[03:28] cyphermox: sforshee: i built wpa 2.6-4 from debian experimental on xenial and installed on my laptop- success. 2.1 and the default 2.4 fail to connect (to my blackberry hotspot phone as hotspot) [03:29] thanks to that assine ci train crap polluting my laptop i had to build ina container, else i'd consider trying to bisect or something [10:35] hello, please take notice of this upload failure https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/12622891 [10:38] ricotz, *expletive deleted* [10:39] ricotz, how did you get informed of that [10:40] apw, I am using the hwe-edge kernel [10:40] ahh [10:40] while the i386 turned up the amd64 didnt, so I have looked [10:42] apw, I assume you deleted the conflicting package and going to retry this amd64 build? [10:42] ricotz, i am going to do something [10:42] alright [10:43] ricotz, the conflicting package has already gone, but there is some nbs in teh PPA i think [12:06] oi guys, is there a log of sorts for canonicals live patch service? [12:19] Hello [12:19] Does ext4 devs are here? [12:32] try #ext4 and #linuxfs refeaime [12:42] Beret, [12:42] bbcmicrocomputer, s [12:43] * apw hits his keyboard with a large stick ... sorry [12:43] just remove the tab key ;) [12:43] steven, - canonical-livepatch status --verbose [12:43] xnox, hey ... cgroup2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified ... is that something we turned on in artful in systemd ? [12:43] * apw boggles that B-eret happend to the be right person for that [12:46] * Beret boggles at andy's lack of aith [12:46] faith [12:46] Beret, heh, no i mean i hit B by accident, nothing to do with the preceeding lines, and in attempting to hit i hit [12:47] hah [12:47] so that you might know the answer was just complete bonus [12:50] the bin doesnt exist on my system Beret [12:51] only /snap/canonical-livepatch/22/canonical-livepatchd [12:52] apw, yes [12:52] steven, you don't have /snap/bin/canonical-livepatch ? [12:52] apw, there are a few things that need fixing still, but so far it's working ok. What did you notice? [12:52] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS#L15 [12:53] ah I dont have snap in my PATH that was it :D [12:53] Beret: can I see the last time it did patch? [12:53] I just see last checked [12:54] * Beret looks for a machine that isn't freshly rebooted [12:54] hallyn: if you send debug logs for wpa (working and not working), maybe we can tell from that what patch you'd be missing. [12:55] or if you tell me what hardware, maybe I have something close enough that it will fail as well [12:59] backstory, my server crashed big time last night. was unable to use it so I had to hard reset it (pull the plug) and that shit never happened [12:59] the only thing I did was enable live patch a week ago or two [13:00] apw, can you grab a colleague who's working on CLP? [13:00] bjf, awake? [13:01] ben_r, ^ [14:00] cyphermox: well the laptop is thinkpad t440s with Intel Corporation Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 nic; hotspot is blackberry passport phone. the bad wpa logfile is at http://paste.ubuntu.com/24624453/ , i'll generate a new good one in a bit [14:31] cyphermox: the logfile when it works (wpa 2.6) http://paste.ubuntu.com/24634013/ [15:07] hallyn: cool, I'll look [15:07] I would start to be suspicious of whatever your blackberry does for an accesspoint though [15:10] yeah, but like i say a nokia n9 (linux) and a windows laptop have no issue. [15:22] tseliot: I have some updates for the nvidia drivers to fix build issues with 4.11 - bug 1691839 and bug 1691841 [15:22] bug 1691839 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 (Ubuntu) "nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 304.135-0ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux 4.11.0-3.8" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1691839 [15:22] bug 1691841 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 (Ubuntu) "nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 340.102-0ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux 4.11.0-3.8" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1691841 [15:26] hallyn: that doesn't mean much, they could be just as "broken", but since there's a patch somewhere we can apply... [15:26] sforshee: cool, thanks, I'll have a look at them soon [15:28] hallyn: I think I see a hint to find the right patch; there's that cmd 20 there that happens before authenticate in the broken case, and before deauth in the working case. It might be nothing but it gives me something to look for [15:29] cyphermox: cool. what's cmd 20 [15:29] del_station [15:29] something I'd expect to see "more" when deauthenticating than when authenticating [15:29] but I'm no wifi expert [15:39] sforshee: halp, could use your input as well :) [15:54] cyphermox: when I looked yesterday it looked like the hotspot didn't like the association data for some reason, which caused the kernel to send that cmd 20 [15:54] ja [15:56] cyphermox: I'd need to refresh my memory to make sense of what those supplicant logs add to the picture [15:56] it doesn't seem to add much to what you've just said [15:57] but there's nothing that really tells us _why_ it didn't like it [15:57] at least not to me to try to find what patch might be missing [15:57] right [15:57] the status is rejected, unspecified. [15:59] I guess if hallyn sniffed the on-air frames from both a successful connection and a failed one we could see what's different [16:07] can i tcpdump -i wlan0 on the laptop itself or will that miss them? [16:13] hallyn: you might need to have a monitor interface to get the wlan frames, I can't remember for sure. /me tries. [16:14] (gonna be in meetings for awhile so won't be able to try for awhile) [16:15] i wish i could get logs from the bb itself. if only i had a purely open source modern phone ... [16:19] hallyn: I'm only seeing higher-level frames that way [16:23] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/24634952/ will get the wlan frames [16:31] didn't show this, but don't forget to use -w to actually capture the frames to a pcap [17:11] and you want to see the result of that with the broken wpasuplicant? [17:24] hallyn: oh, is there a supplicant that works? I must have missed that part. What would be most useful is to see a working and non-working association to compare them. [17:48] sforshee: yeah, when i take 2.6 from debian experimental, and install it in xenial (built in a xenial container), that works [17:48] (2.4 from zesty does not work) === cachio_ is now known as cachio === cachio is now known as cachio_afk === cachio_afk is now known as cachio === Guest64879 is now known as RAOF