[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lmdb (xenial-backports/universe) [0.9.17-3 => 0.9.18-4~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu)
[10:32] <ahoneybun> mm cyphermox http://imgur.com/a/7oRRu
[10:32] <ahoneybun> some spacing issues
[10:32] <ahoneybun> I think the real slides are larger then the test slide
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ninja-build (xenial-backports/universe) [1.5.1-0.1ubuntu1 => 1.7.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: meson (xenial-backports/universe) [0.29.0-1 => 0.40.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mustache-d (xenial-backports/universe) [0.1.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 0.1.3-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lmdb [source] (xenial-backports) [0.9.18-4~ubuntu16.04.1]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ninja-build [source] (xenial-backports) [1.7.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: meson (zesty-backports/universe) [0.39.1-1 => 0.40.1-1~ubuntu17.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: meson (yakkety-backports/universe) [0.34.0-1 => 0.40.1-1~ubuntu16.10.1] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted meson [source] (xenial-backports) [0.40.1-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mustache-d [source] (xenial-backports) [0.1.3-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[12:05] <slashd> sil2100, good day, I have a question for you ... we are currently working on a fix for ebtables package. The upstream project is un-maintained anymore since 2015 in favour of nft project (where all the development is happening now) and we have submitted a bug in Debian to commit and upload our patch but no news as well after a couples of weeks. With that being said how can we make our patch land in Ubuntu to accomodate
[12:05] <slashd> users having this particular bug ? (LP: #1645324)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted meson [source] (yakkety-backports) [0.40.1-1~ubuntu16.10.1]
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted meson [source] (zesty-backports) [0.40.1-1~ubuntu17.04.1]
[12:33] <slashd> SRU team ? rbasak ? ^^^^
[12:34] <apw> slashd, if you have a fix for it, it sounds like something that can be sru#d
[12:35] <slashd> apw, even if not merged at any other level such as upstream or debian due to no longer maintain ?
[12:35] <apw> slashd, it is not uncommon to apply a fix locally first, and then it may get replaced by an "official" fix later
[12:36] <slashd> apw, ok thanks so I'll proceed with the upload then
[12:36] <apw> slashd, though as you have submitted it to debian the chances are the fix if it ever gets applied, would match
[12:36] <apw> slashd, so not in need to any modification if and when debian does apply it
[12:37] <slashd> thank you very much apw
[13:30] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: the real fix for that is to not use a background at all; just the screenshot you need and properly insert it in the right place in the html of the slide
[13:31] <cyphermox> (the grey header is already included in the slideshow code, and the background color is something you can set in CSS anyway.
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gwakeonlan (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1.1 => 0.5.1-1.1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (zesty-proposed/main) [0.8.1-3 => 0.8.1-3ubuntu0.1] (desktop-core)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlan (zesty-proposed/main) [1.9-3.2ubuntu2 => 1.9-3.2ubuntu2.17.04.1] (core)
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlan (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.9-3.2ubuntu2 => 1.9-3.2ubuntu2.16.10.1] (core)
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlan (xenial-proposed/main) [1.9-3.2ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 1.9-3.2ubuntu1.16.04.2] (core)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vlan (trusty-proposed/main) [1.9-3ubuntu10.1 => 1.9-3ubuntu10.2] (core)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-54.57] (core, kernel)
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.8.0-54.57~16.04.1] (kernel)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-54.57~16.04.1]
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-54.57]
[17:29] <cyphermox> hi, could someone please review and accept grub2 (amd64 and arm64) in artful NEW queue?
[17:47] <mapreri> rbasak: Gianfranco asked me to tell you please move virtualbox-ext-pack to release too, not only virtualbox (as otherwise update in systems with both installed is broken)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu4]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu4]
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted debian-med [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1ubuntu1]
[18:54] <ahoneybun> cyphermox: well I wanted to use certain colors and don't like css/html too much
[18:56] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: well, it doesn't work and your colors look like very nearly the same as provided on the system anyway (the header in your image is just slightly lighter)
[18:57] <ahoneybun> cyphermox: I see I did set that color myself so working on getting it right
[18:57] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: I think we're talking past each other
[18:57] <cyphermox> are you looking to have a different color than what is  currently there for the header?
[18:58] <cyphermox> or are you trying to make the "background" match the color of the header?
[18:58] <ahoneybun> cyphermox: I was using an image as the whole thing
[18:58] <cyphermox> yes
[18:58] <ahoneybun> and the problem was that the test-slideshow was using a smaller size then the real one
[18:58] <cyphermox> yeah, that shouldn't be an issue
[18:58] <ahoneybun> getting rid of the image and just going with css background-color
[18:59] <ahoneybun> should have something to merge by the end of the weekend
[18:59] <cyphermox> if you use just the screenshot for the image you want to appear on screen and putting it in the right div tag (use an example from another flavour) should work
[18:59] <cyphermox> (ie. you don't need to have the image be the whole slide, or have a header, or anything like that)
[19:00] <ahoneybun> yea that was my problem
[19:00] <ahoneybun> trying to avoid css/html xD
[19:00] <cyphermox> please don't, it should be trivial anyway, you should be able to just copy-paste from another release
[19:00] <cyphermox> *flavour
[19:01] <cyphermox> otherwise you need to repeat the same process for every slide, whereas with CSS you set the theming once and you're done
[19:01] <cyphermox> tbf, I don't "enjoy" doing html and css either, but sometimes that's the best way to do things, and it's much less yucky than other languages
[19:12] <slangasek> 'perhaps set LP_DISABLE_SSL_CERTIFICATE_VALIDATION if certificate validation failed and you genuinely trust the remote server.'
[19:12] <slangasek> perhaps never ever recommend such things in a stack trace message
[19:13] <nacc> slangasek: oh was that in the backtrace of those earlier failures? or something else
[19:13] <slangasek> nacc: apport retracer crash
[19:14] <nacc> slangasek: ah fun
[19:19] <cjwatson> maybe it should be LP_ROOT_ME_PLEASE
[19:20] <nacc> heh
[19:20] <cjwatson> (I do sometimes use LP_DISABLE_SSL_CERTIFICATE_VALIDATION, but only against a development instance, and never with anything to do with apport ...)
[20:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-113-g513e99e0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[20:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.9-113-g513e99e0-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-113-g513e99e0-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[21:45] <tsimonq2> Any chance someone on the release team can adjust the oversize warning for Lubuntu Next to 1.5 GB?
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgweather (zesty-proposed/main) [3.24.0-0ubuntu2 => 3.24.0-0ubuntu2.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)