/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/05/21/#ubuntu-devel.txt

juliankslangasek: I'm not pitti, but I can say that the coverage of the diff from 1.0.7 to 1.0.10 is 76%, with the average code coverage improving to 83.88% - https://codecov.io/gh/borgbackup/borg/compare/f32c885...e5f712129685e02a6755fa53f1546a66e842b215/diff - that would make me fairly confident.08:33
juliankThat link really should have been in the SRU bug IMO08:34
juliankThere's one part that is not well tested, which is the newly adding importing of paperkeys. If that's broken, that would not cause a regression, though.08:35
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
erle-Why is “unattended-upgrades” updated so often recently?10:10
erle-And why is it called upgrades rather than updates in the first place?10:10
JanCerle-: did you read the changelog?10:52
rbasakerle-: probably because "update" and "upgrade" have specific meanings in the context of apt.12:25
=== NCommander is now known as mcasadevall
slangasekjuliank: well, I don't think unit test code coverage ever tells the whole story, but that's useful info, thanks21:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!