in progress" and start from the end [08:56] "autopkgtest for magnum/4.1.1-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass, i386: Test in progress" [08:56] 7 days ago, sqlalchemy (1.0.14+ds1-1ubuntu1 to 1.1.9+ds1-0ubuntu2) [08:56] magnum {"triggers": ["sqlalchemy/1.1.9+ds1-0ubuntu2"]} [08:57] it's being ground through afaics [08:58] yes, actually the one 8 days old mentioned above was not on i386, my bad [08:58] autopkgtest for konqueror/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1: amd64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Pass, ppc64el: Test in progress (always failed), s390x: Test in progress (always failed) [08:58] for xorg-server [08:59] seems to have been removed, or something like that? [09:01] doesn't exist on those arches [09:01] probably shouldn't be requested, but not causing a problem in this case [09:06] thanks [09:07] that didn't happen for other konqueror requests in excuses [09:07] so something did go wrong [09:07] weird! [09:37] konqueror | 4:16.04.3-0ubuntu1 | artful/universe | arm64, ppc64el, s390x [09:38] it's built from kde-baseapps [09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4 => 1.4.4~17.04.1] (core) [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2.20 => 1.2.23] (core) [09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.3.5 => 1.3.8] (core) [10:37] Laney, some of that kde stuff is being split from older sources into smaller multiple ones, no idea if that is one of them [10:43] looks like it [10:44] I don't quite understand why some of the requests in excuses have s390x/ppc64el and some don't [10:53] maybe they have been built/failed and then never picked up again? [10:55] If there was a request created you'd see it on excuses [11:06] Laney, some of the newer packages don't build on some arches because tey gained new build-deps upstream which are limited arches [11:06] dunno if that relates ... perhaps acheronuk can shed some light [11:06] apw: See http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kbookmarks vs http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#kinit [11:07] konqueror, same version, second one has s390x/ppc64el requests [11:10] Laney, that indeed does seem to be anomolous [11:11] dem cosmic rays [11:22] morning! would someone please remove 64-bit binaries of pixbros and pixfrogger from artful? packages have changed from arch:all to 32-bit only [11:23] also, please update force-badtest from r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1 to r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1ubuntu2/armhf in p.itti's hints file [12:40] apw: at the moment no light to shed. that as Laney says, is just 'weird' [13:06] sil2100: For https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1674399, am I OK to upload the -proposed regression fix to xenial/yakkety/zesty? [13:06] Ubuntu bug 1674399 in openssl (Ubuntu Zesty) "OpenSSL CPU detection for AMD Ryzen CPUs" [Medium,Fix committed] [13:08] wgrant: hey! You mean uploading a new one that's fixing the issues the previous upload introduced? [13:08] wgrant: yes, that should be fine, just give me a poke once those land in the queues [13:09] sil2100: Yep, just the two line patch that I've tested on the affected hardware. [13:09] Thanks, will do. [13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (xenial-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.7 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8] (core) [13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.2 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3] (core) [13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (zesty-proposed/main) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.1 => 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2] (core) [13:15] sil2100: All three are there with diffs. [13:26] wgrant: excellent, let me take a look at those [13:27] sil2100: To be clear, I've run the test suite on i386 and amd64 on Ryzen, and verified that OpenVPN (which exercises the broken code path) works again. [13:28] The other codepaths that are newly enabled on Ryzen are well-tested. This one's only broken because Intel went all weird and still haven't added sha-ni to their big cores for some reason. [13:29] So due to the combination of Intel being silly and the feature check not working on AMD CPUs, the code only operated on Intel Apollo Lake. [13:29] Which like nobody uses. [13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2] [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3] [14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8] [14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-os-brick (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.6.1-0ubuntu1.2 => 1.6.1-0ubuntu1.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-software [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: linux-caracalla (xenial-proposed/primary) [4.4.0-2002.2] === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-caracalla [sync] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-2002.2] [15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-53.56~16.04.1] [15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-79.100] [15:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-53.56] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-software [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.24.3-0ubuntu2] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1] [20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.22] === Ukikie_ is now known as Ukikie [20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170509.0.8292905-0ubuntu1~xenial1] [20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170509.0.8292905-0ubuntu1] [20:40] cyphermox: LP: #1684341> does this change drop installation of fb.efi entirely? Are you planning to reintroduce fb installation later? [20:40] Launchpad bug 1684341 in grub2 (Ubuntu Zesty) "EFI fallback binary should not be installed in --removable mode" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1684341 [20:40] not reintroducing for SRUs, no [20:41] ah [20:41] or at least, not yet, needs more brainpower. [20:41] well, ok [20:41] but yeah, right now, just dropping the fallback, it would have been missing boot.csv anyway [20:41] if it were going to be reintroduced, I would ask for a smaller diff because it seems we'd just be reverting most of these changes later [20:42] it was an addition to begin with [20:42] yeah, but smaller SRU diffs later would tend to go more easily [20:42] yes [20:42] it would be a tiny diff to reintroduce if done properly [20:42] do we need to worry about any cleanup on upgrade for users who *did* get fb.efi installed? [20:43] but I do not think reintroducing it is worth the trouble [20:44] I think the situation now is that users who had the previous SRU installed will wind up with a stale fb.efi on disk [20:44] slangasek: zesty at least handles that removal/migration [20:44] which will therefore not be signed with the right ephemeral key? [20:45] zesty handles> but the SRU to xenial doesn't [20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (zesty-proposed/main) [1:17.04.7 => 1:17.04.8] (core) [20:45] I wasn't sure [20:45] we don't care about the key, since that fb is not in the right location anyway [20:46] so, in that case, yeah it should include the removal in the xenial SRU too [20:46] ok, shall I reject this and let you reupload? [20:47] yes please. [20:48] please leave grub2-signed; no sense in rejecting that since it will remain the same [20:48] indeed [20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.10] [20:56] tjaalton: libxfont, thanks for the changes, accepting now - will we get build tests of the packages in xenial that currently build-depend ond libxfont-dev but aren't being updated? (mtools, xfonts-utils) [20:57] slangasek: yeah that's missing from the sru bug [20:57] and thanks [20:57] I'll add a note [20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.9 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.10] (core) [21:00] slangasek: actually, xfonts-utils needs to build-depend on libxfont1-dev then [21:00] tjaalton: perfect, I trust you'll add that to the SRU [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxfont [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:01] done [21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (core, xorg) [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [21:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-user-docs [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.24.2-0ubuntu2] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop) [21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-user-docs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.24.2-0ubuntu2] [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [21:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [s390x] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [i386] (xenial-proposed/none) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxfont2 [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset) [22:08] infinity: earlier this week I saw you and slang asek talking about 16.04 point releases and wiki - are they actually listed somewhere - cos all the wikis ... :( [22:30] flocculant: https://wiki.ubuntu.com//ReleaseSchedule [22:31] e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule [22:32] slangasek: ack - so no dates going forward yet then - which was what I was trying to get a handle on, I assume there'll be a .3 soonish [22:34] * flocculant wishes for a big release wiki :) [22:36] right; the milestone dates should be set there and in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial, I guess infinity hasn't gotten that done yet [22:42] slangasek: okey doke that's cool actually - hadn't really caught on to the dates being there on lp [22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [22:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1] [22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxfont2 [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.0.1-3~ubuntu16.04.1]