[03:19] nacc: we didn't use to have locales-all :) [06:00] Logan: ah ok, so it can be dropped? [06:00] yup [06:04] Logan: thanks! [06:13] hi, I'm not sure whether this is the right place to request this [06:13] but the currently available version of VLC in ubuntu has an open CVE [06:13] upstream has released a fix, and it has made it into debian unstable [06:13] https://packages.debian.org/sid/vlc [06:13] https://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/vlc [06:14] can maybe the vlc update be backported? [06:14] est31: it is CVE-2017-8312 or a different one? [06:14] Heap out-of-bound read in ParseJSS in VideoLAN VLC due to missing check of string length allows attackers to read heap uninitialized data via a crafted subtitles file. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-8312) [06:14] CVE-2017-8312 it is, yes [06:14] see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2017-May/058651.html [07:36] Hi, has anyone successfully integrated git-buildpackage with backportspackage from ubuntu-dev-tools? === ondrej_ is now known as ondrej [08:13] does 'apt-file update' download the contents for people in artful 3.1.4 version? [08:14] had to downgrade to zesty's 2.5.5ubuntu1 here to restore functionality [08:23] acheronUK: That hooks into apt's download method, so contents are updated when you 'apt-get update' [08:23] cyphermox: thanks for the MIR review of vine :) [08:24] Unit193: except, that they are not [08:29] Unit193: ummmm. looks like it might be an old apt.conf workaround lurking and interfering [08:30] acheronUK: Think you're going to need to be a little more verbose on that one. The nice part about it is that it works on both styles. [08:30] one I added I mean. sigh [08:30] Aha, I see. [08:30] ondrej: what would you be after there? [08:30] branching / tagging? [08:31] acheronUK: I kind of wonder what might be screwing that up. [08:33] Unit193: a workaround to get rid of "W: Target Contents-deb-legacy (Contents-amd64) is configured multiple times in /etc/apt/sources.list:3 and /etc/apt/sources.list:16" [08:33] messages [08:33] when apt sees say a "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful main restricted" line [08:34] and a "deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu artful universe" one [08:34] Ahhh, I see. That's an unimportant one, and I didn't hit it this time anyway so maybe that's been modified (or maybe this sources.list is...More likely.) [08:35] Unit193: this is an upgraded zesty box, so my sources.list was just a sed replacement [08:35] maybe one from a clean install would be fine [08:36] Laney: I have a set of custom scripts that I run from gbp repository to build for distributions in DISTS="foo bar baz" and upload them to specified PPA. It seemed like most of the custom script would be replaceable with backportpackage, but it operates only on .dsc files, so there's a missing step between 'gbp buildpackage' and backportspackage [08:38] e.g. something like ability to run `gbp buildpackage --debuild='backportpackage -d $DIST .'` would be very helpful [08:40] Mmm [08:41] acheronUK: Yeah mine is a bit non-standard: http://paste.openstack.org/show/610708 [08:42] Unit193: and is quite similar to what I've just switched to [08:43] going to do some artful iso install tests soon, so I'll take a look at what the default from those look like now [08:44] It splits the different sections out. [08:44] I'm not entirely sure if 'Ubuntu' proper installs have universe commented out? [08:45] I'll have to check. If one from a default install gives me those errors, I'll know there is still some residual apt config weirdness left over from zesty [08:47] Unit193: for now, thanks :) [08:48] Those warnings will likely remain, fyi. But 'welcome. I like this update partially due to the fact it works in Ubuntu as well as external repositories (including my own.) vs the old one that had to be patched to work with Ubuntu repos, thus broke on external. However, this newer one has poor backwards compatibility. [08:48] Eg, ubottu won't like it. [08:49] Laney: I guess I can make a wrapper that would call dpkg-buildpackage -S and then call backportpackage on the result, but it seems like missing functionality from backportpackage [09:26] dax: are you looking at the issue, or should I ask somewhere else [09:59] Laney: so, the only thing missing in backportpackage is the ability to pass unknown (or -- prefixed) arguments to the builder [10:06] ondrej: k, I guess this sounds like a bug against lp:ubuntu-dev-tools [10:28] Laney: done (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1693766), thanks for being listening ear [10:28] Launchpad bug 1693766 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "[feature request] pass unknown arguments to backportpackage to the builder" [Undecided,New] === mbiebl_ is now known as mbiebl [14:44] slangasek apw is it ok to build click with --disable-packagekit ... the api seems to have changed in xenial since this was last built [14:47] sergiusens: does the package currently ftbfs without this change? [14:47] slangasek: I haven't tried on its own, but could; I did not touch that part of the code [14:47] one sec [14:48] well, we wouldn't want to change that without a specific reason [14:57] click should do that by itself if the version range is such that the plugin would be unbuildable [14:57] see debian/rules and debian/packagekit-check [14:58] sergiusens,slangasek: ^- [14:58] I'm a little surprised that this would have been broken in xenial; but it's only needed by the phone [15:59] slangasek: so ignore me [15:59] ah, thanks cjwatson was just looking at that [16:00] cjwatson: and no, not broken in xenial; I was trying to move the plugin forward and had some left over code when I tried it on xenial [16:00] sorry for the confusion [16:01] good stuff [16:31] anyone else getting SSL cert verification for `pull-lp-source` or `syncpackage` ? [16:31] *verification failure [16:34] nacc: yes [16:34] I did a pull-lp-source about 30mins ago fine, now it seems to give me SSL cert failure [16:34] powersj: ok, glad it's not just me -- same symptoms (working fine before) [16:45] nacc,powersj: yep, looks like a slightly busted cert renewal on launchpadlibrarian.net. chasing via sysadmin [16:46] cjwatson: thanks! [16:50] fixed [16:52] cjwatson: confirmed, thanks! [17:08] bdmurray: it looks like phased-updater stopped working yesterday [17:09] https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html [17:10] slangasek: apw cjwatson https://code.launchpad.net/~sergiusens/click/package-rename/+merge/324689 [18:13] anyone have an idea why diaspora-installer is failing in the autopkgtests? [18:13] xnox: perhaps you? ^ [18:20] mdeslaur, #EOW #OnHoliday #StillWorking [18:22] mdeslaur: Because it's a flaming heap that pulls a bunch of gems from the interweebs and slaps it all together. [18:24] mdeslaur: If you wanted a more in-depth analysis of why ruby and/or those gems suck on some arches, I don't know. :P [18:32] infinity: ah crud, can we push mysql-5.7 out then? [18:58] mdeslaur: Yeah, I might just badtest diaspora-installer for now. It was (differently) broken in yakkety too, almost seems like a miracle that it was occasionally functional in zesty. [18:58] infinity: thanks [19:29] est31: I got as far as "there's no Launchpad bug for it" and went to bed, sorry. Hopefully someone else in here knows the process better. === Sir_Gallantmon is now known as Son_Goku [19:55] sil2100: please reply in LP: #1693538 [19:55] Launchpad bug 1693538 in ubuntu-community "Please grant colin-king PPU rights for zfsutils-linux and spl-linux" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1693538 [21:15] stgraber: it will be zfs-linux and spl-linux [21:15] (of course I understand I do not speak for them) [21:15] apw: yeah, figured it was zfs-linux but I'd like the DMB to confirm [22:49] jbicha: i know you're not a kde developer, but I would appreciate some eyes on LP: #1451728 -- two packages ship the same file in ubuntu (account-plugin-google, kde-config-telepathy-accounts) [22:49] Launchpad bug 1451728 in kaccounts-integration (Ubuntu) "[master] kde-config-telepathy-accounts package install error" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1451728 [22:50] wow, that's a lot of dupes [22:50] jbicha: yeah [22:51] jbicha: and a lot of spam and angry users :) [22:51] makes for hard reading [22:51] but, at least, in zesty, it appears they no longer conflict [22:51] http://paste.ubuntu.com/24671827/ [22:57] jbicha: i was going to look at it in depth next week, but I believe you are much better versed with the desktop side, so just wanted to bring to your attention. I think any user could get into that situtation with installing multiple desktop envs [23:02] if it is already fixed in zesty, hopefully it will be easier [23:17] jbicha: yeah, i just hadn't tracked down (yet) what the fix was