| xnox | infinity, https://errors.ubuntu.com/ snap-install is high up there | 00:03 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | i wonder if anybody is looking at those, who shall i ping? mvo? | 00:03 |
| infinity | xnox: I would think you should poke mvo about those two, yeah. | 04:18 |
| apw | xnox, are those not both specific snap hook failures | 05:38 |
| === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander | ||
| infinity | apw: Whatever they are, if they're registering as a "crash", something's not ideal. | 06:49 |
| infinity | apw: Well, especially a "crash" in snapd. So, maybe apport needs some logic, if the blame lies elsewhere. | 06:50 |
| infinity | apw: (Much in the same way it doesn't blame dpkg for every aborted maintainer scripts) | 06:50 |
| infinity | s/scripts/script/ | 06:50 |
| apw | infinity, indeed | 07:58 |
| xnox | apw, it even smells like particular snaps failing or some such. | 08:07 |
| ogra_ | hmm, we had at least one user in the channel last week that had the same error ... | 08:37 |
| ogra_ | "cannot create lock directory /run/snapd/lock → Permission denied" | 08:37 |
| ogra_ | it might actually be a bug in snapd | 08:38 |
| xnox | apw, https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-xenial/xenial/amd64/s/systemd/20170520_150952_306ba@/log.gz is funny, src:systemd tests fail when running due to aws trigger as modules are missing. Is there aws-extra package that systemd test suite needs to opportunistically install? | 09:53 |
| apw | xnox, there is not | 10:08 |
| xnox | so i guess somehow, i need to detect "funny" kernels and skip the tests. | 10:08 |
| xnox | do you want clean adt from systemd upon aws updates? | 10:09 |
| xnox | (i wonder if other kernels are affected too, e.g. the other A kernel and the G kernel) | 10:09 |
| * xnox giggles the FAANG kernels | 10:09 | |
| apw | xnox, we always want adt clean, so either we need to make that test check for and skip itself if there is no support for it, or reinstate that supprot in them | 10:10 |
| infinity | xnox: "if modinfo scsi_debug >/dev/null; then run_test; fi"? | 10:10 |
| xnox | infinity, i like that yes. | 10:10 |
| infinity | Or, indeed, ask for scsi_debug to be included in linux-aws. But if there's no solid argument for it outside of testsuites, it doesn't really belong in cloud kernels. | 10:11 |
| xnox | i think scsi_debug is a liability in the cloud kernels. | 10:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (xenial-proposed/universe) [2.29 => 2.30] (no packageset) | 11:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.29+16.10 => 2.30+16.10] (no packageset) | 11:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapcraft (zesty-proposed/universe) [2.29+17.04 => 2.30+17.04] (no packageset) | 11:46 | |
| sergiusens | can I get those 3 reviewed? ^ | 11:53 |
| apw | sergiusens, i guess i can have a look | 11:53 |
| apw | sergiusens, i assume artful is already uploaded | 11:54 |
| sergiusens | apw: uploaded and in the release pocket | 12:00 |
| sergiusens | thanks | 12:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-79.100~14.04.1] (kernel) | 12:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-79.100~14.04.1] | 12:19 | |
| xnox | apw, hm FANG kernels are only in xenial. But we do publish images for the non-lts releases too. Could the kernels be copied up? | 12:37 |
| ginggs | would someone please remove 64-bit binaries of pixbros and pixfrogger from artful? packages have changed from arch:all to 32-bit only | 12:38 |
| ginggs | also, please update p.itti's hints file and force-badtest r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1ubuntu2/armhf instead of r-cran-dplyr/0.5.0-1 | 12:39 |
| vtapia | Hi, could someone review the sssd upload in the queue for trusty? | 13:04 |
| apw | xnox, i don't think that they were intended to be copies up | 13:29 |
| apw | vtapia, can you confirm that Z/A are both ok ? | 13:30 |
| vtapia | apw: yes, they are both ok :) | 13:31 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.11.8-0ubuntu0.6] | 14:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios3 [sync] (zesty-proposed) [3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu5.1] | 14:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios3 [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu3.2] | 14:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios3 [sync] (xenial-proposed) [3.5.1.dfsg-2.1ubuntu1.2] | 14:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios3 [sync] (trusty-proposed) [3.5.1-1ubuntu1.2] | 14:50 | |
| jbicha | libgit2 is stuck in artful-proposed: "old binaries left", libgit2-25 is left over from an accidental transition that was reverted the next day in unstable | 15:04 |
| apw | jbicha, +really ugg | 15:06 |
| apw | jbicha, and gone | 15:08 |
| jbicha | yeah, there are too many affected packages for me to be confident about finishing the libgit2 transition very quickly in Ubuntu | 15:27 |
| slashd | sil2100, could you please have a look at LP:# 1689854 ? isc-dhcp was built on "2017-05-15", the verification-done has been done the same day and the package passed the minimum aging period of 7 days. It prevent me for starting a new SRU for isc-dhcp. Thanks. | 16:15 |
| rbasak | slashd: oh yes, I'm not sure if I forgot to mention - the SRU will have to be rebased on the latest, but I think that's just a minor changelog conflict to resolve as they're in entirely different areas. | 16:16 |
| rbasak | FWIW the pending-sru report says days=6, not 7. | 16:17 |
| slashd | rbasak, ack I count the days looking my laptop calendar | 16:18 |
| slashd | rbasak, thanks for your reply for LP: #1176046 (binary split), I'll start the upload as soon as the current isc-dhcp is completed. | 16:20 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1176046 in isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty) "isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1176046 | 16:20 |
| xnox | infinity, when is 16.04.3 scheduled for? because i need to know if i have time to land all the systemd srus i want to land =/ | 16:31 |
| xnox | and i have holidays and stuff | 16:31 |
| jamespage | any MIR team members around? need a review for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vine/+bug/1688091 | 16:41 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1688091 in vine (Ubuntu) "[MIR] vine" [High,New] | 16:41 |
| jamespage | which is blocking up proposed for most of openstack at the moment | 16:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-fan (zesty-proposed/main) [0.12.2 => 0.12.2.1] (no packageset) | 16:48 | |
| bdmurray | slangasek: Could you have a look at u-r-u in zesty? | 16:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:17.04.8] | 17:01 | |
| bdmurray | slangasek: thanks | 17:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.30+17.04] | 19:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.30+16.10] | 19:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapcraft [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.30] | 19:29 | |
| === nacc_ is now known as nacc | ||
| === NCommander is now known as mcasadevall | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!